logo
Afghan data breach: Why UK politicians sought to keep it a secret

Afghan data breach: Why UK politicians sought to keep it a secret

RTÉ News​7 days ago
As the US withdrew from Afghanistan in the summer of 2021, the Taliban swiftly returned to power.
Many Afghan citizens who had worked with international forces since 2001 feared retribution. They did whatever they could to get out.
Footage of people clinging to planes as they took off from Kabul airport, only to fall to their deaths moments later, showed the world just how desperate people were to get out.
Those who had worked with the British government in Afghanistan were able to apply for a scheme known as the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap).
Over 34,000 people were resettled in the UK as part of the scheme.
However, in February 2022, an email sent by an official in the Ministry of Defence led to devastating consequences.
The soldier who sent the email thought that it contained the names of just 150 people. In fact, it contained the names and details of nearly 19,000.
Included in the list were the details of over 100 British officials, including members of the special forces and MI6.
By August 2023, some of the names appeared on Facebook. The British government knew it had a major problem.
Superinjunction
Around the same time, a number of journalists started to hear that there had been a major data breach involving the 'Arap' scheme. Within days the Ministry of Defence asked the courts for an injunction.
However, there was concern that even the mention of an injunction could attract attention and ultimately unravel the tightly concealed breach. The judge therefore suggested that a superinjunction might be better.
This meant that not only could the story not be reported, but people could not even mention that the injunction existed. It was an unprecedented move.
What initially was supposed to be a four-month superinjunction lasted almost two years.
It would raise profound questions around the impact of such injunctions on democracy, freedom of speech and freedom of the press.
Afghanistan Response Route
A secret scheme, the Afghanistan Response Route, was also established to relocate Afghanis suspected of being in danger due to the data breach.
Altogether around 6,900 Afghanis will be relocated through the scheme by the time it closes.
Six months after Labour entered government, the new Defence Secretary, John Healey, commissioned an independent review.
Speaking in the House of Commons this week he told MPs that the review concluded that there was "little evidence of intent by the Taliban to conduct a campaign of retribution against former officials".
He added that "the wealth of data inherited from the former Government by the Taliban would already enable them to target individuals if they wish to do so which means".
It was therefore found that it was "highly unlikely" that this leak would be the reason the Taliban would act against an individual.
However, this risk couldn't be ruled out entirely.
After providing this report to the court, the judge ruled that he could lift the superinjunction at 12pm on Tuesday 16 July.
Calls for an inquiry
The controversy has raised uncomfortable questions for both the government and lead opposition party in the UK.
It is perhaps for that reason that the Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch chose not to raise the matter during Prime Ministers Questions this week, despite it being the dominant news story that day.
Instead, it was Liberal Democrats leader Ed Davey who called for a public inquiry into the controversy.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer also attempted to throw blame back towards the Conservatives, telling the chamber that the party opposite had "serious questions to answer".
However, the former Secretary of Defence, Ben Wallace, who was in office when the leak first happened, robustly defended his actions this week.
He told BBC radio that an injunction was sought to "protect those people who could have been or were exposed".
Grant Shapps, who replaced Ben Wallace shortly after the leak happened, also said that the superinjunction was the correct measure to take, explaining that his focus was to "protect those people who could have been or were exposed".
The lasting impact
Many have asked whether this superinjunction lasted too long or whether it was appropriate at all.
It was in place during an election year when issues around immigration and public spending were major topics of debate. And yet it had to remain a secret.
The Afghanistan Response Route is expected to eventually cost the British taxpayer £850 million. And as of May 2025, more than16,000 Afghan people had moved to the UK because of the data breach.
However, many people in positions of authority at the time will argue that they were dealing with a potentially devastating situation in real time, where people who had worked with the UK government risked being killed because of it.
They say that the injunction was an unprecedented but necessary measure to try to mitigate the damage.
The debate is set to continue, with the Commons Defence Committee committing to hold an inquiry into the matter.
A chance to shed light on a controversy which has evaded scrutiny for almost two years.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Over 220 MPs call for Britain to recognise Palestine as Starmer says this will be 'part of wider plan'
Over 220 MPs call for Britain to recognise Palestine as Starmer says this will be 'part of wider plan'

The Journal

time30 minutes ago

  • The Journal

Over 220 MPs call for Britain to recognise Palestine as Starmer says this will be 'part of wider plan'

