
France is ditching bank holidays and so should we
More recently the UK's political leadership has taken on President Macron's habit of hugging everyone. Thus Sir Keir Starmer can't see the likes of President Zelensky across a crowded room without clambering over a sea of suits to give the guy a hug. And last week Sir Keir was with Europe's great hugger-in-chief and thus enveloping 47-year-old Emmanuel Jean-Michel Frédéric in his arms.
But here's another thing: as bold as Dijon mustard, as sensible as the line judges at Roland-Garros and as perky as garlic, it has just been announced by the French Prime Minister François Bayrou. He's ditching two bank holidays.
'The entire nation has to work more,' he said this week, adding, 'so that the activity of the country as a whole increases and so that France's situation improves.'
Bayrou's plan comes as he attempts to lower the country's spiralling public deficit and debt and, in next year's budget, save €43.8 billion. His plan is, he says, the 'last stop before the cliff edge'.
And sounding more like Idi Amin, the Ugandan president of the 1970s, than a centrist European politician of the 2020s, he is insistent that, 'everyone will have to contribute to the effort'.
The immediate practical problem, aside from the cacophony that is the sound of 68 million grumbling frogs, is which days to scrap. France has 11 national holidays and Bayrou has suggested scrapping Easter Monday (fair enough in a nation of croissant-munching atheists – only 5 per cent attend Mass on Sundays) and May 8, which is Victory Day. The latter should logically be renamed Surrender Day, occurs on June 22 (the date in 1940 of the Armistice) and on which the nation should definitely be put to work.
The plan may sound harsh, particularly for a people famed for their love of leisure – most people take a month off in summer, they must work a maximum of 35 hours a week, lunch for a minimum of an hour and can dwell over a coffee long after it has gone cold. And indeed politicians, left and right, were spitting out their vins de table in rages this week.
'[It's] a direct attack on our history, our roots and on working France,' said Jordan Bardella of the far-Right National Rally. Fabien Roussel of the French Communist party described it as 'an organised hold-up'.
But hang on, it's actually a fabulous idea. And one that we should embrace as firmly as a Starmer/Macron hug.
The UK has eight bank holidays. There's Christmas Day, Boxing Day, New Year's Day, Good Friday, Easter Monday and then a load of early summer ones that charge at you out of the blue normally when a heatwave has come and gone and it starts to rain and a random one at the end of August that enables people at the tail end of the Notting Hill Carnival to smoke cannabis in the street without impunity before a few stabbings at dusk.
And they are now – in concept and practice – out of date and a contributor to national decline. And, before you squeal about the idea of my tearing apart a cornerstone of Britain's cultural history, they are relatively new. It was 1871 that an Act of Parliament was passed officially designating a number of days that workers should have off and on which banks would be closed. The man behind the Bank Holidays Act was the liberal reforming MP Sir John Lubbock who believed that religious holidays should be formalised. There was otherwise no way to ensure that a factory worker wasn't forced to toil, in gruelling conditions, for six days a week.
The 'St Lubbock's Days', as they were called for a while, reflected the shift in Victorian England to more formalised leisure. But that was then. More than 150 years later and Britain dwells in a state of lugubrious idleness at which Lubbock himself would raise an eyebrow.
Indeed post-Covid, most of the UK enjoys a four-day jolly every weekend. Offices are lucky if workers deign to join them Tuesday to Thursday and they can only tempt them in by offering free cereal, table tennis, comfy sofas in so many break-out areas, a drinks trolley on a Thursday afternoon (non-alcs catered for so as not to offend the Gen Zs) and a promise not to send the poor lambs too many emails on a Monday or Friday. Because the end of the week is firmly the beginning of the weekend and Monday is a recovery day and who wants to get on a horrid train when you can Zoom from home in your jim-jams.
Our work patterns are also considerably less Victorian. Almost 7.5 million people now freelance – full- or part-time – and bank holidays lurk around the corner for them as pestilent days of childcare and lost revenue.
Each bank holiday costs the nation some £2.4 billion in economic output so while politicians publicly support occasional additions such as that for King Charles's coronation in 2023, privately they shudder at the damage it does to the nation's books.
