Governing body wins fight to change apartheid-era school name
The governing body of an Afrikaans public school named after a former prime minister who was instrumental in the promulgation of apartheid has won a legal battle in the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) to rename the institution.
Hoërskool DF Malan, established in 1954, obtained the permission of then prime minister Dr Daniel Francois Malan, who served as prime minister from 1948 to 1954, to be named after him.
However, more than three decades into South Africa's constitutional democracy, the name is regarded as an albatross around the neck of a school in Bellville known for its culture of academic excellence and policy of inclusivity. Over four years the school achieved a 100% matric pass rate. A decision was taken in 2020 to embark on a lengthy consultative process to chose new school symbols, values and a name.
The first request for change came from an alumnus who wrote to the governing body in 2018, saying the name was 'insensitive and inappropriate'. Two more letters were received in September 2019 from a parent of two pupils. The pressure ramped up in 2020 when a group called 'DF Malan Must Fall' joined the fray.
'A public institution's name often says more about its identity, ethos and culture than its written mission statement. This is even more so if the institution is named after a controversial historical figure,' reads a judgment handed down on Wednesday by the SCA.
'It is thus unfortunate that more than three decades into our constitutional democracy there are still public institutions which are named after individuals who were instrumental either in the development or implementation of the universally deprecated apartheid ideology. The DF Malan High School ... which bears the name of one of the chief architects of apartheid, is one such an institution.'
Barend Hermanus Rautenbach, Johan Smit, Francois Malan and Barend de Klerk — parents affected by the decision to change the school name to DF Akademie — took umbrage and hauled the governing body to the Western Cape High Court in December 2021 seeking an order reviewing and setting aside the name-change decision.
They argued the governing body did not have statutory power to change the name, the consultative process it adopted was procedurally unfair and irrational, and the decision was not rationally connected to the information before the governing body.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
20 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
SCA sends home affairs minister packing in ZEP appeal
The Supreme Court of Appeal has rejected an appeal by the minister of home affairs against the Johannesburg high court order on Zimbabwe Exemption Permits (ZEPs), which give about 180,000 Zimbabweans a special dispensation to lawfully remain in South Africa. The judgment also clears the path for the Zimbabwean Immigration Federation to return to court and argue that it is only parliament, and not the home affairs minister, which can decide whether to extend the ZEP regime. In 2023, the Johannesburg high court set aside a decision by former minister Aaron Motsoaledi to terminate the ZEP regime and to reconsider his decision, following a fair process. The SCA's judgment on Friday said that counsel for the minister told the court that 'the order is being implemented, and ... the minister is following a fair process'. But the federation wants to go back to court to argue that ZEP-holders and their children enjoy constitutional rights in South Africa. If these are to be limited, only parliament may do so — 'by enacting a law of general application,' says the SCA's judgment. The SCA did not give a view on whether that argument was correct, but it rejected an appeal by the minister that would have prevented the federation from ever making it. When the high court gave its order, the federation was one of the parties in the litigation, along with the Helen Suzman Foundation (HSF). Theirs were two separate cases, which were heard together. While the federation and the HSF both wanted similar orders, at that time, from the high court, their grounds were different. And while the HSF asked the court for a final order, the federation only sought an interim interdict — it wanted to argue its main case at a later date. The court gave a final order, as sought by the HSF, and also the interim interdict sought by the federation. The minister had already tried, and failed, to appeal against the HSF order. In this case, the minister approached the SCA on appeal, saying the interim interdict was 'redundant' since the court had already granted a final order to the HSF. In Friday's judgment, the SCA disagreed. Judge of Appeal David Unterhalter said the federation's case 'raised distinctive grounds of review', which laid the basis for an argument that was not raised or argued earlier — about the powers of the minister when there were constitutional rights at stake. If the federation's argument was to be accepted, it 'would not permit the minister to terminate the ZEP regime'. 'That is a remedial outcome of a considerably more far-reaching kind because it reaches into the future and is not based on a reconsideration,' said Unterhalter. The redundancy argument could therefore not hold, he said.
