South Africa's National Security: Ntshavheni identifies coup d'état risks
Image: Presidency
Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo named coup d'état as one of the risks the national intelligence had identified and take action against.
Ntshavheni made the revelation when she was responding to the media when asked about the risks they had identified when she released the National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) and redacted National Security Strategy (NSS) for the sixth administration.
In her response, she initially said they had listed the risks to the national security in the documents, but indicated that the risk did not necessarily materialise.
'You need to identify and mitigate against it. One of the risks is the risk of coup d'état. We have identified it and put measures to mitigate against it.'
Ntshavheni also said they could assure South Africans that there was not anyone attempting to do a coup d'état in South Africa in the last few day or weeks.
'There has not been anyone attempting to do a coup in South Africa. We say that, not that there are no people planning. There are, but we continuously monitor them and make sure we deal with those.'
She stated that the intelligence agencies were not the ones making arrests and that those making the arrests don't say it was intelligence driven.
'We rely on law enforcement agencies to make the arrests. We would have made the spade work,' Ntshavheni said.
The minister was making the comments at a media briefing after tabling the budget vote of the State Security Agency (SAA) in the national Assembly.
She had undertaken to make public the NIE and redacted National Security for the period between 2019 and 2024.
Ntshavheni described the release of the two documents as 'a historic milestone in our democratic journey, one which speaks directly to the principles of national security, constitutional accountability, transparency, and national resilience'.
'The national security considerations dictate that we cannot release the current version of NIE and National Intelligence Priorities (NIS). Hence, we are publishing the NIE covering the period of the sixth Administration.'
She explained that release of the documents was to help South Africans understand the mandate of the state security.
She explained this work guides the work of SSA, adding that they wanted a conversation into the priorities on national security as it related to domestic and foreign matters set for the country.
Outlining the NIE, Ntshavheni said it provided a consolidated, evidence-based assessment of the strategic threats, risks, and opportunities facing the nation.
'It is the product of collaborative inputs from across the national intelligence community under the tutelage of the National Intelligence Coordinating Committee (NICOC) as per the provisions of the National Strategic Act 1994 (Act 39 of 1994), and other strategic partners. It seeks to ensure that our national response to complex security issues, from illegal migration, espionage, cyber threats and transnational organised crime to climate security as well as domestic instability among others, is informed, proactive, and coordinated.'
She also said the 2019–2024 National Intelligence Priorities were fully integrated with the priorities of the Medium-Term Strategic Framework with domestic intelligence priorities being to investigate threats to South Africa's sovereign economic and business capacity and capabilities emanating from both domestic and foreign actors and events, among other things.
It also investigated activities related to terror financing that are characterised by vulnerabilities in the border security environment, exploitation of the cash economy, abuse of remittances, as well as the challenges presented by the new financial technologies and investigation and of syndicated criminal activities, including drug smuggling as well as human smuggling and trafficking.
Ntshavheni said the National Security Strategy, endorsed by the Cabinet on 13 March 2024, outlined a whole-of-government, and with its publication, the whole-of-society approach to national security, by embedding intelligence at the core of strategic foresight, resilience-building, and crisis prevention.
'We should not be measured by the number of crises we managed but be measured by the number of crises not taken place. In the period between 2019 and 2024, outside July 2021 unrest, there have not been disruptive threats to the country,' she said, adding the exception was climate change.
'We have been working to give advice on the best mechanisms on areas affected by climate change to prevent future loss of lives.'
She insisted that the National Security Strategy was grounded in the principle that national security was inseparable from human security, economic stability, democratic governance, social justice and above all national interest.
Ntshaveni also said the release of the NIE, NIPs, and NSS was her commitment to building a modern, ethical, and professional intelligence capability, guided by law, oversight, and strategic foresight.
'This is part of our commitment to transform the sector to serve the Constitution, not partisan interests … Our national security response must be anticipatory, inclusive, and adaptive.'
