logo
To infinity and beyond with a possum and sweet chilli sauce

To infinity and beyond with a possum and sweet chilli sauce

One of the things MPs like most about the Budget debate — the freewheeling discussion of the Finance Minister's hard work — is that it enables them to speak about almost anything so long as it can (sometimes very loosely) be linked back to the Budget.
Hence this week our southern MPs have been talking about possums, utes, outer space, Barker's sweet chilli sauce ... and every so often about something of vital importance.
On Tuesday Taieri Labour MP Ingrid Leary fell into the latter camp with an impassioned speech about the state of the nation's mental health system.
"The Budget would have been the perfect opportunity to [workforce gaps], including the 1594 full-time equivalents that the NCAT — which is the National Committee for Addiction Treatment—has identified as missing from the NGO frontline," Ms Leary said.
"But no, they did not. Instead, they threw a paltry bit of money to help the transition at emergency departments for the withdrawal of police. That was far too little, far too late."
It was Ms Leary's Labour Dunedin colleague Rachel Brooking who brought possums and utes to the debate soon after — which was fairly funny, albeit with a serious purpose.
The Budget had been good for possums, Ms Brooking said, because of cuts to pest management initiatives. And it had been good for utes because of subsidies being afforded to companies.
But most of all, Ms Brooking said scornfully, the Budget had been bad for women.
"Anyone listening closely to the House when the Budget dropped will have heard me give an audible gasp when I read ... that $12 billion was looking to be saved from pay equity.
"Yet the Prime Minister had the gall to say to us just the week before, 'No, no, no. This has nothing to do with pay equity'. It is astounding."
And she did not mean that in a good way.
Up soon after, Taieri Green list MP Scott Willis warmed up on the topic of people feeling the cold as winter bit hard — although he might have sparked debate on his own side by talking about getting nice and cosy in front of a fire rather than being warmed up by an electric fire powered by solar or wind energy.
"What really would have helped people and helped landlords, even, would have been support for warm, dry, energy-efficient homes," Mr Willis said.
"But this government, over the last two Budgets, has cut over $230m from the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority ... crippling the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority. Why has this government decided that ordinary Kiwis should be left out in the cold?"
The next day the South's government MPs got to give an alternative, all together more enthusiastic appraisal of the Budget.
Rather than wreaking havoc on all and sundry, Southland National MP Joseph Mooney extolled it for "balancing the New Zealand taxpayers' funds in a very considered and careful way in a challenging domestic and geopolitical environment."
Funding such as new daytime urgent care services in places like Invercargill, Gore, and Alexandra found favour with Mr Mooney, as did the potential expansion of the service to Balclutha, Lumsden, Roxburgh and all places in between in the future.
It was Mr Mooney who donned his space suit, noting Southlander Sir Peter Beck had made New Zealand the third-largest launcher of satellites into infinity and beyond.
"He had a wild dream and made it happen in a country that did not have a space sector. I think that's an opportunity for all of us to lift our sights high, aim for the stars, and we can make it happen," he said, leaving unspoken but fairly obvious the assertion that the government was helping such firms to focus on the target.
Leaving Waitaki MP Miles Anderson — no doubt well aware that many residents in Geraldine would like their town to instead be in the Rangitata electorate — to praise the fine products of Barker's of Geraldine.
"I spoke this morning to the team at Barker's of Geraldine — and those of you who have had the opportunity to try some of their goods, I highly recommend them."
"Great little place. Sweet chilli sauce," Otaki MP Tim Costley chimed in, a sentiment echoed from across the House.
"They supply jams, preserves, and pickles to supermarkets across the country," Mr Anderson added, in his best infomercial manner.
There was actually a point to all this spruiking: Mr Anderson wanted to use his time to boast about Investment Boost, the Budget's central policy for business growth.
Enabling firms to immediately write off some of the cost of new equipment was a boon for an expanding business like Barker's, he said ... and that was not all for the great electorate of Waitaki.
"Other local businesses are also having an increase in asset investment," Mr Anderson said.
"Te Pari Industries tell me that they have seen an increase in interest for their products, and that farmers are making decisions much more quickly with both sheep and dairy systems. Drummond & Etheridge in Oamaru, local farm machinery retailers, saw an immediate increase in sales and a significant increase in buyer inquiry."
And with a shout out to Five Forks School — pupils from which had visited the House the previous day and been acknowledged from the chamber — that was it for the Budget debate for another year. Half time, change sides
Act New Zealand Southland list MP Todd Stephenson is poised to become the most recognisable backbencher in the country following the grand rearrangement of the House this week.
With the coalition swapping deputy prime ministers, New Zealand First's MPs have moved to where Act once sat, and vice versa.
As Act's whip, Mr Stephenson is now sitting in the second row alongside National chief whip Stuart Smith.
That means that during Question Time — the only bit of Parliament that most New Zealanders catch a glimpse of — that Mr Stephenson is sitting right behind Christopher Luxon and David Seymour when the cameras roll.
mike.houlahan@odt.co.nz
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Offshore oil ban repeal: Coalition seeks consensus amid opposition
Offshore oil ban repeal: Coalition seeks consensus amid opposition

