
My father was sold a trust to beat care fees that's useless and will cost £3,000 to cancel: SALLY SORTS IT
My 85-year-old father and I decided to make new wills with Jones Whyte in 2022.
The woman handling our case insisted we should have a family protection trust fund for his home, suggesting that it was a must in case he went into a nursing home – which has never been the intention.
We agreed under stress and paid £2,566, not understanding the full implications and the fact the house which my dad wants me to inherit was signed over to the trustees – Jones Whyte – irrevocably.
When we asked for the trust to be dissolved, Jones Whyte came back to say this would cost at least £3,000 plus VAT. We don't think this is fair.
Please help.
R.M., Glasgow.
Sally Hamilton replies: You and your father were clearly convinced that the family house could be protected from being sold to meet care bills. This landed him with a £2,566 bill and a product you didn't need or want.
A trust is a legal structure where trustees – in your case, solicitors – are appointed to control the contents for the benefit of the person it is set up for.
This means a property cannot be sold without the trustees' consent, for example.
There is a chance that the authorities will overlook a property held in a family protection trust when assessing liability for care bills.
But it should have been made clearer to you that there is also a high risk that they will not.
Many local authorities do not take kindly to trusts if they believe they were arranged to hide assets – known in legal parlance as the 'deliberate deprivation of assets'.
Such trusts are tempting because the law says people must pay all their own care home costs if they have assets of £23,250 or more in England and Northern Ireland, £35,000 in Scotland or £50,000 in Wales.
Emily Deane, technical counsel at the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners, told me: 'Using a trust to prevent paying care home fees is not a risk worth taking.
If a local authority decides that you have deliberately reduced your assets to avoid paying for care home fees, they may still include the value of the property you no longer have when they do the financial assessment.'
Such trusts are often used to potentially reduce inheritance tax (IHT) bills if the value of someone's estate on death is otherwise likely to exceed the threshold.
Currently, it is possible to bequeath up to £325,000 without incurring IHT – and if passing a house down to a child or grandchild on death, there is an extra allowance of £175,000.
Scam Watch
Shoppers should beware a scam Facebook post impersonating retailer Boots, consumer website Which? warns.
Fraudsters write that Boots is offering mystery boxes with 'leftover cosmetics' for £3 – in return for answering a three-question survey.
The tricksters direct you to a link to complete the questionnaire but this will aim to steal your personal and financial details, Which? says. The posts could come from a hacked account.
Do not click on the link. Instead, press the three dots in the right corner of the post and click 'report'.
This means your dad's estate would have to exceed £500,000 before any tax was due. At the time his trust was implemented, he was 82 and his home was worth £230,000.
You believe it has barely changed in value in the three years since. Your dad could simply leave the house in his will with no IHT due.
You asked Jones Whyte to unwind the trust. But you were shocked to be told this would cost £3,000 plus VAT and a fee for reviewing the trust.
I felt you had a good case so asked Jones Whyte to put you back in the position you were in before setting up the trust without stumping up any more cash. You wanted me to negotiate with them on your behalf, but Jones Whyte declined.
As you were nervous, a friend accompanied you to a meeting and took notes. Discussions went well and the firm agreed to wind up the trust – at no charge.
Your father's house is now back in his own name and you are planning to make some modifications to the property to make his life easier. You were grateful for my intervention.
A spokesman for Jones Whyte says: 'While we cannot comment on the specific details of any particular client matter, we are pleased to have been able to resolve [this client's] concerns to their satisfaction, both constructively and respectfully at all times.'
BA won't help with our insurance claim
We booked British Airways flights to Washington DC last June costing £4,574. At the beginning of that month my husband was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer.
He notified the insurance company, Staysure – but more than nine months later we are still waiting to be paid.
The sticking point is BA, which needs to provide a document proving we didn't fly on the date booked or at a later date.
My husband has filled in form after form but gets nowhere. Please help.
K.G., Sandhurst.
Sally Hamilton replies: I was sad to read that your holiday plans to visit your three grandchildren had been thrown up in the air due to your husband's shock diagnosis. I was sadder still to learn of the extreme headwinds he's faced getting his money back.
Travel insurers need to receive official cancellation documents to process a claim – for audit, record-keeping and fraud prevention.
The only money sent so far was £463 in refunded air passenger duty. Airlines by law must reimburse this cost if passengers don't fly.
Your husband contacted BA on its chat service and by phone almost weekly once he had recovered from his cancer operation, but to no avail. He even drove to Heathrow to try to find a BA employee who could help.
I was horrified by the lengths he had been forced to go to in his condition, so I stepped in on your behalf, first asking BA to get its act together.
I am pleased to say BA issued the missing document the same day and apologised for your experience.
Staysure escalated the case to its underwriters who agreed to settle immediately due to the exceptional circumstances.
Within two days you had received £3,931 in your account – your booking cost minus the refunded airport taxes and the insurance excess of £180.
Your husband told me there were no words to express his relief and thanked me for my intervention. I wish you both the very best.