SOME 221 MPS from across different political parties have joined forces to call on the UK Government to recognise a Palestinian state. The MPs have urged the UK Government to take the step ahead of a United Nations conference in New York next week. This follows France's announcement yesterday evening it will formally recognise Palestine at a UN summit in September. France is the biggest and most powerful European country to recognise Palestine. More than 140 countries recognise a Palestinian state, including Ireland, doing so last May . The MPs' letter, co-ordinated by Labour's Sarah Champion, said: 'We are expectant that the outcome of the conference will be the UK Government outlining when and how it will act on its long-standing commitment on a two-state solution; as well as how it will work with international partners to make this a reality.' Parliamentarians from Labour, the Conservatives, Lib Dems, SNP, Greens, Plaid Cymru, SDLP and independents are among those who signed the letter. Champion acknowledged 'recognition alone will not end the suffering in Gaza or the rapid expansion of settlements and settler violence in the West Bank'. But she said it would be an important step on the path towards a two-state solution to end the war. The Labour MP added: 'Recognition would send a powerful symbolic message that we support the rights of the Palestinian people, that they are not alone and they need to maintain hope that there is a route that leads to lasting peace and security for both the Israeli and the Palestinian people.' Ministers have faced growing calls to recognise a Palestinian state immediately amid mounting global anger over the starving population in Gaza. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said this evening that such a move needed to be part of the 'pathway' to peace in the Middle East, which he and allies are working towards. 'That pathway will set out the concrete steps needed to turn the ceasefire so desperately needed, into a lasting peace,' Starmer said. He added: 'Recognition of a Palestinian state has to be one of those steps. I am unequivocal about that. Advertisement 'But it must be part of a wider plan which ultimately results in a two-state solution and lasting security for Palestinians and Israelis.' He also said that the 'appalling scenes in Gaza are unrelenting' and added: 'The continued captivity of hostages, the starvation and denial of humanitarian aid to the Palestinian people, the increasing violence from extremist settler groups, and Israel's disproportionate military escalation in Gaza are all indefensible. In a statement released today alongside the leaders of France and Germany, Starmer urged 'all parties to bring an end to the conflict by reaching an immediate ceasefire'. Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz also called for Israel to stop restricting the flow of aid into Gaza. Charities operating in Gaza have said Israel's blockade and ongoing military offensive are pushing people there towards starvation, warning that they are seeing their own workers and Palestinians 'waste away'. Israel says it allows enough aid into the territory and faults delivery efforts by UN agencies, which say they are hindered by Israeli restrictions and the breakdown of security. As he left for Scotland today, US President Donald Trump suggested that Macron's announcement that France would recognise Palestinian statehood was unimportant. 'What he says doesn't matter', Trump told reporters at the White House. Starmer will meet the US president during his five-day private trip to Scotland. US-led peace talks in Qatar were cut short yesterday, with Washington's special envoy Steve Witkoff accusing Hamas of a 'lack of desire to reach a ceasefire'. The deal under discussion is expected to include a 60-day ceasefire in which Hamas would release 10 living hostages and the remains of 18 others in phases in exchange for Palestinians imprisoned by Israel. Aid supplies would be ramped up and the two sides would hold negotiations on a lasting truce. Hamas-led militants based in Gaza abducted 251 people in the 7 October attack in 2023 that triggered the war and killed about 1,200 people. Fewer than half of the 50 hostages still in Gaza are believed to be alive. Israel's war in Gaza has killed more than 59,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry.

Ghislaine Maxwell finishes Epstein interviews with US Justice Department officials
Ghislaine Maxwell finishes Epstein interviews with US Justice Department officials

Irish Examiner

timean hour ago

  • Irish Examiner

Ghislaine Maxwell finishes Epstein interviews with US Justice Department officials