NZ Herald

time3 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

Offshore oil ban repeal: Coalition seeks consensus amid opposition

However, in a statement on Thursday, Jones said the ban was 'ill-fated' and 'has exacerbated shortages in our domestic gas supply by obliterating new investment in the exploration and development needed to meet our future gas needs'. 'New Zealanders are bearing the brunt of this constrained gas supply, and energy security concerns are impacting investor sentiment ... we are seeing businesses in the regions closing as a result with Kiwis losing their jobs, and we're importing hundreds of tonnes of Indonesian coal to meet peak energy demand. 'This legislation is just one of many actions we are taking to get the right settings in place to resuscitate sector confidence, shore up energy supply, and protect electricity affordability.' He was absent from Parliament on Thursday, leaving the main Government speech to the National Party's Simon Watts – the Minister for Energy and Climate Change. Watts said the opposition's argument that reversing the ban would not yield new gas for a decade was 'a distraction'. 'The immediate signal that this bill sends to investors is critical now. It encourages immediate investment in long-term exploration and in maximising production from our existing fields, which can deliver benefits far sooner. 'New Zealand is committed to a clean-energy transition and meeting our emissions targets. We have committed to deliver net zero by 2050, including by doubling renewable electricity, and removing consenting barriers. Natural gas remains critical to our energy security. Without gas, we would need to either rely on more coal, which results in around twice the carbon dioxide emissions than natural gas, or face energy insecurity and higher prices.' His Labour Party counterpart Megan Woods, however, said the evidence showed record investment in existing fields after 2018. Labour MP Megan Woods has slammed the Government's offshore exploration push. Photo / Mark Mitchell 'For this Government to claim that it had a chilling effect on investment is simply wrong. What we had was those offshore oil and gas operators looking for every last bit they could eke out of the existing fields, and it is not there. 'Then we had Shane Jones saying that this will open up opportunities off the East Coast of the South Island. Well, news flash: billions of dollars have been spent looking for that particular El Dorado ... this Government is going to give $200 million to offshore companies to go and have a look again where they've already decided there are not commercial finds available.' She pointed to official analysis showing reversing the ban would add 14.2 million tonnes of emissions, and 'a bit that should have been redacted from the regulatory impact statement' showing it could affect trade. 'Let me read from that: 'Legally privileged: Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade assessed that reversing the 2018 ban would likely be inconsistent with the obligations in several of New Zealand's free-trade agreements' – so farmers need to be worried, our access to the EU and the UK are being put at risk.' The Green Party spokesman for just transitions, Steve Abel, was also sceptical the oil industry could be attracted back. He was part of the Oil-Free Seas Flotilla in 2011 that harried Petrobras' surveying ship for 42 days, welcomed to the area by a 500-strong haka 'said by Te Whānau-a-Apanui, the iwi greeting us, to be the biggest haka since James Cook had arrived in that part of the country – I'm hoping we were more worthy of it than he was', Abel said. The Green Party's Steve Abel says the 2018 ban simply sealed the fate of an oil industry already in decline. Photo / Marty Melville He listed off a series of oil companies that exited New Zealand before the ban came into place: Exxon Mobil abandoning its southern oil and gas hunt in November 2010 after three years, Petrobras in December 2012, Texan driller Anadarko exiting its permit on the North Island's west coast in May 2014, Statoil quitting its Northland permit in October 2016, and Shell selling its remaining assets to OMV in March 2018. He said the ban was the 'final nail in the coffin of an industry that was already declaring its own demise in this country, because they came, they prospected, they found nothing, and they found nothing but overwhelming public opposition from the people of this country'. Echelon Resources – the company formerly known as New Zealand Oil and Gas, last month told RNZ the best wells are typically drilled first, so new drilling will be more difficult and expensive. Its managing director, Andrew Jeffries, said other countries had more political consensus, making New Zealand an even more unattractive option for investment. Act Party MP Simon Court said the repeal would restore certainty, credibility and confidence, but called on Labour not to reimpose the ban if it won power. 'Today marks the end of an era – a really bad one. It marks the end of a six-year reign of economic vandalism and energy illiteracy by the previous New Zealand Labour Government. 'Even the Honourable Shane Jones said at the time – bless his soul – that ending oil and gas exploration 'is the only scenario'. When he stood at that podium, I was shocked, but I'm pleased that minister has come to his senses – but profoundly disappointed that the Labour Party still has not.' Court's leader, David Seymour, said it was 'very possible that they won't find the gas, but the impediment to people getting cheaper energy should not be our own Government, and that's why I say if New Zealand First can change their mind then Labour should be able to do that too'.

