
WATCH: GOP senators rail against staggering $4.7 trillion in untraceable Treasury payments
Prior to the discovery, Treasury Account Symbol (TAS) identification codes were optional for $4.7 trillion in Treasury Department payments, so they were often left blank and were untraceable. The field is now required to increase "insight into where the money is actually going," the Treasury Department and DOGE announced in February.
"Of the 1.5 billion payments that we send out every year, they are required to have a TAS, a Treasury Account Symbol. We discovered that more than one third of those payments did not have a TAS number," Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government earlier this month.
Fox News Digital asked Republican senators on Capitol Hill to respond to the approximately 500,000 in untraceable payments made by the Treasury Department each year.
"I'm not surprised at all, unfortunately," Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kansas, said before adding, "They were leaving complete fields undone when they were filling out their financials, so this is a common theme. I'm not surprised."
Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Missouri, called for an investigation into where those payments actually went.
"There's so much waste. There's so much fraud, There's so much abuse in our government," Schmitt told Fox News Digital. "I'm glad there was a laser-like focus on it. We ought to make many of those reforms permanent, but there probably ought to be some investigations here about where this money actually went. I mean this is taxpayer money. People work hard."
After DOGE and the Treasury Department uncovered $4.7 trillion in untraceable funds, Marshall and Sen. Rick Scott of Florida introduced a bill in March requiring the Treasury Department to track all payments.
The Locating Every Disbursement in Government Expenditure Records (LEDGER) Act seeks to increase transparency in how the Treasury Department spends taxpayer money.
"When you hear about this story that they didn't know where the money was going, it makes you mad because this is somebody's money, this is taxpayers' money when we have almost $37 trillion in debt, so this makes no sense at all," Scott said.
The Congressional Budget projects that interest payments on America's national debt will total $952 billion in fiscal year 2025. That's $102 billion more than the United States' defense budget at $850 billion.
"We paid out more last year on our debt, $36 trillion in debt, with $950 billion in interest going to bondholders all over the world, including in China. That $950 billion didn't go to build a bridge or an F-35. We paid more on the interest on debt than we did to fund our military," said Sen. Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska.
"That is an inflection point that when most countries hit, you look at history, that's when great powers start to decline. So we have to get those savings."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I Asked ChatGPT To Explain Why Inflation Is Killing My Wallet Like I'm 12
Inflation isn't a four-letter word, but the way that everyone from economists to TV pundits to politicians talks about it, it might as well be. Even if you don't know exactly how inflation works, you've heard enough to be concerned about the sucker punch it could potentially deliver to your wallet. Still, you want to know more about why inflation should be such a concern, and you don't want a lot of jargon. Find Out: Read Next: Well, your friendly neighborhood financial writer — that would be me — decided to conduct a thought experiment: Why not ask ChatGPT to explain it to me like I am 12 years old? Normally, I'd go to professional experts or do a more complete deep dive online, which is what you should do, given that ChatGPT is far from perfect. Still, it did give me a baseline explanation that anyone could use to build deeper knowledge. Juice Boxes, Really? OK, ChatGPT did not start off great because it invited me to consider buying my favorite juice box for its current hypothetical price of $1. When I was 12 years old, I was all about Polly Pocket like a discerning child. Anyway, ChatGPT continued its explanation by stating that if I have $10, I'm able to buy 10 juice boxes at their current price. 'Easy math, right?' ChatGPT responded. Que the 'Jaws' theme: 'But then… inflation happens.' Check Out: What Is Inflation, After All? For all the chatter about inflation, it's very seldom defined in ways that the average consumer can understand. ChatGPT put it very simply: 'Inflation means prices go up over time. So now, the same juice box costs $1.25 instead of $1.' Given how important an accurate definition of inflation is to our overall thought experiment, I decided to go to other, more official sources to confirm. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) also defines inflation as the rate of increase in prices over a period of time. 'Inflation is typically a broad measure, such as the overall increase in prices or the increase in the cost of living in a country,' the IMF explained. 'But it can also be more narrowly calculated–for certain goods, such as food, or for services, such as a haircut, for example.' Back to our scenario: Now the price of my beloved juice boxes has gone up, but I still only have $10. I can only buy eight juice boxes instead of 10. 'Same money, fewer juice boxes,' ChatGPT proclaimed. 'That's inflation hurting your wallet.' Why Does It Hurt Me? Well, in a nutshell, my money doesn't stretch as far as it used to. I can't buy as much stuff as I used to — whether it's juice boxes, Polly Pockets or, when I'm a grown-up, other goods and services that aren't as fun but essential — with the same amount of money. 'If you don't get more money (like a bigger allowance), you're basically getting poorer without doing anything wrong,' ChatGPT explained. Instead of allowance, think of your salary (which is kind of an allowance for grown-ups). If your salary remains the same, but inflation drives up prices, you're essentially looking at a juice box situation of your own. So, What Do I Do About It? That's the $6 million question (or maybe more like $8 million question, these days). Learning how to stretch your dollar further should be a conversation between you and your financial advisor. But when I asked ChatGPT for a few suggestions, it gave me some ideas. 'Let's say you keep $100 in a piggy bank. If inflation is 5% per year, then after one year, your $100 only feels like $95 — because everything costs more now,' it said. 'When you're older, use a savings account with interest (so your money earns more).' Most likely, ChatGPT was referring to a high-yield savings account, which is a great way to make your money grow in savings. ChatGPT also recommended that I learn about investing, since the stock market usually grows faster than inflation. Again, this is something you'd want to review with an advisor, but as a personal finance site, we can confirm that it's truer than not. While ChatGPT should not be the be-all, end-all of your explorations into money matters, I did find that it gave me an easily understandable definition of inflation. More From GOBankingRates 5 Old Navy Items Retirees Need To Buy Ahead of Fall Mark Cuban Says Trump's Executive Order To Lower Medication Costs Has a 'Real Shot' -- Here's Why This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGPT To Explain Why Inflation Is Killing My Wallet Like I'm 12 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Energy Transfer: Is This High-Yield Stock a Buy as Growth Projects Pile Up?
