TKO Raises Full-Year Financial Guidance After PBR, On Location and IMG Acquisitions
'TKO generated strong financial results in the quarter, led by record performance at both UFC and WWE,' said Ariel Emanuel, executive chair and CEO of TKO. 'Our live content and experiences are proving a key differentiator for organizations and brands looking to capture audience, and our strategy is tailor made for today's experience economy and the white-hot sports event marketplace. Given the continued momentum across our portfolio and our overall business outlook, we are raising our guidance for the full year.'
More from Variety
ESPN Gets Headlock on WWE Live Events Like 'WrestleMania' in New U.S. Rights Deal, Content to Roll Off NBCU's Peacock
Cardi B Brings the Drama as Host of WWE's SummerSlam: 'We're Making History Tonight!'
WWE Wrestling-Themed Indian Film 'Chatha Pacha' Secures Global Deal With the Plot Pictures for Release in 100+ Countries (EXCLUSIVE)
TKO raised its full-year guidance for revenue to between $4.630 billion and $4.690 billion, up from $4.490 billion to $4.560 billion. The target for adjusted EBITDA has been increased from $1.540 billion to $1.560 billion, up from $1.490 billion to $1.530 billion.
More to come
Best of Variety
New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week
What's Coming to Disney+ in August 2025
What's Coming to Netflix in August 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kenvue meets profit estimates amid strategic review
(Reuters) -Kenvue reported a second-quarter profit largely in line with Wall Street estimates on Thursday, amid a strategic review at the consumer health company. The company posted an adjusted profit of 29 cents per share, compared with analysts' average estimate of 28 cents per share, according to data compiled by LSEG.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
West Point Gold Engages VRIFY to Accelerate Exploration and Unlock Discovery at Gold Chain Project
Vancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - August 7, 2025) - West Point Gold Corp. (TSXV: WPG) (OTCQB: WPGCF) (FSE: LRA0) ("West Point Gold" or the "Company") is pleased to announce that it has engaged VRIFY Technology Inc. ("VRIFY"), the leading provider of AI-assisted mineral discovery and 3D project visualization, to support and accelerate its exploration efforts across its Gold Chain Project in Arizona. West Point will harness VRIFY's full suite of products to maximize the value of its extensive datasets to drive smarter, faster discovery outcomes. DORA, the world's only AI-Assisted Mineral Discovery Platform, will support the Company in identifying, ranking, and validating targets using artificial intelligence. Viz, VRIFY's dynamic 3D visualization tool, will transform stakeholder engagement and elevate the clarity of technical storytelling. "Our team has always prioritized visual storytelling," said Quentin Mai, President & CEO of West Point Gold. "Partnering with VRIFY allows us to take our project presentations to the next level and more effectively showcase the potential of our Gold Chain Project to investors and stakeholders." With a robust drilling database, strong geophysical coverage, and a large, highly prospective land package anchored by the advancing Tyro target, West Point is well-positioned to benefit from DORA's ability to synthesize complex geological data into high-confidence exploration targets. The Company is looking to maximize the return on shareholder capital by focusing exploration efforts where the probability of success is highest. "We believe the use of VRIFY's AI-Assisted Mineral Discovery Platform, DORA, should help us define and prioritize the many step-out targets we have at Gold Chain," said Derek Macpherson, Executive Chairman of West Point Gold. "The use of AI will allow us to more efficiently take advantage of the extensive early-stage geologic work we have completed to date, hopefully accelerating our exploration process as we work to demonstrate Gold Chain's full potential." VRIFY CEO and Co-Founder, Steve de Jong, added, "West Point is a great example of the forward-thinking teams we're excited to partner with. They understand that leveraging AI and modern visualization isn't optional anymore, it's how the next generation of discoveries will be made." With mineral exploration entering a new era driven by artificial intelligence, West Point Gold's adoption of VRIFY reflects a broader strategic shift towards data-driven discovery, capital efficiency, and maximizing per-share value creation for shareholders. About West Point Gold Corp. West Point Gold Corp. (formerly Gold79 Mines Ltd.) is a publicly listed company focused on gold discovery and development at four prolific Walker Lane Trend projects covering Nevada and Arizona, USA. West Point Gold is focused on developing a maiden resource at its Gold Chain project in Arizona, while JV partner Kinross is advancing the Jefferson Canyon project in Nevada. About VRIFY VRIFY is redefining mineral exploration by putting the power of AI into the hands of geoscientists. DORA, VRIFY's AI-Assisted Mineral Discovery Platform, empowers technical teams to leverage the industry's largest proprietary exploration dataset and mineral-system-specific AI models to identify, rank, and validate high-potential targets faster, and with greater confidence. A high-growth software company trusted