logo
German economy in crisis: When will it bounce back? – DW – 05/22/2025

German economy in crisis: When will it bounce back? – DW – 05/22/2025

DW23-05-2025

The new German government wants to revive the German economy by introducing an urgent recovery program. However, the crisis is so severe that economic experts see little chance of a rapid upturn.
The term recession refers to an economy that is shrinking. This has been happening in Germany for two years now, the only country in the European Union experiencing such a decline.
In 2024, more companies closed than in the previous major financial and economic crisis in 2011. High electricity prices have meant that energy-intensive industries have been hit especially hard. In addition, companies are having to close due to a shortage of workers and specialists as society is ageing. Germany's burgeoning bureaucracy is another major factor hampering business.
The new government has set out to improve the situation quickly and sustainably. But this will not come about overnight. This is the finding of the Federal Government's economic advisory body. In its spring report, the German Council of Economic Experts spoke of a "period of considerable sluggishness" and practically ruled out a rapid recovery.
No longer internationally competitive
For 2025, the five economics professors project stagnation, meaning zero growth. In 2026, they see the economy possibly recovering somewhat with one percent growth. However, the experts are far from certain that Germany will be able to get back on track for economic success in the medium and long term.
The German economy has become less and less competitive. A decisive factor was Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and the halt to Russian gas supplies. The successful German business model of using cheap energy and high engineering skills to manufacture products that are in demand worldwide has been history ever since.
The panel of five advisors presented their annual spring study of the German economy Image: Sebastian Gollnow/dpa/picture alliance
Donald Trump puts the brakes on German exports
On top of this, there are also domestic problems. "Bureaucratic regulations and lengthy approval procedures are slowing down macroeconomic growth," states the report by the economic experts. US President Donald Trump is also having a negative impact. His tariffs are jeopardizing economic growth worldwide, but have particularly negative consequences for the export-oriented German economy.
In order to ease the burden on companies, Federal Economics Minister Katherina Reiche wants to introduce a number of initial measures by mid-July. The electricity tax is to be reduced, and the labor market will be reformed, Reiche said at an economic forum last week. Growth is the order of the day, she said, and the government will provide the stimulus, also by lowering corporate taxes.
Steep energy costs harm German industry
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
New business models are needed
The panel of economic experts is calling on the federal government to take a realistic view of the future. No attempts should be made to save jobs that are not viable in the long term, they wrote in their report. "An economic policy that aims to stop structural change through subsidies cannot be successful in the long term," said Monika Schnitzer, Chairwoman of the German Council of Economic Experts. Instead, the transition to new business models and professions should be promoted in a targeted manner.
The multi-billion-euro financial package launched by the governing center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU)/Christian Social Union (CSU) and the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD) is a source of hope. Some €500 billion ($567) are to be invested in the ailing infrastructure over the next twelve years.
Money sparks greed
"If used correctly, the funds can make Germany fit for the future, with considerable positive growth effects," said economist Achim Truger. However, he added, only if the money is actually spent on investments.
New German government weighs hiking minimum wage
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The economists suspect that the ruling parties may use extra funds to finance their election promises, such as an increase in pensions for housewives, agricultural diesel subsidies, and a reduction in the restaurant tax. The economists warn that the €500 billion package must not be misappropriated.
Because this much money cannot be spent quickly, the experts do not expect a positive effect until 2026 at the earliest.
As the €500 billion fund and the massive increase in defense spending are based on fresh loans, Germany will no longer be able to meet the EU debt targets. This is something the experts have also warned against. Only if Germany manages to modernize itself structurally, the experts say, would such expenditures be justifiable.
Many Germans are working part-time
Chancellor Friedrich Merz has repeatedly said that people in Germany need to work more. "We cannot maintain prosperity with a four-day week and a work-life balance," he recently told the CDU Economic Council. He called for more flexible working hours and incentives for people to continue working voluntarily beyond retirement age.
Economics professor Veronika Grimm said it is right that incentives are needed to increase participation in the labor market. She sees great potential in increasing the participation of women, mainly by improving childcare. But how can this be done if there are too few teachers?
Grimm suggests that a shrinking workforce will force an increase in productivity of those who remain. This, she says, is possible through digitalization and a reduction in bureaucracy.
Global shipping companies faces twin threats from Trump
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
How to reduce bureaucracy
Despite numerous political initiatives, the burden of bureaucratic costs on companies has not yet decreased noticeably. The experts suggest speeding up application and approval procedures, reducing disclosure obligations that companies have towards the state, digitizing public administration, and setting up a standardized nationwide e-government portal. New regulations should be effective and user-friendly. Otherwise, this would only lead to more inefficient bureaucracy.
"Between hope and trepidation" is how the Council of Experts described their outlook. And in their press release, the German Chamber of Industry and Commerce wrote: "Time is pressing, companies are ready. Now the politicians have to deliver."
This article was originally written in German.
While you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter, Berlin Briefing.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NATO likely to hike defense spending despite economic woes – DW – 06/05/2025
NATO likely to hike defense spending despite economic woes – DW – 06/05/2025