And they are patently not 'bank' holidays of course, because nowadays you can bank online 24 hours a day. Furthermore, most high street banks are now upscale bars and people only wander into the remaining banks by mistake when they're drunk.
Bank holidays are no longer precious, quiet days, and they are conspicuously not religious. The only notable religion featuring being that of unabashed consumerism.
That France is enacting this policy while, according to the Office for National Statistics, actually being more productive than us should shame us into working more. So let's scrap two of them, the random May one and the August one, the extra days worked can merit a proportionate pay rise and hospitality need not grumble because, with more money in one's pocket, we can all afford to nip to the pub after work.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
19 minutes ago
- Reuters
Cut to UK voting age puts new group in political spotlight
LONDON, July 21 (Reuters) - Britain's move to lower the voting age to 16 launches the political battle for teenagers' votes, with campaign groups warning no one should make assumptions about their allegiances and parties must address the issues that affect them. For decades, election trends and polls suggested younger voters tended to lean more to the left in Britain, but recent evidence from Europe shows young voters, particularly men, backing right-wing parties, including the far-right. "Don't take them for granted. Don't assume that their vote has already been cast before an election," Dan Lawes, co-CEO of youth-led charity My Life, My Say, said of young voters. "Young people want to be sold policies. But politicians have to reach them." A diverse new generation also wants their specific concerns to be heard and addressed. According to a tracker by pollsters YouGov, the economy is the most important issue concerning the 18-24 age group, followed by housing and immigration. Data for 16- 18-year-olds was not available. A poll of 500 16-and 17-year-olds last week found that 33% said they would vote for the centre-left Labour Party, led by Prime Minister Keir Starmer, while 20% would support the right-wing Reform UK Party led by Nigel Farage, which leads polls of the wider population. "We are going to give this Labour government the shock of their lives. We're going to get 16- and 17-year-olds to vote for us," Farage said following the move. The new cohort would add around 1.6 million potential voters to the roughly 48 million eligible to vote at the 2024 election. In last year's European Parliament elections, many young voters shifted toward far-right populist parties that used social media highly effectively to address their concerns. In Germany, where 16- to 18 year-olds voted for the first time in European elections in 2024, their support helped boost the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party. In Austria, where 16- and 17-year-olds have been able to vote since 2007, polls showed that most voters under 35 voted for the far-right Freedom Party (FPO) in a 2024 parliamentary election, helping it secure first place. "It's quite scary how many... people (my age) are following him (Farage). He's not my favourite person," said 17-year-old student Matilda Grace. However, Anki Deo, from campaign group Hope Not Hate, said follows on social media did not directly lead to votes. "Many young people are mistrustful of the political system and politicians - it's going to take a lot more than funny TikToks for any political party to win them over," she said. "Reform UK can ramp up their social media efforts, but their policy platform is still far out of line with the attitudes of the majority of young people." Labour pitched the reform as a way to boost participation and trust after the lowest turnout at the 2024 national election since 2001, hoping to encourage a lifelong habit of voting. Britain's democratic system has endured a turbulent decade, marked by the divisive Brexit vote and the political upheaval that followed, including an unprecedented turnover of prime ministers and ministers. Some critics say 16- and 17-year-olds lack the maturity to vote, and the main opposition Conservative Party called the plan inconsistent, noting the new cohort still can't buy a lottery ticket, drink alcohol, marry, or join the military. Younger voters have reacted to the announcement with excitement, but also with some caution. "Young people can be very impressionable. Some people obviously can make their own decisions and they know what propaganda is, but I think education is the most important thing," said Ana Fonseca, a 17-year-old student, who called for mandatory lessons on politics and democracy. Rita Patel, vice chair of Operation Black Vote, which advocates for greater political representation, said the reform needed to lead to meaningful democratic participation for groups like young Black voters, who face distinct challenges and want issues like racism tackled. "Young Black people are politicised from birth because they have no choice in this world and in this country to navigate that system that is often hostile to their needs," Patel said.