[email protected]
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
Operation Dudula wanting to know why organisations prioritise foreign nationals
Operation Dudula have questioned the intentions of non-profit organisations and civil rights groups defending illegal migrants. Operation Dudula are taking their illegal migration fight to the steps of organisations they deem to be sympathetic to foreign nationals. The pro-South African movement marched through Johannesburg and Durban on Thursday to deliver memoranda to two organisations. Operation Dudula consider the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) and Socio-Economic Rights Institute of South Africa (Seri) to be the leading protectors of illegal foreign migrants. Alleged foreign preference A wall of police officers was required to separate Operation Dudula protestors and counter-protesters in Johannesburg on Thursday. Operation Dudula were on their way to Seri's offices, whom they accuse of using litigation to defend the interests of foreign nationals in contravention of South African law. Operation Dudula spokesperson Zandile Dabula stated that the marches are aimed at asking why these organisations prioritise foreign nationals over South Africans. Dabula stated that the organisation wanted Seri and SAHRC not to side with foreign nationals blindly, but to treat South African complaints with legitimacy. 'They should also go out to communities to find out what the real issues are. They are not really looking into matters that are affecting citizens of this country,' Dabula told The Citizen. 'We do know they are being funded by non-South Africans, but their role is to advocate for South Africans,' she added. Seri's funders include, among others, Open Society Foundations, Global Affairs Canada, Norweigan People's Aid and San-Francisco-based Cameron Schrier Foundation. 'Dudula a threat' The SAHRC told The Citizen that they would study Operation Dudula's memorandum before commenting, and Seri representatives referred questions to their head of litigation, who had not responded by the time of publication. Equal rights groups that receive legal support from Seri released a joint statement in solidarity with their fight against discrimination. 'Xenophobia is not only driven by fear and prejudice, it is a direct assault on human dignity and the universal rights enshrined in our Constitution,' stated Kopanang Africa Against Xenophobia spokesperson Mike Ndlovu. He described Operation Dudula's actions as 'intimidation', stating that they will remain resolute in defence of human rights. 'Operation Dudula is a threat, not only to migrants, but to all who believe in freedom, equality, and constitutionalism.' 'Its actions rely on and reinforce a system of violence, exclusion, and scapegoating reminiscent of apartheid,' conclude Ndlovu. 'Not xenophobic' Dabula reiterated that these organisations were not responding to complaints about foreign nationals victimising South Africans. 'Do they even have the country's best interests at heart, or do they just want to see this country go down the drain?' she asked. Dabula also wanted organisations to stop labelling Operation Dudula xenophobic and inhumane, stressing that they did not target individuals or nationalities. 'We are just against the illegality and how they conduct themselves when they come here because our buildings have been taken over and our children are dying,' she said. 'We are not against our brothers and sisters, but we have a problem with illegality and criminality. We just want what is best for South Africans, and we will not stop,' Dabula concluded. NOW READ: NGOs say foreigners in SA told to return to their countries when opening cases against Operation Dudula


The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
‘Cyril must fall': Organisations march against Ramaphosa to Union Buildings on Mandela Day
The movements argue that the Ramaphosa administration has failed to address issues, and now residents are paying for it. Several civil movements have announced that they will commemorate Mandela Day on the streets, demanding the resignation of President Cyril Ramaphosa. The march, organised by Defend South Africa in collaboration with the United Civic Movements, is scheduled to start from the Old Putco Depot in Marabastad, Tshwane, at 10am and is destined for the Union Buildings. Several organisations under the United Civic Movements will be joining the march. ALSO READ: MK party gives Ramaphosa until Mandela Day to resign 'One of the most devastating consequences of this administration's failure is the skyrocketing unemployment rate, which has increased from 29.1% in 2019 to 32% in 2024. The youth of South Africa, once promised a brighter future, now face 58% unemployment, up from 43% — a betrayal of the hopes and dreams of a generation,' say the organisations. They will be marching against the rising costs, unemployment, uncontrolled illegal immigration, crime, corruption, Phala Phala scandal and the state of the South African National Defence Force, among other issues. 'The statistics and scandals paint a clear picture of failure: rising unemployment, worsening poverty, escalating crime, uncontrolled illegal immigration, a collapsing military, widespread corruption, and a deliberate subversion of democracy. South Africa cannot afford to continue on this path. ALSO READ: 'Ramaphosa will go down in history as one of the most useless presidents' – analyst 'The people must demand accountability and take action to remove a government that has neglected its duty to serve and protect its citizens.' 'Cyril Ramaphosa must fall' The movements argue that the Ramaphosa administration has failed to address these issues, and now residents are paying for it. 'South Africa is in crisis, the economy is on crutches, and illegal immigration is out of control. KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi's press media confirmed that this administration is corrupt to the core. ALSO READ: Ramaphosa's response 'a direct spit in the face of our revolutionary forefathers' – Sisulu foundation 'We demand his resignation and an end to state capture 2.0. We demand the removal of corrupt police officials, not the establishment of useless commissions. Ramaphosa did not have to appoint a commission; it's a game that he's playing. 'We demand action against Illegal immigration and control of borders. The informal economy must be handed back to South Africans. Cyril must fall, the people must rise.' In his weekly letter, Ramaphosa defended the establishment of the commission into Mkhwanazi's allegations. 'It is necessary that we establish the facts through an independent, credible and thorough process so that we can safeguard public confidence in the police service. This is particularly important as we seek to put the era of state capture behind us,' said Ramaphosa. ALSO READ: Ramaphosa says punitive action against Mchunu would set dangerous precedent 'In establishing this Commission of Inquiry, we are affirming our commitment to the rule of law, to transparency and accountability, and to building a South Africa in which all people are safe and secure.' Meanwhile, the MK party have given Ramaphosa until 9am on Friday, 18 July, or face a motion of no confidence.

IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Sisulu Foundation slams Ntshavheni's ‘coup' remarks as ‘deeply irresponsible and dangerous'
Walter & Albertina Sisulu Foundation critisiced Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni for her recent remarks that South Africa's security services had detected 'potential coup risks.' Image: GCIS The Walter and Albertina Sisulu Foundation has harshly criticised Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni for her recent comments that South Africa's security services had detected 'potential coup risks,' calling her statement 'deeply irresponsible, dangerous, and, in the current political climate, reckless in the extreme.' 'To utter such claims on the parliamentary record - without presenting evidence, without a public briefing, and without accountability - is not merely careless, it verges on fear-mongering by executive design,' the foundation said in a statement. The statement followed Ntshavheni's remarks at a media briefing after she tabled the budget vote for the State Security Agency in the National Assembly. She said the National Intelligence Estimate and redacted National Security Strategy for the sixth administration identified a possible coup d'état as a national security risk. 'You need to identify and mitigate against it,' Ntshavheni said. 'One of the risks is the risk of a coup d'état. We have identified it and put measures in place to mitigate against it.' She emphasised that there had been no recent coup attempts, but said 'there are' people planning such actions. 'We continuously monitor them and make sure we deal with them,' she said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Ntshavheni also explained that intelligence agencies are not responsible for making arrests, but rather for providing the groundwork for law enforcement. 'We rely on law enforcement agencies to make the arrests… We would have made the spade work.' However, the foundation said that Ntshavheni's comments come at a politically charged time, shortly after President Cyril Ramaphosa placed Police Minister Senzo Mchunu - an ally of Ramaphosa - on special paid leave amid allegations of political interference and obstruction of criminal investigations. 'Mchunu's suspension followed explosive claims by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, who bravely revealed a web of collusion between police leadership, political elites, and organised criminal syndicates,' the foundation said. 'Instead of responding with clarity, urgency, or reform, the government has done what it increasingly does when under pressure: create a diversion - and what better distraction than the specter of a coup?' The foundation said Ntshavheni's statement risks undermining both national stability and investor confidence. 'For a senior cabinet minister to casually mention 'potential coup risks' without any supporting detail or national security update risks inciting fear and breeding suspicion,' it said. 'It projects instability, even where none may exist, and it reinforces the worst fears of many - that this administration is willing to play loose with facts, weaponize paranoia, and erode democratic norms in a transparent, but dangerous, attempt to manage internal political fallout.' The foundation stressed that Ntshavheni's comments were made as public scrutiny over the president's handling of the police crisis reached a boiling point. 'The appointment of a non-MP acting police minister (within his powers), the creation of yet another judicial commission (the fifth of his presidency), and the president's silence on Phala Phala have already enraged citizens.' On Tuesday, Ramaphosa named Mineral Resources Minister Gwede Mantashe as acting minister of police while retaining his current portfolio. Professor Firoz Cachalia, who is set to retire from the University of the Witwatersrand, will assume the role permanently in August. This follows allegations by Mkhwanazi, who accused Deputy Police Commissioner Lieutenant General Shadrack Sibiya of colluding with information peddler Brown Mogotsi and Mchunu to dismantle the task team investigating political killings in KwaZulu-Natal. In response, both Mchunu and Sibiya were placed on special leave. Ramaphosa also announced a judicial commission of inquiry to probe the allegations. The foundation went on to argue that Ntshavheni's 'coup narrative' may function as a deliberate attempt to distract the public and Parliament from holding leadership accountable. 'Instead of answers, we get an unverified claim of a coup attempt, floated in the most public forum of the land, then immediately dropped with no follow-up,' it said. 'This is not governance. It's governance by gaslight, and most disturbing of all, a disdainful display of continued disrespect for the South African people.' It also expressed concern that Ntshavheni's vague language might indirectly cast doubt on Mkhwanazi, the whistleblower whose testimony has kept the public talking. 'Her vague and ominous language, unaccompanied by evidence or clarification, could feed speculation that the commissioner himself could be viewed as a threat - an outrageous and potentially defamatory insinuation.' 'This less than subtle but loaded messaging creates public doubt, discredits a whistleblower, and may serve to sully Mkhwanazi's character and undercut his growing public support.' If that was the implication, the foundation said, Ntshavheni's remarks could amount to a violation of her constitutional oath. 'As a minister, Ntshavheni is constitutionally bound under Schedule 2 to be faithful to the Republic, uphold the Constitution, and serve with integrity,' the foundation said. 'Using her platform in Parliament to undermine a credible whistleblower, distort the national conversation, and deflect from political accountability is not only unethical, but it also borders on a breach of the constitutional duty to act in the public interest.' Furthermore, it warned that Ntshavheni's statement might taint the legitimacy of the judicial commission tasked with probing the alleged criminal infiltration of the justice system. 'A commission operating under the cloud of a supposed coup could be politically tainted from the outset, constrained in its independence, or misdirected in its mandate,' the statement read. The foundation called on Parliament to exercise its oversight powers. 'Ntshavheni must be called to account for her statements. If she has the intelligence to substantiate her remarks, she must provide it. If she does not, then her words should be withdrawn - and censured.' 'The legislature must reclaim its oversight function and reassert the supremacy of constitutional order over political theatre.' IOL Politics