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
A long walk to economic freedom for the youth
On June 16, 1976, thousands of students in Soweto took to the streets to demonstrate against Bantu Education and the imposition of Afrikaans in their schools. When the youth protested on June 16, they did so with clarity, conviction, and courage. Their mission was not only to fight against the indignity of being taught in Afrikaans but to stand up against the injustice of apartheid, says the writer. Image: Mike MIZLENI / AFP Kim Heller The most appropriate homage to the 1976 generation of young activists would be for the youth of today to take up the revolutionary baton and complete the race for total liberation in South Africa. This will require a focused and resolute vision and purpose, coupled with the spirit of fierce commitment to freedom and justice demonstrated by the youth in South Africa in June 1976. When the youth protested on 16 June 1976, they did so with clarity, conviction, and courage. Their mission was not only to fight against the indignity of being taught in Afrikaans but to stand up against the injustice of apartheid, which brutally crushed the hopes and dreams of African people. They nobly fulfilled their generational mission. While political democracy has dawned in South Africa, the youth of today, the Born Frees, are yet to find their pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. Instead, caught in the stillbirth of economic liberation, they are at risk of becoming a lost generation. Rather than building on the solid foundation of the struggles of yesteryear and being the architects of a more prosperous tomorrow for future generations, today's youth are caught in the ruins of historical injustice and inequality. Wandering like waifs along a deserted path, hopeless and hapless. The picture is gloomy. There are well over three million unemployed young South Africans. The education system is failing miserably in addressing systemic imbalances. Government job creation is limited and ineffective. Universities are graduating students who cannot find jobs. That nearly half of all South Africans aged between 15 and 24 are jobless should be a red flag for the government. Deficient governance and the debauchery of politicians plundering public funds for youth and social development programmes established a bankrupt leadership ethos which misdirects the youth. Youth innovation and industry are vital if young South Africans are to prosper. The idea is for the youth to jump-start themselves, but this is unrealistic given the economic constraints and marginalisation of the majority of young people in South Africa. High levels of government and business investment are necessary. So, too, is the correct leadership blueprint. Youth development cannot flourish on an inkwell of corruption or the poisoned pen of seriously compromised political and business leaders. A 2023 study by the Human Sciences Research Council showed that twenty-three per cent of young South Africans believed that hard work is the best route to better financial status, while forty-nine per cent felt that having political connections was a more effective pathway to prosperity. Ongoing systemic negligence by the ANC government has produced a despondent, largely paralysed youth stuck in a wheel of dependency on paltry government handouts. Mental health issues are skyrocketing, with suicide being the fourth highest leading cause of death among 15-24-year-olds. Government handouts need to be replaced, or at least strongly supplemented by a sturdy undercarriage of sustainable public and private sector investment. The Presidency should be obsessed daily with a high target, strictly monitored youth development and empowerment programme, which includes sustainable job creation and start-up youth business hubs across the nation. Anything less is a betrayal of the youth. Social grant safety nets have become a cage, feeding dependency. In the serial failure of government promises, the youth of today will need to look to themselves for salvation. It is a risky business for many. Research conducted by Global Entrepreneurship Monitor in 2024 found that South Africa's youth were highly risk-averse, with 62% citing fear of failure as a barrier to starting businesses. Dr Frantz Fanon wrote that "each generation must, out of relative obscurity, discover its mission, fulfil it, or betray it." He stresses the need for the youth to seize its moment. On June 16, 1976, young African children seized the moment, in the very worst of conditions, and overcame them. The potential of today's youth to inspire change is immense despite their difficult circumstances. The world bore witness to the unity of the Kenyan youth against the Finance Bill in 2024, which led to a review of government policy. The Nigerian youth protests in 2024 drew world attention and condemnation of police brutality in the nation. Young Sudanese activists have been very vocal and effective in their fight for human rights and good governance. In many African countries, including Kenya, Ghana, and Nigeria, youth-led digital enterprises are increasing financial inclusion and greater access to education and are beginning to activate new production and distribution value chains. An attitude of self-betterment and self-liberation is the redemption song of today's youth. Despair is not a strategy, and noise-making without a coordinated voice is ineffective. Purpose is prince and unity is king. This was aptly demonstrated by the 2024 Kenyan protestors, the children of 1976 in apartheid South Africa, and the Fees Must Fall movement in post-apartheid South Africa. A coordinated youth programme is urgently needed to compel the government and businesses to take the plight of young South Africans more seriously. So, too, is a national campaign to self-drive and self-direct youth-driven projects. The youth of South Africa constitute almost 35 per cent of the overall population. They have the right and responsibility to shape the nation's future. It can be done. Nothing is impossible. In the words of Muhammad Ali, "Impossible is just a big word thrown around by small men who find it easier to live in the world they've been given than to explore the power they have to change it." * Kim Heller is a political analyst and author of No White Lies: Black Politics and White Power in South Africa. ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.
TimesLIVE
a day ago
- TimesLIVE
Governing body wins fight to change apartheid-era school name
The governing body of an Afrikaans public school named after a former prime minister who was instrumental in the promulgation of apartheid has won a legal battle in the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) to rename the institution. Hoërskool DF Malan, established in 1954, obtained the permission of then prime minister Dr Daniel Francois Malan, who served as prime minister from 1948 to 1954, to be named after him. However, more than three decades into South Africa's constitutional democracy, the name is regarded as an albatross around the neck of a school in Bellville known for its culture of academic excellence and policy of inclusivity. Over four years the school achieved a 100% matric pass rate. A decision was taken in 2020 to embark on a lengthy consultative process to chose new school symbols, values and a name. The first request for change came from an alumnus who wrote to the governing body in 2018, saying the name was 'insensitive and inappropriate'. Two more letters were received in September 2019 from a parent of two pupils. The pressure ramped up in 2020 when a group called 'DF Malan Must Fall' joined the fray. 'A public institution's name often says more about its identity, ethos and culture than its written mission statement. This is even more so if the institution is named after a controversial historical figure,' reads a judgment handed down on Wednesday by the SCA. 'It is thus unfortunate that more than three decades into our constitutional democracy there are still public institutions which are named after individuals who were instrumental either in the development or implementation of the universally deprecated apartheid ideology. The DF Malan High School ... which bears the name of one of the chief architects of apartheid, is one such an institution.' Barend Hermanus Rautenbach, Johan Smit, Francois Malan and Barend de Klerk — parents affected by the decision to change the school name to DF Akademie — took umbrage and hauled the governing body to the Western Cape High Court in December 2021 seeking an order reviewing and setting aside the name-change decision. They argued the governing body did not have statutory power to change the name, the consultative process it adopted was procedurally unfair and irrational, and the decision was not rationally connected to the information before the governing body.
