logo
US report on human rights abuse in SA rejected

US report on human rights abuse in SA rejected

The Citizena day ago
Government and analysts say the report is politically biased and risks further damaging relations between the two nations.
The recently released report from the US stating the human rights of minorities in South Africa are being violated serves as a wake-up call, but its credibility is questionable, according to political experts.
They were commenting on the US state department annual report in which SA is accused of a 'substantially worrying step towards land expropriation of Afrikaners and further abuses against racial minorities'.
The report also cites other human rights concerns, including arbitrary killings, arbitrary arrests, repression of racial minorities and a lack of government action to investigate and prosecute officials involved in these abuses.
Dirco rejects 'deeply flawed' report
The department of international relations and cooperation (Dirco) said it was 'disappointed' at the report's findings.
'We find the report to be an inaccurate and deeply flawed account that fails to reflect the reality of our constitutional democracy. The report's reliance on a-contextual information and discredited accounts is highly concerning.
'It cites an incident involving the deaths of farm workers and, despite the matter being actively adjudicated by our independent judiciary, misleadingly presents it as an extrajudicial killing.
'This is a fundamental distortion of the facts, as the individuals are formally arraigned before a court of law.
'Similarly, incidents of police using force are mentioned without acknowledging the robust processes in place, where institutions to protect our democracy are investigating if due process was followed and if such force was warranted.'
ALSO READ: US sanctions may backfire and deepen divisions in SA
Dirco added that SA has a transparent system with information freely available from law enforcement agencies and Chapter 9 institutions.
'It is ironic that a report from a nation that has exited the UN Human Rights Council and, therefore, no longer sees itself as accountable in a multilateral peer review system would produce one-sided factfree reports without due process or engagement.'
'No easy way out'
Prof Theo Neethling of the University of Free State said the report was a damning indictment of SA, yet it is on shaky ground, relying on political perceptions rather than facts.
'The US and SA governments do not see eye to eye on key issues. Considerable work lies ahead in the diplomatic arena for SA, as the matter can only be resolved through diplomacy.
'SA's diplomatic relations with the US have been strained for years and this latest report has only worsened the situation.
'It is unclear whether this comes directly from President Donald Trump or members of his administration, but one thing is certain: there is no easy way out of this diplomatic quagmire.
'The report also puts President Cyril Ramaphosa in a difficult position, requiring a decisive response if the SA government is serious about restoring its relationship with the US to a healthy footing.'
Neethling said the situation was also putting the Ramaphosa government in a tricky position regarding the hosting of the G20 summit, as despite the report's factual shortcomings, it puts the country in the spotlight, while doing little to inspire confidence among investors.
ALSO READ: Trump-Musk breakup: Will 49 'refugees' return to South Africa?
US accused of undermining sovereignty
Political analyst Prof Ntsikelelo Breakfast said the US is undermining SA's sovereignty.
'No country, according to public international law, has the right to interfere in the domestic affairs of another country,' he said.
'If there are human rights abuses, there are platforms to address that.
'Why are they questioning our policies? The US has its own racially inspired policies. Their action is a sign of disrespect. This is just being disrespectful.'
Breakfast said the relationship between the countries was benefiting SA, therefore Ramaphosa must find a way of restoring harmonious relations while protecting the country's sovereignty.
Call for government to address law and order crisis
Christo van der Rheede, executive director of the FW de Klerk Foundation, said the report should be a wake-up call for the government of national unity and the ANC.
The country faces a serious breakdown in law and order, and urgent steps must be taken to restore it, he added.
'However, we need to scrutinise how the facts in the report are presented and to agree on the following: first, the report is partially flawed in that it singles out Afrikaners as a minority group specifically targeted.
ALSO READ: 'There is no white genocide happening here,' says Trump's top pastor after SA visit
It is simply not true. No land is expropriated without compensation and no genocide is happening.
'Particularly worrying is the following statement: 'Significant human rights issues included credible reports of… the repression of racial minorities'.
'Second, the letter and spirit of our constitution, in terms of human dignity, equality, human rights and freedoms, is under attack and urgent steps are required to ensure it is adhered to by all levels of government.'
Van der Rheede added it would have been more credible if the 2024 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices were aligned with key constitutional imperatives and values and the failures of the state.
'All South Africans are impacted by ill-conceived economic policies, a stagnant economy, unemployment, crime, erosion of state capacity, poor service delivery and other socioeconomic ills.
'At the heart of this is a breakdown in law and order. And yes, our government must take full responsibility for the state we are in.'
Claims of targeted genocide dismissed
Political analyst Goodenough Mashego said: 'Most European countries with embassies here do regular checks when it comes to democracy and human rights.
'None has produced a report that says SA has a policy of disenfranchising Afrikaners, taking their land, killing them or committing genocide.'
NOW READ: Trump's proof of 'white genocide' in SA contains images from Democratic Republic of Congo
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dirco reviewing ministerial report on Hajj and Umrah for SA pilgrims
Dirco reviewing ministerial report on Hajj and Umrah for SA pilgrims