Straight to the point
I switched my energy supplier from E.ON in October and sent the utility firm a final payment of £125.10. But it later sent me a bill for £235 for October, despite
having switched provider by then. It offered me a £156 discount for the bill but I don't think I should owe anything.
B.M., Suffolk.
E.ON apologises and says your new energy supplier took an incorrect meter reading. You have been offered £150 as a goodwill gesture.
***
Late last year the recliner mechanism in my SCS sofa broke. I paid an SCS technician £75 to repair it but it broke again two days later.
The technician has visited again but could not fix it. The supplier of the recliner parts is now no longer in business so SCS offered me a 50 per cent refund of what I paid for the sofa.
That was in March – I've heard nothing since.
E.B., via email.
SCS apologises and has now refunded you. It says it sent you a response but this never reached you.
***
In November I ordered an iPhone 16 on a 24-month contract, paying £29 upfront and £37.99 each month.
When it arrived the box looked like it had been tampered with and was empty except for the charging cable.
My provider won't cancel the contract and says the parcel had the phone inside when it left the warehouse.
C.F., Fife.
Your provider has now sent you a replacement phone and refunded the money you have already paid towards the bill.
***
My son bought me a £75 voucher as a Christmas present. When I came to spend it I was told the card had already been validated.
Its customer service has reloaded the card – but only with £26.
E.A., Hampshire.
The remaining £49 has now been credited to the voucher.
Write to Sally Hamilton at Sally Sorts It, Money Mail, Northcliffe House, 2 Derry Street, London W8 5TT or email sally@dailymail.co.uk — include phone number, address and a note addressed to the offending organisation giving them permission to talk to Sally Hamilton. Please do not send original documents as we cannot take responsibility for them. No legal responsibility can be accepted by the Daily Mail for answers given.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Major high street retailers duping shoppers with ‘misleading discounts' on pricey TVs, Which? warns
Plus, we've explained how to compare prices to always get the best deal SHOPPERS looking for a new television may want to think twice before trusting the discounts advertised by some of the UK's biggest retailers. An investigation by consumer champion Which? has revealed questionable pricing practices at Currys, Very, and other major sellers, potentially misleading customers into believing they are getting better deals than they actually are. Advertisement 1 Lisa Webb, Which? consumer law expert, said: "Shoppers deserve clear, honest pricing - not smoke and mirrors." Credit: Getty Which? analysed over 1,600 television deals across five retailers. More than half (56%) of the "was" prices used in promotions were not the most recent prices charged before the discount. Which? said this tactic can create the illusion of massive savings when, in reality, the higher price may not have been charged for months – or was only briefly in place. Plus, four in 10 TVs (40%) had a "was" price that was only in effect for less time than the discounted price. Advertisement And a third of all the TVs reviewed (33%) were doubly misleading, with both intervening prices and promotional periods longer than the higher "was" price. Which? said the findings are concerning because UK consumer protection guidance states that a "was" price must represent the genuine price immediately prior to the discount. Retailers that dodge these rules risk enforcement action from authorities such as the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA). Lisa Webb, Which? consumer law expert, said: "Shoppers deserve clear, honest pricing - not smoke and mirrors. Advertisement "If retailers are using dodgy was/now discounts to create the illusion of a bargain then we expect the competition regulator to take enforcement action. 'Anyone in the market for a new TV or any other expensive purchase should take any such discounts with a pinch of salt and check price tracking sites like CamelCamelCamel or Price Runner to ensure they are getting a genuine deal before making a decision." Shopping discounts - How to make savings and find the best bargains Which retailers were the worst offenders? Very emerged as the worst offender in the Which? investigation. Of the 399 TV deals reviewed, nearly nine in 10 (87%) used "was" prices that were not the most recent, and over half (53%) had higher prices that were in place for less time than the promotional price. Advertisement For example, the LG OLED65B46LA 65-inch TV was advertised with a "was" price of £2,499 and a "now" price of £1,499. However, the £2,499 price hadn't been charged for five months and had been replaced by seven lower price points during that time. Currys also came under fire, with three-quarters (75%) of its 608 TV deals featuring outdated "was" prices. Plus, it had the highest rate (68%) of TVs where the higher price applied for a shorter time than the discounted price. Advertisement An example includes the LG UT73 50-inch TV, which had a "was" price of £399.99 and a "now" price of £299.99. The higher price had only been in place for 25 days, compared to 207 days at the lower price. What about other retailers? While AO was also found to use intervening prices in a third (33%) of its deals, it provides transparency by publishing the dates of its "was" prices and acknowledging that lower prices may have applied. This makes AO's deals less likely to mislead shoppers, Which? said. Advertisement Argos performed the best, with nearly all of its "was" prices reflecting the price immediately before the promotion, offering customers a more accurate picture of potential savings. Amazon's pricing practices were also reviewed, but the retailer uses a different approach. Its "was" prices reflect the median price paid by customers over the past 90 days, excluding promotional offers. While this is a distinct method, Which? has concerns that it could still confuse shoppers and make discounts appear larger than they are. Advertisement Which? also revealed earlier this week that Sports Direct shoppers are being misled by deceptive pricing tactics, creating the illusion of bargain deals.