DW

time3 hours ago

  • DW

NATO likely to hike defense spending despite economic woes – DW – 06/05/2025

The military alliance looks set to satisfy US President Donald Trump's demands to commit to a massive increase in defense spending. Some creative counting proposed by NATO head Mark Rutte could soften the financial blow. A NATO defense ministers' meeting in Brussels on Thursday showed "broad support" for signing off a historic hike in defense spending at a crunch summit later this month. This was their response to the growing threat from Russia and a "more dangerous world" in general, the military alliance's Secretary General Mark Rutte told reporters. "I will propose an overall investment plan that would total 5% of gross domestic product in defense investment," Rutte announced, following months of pressure from US President Donald Trump for allies to more than double the present target. Current NATO guidelines encourage states to spend 2% of their economic output on their militaries. But not all of the alliance's members meet this target, raising questions of how they will reach an even higher spending goal. Splitting the bill In response, NATO chief Rutte has specified a division of the new spending goal that could allow Trump to claim a headline figure, while giving the other 31 nations room to maneuver their national budgets. Thus, of the 5%, 3.5% of national GDP could be allotted to "core defence spending", while the remaining 1.5% could be diverted to "defense- and security-related investment like infrastructure and industry," he said. Allied defense ministers gathered at the NATO headquarters in Brussels Image: Dursun Aydemir/Anadolu/picture alliance Trump has long criticized NATO allies for relying on the US' large military might as a strategy to defend the European continent. In 2023, more than two thirds of the 32 NATO countries' collective $1.3 trillion (€1.14 trillion) military spending came from Washington, according to data compiled by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). On Thursday, US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth drove home the message to the rest of the alliance once again. "Every shoulder has to be to the plough. Every country has to contribute at that level of 5% as a recognition of the nature of threat," he said. Leaders of the world's most powerful defense alliance are set to gather in three weeks in the Dutch city The Hague. Topping the agenda will be discussions on the ongoing war in Ukraine, and Russia's resulting massive rearmament drive. It seems likely that NATO members will officially commit to the 5% goal at these upcoming talks. Giving in to pressure Under US pressure, and with Europeans alarmed by Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, NATO military spending has already burgeoned in recent years. Most countries now meet the 2% threshold, which was agreed upon 11 years ago. But around one third of the alliance still doesn't, including Portugal, Italy, Canada, Belgium, and Spain. Most NATO states had indicated willingness to spend more, but the 5% goal was considered far-fetched when Trump floated the idea earlier this year. Almost half a year on, the message seems to be resonating with many in the alliance. Earlier this week, 14 NATO states, including the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and the five Nordic states, published a joint statement in which they said they were "moving towards reaching at least 5% of GDP on defense and defense-related investments." Specter of war: Are Europeans really ready to rearm? To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Last month, German Foreign Minister Johann Wadepuhl also indicated Germany could get on board with the goal. Several NATO countries, including Poland, Estonia and Lithuania, have already committed to spending 5% or more in the future. All are former Soviet states, and two of them share a border with Russia. Since taking office in January, the "America-first" president has strained the NATO alliance with threats not to help defend alliance members that didn't meet spending targets should they be attacked. His designs on the semi-autonomous Danish territory Greenland have also alienated allies, as have his attempts at bilateral talks to find an end to Russia's war in Ukraine, which sidelined European partners and left Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy largely marginalized. Questions remain There are still many open questions to be answered, one of them being the timeline. On Thursday, Estonian Defense Minister Hanno Pevkur spoke of committing to reaching 5% within five years. "We don't have time for ten years, we don't even have time for seven years, to be honest," he said. But the official focus at this week's meeting was on working out what exact capabilities NATO would need and may currently be missing to defend itself if a member of the alliance were attacked. After the talks, Rutte spoke of the need to upgrade air defense systems and long-range missiles, among other things. German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said Germany might need as many as 50,000 – 60,000 more troops in its standing forces to meet defense needs in the coming years. Increased spending amid economic downturn While consensus appears to be forming, it is also clear that increasing military spending to 5% of GDP would be an enormous strain on public finances, particularly as Europe's two major economies, Germany and France, face tough times. Paris and Berlin are touting increased defense spending as a chance to fuel economic growth in Europe, but there is a risk of public backlash. In April in Rome, the opposition Five Star Movement led a protest against an EU drive to rearm the bloc — a move supported by the government of far-right Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni — reportedly drawing tens of thousands of people. According to Cullen Hendrix, an expert from the Peterson Institute for International Economics, a US think tank, a 5% spending target would essentially put NATO countries on "war footing." US secretary of State Pete Hegseth was in Brussels for the last NATO gathering before next month's summit Image: Bob Reijnders/Middle East Images/AFP/Getty Images "In 2023, just nine countries spent 5% of GDP or more on defense: Algeria, Armenia, Israel, Lebanon, Oman, Russia, Saudi Arabia, and South Sudan," Hendrix wrote in February. "Most are, or were, at war. Five of these are authoritarian petro-states, unencumbered by competitive elections or the need to tax their populaces to fund this military largesse." There is also a risk that increased spending will make Europe less safe, Hendrix warned. "Increasing military spending to this extent would likely catalyze an arms race with those near-peer competitors." On Thursday in Brussels, Rutte argued there was little choice but to spend significantly more on defense, pointing to recent comments by the German Chief of Defense Carsten Breuer, who posited that Russia would be ready to mount an attack on NATO states by 2029. "We live in a more dangerous world," Rutte said. "We are safe today, but if we don't do this, we are not safe in the foreseeable future." Edited by: Maren Sass