Anger over axing of scholarships
Anger over axing of scholarships

Otago Daily Times

time8 hours ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Anger over axing of scholarships

Top students will abandon the University of Otago after a shock decision to axe scholarships, the institution has been warned. Staff and students were informed of the cuts to doctoral scholarships in an email from vice-chancellor Grant Robertson this week. "We are now in a situation where, if we continue to award scholarships using our current approach, what is set to be a tight 2026 scholarship budget ... will likely be required entirely to fund students already studying with us now or who will have started based on 2025 offers," the email says. "A consequence of that situation would be that, to stay within budget, there would be no funding for new scholarship offers in 2026. This is a position I want to avoid. " Mr Robertson's email also referred to the difficult financial environment the university was facing: "Both at Otago and nationally we face tightening research funding and significant strategic shifts in the external landscape". Otago University Students' Association president Liam White said the announcement was "a huge shock, and frankly, disappointing". "It seems like all of this has happened rather quickly, without a ton of notice, and I am concerned for the students that potentially have planned the next three years of their life and now, for whatever reason, aren't able to get a scholarship." An Otago University spokeswoman said the decision was expected to mean a reduction of about 50 doctoral scholarships in the coming months. It still expected to award 140 of the scholarships this year. OUSA postgraduate representative Josh Stewart said he was absolutely livid at the university's "short-sighted decision making" and the lack of communication. "I really feel for all the students who consistently have to deal with the university system, where the ballpark keeps changing, and they don't get any say in the matter." Many students he had spoken to about the changes were now considering studying elsewhere, he said. "Otago is always having to compete with doctoral scholarships overseas ... If they, however, stay at Otago, one would think that a degree of loyalty will be rewarded, but now the rules have changed again." Green MP Francisco Hernandez had also seen the email. He said the announcement was the natural result of the government's Budget decision to cut overall tertiary funding by $162 million. "We are already experiencing a mass exodus of some of our best and brightest young people. These short-sighted cuts risk leaving communities like Dunedin as hollowed-out husks." MPols student Lindsay Roberts was among many students concerned about their academic future at Otago University. "I think for me and anyone considering doing a PhD in the future it kind of changes the incentive, to progress your career and progress your academic journey, you do want some kind of financial support as there is a big financial risk. "It pushes the incentive elsewhere — I've discussed going to Waikato University," Mr Roberts said. Former Otago University academic Prof Robin Gauld, now executive dean of Bond Business School at Bond University in Queensland, said he was aware of the concerns among the professoriate at his former university. "Good PhD students are incredible. They go on to be stellar academics, and they're incredibly productive. "So they build reputation and they build a research pipeline. They are a pretty important piece of the university's lifeblood, really." Mr Robertson's email said the September and November Graduate Research Committee doctoral scholarship panels and award rounds would be cancelled. Students who met the academic criteria for an automatic scholarship award would still be accepted and it would follow through with offers to those approved at the most recent (June) meeting of the Graduate Research Committee and the agreed Maori and Pacific Strategic awards. "Our budget for 2026 must continue the path to reducing our deficit and returning us to a financial surplus, as required by the Tertiary Education Commission." A university spokeswoman said it forecast spending about $19.77m on doctoral scholarships this year, slightly above last year's spend of $18.26m. It declined to give a projected spend for next year, other than to say it was "certainly no more " than this year. It did not expect the change to affect its reputation. "This is a temporary pause on new doctoral scholarship offers. We have hundreds of doctoral scholarship students studying at Otago, and we will be awarding more scholarships this year and next year."