The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Major high street retailers duping shoppers with ‘misleading discounts' on pricey TVs, Which? warns
SHOPPERS looking for a new television may want to think twice before trusting the discounts advertised by some of the UK's biggest retailers. An investigation by consumer champion Which? has revealed questionable pricing practices at Currys, Very, and other major sellers, potentially misleading customers into believing they are getting better deals than they actually are. 1 Which? analysed over 1,600 television deals across five retailers. More than half (56%) of the "was" prices used in promotions were not the most recent prices charged before the discount. Which? said this tactic can create the illusion of massive savings when, in reality, the higher price may not have been charged for months – or was only briefly in place. Plus, four in 10 TVs (40%) had a "was" price that was only in effect for less time than the discounted price. And a third of all the TVs reviewed (33%) were doubly misleading, with both intervening prices and promotional periods longer than the higher "was" price. Which? said the findings are concerning because UK consumer protection guidance states that a "was" price must represent the genuine price immediately prior to the discount. Retailers that dodge these rules risk enforcement action from authorities such as the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA). Lisa Webb, Which? consumer law expert, said: "Shoppers deserve clear, honest pricing - not smoke and mirrors. "If retailers are using dodgy was/now discounts to create the illusion of a bargain then we expect the competition regulator to take enforcement action. 'Anyone in the market for a new TV or any other expensive purchase should take any such discounts with a pinch of salt and check price tracking sites like CamelCamelCamel or Price Runner to ensure they are getting a genuine deal before making a decision." Shopping discounts - How to make savings and find the best bargains Which retailers were the worst offenders? Very emerged as the worst offender in the Which? investigation. Of the 399 TV deals reviewed, nearly nine in 10 (87%) used "was" prices that were not the most recent, and over half (53%) had higher prices that were in place for less time than the promotional price. For example, the LG OLED65B46LA 65-inch TV was advertised with a "was" price of £2,499 and a "now" price of £1,499. However, the £2,499 price hadn't been charged for five months and had been replaced by seven lower price points during that time. Currys also came under fire, with three-quarters (75%) of its 608 TV deals featuring outdated "was" prices. Plus, it had the highest rate (68%) of TVs where the higher price applied for a shorter time than the discounted price. An example includes the LG UT73 50-inch TV, which had a "was" price of £399.99 and a "now" price of £299.99. The higher price had only been in place for 25 days, compared to 207 days at the lower price. What about other retailers? While AO was also found to use intervening prices in a third (33%) of its deals, it provides transparency by publishing the dates of its "was" prices and acknowledging that lower prices may have applied. This makes AO's deals less likely to mislead shoppers, Which? said. Argos performed the best, with nearly all of its "was" prices reflecting the price immediately before the promotion, offering customers a more accurate picture of potential savings. Amazon's pricing practices were also reviewed, but the retailer uses a different approach. Its "was" prices reflect the median price paid by customers over the past 90 days, excluding promotional offers. While this is a distinct method, Which? has concerns that it could still confuse shoppers and make discounts appear larger than they are. Which? also revealed earlier this week that Sports Direct shoppers are being misled by deceptive pricing tactics, creating the illusion of bargain deals. How to compare prices to get the best deal JUST because something is on offer, or is part of a sale, it doesn't mean it's always a good deal. There are plenty of comparison websites out there that'll check prices for you - so don't be left paying more than you have to. Most of them work by comparing the prices across hundreds of retailers. Here are some that we recommend: Google Shopping is a tool that lets users search for and compare prices for products across the web. Simply type in keywords, or a product number, to bring up search results. Price Spy logs the history of how much something costs from over 3,000 different retailers, including Argos, Amazon, eBay and the supermarkets. Once you select an individual product you can quickly compare which stores have the best price and which have it in stock. Idealo is another website that lets you compare prices between retailers. All shoppers need to do is search for the item they need and the website will rank them from the cheapest to the most expensive one. CamelCamelCamel only works on goods being sold on Amazon. To use it, type in the URL of the product you want to check the price of.


Glasgow Times
8 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Award-winning coffee shop in Paisley closes after five years
The owners of Spoons Coffee House, based on Causeyside Street, thanked customers for their support in a post on social media. The last day of trading was Thursday, June 12, with the decision being taken to shut the business so the owners can "concentrate on family". Spoons Coffee House was previously named Best Coffee Shop at the annual Scotlands Business Awards in both 2022 and 2023. READ MORE: Japanese coffee shop founded in Shetland to open in Glasgow A statement published on Facebook read: "Team Spoons would like to say a massive thanks from the bottom of our hearts to each and every person that has supported us from the start back five years ago we couldn't have done any of it without you. "From helping the community to winning awards, you have all helped and we will be forever thankful. "Special thanks to all our regulars, you all know who you are, too many to name, we have made friends for life. "You all made our dream come true but now time for change and concentrate on our little family as our boy is turning 5 and now going to school in August. "So sorry for the last minute post we will miss you all take care."