What Trump-Musk feud means for tech billionaire's businesses – DW – 06/06/2025
What Trump-Musk feud means for tech billionaire's businesses – DW – 06/06/2025

DW

time3 hours ago

  • DW

What Trump-Musk feud means for tech billionaire's businesses – DW – 06/06/2025

Tesla CEO Elon Musk spent some $300 million on Donald Trump's campaign, gaining unprecedented access to the Republican president's administration. What does their public row mean for Musk's empire? How did Musk and Trump get so close? Once a vocal critic of Donald Trump during his 2016 United States election campaign, Elon Musk, the billionaire CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, pivoted from his Democratic Party roots to embrace Trump's policies during the Republican's second term. Frustrated by Obama-era regulations stifling his ventures, Musk embraced Trump's agenda of tax cuts and deregulation. Their bond grew from mutual respect to a robust political alliance, which saw Musk last year back Trump's reelection campaign to the tune of nearly $300 billion (€263 billion). When Trump returned to the White House in January, the world's richest man took on an advisory role in the administration, leading the controversial Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Tasked with slashing public spending, Musk's role stirred controversy, impacting Tesla's stock price and auto sales. After months of pressure from investors, Musk agreed last month to scale back his work in Trump's government. Trump and Musk on the outs over Big Beautiful Bill To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video What sparked the public feud between Trump and Musk? On Thursday, wearing a T-shirt emblazoned with the "The Dogefather," Musk was given an initially cordial farewell by the president in the Oval Office. But Trump could not contain his frustration at Musk's earlier criticism of his administration's sweeping tax and spending bill, which the Tesla founder called fiscally reckless and a "disgusting abomination." After Musk then accused the US president of alleged ties to child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, the news conference ended with Trump threatening to revoke Musk's government contracts, which could cost his business empire billions of dollars. Over the next few hours, the row spilled over to social media, where both men repeated their White House remarks, prompting the SpaceX owner to announce an immediate decommissioning of its Dragon spacecraft, before appearing to back down. How did markets react to the Trump-Musk fallout? Tesla stock lost about $150 billion in market value on Thursday — the largest single-day decline in its history. The stock closed down over 14%. However, news outlet Politico reported Friday that the two men were scheduled to speak later in the day in the hope of defusing the situation, which caused a sharp reversal in the stock's fortunes. Tesla stock was up 5% in pre-market trade. However, a White House official said later Friday that Trump had no plans for any call, adding that he may get rid of his Tesla bought in March in a show of support against Musk in the face of anti-Tesla protests. Tesla shares have been on a wild rollercoaster ride this year after a strong performance around the US election. Having peaked at $428 in January, shares in the electric vehiclemaker plummeted by almost half in March as investors reacted negatively to Musk's involvement in the Trump administration. Tesla stock then rallied when Trump paused his unprecedented tariffs on the rest of the world and after US regulators eased rules on self-driving vehicles. Trump came to Musk's aid when Tesla vehicles and dealerships were attacked Image:What's at stake for Musk's empire? The public spat, as well as Trump's budget plans, have left the fortunes of Musk's companies hanging in the balance. Tesla, Musk's most profitable firm, could be severely impacted by Trump's plans to cut a subsidy on new electric vehicles that is worth up to $7,500 for buyers. Despite Musk's aggressive criticism and lobbying by Tesla, Trump plans to eliminate the credit by the end of the year, seven years before it was due to expire. News agency Bloomberg cited JP Morgan analysts as saying that the cut would reduce Tesla's full-year profit by $1.2 billion. Cuts to state-level credits could further impact the EV maker's bottom line this financial year. It could, however, encourage EV buyers to bring forward their plans and spur demand for Tesla's vehicles in the short term. Tesla is already being impacted by Trump's tariffs as the firm relies on Chinese parts for its Cybercab robotaxi and Semi electric truck. Starlink satellite system shaping modern warfare To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video However, it is unclear whether Trump can unilaterally make good on his threat to tear up federal contracts with Musk's firms like SpaceX. Since 2000, SpaceX has received more than $22 billion in contracts from the US Defense Department and space agency NASA. If Trump were to terminate the contracts, it would have a huge financial impact on SpaceX and disrupt the US government's space ambitions. SpaceX's Crew Dragon is currently the only US spacecraft certified to carry crew to the International Space Station (ISS). Any ending of Pentagon contracts involving Musk's Starlink satellite internet service would also be a lose-lose for both Musk and the government. Starlink provides broadband services to rural areas. Terminals are also deployed on US military bases, ships, aircraft, and armored vehicles. The satellite internet service is often used for disaster response. Edited by: Uwe Hessler

