Jagan silent on ‘voter theft' due to BJP ties: Gidugu Rurdra Raju
Mr. Rudra Raju who was visiting North Andhra to attend a few marriages while speaking to the media praised Rahul Gandhi's relentless fight against the discrepancies in voters lists in Karnataka, Maharashtra and Haryana. He said: 'If Mr. Jagan is really a victim of manipulations of Electronic Voting Machines (EVM) manipulation during the 2024 general elections , he should fight back and not become a puppet in the hands of BJP high command. The Congress will give a befitting reply if anyone makes remarks against its leaders.'
He welcomed the Supreme Court's directive to the Election Commission of India (ECI) regarding Bihar's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter's list. 'The ECI's unilateral cancellation of voting right for 65 lakh people was exposed with the Supreme Court's order. It has boosted the morale of all the opposition parties of the INDIA Bloc. Rahul Gandh's 'Vote Adhikar Yatra' in Bihar will deter election authorities from colluding with the ruling BJP and NDA partners hereafter,' Mr. Rudra Raju added.
Mr. Rudra Raju who has been newly elected Observer for Himachal Pradesh, said that the Congress Party's momentum is growing nationwide and it began with Rahul Gandhi's fight against the Narendra Modi government misrule and alleged misuse of Constitutional institutions like CBI, ED, ECI and others.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
3 minutes ago
- Hans India
SC trashes plea challenging 2024 Maharastra polls
The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a petition challenging the 2024 Maharashtra Assembly elections on grounds of alleged irregularities in votes cast after 6 p.m.. A bench of Justices M.M. Sundresh and N. Kotiswar Singh refused to interfere with the decision of the Bombay High Court that had dismissed a writ petition claiming that nearly 76 lakh votes — 6.8 per cent of the total — were "illegally" cast after the official polling hours on November 20, 2024. In an order passed on June 25 this year, the Bombay HC had termed the writ petition —which relied on an RTI response obtained by activist Venkatesh Nayak stating that the Election Commission of India (ECI) did not have records of post-6 p.m. votes — a "gross abuse of the process of law". A bench of Justices G.S. Kulkarni and Arif S. Doctor had observed that petitioner Chetan Chandrakant Ahire, a voter from Mumbai's Vikhroli constituency, had no locus standi to challenge elections across all the constituencies in Maharashtra. "It is a relief, too far-fetched, that too on the basis of no cause of action as the facts clearly demonstrate," stated the Justice Kulkarni-led Bench in its judgement. It further disapproved the reliance on newspaper articles and third-party RTI applications, saying: "We are of the clear opinion that merely on political opinions or on unsubstantiated newspaper reports, a petition under Article 226 cannot at all be maintained." It added that "there is no other material whatsoever, much less of any authenticity, to the effect that there was any malpractice, fraud or complaint of any nature in regard to the voting at the closing hours of the poll, i.e. at about 6 p.m." The Bombay High Court had also rejected the prayer to revert to paper ballots, citing the Supreme Court rulings upholding the use of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs). "We have no manner of doubt that this writ petition needs to be summarily rejected. It is accordingly rejected. The hearing of this petition has practically taken the whole day, leaving aside our urgent cause list, and for such reason the petition would certainly warrant dismissal with cost, however, we refrain from doing so," the Justice Kulkarni-led Bench had observed.


Indian Express
3 minutes ago
- Indian Express
BJP wields its Tamil card, calls V-P nomination for C P Radhakrishnan ‘a moment of pride' for state
WITH the DMK riding on Dravidian politics to take on the BJP, it was the latter's turn to score a point Monday, a day after the BJP announced C P Radhakrishnan as the NDA candidate for vice-president. BJP state chief Nainar Nagendran declared the nomination of the veteran Tamil leader for the post as 'a moment of Tamil pride', urging the ruling DMK to 'correct its historic blunder' of not supporting A P J Abdul Kalam for a second term as President. Union Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, who has reportedly been picked to be Radhakrishnan's campaign manager, is believed to have phoned Chief Minister M K Stalin seeking consensus behind the NDA pick. BJP ally AIADMK also pitched in for Radhakrishnan, lending the nomination its regional heft. AIADMK leader Edappadi K Palaniswami said all Tamil Nadu MPs should 'shed political differences' and support the NDA candidate. 'Since Radhakrishnan hails from Tamil Nadu, it is a good opportunity for the state,' he said in Tiruvannamalai. The DMK, however, rejected the BJP's outreach, accusing it of picking Radhakrishnan with an eye on the Tamil Nadu polls next year. Senior DMK leader T K S Elangovan said just projecting a person from Tamil Nadu did not make the BJP pro-Tamil Nadu, and reiterated the DMK-led state government's allegation of being denied funds by the Centre. In fact, as per DMK circles, a party MP, Tiruchi Siva, may be the INDIA bloc candidate for the post, setting up a head-to-head battle between two politicians from Tamil Nadu. DMK ally Congress said Tamil Nadu, where the BJP has been trying to make inroads, would not fall prey to the party's plans. State Congress president K Selvaperunthagai said Tamil Nadu would 'never accept the BJP, even if they nominate a person from here as President', calling its ideology divisive. The CPI(M), which is also a part of the INDIA bloc and an ally of the DMK in the state, said there was 'no question' of supporting Radhakrishnan. His election as vice-president 'would not bring even an iota of benefit to Tamil Nadu', the CPI(M) said.


Hindustan Times
3 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Firewalling the poll process from politics
An unusually combative press conference addressed by chief election commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar on Sunday underlined the trust deficit between the poll watchdog and the Opposition that can cast a shadow on the poll process. At the press conference, the first by CEC Kumar since he took over and the first since the controversial special intensive revision (SIR) drive in Bihar, the poll body termed the Opposition's allegations of 'vote theft' false and baseless, calling upon Congress leader Rahul Gandhi to provide proof of his claims or withdraw his remarks. Instead of resorting to examples involving mothers and daughters to grandstand on privacy, the poll body should consider issuing objective rebuttals of the allegations made, like it did when charges were made against electronic voting machines earlier. (ANI) As the custodian of the world's largest democracy, the Election Commission of India (ECI) has a right to defend itself and the sanctity of the poll process. And it is also true that some of the purported issues alleged with the voter roll — such as that of duplicate names or dodgy addresses — are legacy issues that lingered for decades and across multiple governments. But turning this exchange into a political showdown will serve neither ECI nor Indian democracy well. It should instead consider the principles of transparency and inclusiveness, upheld by the Supreme Court, which ordered ECI to publish details of all 6.5 million deletions from the rolls in Bihar and accept Aadhaar as a valid document in SIR despite the poll body's apparent reluctance. Instead of resorting to examples involving mothers and daughters to grandstand on privacy, the poll body should consider issuing objective rebuttals of the allegations made (like it did when charges were made against electronic voting machines earlier) and accept lacunae in the process if any exist. CEC Kumar has already conceded the risks of a hurried clean-up of voter rolls. ECI should now attempt to address lingering concerns over the poll process by exercising maximum transparency within the bounds of the law.