globally by over 170 mineral exploration and mining companies, VRIFY is shaping a new era of exploration and discovery. Learn more at: For further information regarding this press release, please contact: Aaron Paterson, Corporate Communications ManagerPhone: +1 (778) 358-6173Email: info@ Stay Connected with Us:LinkedIn: (Twitter): @westpointgoldUSFacebook: FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS: Certain statements contained in this press release constitute forward-looking information. These statements relate to future events or future performance. Forward-looking statements include estimates and statements that describe the Company's future plans, objectives or goals, including words to the effect that the Company or management expects a stated condition or result to occur. The use of any of the words "could", "intend", "expect", "believe", "will", "projected", "estimated" and similar expressions and statements relating to matters that are not historical facts are intended to identify forward-looking information and are based on the Company's current belief or assumptions as to the outcome and timing of such future events including, among others, assumptions about future prices of gold, silver, and other metal prices, currency exchange rates and interest rates, favourable operating conditions, political stability, obtaining government approvals and financing on time, obtaining renewals for existing licenses and permits and obtaining required licenses and permits, labour stability, stability in market conditions, availability of equipment, availability of drill rigs, and anticipated costs and expenditures. The Company cautions that all forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain, and that actual performance may be affected by a number of material factors, many of which are beyond the Company's control. Such factors include, among other things: risks and uncertainties relating to West Point Gold's ability to complete any payments or expenditures required under the Company's various option agreements for its projects; and other risks and uncertainties relating to the actual results of current exploration activities, the uncertainties related to resources estimates; the uncertainty of estimates and projections in relation to production, costs and expenses; risks relating to grade and continuity of mineral deposits; the uncertainties involved in interpreting drill results and other exploration data; the potential for delays in exploration or development activities; uncertainty related to the geology, grade and continuity of mineral deposits; the possibility that future exploration, development or mining results may vary from those expected; statements about expected results of operations, royalties, cash flows, financial position may not be consistent with the Company's expectations due to accidents, equipment breakdowns, title and permitting matters, labour disputes or other unanticipated difficulties with or interruptions in operations, fluctuating metal prices, unanticipated costs and expenses, uncertainties relating to the availability and costs of financing needed in the future and regulatory restrictions, including environmental regulatory restrictions. The possibility that future exploration, development or mining results will not be consistent with adjacent properties and the Company's expectations; operational risks and hazards inherent with the business of mining (including environmental accidents and hazards, industrial accidents, equipment breakdown, unusual or unexpected geological or structural formations, cave-ins, flooding and severe weather); metal price fluctuations; environmental and regulatory requirements; availability of permits, failure to convert estimated mineral resources to reserves; the inability to complete a feasibility study which recommends a production decision; the preliminary nature of metallurgical test results; fluctuating gold prices; possibility of equipment breakdowns and delays, exploration cost overruns, availability of capital and financing, general economic, political risks, market or business conditions, regulatory changes, timeliness of government or regulatory approvals and other risks involved in the mineral exploration and development industry, and those risks set out in the filings on SEDAR+ made by the Company with securities regulators. Although the Company believes that the assumptions and factors used in preparing the forward-looking information in this corporate press release are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on such information, which only applies as of the date of this news release, and no assurance can be given that such events will occur in the disclosed time frames or at all. The Company expressly disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, other than as required by applicable securities legislation. Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. To view the source version of this press release, please visit
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Best college football stadiums rankings by Yelp, Tripadvisor, Google reviews