Key Points Energy Transfer lowered its full-year guidance slightly. The company continues to add exciting new growth projects to its backlog. The stock is cheap both compared to peers and historically. 10 stocks we like better than Energy Transfer › Energy Transfer (NYSE: ET) is a favorite among income-oriented investors. The master limited partnership (MLP) sports a 7.4% yield and has been growing its distribution nicely in the past few years. While MLPs come with some extra paperwork at tax time, the majority of their distributions are deemed a return of capital and are tax-deferred until the stock is sold. What's even more exciting, though, is that the midstream company is entering a new growth phase, and its backlog of attractive projects is starting to pile up. This should lead to solid growth in the coming years. The company recently announced a new large growth project right around the time it posted its second-quarter results. Growth projects keep piling up Just ahead of its earnings announcement, Energy Transfer announced a new $5.3 billion natural gas pipeline project called the Desert Southwest pipeline that will take natural gas from the Permian to markets in Arizona and New Mexico. The pipeline will be able to handle 1.5 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d), and it expands the company's Transwestern natural gas pipeline network. The project is expected to be complete by the end of 2029 and is backed by significant long-term commitments. This follows the company's already announced Phase 1 of its Hugh Brinson Pipeline, which also will have 1.5 Bfc/d of capacity takeaway from the Permian to markets in Texas. Phase 1 of the project is expected to come online by the end of 2026. Energy Transfer also just agreed to go through with Phase 2 of the project, which will give it the ability to transport approximately 2.2 Bcf per day of natural gas from west to east and approximately 1 Bcf per day from east to west. The company said that the project "establishes Energy Transfer as the premier option for customers seeking a flexible and reliable natural gas solution to support their power plant and data center growth plans." Energy Transfer also said it is making substantial progress toward the commercialization of its Lake Charles LNG project. LNG (liquified natural gas) exports are one of the hottest areas of the energy market. The long-awaited project looks like it may finally get the green light, with it finding a partner for the project in MidOcean Energy and signing a number of offtake agreements. The company is also in advanced discussions with some offtake partners for them to take an ownership stake, and it ultimately plans to own about 25% of the project. The company also remains excited about the opportunities it sees coming from data center customers. It said it continues to see a significant level of activity and that it is in advanced discussions with several facilities in close proximity to its footprint. Overall, the company is spending $5 billion in growth capital expenditures (capex) this year, and it has a lot more projects lined up. Half its current growth spending will be on natural gas-focused projects. Turning to its Q2 results, Energy Transfer grew its adjusted EBITDA in the quarter by 3% year over year to $3.87 billion. Distributable cash flow (DCF) to partners fell 1% to $1.96 billion, down from $2.04 billion a year ago. Volumes were up across its systems, including an 11% year-over-year jump in interstate natural gas volumes, a 10% jump in midstream gathered volumes, a 9% rise in crude oil volumes, and an 8% increase in intrastate natural gas volumes. However, the company saw some reduced pipeline optimization in its Texas intrastate pipeline system due to lower spreads, and it saw lower crude transportation revenues on its Bakken pipeline system. As a result, the company now expects its full-year EBITDA to be at or slightly below the low end of its $16.1 billion to $16.5 billion guidance. Time to buy Energy Transfer stock While the slight reduction in guidance is disappointing, the long-term story for Energy Transfer looks bright. The number of growth projects the company has in front of it is just piling up, with it generally expecting to get a mid-teens return on these projects. The larger projects are still a ways off, but they should provide the company with a strong runway of growth in the coming years. At the same time, investors get a nice distribution that is well covered by the company's DCF. For Q2, its coverage ratio was a robust 1.7 times. The company is looking to grow its distribution by a 3% to 5% annual rate moving forward, and it increased its quarterly payout by more than 3% year over year last month to $0.33 per unit. Meanwhile, about 90% of its 2025 EBITDA is coming from fee-based operations, with many of its contracts having take-or-pay provisions, so this is a nice steady business. The company's balance sheet is also in good shape. Turning to valuation, the stock trades at a forward enterprise value (EV)-to-EBITDA multiple of just 8.1 times. That's toward the low end of its MLP peers and below the 13.7x EV/EBITDA multiple the average MLP traded at between 2011 and 2016. With a lot of growth ahead, a robust yield, growing distribution, and cheap valuation, Energy Transfer looks like a great option for income-oriented investors moving forward. Should you buy stock in Energy Transfer right now? Before you buy stock in Energy Transfer, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Energy Transfer wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025 Geoffrey Seiler has positions in Energy Transfer. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Energy Transfer: Is This High-Yield Stock a Buy as Growth Projects Pile Up? was originally published by The Motley Fool Erreur lors de la récupération des données Connectez-vous pour accéder à votre portefeuille Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données


Fox News
18 minutes ago
- Fox News
Zohran Mamdani is a 'grifter,' says Lisa Boothe
'The Big Weekend Show' co-hosts discuss the state of the New York City mayoral race and Sen. Bernie Sanders' remarks about former Vice President Kamala Harris' 2024 presidential campaign.