Disgraced British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, the imprisoned former girlfriend of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, has finished one-and-a-half days of interviews with US Justice Department officials, answering questions 'about 100 different people', her lawyer said. 'She answered those questions honestly, truthfully, to the best of her ability,' David Oscar Markus told reporters outside the federal courthouse in Tallahassee, Florida, where Maxwell met with deputy attorney general Todd Blanche. 'She never invoked a privilege. She never refused to answer a question, so we're very proud of her,' Mr Markus said. David Oscar Markus, a lawyer for Ghislaine Maxwell, talks to the media outside the federal courthouse in Tallahassee, Florida, after deputy attorney general Todd Blanche met with Maxwell (Colin Hackley/AP) Maxwell is serving a 20-year sentence and is housed at a low-security federal prison in Tallahassee. She was sentenced three years ago after being convicted of helping Epstein, a wealthy, well-connected financier, sexually abuse underage girls. Officials have said Epstein killed himself in his New York jail cell while awaiting trial in 2019, but his case has generated endless attention and conspiracy theories because of his and Maxwell's links to famous people, such as royals, presidents and billionaires, including US President Donald Trump. In a social media post this week, Mr Blanche said Maxwell would be interviewed because of President Trump's directive to gather and release any credible evidence about others who may have committed crimes. Mr Trump has denied prior knowledge of Epstein's crimes and claimed he cut off their relationship long ago. But he faces ongoing questions about the Epstein case, overshadowing his administration's achievements. On Friday, reporters pressed the Republican president about pardoning Maxwell, but he deflected, emphasising his administration's successes. Mr Markus said Maxwell 'was asked maybe about 100 different people'. David Oscar Markus, a lawyer for Ghislaine Maxwell, outside the federal courthouse in Tallahassee, Florida (Colin Hackley/AP) 'The deputy attorney general is seeking the truth,' Mr Markus said. 'He asked every possible question, and he was doing an amazing job.' Mr Markus said he did not ask for anything for Maxwell in return, though he acknowledged that Mr Trump could pardon her. 'Listen, the president this morning said he had the power to do so. We hope he exercises that power in the right and just way,' Mr Markus said. Earlier this month, the Justice Department said it would not release more files related to the Epstein investigation, despite promises that claimed otherwise from attorney general Pam Bondi. The department also said an Epstein client list does not exist. Maxwell is appealing against her conviction, based on the government's pledge years ago that any potential Epstein co-conspirators would not be charged, Mr Markus said. Epstein struck a deal with federal prosecutors in 2008 that shifted his case to Florida state court, where he pleaded guilty to soliciting and procuring a minor for prostitution. Epstein in 2019 and Maxwell in 2020 were charged in federal court in New York. Read More Bill Clinton reportedly sent Jeffrey Epstein note for birthday album

Northern Ireland economy set for boost from British-India trade deal
Northern Ireland economy set for boost from British-India trade deal

Irish Post

time4 hours ago

  • Irish Post

Northern Ireland economy set for boost from British-India trade deal

A NEWLY signed British-India trade agreement is expected to pour £50 million into Northern Ireland's economy. The deal, which is part of the British government's wider Plan for Change, is a major milestone in international trade and promises wide-ranging benefits for Northern Ireland's key industries and workforce. The agreement, officially signed today by Business and Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds and India's Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal, coincides with a high-level meeting between Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The overall British-India trade package is valued at nearly £6 billion and is projected to create more than 2,200 jobs across Britain and Northern Ireland. Northern Ireland's advanced manufacturing and engineering sectors are set to benefit the most. These sectors, which account for about 30% of local employment, will benefit from the removal or reduction of costly tariffs. In addition, local medical technology firms will see duties on medical devices, which currently range from 8.25% to 13.75%, slashed or eliminated over the next decade. One of the most notable wins comes for Northern Ireland's Irish whiskey industry. Duties on exports to India will be immediately halved from 150% to 75% and gradually lowered to 40% over ten years. Producers will also gain greater flexibility in sourcing ingredients and packaging, allowing them to better compete in the rapidly growing Indian market. Secretary of State for Northern Ireland Hilary Benn described the agreement as a 'landmark deal' with real and immediate benefits. 'This agreement will help further unlock the huge potential for growth across Northern Ireland, including its thriving services and technology sectors,' he said. The deal is particularly promising for exporters. Last year, 143 Northern Ireland companies exported £65 million worth of goods to India—a figure now expected to rise sharply thanks to streamlined customs procedures and a dramatic drop in India's trade-weighted average tariff from 15% to just 3%. Business and Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds emphasised the local impact: 'The millions brought to Northern Ireland each year from the deal we've signed with India today will be keenly felt across local communities—whether that's higher wages for workers, more choice for shoppers, or increased overseas sales for businesses.' Among those welcoming the deal is Belfast-based diagnostic kit manufacturer Biopanda. Sales Manager Philip McKee said, 'We value the business we've already done in India, and the UK-India FTA should allow our distributors to offer a wider range of our products at lower prices. That's a win for us and a win for consumers in India.' As part of the broader benefits package, Northern Ireland workers could see wages rise in line with a British and NI-wide uplift of £2.2 billion annually. Shoppers may also benefit from cheaper clothing, shoes, and food products due to reduced tariffs on imported Indian goods. Britain already imports £11 billion worth of goods from India. With this agreement now in place, businesses across Northern Ireland are expected to enjoy easier and cheaper access to critical components and materials, particularly in areas like consumer goods and manufacturing. See More: Britain, India, Jonathan Reynolds, Northern Ireland, Trade

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store