DA claims President Ramaphosa misled the public on Mcebisi Jonas's US visa rejection
Image: Supplied
The Democratic Alliance (DA) has alleged that President Cyril Ramaphosa's special envoy to the United States, Mcebisi Jonas, was rejected by Washington in May 2025.
Jonas was appointed by Ramaphosa to the role of special envoy after the expulsion of former ambassador Ebrahim Rasool from Washington earlier this year, following Rasool's incendiary comments labelling US President Donald Trump a leader of a global white supremacist movement.
The DA claims that Jonas's application for a diplomatic visa was denied, with the US formally communicating to the Presidency that Jonas was not recognised as the country's official representative.
Despite these revelations, Ramaphosa has remained publicly silent, leading the DA to accuse the administration of misleading the public regarding Jonas's position and suitability.
"Despite being fully aware that Jonas had been denied a diplomatic visa by the US and would not be formally received, President Ramaphosa doubled down on national TV, declaring Mcebisi Jonas is still my North American envoy and has done good work.
"...When confronted with the DA's announcement that it would submit a Promotion of Access to Information (PAIA) request detailing Jonas' official engagements over the past 90 days, instead of coming clean with the truth, Presidential spokesperson Vincent Magwenya lashed out on social media, accusing the DA of 'encroaching' on the President's powers.
"The Presidency owes South Africans a full and honest explanation as to how it can justify having doubled down on the appointment of a rapporteur whose credentials have been officially rejected by the host government,'' said the DA.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
Jonas was notably absent during the high-profile meeting between Ramaphosa and Trump in May. In response, the presidency released a statement that aimed to clarify his absence, affirming that both Jonas's visa and credentials were indeed valid.
However, speculation regarding Jonas's absence arose after reports suggested that the Trump administration raised concerns over past remarks he made, in which he reportedly labelled Trump 'a racist, a homophobe, and a narcissistic right-winger.'
The DA added that with no recognised representative currently championing South African interests in the US, the economy stands to lose billions of rands when the tariffs come into effect.
"The DA will be writing to the Speaker of Parliament to request an urgent parliamentary briefing from the Presidency on the failed Jonas appointment. The DA will take all necessary steps to demand the immediate appointment of a credible envoy, capable of repairing the immense damage that has now been done," said the party.
sinenhlanhla.masilela@iol.co.za
IOL News
Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
16 minutes ago
- IOL News
South Africa's National Security: Ntshavheni identifies coup d'état risks
Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni said national intelligence identified coups as one of the risks and put measures to mitigate against it Image: Presidency Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo named coup d'état as one of the risks the national intelligence had identified and take action against. Ntshavheni made the revelation when she was responding to the media when asked about the risks they had identified when she released the National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) and redacted National Security Strategy (NSS) for the sixth administration. In her response, she initially said they had listed the risks to the national security in the documents, but indicated that the risk did not necessarily materialise. 'You need to identify and mitigate against it. One of the risks is the risk of coup d'état. We have identified it and put measures to mitigate against it.' Ntshavheni also said they could assure South Africans that there was not anyone attempting to do a coup d'état in South Africa in the last few day or weeks. 'There has not been anyone attempting to do a coup in South Africa. We say that, not that there are no people planning. There are, but we continuously monitor them and make sure we deal with those.' She stated that the intelligence agencies were not the ones making arrests and that those making the arrests don't say it was intelligence driven. 'We rely on law enforcement agencies to make the arrests. We would have made the spade work,' Ntshavheni said. The minister was making the comments at a media briefing after tabling the budget vote of the State Security Agency (SAA) in the national Assembly. She had undertaken to make public the NIE and redacted National Security for the period between 2019 and 2024. Ntshavheni described the release of the two documents as 'a historic milestone in our democratic journey, one which speaks directly to the principles of national security, constitutional accountability, transparency, and national resilience'. 'The national security considerations dictate that we cannot release the current version of NIE and National Intelligence Priorities (NIS). Hence, we are publishing the NIE covering the period of the sixth Administration.' She explained that release of the documents was to help South Africans understand the mandate of the state security. She explained this work guides the work of SSA, adding that they wanted a conversation into the priorities on national security as it related to domestic and foreign matters set for the country. Outlining the NIE, Ntshavheni said it provided a consolidated, evidence-based assessment of the strategic threats, risks, and opportunities facing the nation. 'It is the product of collaborative inputs from across the national intelligence community under the tutelage of the National Intelligence Coordinating Committee (NICOC) as per the provisions of the National Strategic Act 1994 (Act 39 of 1994), and other strategic partners. It seeks to ensure that our national response to complex security issues, from illegal migration, espionage, cyber threats and transnational organised crime to climate security as well as domestic instability among others, is informed, proactive, and coordinated.' She also said the 2019–2024 National Intelligence Priorities were fully integrated with the priorities of the Medium-Term Strategic Framework with domestic intelligence priorities being to investigate threats to South Africa's sovereign economic and business capacity and capabilities emanating from both domestic and foreign actors and events, among other things. It also investigated activities related to terror financing that are characterised by vulnerabilities in the border security environment, exploitation of the cash economy, abuse of remittances, as well as the challenges presented by the new financial technologies and investigation and of syndicated criminal activities, including drug smuggling as well as human smuggling and trafficking. Ntshavheni said the National Security Strategy, endorsed by the Cabinet on 13 March 2024, outlined a whole-of-government, and with its publication, the whole-of-society approach to national security, by embedding intelligence at the core of strategic foresight, resilience-building, and crisis prevention. 