Time For Labour To Back Down On Disastrous Oil And Gas Stance
Time For Labour To Back Down On Disastrous Oil And Gas Stance

Scoop

time9 hours ago

  • Scoop

Time For Labour To Back Down On Disastrous Oil And Gas Stance

ACT is celebrating ahead of the expected passage of the Crown Minerals Amendment Bill, and calling on Chris Hipkins to put to rest Labour's opposition to oil and gas exploration. 'Repealing the oil and gas ban is a crucial step toward energy security, lower power bills, and more high-paying jobs for Kiwis trying to keep the lights on and the heaters running," says ACT Leader David Seymour. 'Labour's 2018 ban – backed by New Zealand First and the Greens – was some of the most reckless economic vandalism this country has ever seen. It sent a message to the world that New Zealand is a politically volatile place where investment isn't safe. New Zealand First has since changed its stance, and it's time for Labour to follow suit. "In introducing the ban, Labour didn't consult the public, they didn't ask the experts, they didn't even take it to Cabinet. They simply stood at a podium, banned offshore oil and gas exploration, and declared victory. 'As I said at the time,' The intention is we lead the world in environmental policy. The outcome is the world thinks we're foolish idiots in a kind of banana republic that can't make laws in a predictable, principled, or stable way '. "And it did send a clear message to the world: New Zealand is a risky, politically volatile place to invest. Investors who had already committed to our country were blindsided. And for those considering long-term, billion-dollar investments, Labour's reckless ban would certainly make them think twice. Meanwhile, Labour was happy for power companies to import dirty coal for our energy needs. 'Labour made the announcement to get international headlines. But they never stopped to think about the real-world consequences for New Zealanders' livelihood. 'Unlike wind, solar or hydro, gas is there when you need it, not just when the sun shines or the rain falls. It's a critical part of a reliable, affordable energy mix. Most importantly, reliable gas keeps our bills down. It powers the factories, heats the homes, and fuels the economy. "Kiwis can rejoice that we've shrugged off the legacy of Jacinda Ardern and are replacing ideology with a practical approach to reliable, affordable energy. "Now, Chris Hipkins needs to prove Labour has matured under his leadership. Regardless of how his party votes today, he ought to confirm Labour backs stable, pro-investment settings – not see-saw changes that would only serve to further damage New Zealand's attractiveness as a place to invest and be productive."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store