Telegraph
22 minutes ago
- Telegraph
‘Prisoners to El Saldavor' just shows Farage will say anything
How seriously should we take Reform UK? As a young Right-winger on the make in the foothills of his career, it is a question that vexes me on a daily basis. On paper, very: they now have a healthy opinion poll lead, won a storming victory at May's locals, and are on track for a majority at the next general election. My opinion of Sir Jake Berry is low. But is it jealousy? He saw which way the wind is blowing and fled to the sanctuary of Castle Reform before the defection drawbridge is drawn up. In branding Nigel Farage yesterday's man, in refusing to drink the Reform Kool Aid, have I hobbled my career? Yesterday's boy – c'est moi. And yet. Then I see an announcement like this morning's on crime, and I pause. Undoubtedly, Farage said all the right things. A pledge that a future Reform government will halve crime. A new prison building programme delivering 30,000 places. The deportation of foreign offenders, with the assistance of his new best friend Edi Rama, Albania's Prime Minister. An end to 'two-tier justice' and the early release of violent criminals and sex offenders. A 'three strikes' system for serious offenders. More police officers. Safer streets. Motherhood, apple pie, a BMW and bigger breasts for your wife. Ah. Wait. Sorry. Those last two weren't Farage today, but Boris Johnson, making the case for voting Conservative all the way back in 2005. I was put in mind of Johnson by Farage's announcement, if only because I can seem to remember hearing very similar pledges an election or two back. Yes, the prospect of sending the worst offenders to Nayib Bukele's El Salvador is an exciting addition to the roster. But we have heard so much of this before – the hollow promises of failed governments. Reform looks less like a radical departure from the old politics, but a miserable continuation of it. Successive ministers have presided over our worsening crime crisis, over the periodic emptying of our over-filled prisons, over a legal system that treats stupid tweets more harshly than sex crimes, over the tacit legalisation of shoplifting and burglary. Why would Home Secretary Darren Grimes, Justice Secretary David Bull, and the rest of Reform's gaggle of groupies, Z-list celebs, and Tory cast-offs succeed where their predecessors have not? Why should we think Farage – a metals trader turned TV host who has never held ministerial office or run a large organisation – has the answer? If both the Conservatives and Labour have been unable to control and overhaul Whitehall, how will Reform – especially when they will be facing concerted opposition from every aspect of the so-called establishment? Farage says he will bring in expertise from outside of politics. But, again, every incoming government pledges to do this. The number of ex-private sector ministers who have quit in disgust at their inability to circumvent Sir Humphrey are legion. Whitehall's anti-bodies – its resistance of misfits, weirdos, and talent – are very powerful. How will Farage surmount them? If Farage intends to spend the next four years genuinely planning his British Meiji Restoration – recruiting talent, plotting out policy and legislation, and wargaming the constant attempts to frustrate a Reform government – one could start to believe that he will succeed where the old parties have failed. I hold out hope. Britain needs radical change, and he is the man best-placed to deliver it. But how can I have faith that he will adopt this historical role when he goes on television to announce he would nationalise half the water industry with no clarity on the cost? I'll hold fire on my defection for the time being.


Reuters
22 minutes ago
- Reuters
Poland readies 'how to' guide to coping in case of war, natural disaster
WARSAW, July 21 (Reuters) - Poland is preparing a manual on how to cope in case of war or natural disaster, an interior ministry official told Reuters, aiming to strengthen national resilience amid heightened regional uncertainty including conflict in neighbouring Ukraine. The 40-page pamphlet, titled "Safety guide", gives advice on getting clean water, responding to air raids or blackouts and locating bomb shelters, as part of the first public awareness campaign of its kind in Poland in decades. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk has repeatedly warned that the threat of a global war is serious and real, especially in the context of the war in Ukraine and allegations of Russian sabotage, disinformation and cyberattacks against the West. Russia has repeatedly denied that it engages in sabotage or cyberattacks on other countries and says it has no intention of starting a war with NATO. "Wars are not won on the front lines. The Ukrainian example shows it very clearly," said Robert Klonowski, Polish interior ministry deputy director. The booklet warns that during a crisis supplies of food, medicine, and gasoline could run short, the government said. The booklet, which will be released online in September in Polish, will later be translated into English and Ukrainian, with plans to produce a Braille and children's version, the ministry added. Ministry plans to deliver printed copies to all 14 million households in Poland. Poland, which borders Ukraine, Russia and Belarus, has been a leading voice calling for members of NATO to spend more on defence, and is itself allocating 4.7% of gross domestic product to boosting its armed forces in 2025.