'We should not be measured by the number of crises we managed but be measured by the number of crises not taken place. In the period between 2019 and 2024, outside July 2021 unrest, there have not been disruptive threats to the country,' she said, adding the exception was climate change. 'We have been working to give advice on the best mechanisms on areas affected by climate change to prevent future loss of lives.' She insisted that the National Security Strategy was grounded in the principle that national security was inseparable from human security, economic stability, democratic governance, social justice and above all national interest. Ntshaveni also said the release of the NIE, NIPs, and NSS was her commitment to building a modern, ethical, and professional intelligence capability, guided by law, oversight, and strategic foresight. 'This is part of our commitment to transform the sector to serve the Constitution, not partisan interests … Our national security response must be anticipatory, inclusive, and adaptive.' [email protected]
The Citizen
16 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Call to ‘tax the rich' as global finance ministers meet in Zimbali
Working group says National Treasury should adopt measures that do not disproportionately impact working-class South Africans. The Tax Justice Working Group calls for progressive positions on international tax reform while SA hosts the G20 presidency. Picture: iStock A grouping of civil society organisations, trade unionists and activists is calling on the South African government to take action to 'tax the rich' and tackle corporate tax abuse. The South African Tax Justice Working Group is represented by organisations such as Cosatu, Oxfam, and the Institute for Economic Justice (IEJ). It made the call ahead of the G20 Finance Track meeting currently underway at the Zimbali Resort on KZN's North Coast. 'This week, as finance ministers of the G20 gather in KwaZulu-Natal, we call on the South African government to match its global commitments with bold domestic action to … stop tax abuse by multinational corporations,' it stated. The taxation of high-net-worth individuals has become a growing focus in international policy discussions. A study commissioned by the G20 and led by economist Gabriel Zucman estimates that a 2% tax on the wealth of the world's 3 000 wealthiest billionaires could generate between $200 billion (R3.6 trillion) and $250 billion (R4.5 trillion) annually. Read more Common pitfalls to avoid this tax season ALSO READ: Will South Africa's rich pay wealth tax or find ways to avoid it? The issue gained further traction at the G20 Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in November 2024. Early in July this year, Spain and Brazil launched a joint initiative to promote higher global taxation of the ultra-wealthy. The proposal was formally introduced at the United Nations 4th International Conference on Financing for Development, held in Sevilla, Spain, and is expected to shape upcoming negotiations on international tax cooperation. 'South Africa joined the Sevilla Platform for Action [SPA] on taxing high-net-worth individuals at the conference, which signals a significant commitment to fairer taxation of the wealthy,' the tax working group notes. ALSO READ: Budget 2025: Is wealth tax coming for South Africa's rich? In a statement issued after the launch in Spain, Oxfam noted that Spain, Brazil and South Africa had taken an important step in 'forging an alliance … to show political will for taxation of the super-rich'. 'Now other countries must follow their lead and join forces,' Oxfam tax justice policy lead Susana Ruiz said, adding that COP30 in Brazil and the G20 in South Africa are key opportunities for international cooperation to tax the super-rich. ALSO READ: Many wealthy taxpayers are leaving SA due to increasingly high taxes Working group declaration The South African Tax Justice Working Group also adopted a declaration calling on government to champion progressive positions on international tax reform in its work as the G20 presidency. 'South Africa has not only the potential to play a leading role in [implementing a wealth tax], but also stands to benefit due to the reality of unprecedented inequality within this country.' It said National Treasury should take advantage of this international momentum to advance a progressive taxation agenda and work towards a wealth tax and other proposals that do not disproportionately impact working-class South Africans, unlike value-added tax (Vat) and other regressive measures. In May, shortly before tabling the third iteration of South Africa's 2025 Budget, Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana told parliament he does not support the idea of a wealth tax to address the budget shortfall, arguing that wealthy individuals in South Africa already contribute through various existing taxes. This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Trust in South African police hits record low, survey reveals
A recent survey revealed that trust in SAPS is at an all time low. The findings come amid a growing political crisis following damning allegations by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi against Police Minister Senzo Mchunu. Police trust in South Africa has reached its lowest level in 27 years, according to a Social Attitudes Survey released by the Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC). The findings come amid a growing political crisis following damning allegations by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi against Police Minister Senzo Mchunu. The survey shows that only 22% of South Africans expressed confidence in the police in 2022, with similarly low levels recorded in 2023 and 2024/25. This marks the worst confidence ratings since data collection began in 1998. 'A majority of the adult public never expressed trust in the police,' said Dr Benjamin Roberts, HSRC research director and principal investigator of the study. 'The findings are expected to inform interventions aimed at restoring public faith in the police. By adopting a more community-focused and accountable approach to policing, we can work towards creating safer and more secure communities for all South Africans.' Between 1998 and 2010, trust levels hovered between 39% and 42%. Confidence fell sharply after the 2012 Marikana massacre and dipped even lower following the July 2021 unrest, when only 27% of respondents expressed trust in the police, he said.