Malta: Two convicted in 2017 murder of journalist    – DW – 06/06/2025
Malta: Two convicted in 2017 murder of journalist    – DW – 06/06/2025

DW

time4 hours ago

  • DW

Malta: Two convicted in 2017 murder of journalist – DW – 06/06/2025

A Maltese court convicted two men of supplying explosives used to assassinate an investigative journalist. Daphne Caruana Galizia, who reported on government corruption, was killed with a car bomb. A Maltese court pronounced Robert Agius (41) and Jamie Vella (42) guilty of complicity in the October 16, 2017, assassination of investigative journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia late Thursday. The two were convicted of supplying military-grade explosives to killers targeting Caruana Galizia with a car bomb. The 53-year-old journalist wrote extensively about government corruption and crooked business deals. Much of her investigative focus during the time leading up to her targeted killing was trained on the inner circle of then President Joseph Muscat. Her brazen killing shocked Europe and sparked protests on the Mediterranean island. Protesters rallied against Muscat over his perceived efforts to shield friends and allies in a later investigation into the murder. He eventually resigned from office in 2019. Though a 2021 public inquiry found no evidence of direct government involvement in Caruana Galizia's murder, it did attest to a "climate of impunity" within the administration toward those who may have wanted to do her harm. On Friday, the slain journalist's family said the verdict brings them "a step closer to justice." "Yet, eight years after Daphne's brutal assassination, the institutional failures that enabled her murder remain unaddressed and unreformed," the family added. Yorgen Fenech stands accused of putting together the Daphne Caruana Galizia assasination Image: AP Photo/picture alliance What else do we know about the trial into Caruana Galizia's murder? Agius and Vella are expected to be sentenced early next week, with prosecutors seeking life sentences for both men. They are the fifth individuals to be convicted thus far in connection with Caruana Galizia's assassination. Two men, brothers George and Alfred Degiorgio, are serving 40 year sentences for carrying out the murder. Vince Muscat was convicted along with the Degiorgios but given a 15-year reduced sentence and a pardon in another murder case for providing key witness testimony that led to the convictions of Agius and Vella. A sixth man, Maltese businessman Yorgen Fenech — who was among those with close ties to the Muscat government — currently awaits trial on charges that he masterminded the Caruana Galizia hit. Fenech was arrested in November 2019, attempting to flee the country on his yacht. He was granted bail in January 2025. No date has been set for his trial yet. Political crisis in Malta To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Edited by: Rana Taha

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store