The Citizen

time12 hours ago

  • The Citizen

Dirco reviewing ministerial report on Hajj and Umrah for SA pilgrims

President Cyril Ramaphosa addressed the issue of the annual Hajj quota with Crown Prince and Prime Minister Mohammad bin Salman al Saud in 2022. The Department of International Relations and Cooperation (Dirco) is reviewing the recommendations contained in a report about the annual Hajj and Umrah pilgrimages to Saudi Arabia for South African citizens. Dirco referred to its previous media statement dated 10 February 2023, 'Establishment of the Ministerial Committee on the Efficient Management of the Annual Hajj and Umrah Pilgrimages'. Ministerial committee In that statement, former international relations minister Naledi Pandor said the mandate and role of the ministerial committee was to provide strategic direction to support the efficient management of the annual Hajj and Umrah pilgrimages. Pandor said it was also to ensure that the South African pilgrims may enjoy a well-organised pilgrimage in an appropriate system under the auspices of the relevant ministry of Hajj and Umrah in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. ALSO READ: King Salman invites Ramaphosa for state visit to Saudi Arabia Ramaphosa and MBS Pandor also informed the ministerial committee that President Cyril Ramaphosa addressed the issue of the annual quota during his state visit to Saudi Arabia on 15-16 October 2022 with Crown Prince and Prime Minister Mohammad bin Salman al Saud. Pandor also followed up with her counterpart, Faisal bin Farhan, Minister of Foreign Affairs. The ministerial committee at the time was chaired by ambassador Ebrahim Rasool and members included Fatima Chohan, professor Mathole Motshekga, professor Anil Sooklal, ambassador Ashraf Suliman and Zeenat Adam. Final Report Dirco spokesperson Chrispin Phiri said the ministerial committee submitted its final report to Dirco on 30 June 2025. 'The department is currently reviewing the recommendations contained in the report and is engaging with the Commission for the Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Communities (CRL Rights Commission) to ensure alignment with constitutional and community-based principles,' he said. New framework The Ministry of Hajj and Umrah of Saudi Arabia recently announced a new operational framework for the facilitation of Hajj from South Africa, effective from 2026. 'Under this new model, the traditional use of licensed tour operators will be discontinued. Instead, all service contracts will be signed directly with Saudi service providers, who will assume full responsibility for service delivery within the kingdom. Coordination will be managed through the Nusuk Masar electronic platform, under the oversight of the Saudi Ministry of Hajj and Umrah,' Phiri said. Phiri said Dirco remains committed to providing consular support to South African nationals undertaking their religious obligations, including Hajj and Umrah and to 'maintaining the positive reputation of the Republic of South Africa in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia'. ALSO READ: More than a million pilgrims prepare for start of Hajj on 4 June

SA caught in East-West tug-of-war after military chief's Iran visit
SA caught in East-West tug-of-war after military chief's Iran visit