Oklahoma State has been playing college football in what is now called Boone Pickens Stadium for more than 100 years. It's the oldest home field in the Big 12. But the money infused by the Cowboys' biggest booster and stadium namesake (before he died in 2019) transformed the place into a state-of-the-art facility over the past 20 years ‒ and to rave reviews. The feedback is in at this point and the changes have been a big hit. Boone Pickens Stadium had the best reviews of any college football venue in the country ahead of the 2025 season as judged by the ratings systems at Yelp, Tripadvisor and Google. It had a 4.8 (out of 5) star rating based on more than 1,700 combined entries on the three services. Famous fields like Alabama's Bryant-Denny Stadium and LSU's Tiger Stadium from the SEC, The Big House at Michigan and Clemson's Memorial Stadium were also among the familiar favorites that landed in the top 25 based on the reviews by users. But the list was slightly different than traditional surveys of the country's best college football stadiums, with a few notable snubs that just missed the list. Boone Pickens Stadium, for instance, slotted in at No. 25 in USA TODAY's recent ranking of college football stadiums. The Big 12 actually had the two best-reviewed stadiums among the 136 Football Bowl Subdivision schools based on the average combined ratings doled out on Google, Yelp and Tripadvisor over the years. Kansas State's Bill Snyder Family Stadium had the second-best combined rating in the country. The SEC did lead the way with four of the top 10 best-reviewed stadiums and six of the top 25 best stadiums in college football, according to Google, Yelp and Tripadvisor. The Big 12 followed closely with five stadiums on the list, while the Big Ten had four. There were also seven Group of Six conference schools with stadiums that made the top 25 based on ratings and reviews, with Hancock Whitney Stadium, where Sun Belt Conference member South Alabama plays its home games, finishing among the top five overall. Here's a full breakdown of the top 25 college football stadiums in the country based on Google, Yelp and Tripadvisor ratings entering the 2025 season: COACHES POLL HOT TAKES: SEC whips Big Ten in preseason, but not playoff College football stadium rankings 2025 Note: Rankings based on average star ranking at Google, Yelp and/or Tripadvisor. Ratings as of Wednesday, August 6 1. Oklahoma State ‒ Boone Pickens Stadium Yelp: 4.8 stars, 6 reviews Tripadvisor: 4.8 stars, 37 reviews Google: 4.8 stars, 1,683 reviews 2. Kansas State ‒ Bill Snyder Family Stadium Yelp: 4.5 stars, 13 reviews Tripadvisor: 4.9 stars, 34 reviews Google: 4.8 stars, 1,619 reviews 3. Alabama ‒ Bryant-Denny Stadium Yelp: 4.6 stars, 68 reviews Tripadvisor: 4.8 stars, 668 reviews Google: 4.8 stars, 5,539 reviews 4. South Alabama ‒ Hancock Whitney Stadium Yelp: 4.5 stars, 4 reviews Tripadvisor: N/A Google: 4.8 stars, 388 reviews 5. Texas A&M ‒ Kyle Field Yelp: 4.4 stars, 42 reviews Tripadvisor: 4.8 stars, 429 reviews Google: 4.8 stars, 3,279 reviews 6. LSU ‒ Tiger Stadium Yelp: 4.4 stars, 73 reviews Tripadvisor: 4.8 stars, 902 reviews Google: 4.8 stars, 3,843 reviews 7. Clemson ‒ Memorial Stadium Yelp: 4.9 stars, 16 reviews Tripadvisor: 4.7 stars, 266 reviews Google: 4.8 stars, 2,868 reviews 8. Auburn ‒ Jordan-Hare Stadium Yelp: 4.1 stars, 43 reviews Tripadvisor: 4.8 stars, 237 reviews Google: 4.8 stars, 3,151 reviews 9. Virginia Tech ‒ Lane Stadium Yelp: 4.5 stars, 20 reviews Tripadvisor: 4.7 stars, 161 reviews Google: 4.8 stars, 1,932 reviews 10. Nebraska ‒ Memorial Stadium Yelp: 4.5 stars, 59 reviews Tripadvisor: 4.7 stars, 523 reviews Google: 4.8 stars, 4,761 reviews 11. Michigan ‒ Michigan Stadium Yelp: 4.4 stars, 150 reviews Tripadvisor: 4.7 stars, 774 reviews Google: 4.8 stars, 8,988 reviews 12. BYU ‒ Lavell Edwards Stadium Yelp: 4.1 stars, 37 reviews Tripadvisor: 4.2 stars, 26 reviews Google: 4.8 stars, 2,826 reviews 13. Georgia ‒ Sanford Stadium Yelp: 4.5 stars, 50 reviews Tripadvisor: 4.7 stars, 387 reviews Google: 4.8 stars, 3,295 reviews 14. Iowa ‒ Kinnick Stadium Yelp: 4.3 stars, 28 reviews Tripadvisor: 4.4 stars, 133 reviews Google: 4.8 stars, 3,297 reviews 15. Oklahoma ‒ Gaylord Family Oklahoma Memorial Stadium Yelp: 4.3 stars, 29 reviews Tripadvisor: 4.6 stars, 266 reviews Google: 4.8 stars, 3,054 reviews 16. Army ‒ Michie Stadium Yelp: 4.4 stars, 15 reviews Tripadvisor: 4.6 stars, 112 reviews Google: 4.8 stars, 928 reviews 17. West Virginia ‒ Milan Puskar Stadium Yelp: 4.6 stars, 5 reviews Tripadvisor: 4.6 stars, 242 reviews Google: 4.8 stars, 1,472 reviews 18. Notre Dame ‒ Notre Dame Stadium Yelp: 4.2 stars, 102 reviews Tripadvisor: 4.6 stars, 557 reviews Google: 4.8 stars, 5,038 reviews 19. Coastal Carolina ‒ Brooks Stadium Yelp: 5 stars, 2 reviews Tripadvisor: N/A Google: 4.7 stars, 668 reviews 20. Liberty ‒ Williams Stadium Yelp: 5 stars, 2 reviews Tripadvisor: N/A Google: 4.7 stars, 714 reviews 21. Jacksonville State ‒AmFirst Stadium Yelp: N/A Tripadvisor: N/A Google: 4.7 stars, 669 reviews 22. Troy ‒ Veterans Memorial Stadium Yelp: N/A Tripadvisor: N/A Google: 4.7 stars, 544 reviews 23. Wisconsin ‒ Camp Randall Stadium Yelp: 4.6 stars, 68 reviews Tripadvisor: 4.7 stars, 430 reviews Google: 4.7 stars, 3,392 24. Appalachian State ‒ Kidd Brewer Stadium Yelp: 4.3 stars, 3 reviews Tripadvisor: N/A Google: 4.7 stars, 623 reviews 25. Wyoming ‒ War Memorial Stadium Yelp: 4.4 stars, 8 reviews Tripadvisor: N/A Google: 4.7 stars, 728 reviews This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: College football stadiums ranked by Google, Yelp, Tripadvisor reviews