IOL News

time14 hours ago

  • IOL News

SA caught in East-West tug-of-war after military chief's Iran visit

Pretoria's foreign policy under scrutiny amid Iran relations Image: GCIS The South African government's distancing from recent Iran–RSA military cooperation has intensified diplomatic and economic headwinds, just as Western capitals press Pretoria to realign away from Eastern partners. The controversy hinges on remarks by South African National Defence Force (SANDF) chief General Rudzani Maphwanya during a visit to Iran, and the government's current posture on the broader foreign policy balance between East and West. The episode began to unfold after General Maphwanya's trip to Iran, a move that has since been disavowed by both the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) and the Department of Defence and Military Veterans. The government maintained that President Cyril Ramaphosa, with DIRCO's guidance, remains the architect of South Africa's foreign policy. 'President Cyril Ramaphosa confirmed he would meet the general to discuss his 'ill-advised' trip,' a government source said, signalling that the visit has become a political flashpoint rather than a simple military exchange. DIRCO spokesperson Chrispin Phiri declined to comment on potential disciplinary steps against those who disregarded international protocol, noting the department's role in policy implementation rather than battlefield diplomacy. The political weather has grown even cloudier as Western powers press Pretoria to clarify its stance amid fears of mixed messages on the country's alignment. The US Congress has repeatedly questioned South Africa's closeness to BRICS partners and - by extension - its relationships with China, Russia, and Iran. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Political analyst Joe Mhlanga offered a stark assessment: Maphwanya's public remarks about potential military cooperation indicated a broader 'evidence that the country's foreign policy is not solid.' He warned that a pattern of swinging toward the East or West - 'going to the East to do something when they want to go to the West they just do' - could undermine confidence in South Africa's policy coherence. 'What we're saying is that countries seem to be taking positions when it comes to certain issues, so we cannot state that we are a country that is neutral,' Mhlanga said in paraphrase of his analysis. 'We need to have a clear foreign policy stance… You cannot be standing on both legs and stating that you support both Iran and the US.' The domestic response has been swift and pointed. The Democratic Alliance (DA) criticised Maphwanya's remarks as stepping beyond military-to-military dialogue into foreign policy. DA Defence spokesperson Chris Hattingh said: 'This is not the role of a military chief. Foreign policy is the domain of the elected Government of National Unity and must be conducted through DIRCO, not by an unelected general freelancing on the world stage.' The broader concern is that the public dispute over the Iran/RSA relationship comes at a sensitive juncture.

Ramaphosa unaware of SANDF chief's controversial Iran visit
Ramaphosa unaware of SANDF chief's controversial Iran visit

The Star

time15 hours ago

  • The Star

Ramaphosa unaware of SANDF chief's controversial Iran visit

Mayibongwe Maqhina | Published 5 hours ago The Presidency on Thursday night said President Cyril Ramaphosa was unaware of the 'ill-advised' visit by South African National Defence Force (SANDF) Chief Rudzani Maphwanywa to Iran. Addressing the media, Ramaphosa's spokesperson Vincent Magwenya said Ramaphosa did not sanction Maphwanya's visit. He stated that it was Defence Minister Angie Motshekga, not Ramaphosa, who approved Maphwanya's travel. 'As much as the president is the appointing authority and the commander-in-chief, he does not get involved in supervising the general's travel. That process sits with the minister. So the president did not know.' Maphwanya was quoted by Iranian media as pledging 'common goals' with Iran and said his trip carried 'a political message'. Magwenya said there was a concern about Maphwanya's trip. 'At this period of heightened geopolitical tensions as well as conflict in the Middle East, one can say the visit was ill advised and more so the expectation is that the general should have been a lot more circumspect with the comments he makes, which delve into the area of foreign policy that only the president, as well as the Department of International Relations, are responsible for.' Maphwanya's trip took place amid tensions between South Africa and the US President Donald Trump imposed 30% tariffs on South African goods, which were implemented this month. Magwenya said South Africa was in a process of resetting diplomatic and political relations with the United States, as well as balancing the trade relationship in a mutually beneficial manner between the two countries. 'Of resolving the relationship or resolving issues around the relationship with the US, you then have senior government or military officials in statements that will further inflame the situation. It is not helpful at all,' he said. Both the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) and the Defence have distanced themselves from Maphwanya's remarks, citing that Ramaphosa and DIRCO were custodians of foreign policy. Magwenya said Ramaphosa will meet Maphwanya within the next week regarding his 'ill-advised' trip. 'I can't say when that meeting will happen, but there will be an engagement between the president and the general. So it's still early to say what the outcome of that engagement will be.' He would not comment on the possible consequence, if there was to be any, for the defence's chief amid calls by the DA for him to be hauled before a court martial. 'It is also difficult to speak to. One must consider what constitutes the grave nature of charges or accusations that would require a court-martial ,' Magwenya said. Deputy Defence Minister Bantu Holomisa told Newzroom Afrika that he was unaware of the visit. 'I don't know what the purpose of his visit was. It is only the minister who will be in the know. If he did not ask for permission to leave from the minister, then he will have to swim in his stew,' he said. Holomisa also said such visits outside the country were authorised by Motshekga. 'The last word has been said by the Presidency, and the Presidency is the custodian of our foreign policy. There is nothing one can contest on that, but what we should be waiting for is either to hear the minister herself addressing this issue or alternatively wait for General Maphwanya to come back and tell the nation how he went there, what was the purpose.' He said since the matter was in the open, Maphwanya should be allowed to respond openly and be transparent about it. Holomisa added that it was too early to say what would happen to Maphwanya. 'If he went abroad without permission from the president or the minister, he will have to face the music and explain on what basis he had to utter such words, which are creating controversy,' he said. [email protected]

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store