
M Venkaiah Naidu on the Emergency: That dark day
Fifty years ago, a state of Emergency was imposed for 21 months by the then Prime Minister, Indira Gandhi, shaking the nation to its very core. This act proved to be the gravest threat our democracy has faced since India overthrew the colonial yoke. The Emergency remains a singular inflection point marking a shift towards authoritarianism in our political system and a critical moment in the lives of political leaders, activists, and the people.
The disturbing crackdown on and imprisonment of Opposition leaders, the complete clamping down on civil liberties and curtailment of all fundamental rights, including the right to free speech and the right to assemble for peaceful protests, were unprecedented dictatorial measures. The clampdown on press freedom, including censorship, and attempts to curb the independence of the judiciary, among other grim developments, were pointers to a dangerous trend.
For today's generation, the Emergency, which shook the foundations of India's democratic structure 50 years ago, may seem like a distant chapter in history. Young people today must be educated about this dark phase that threatened to change the fundamental nature of Indian democracy.
Let us first understand the extreme conditions that can potentially force the President to declare a National Emergency. Under Article 352 of the Constitution, the President can declare a National Emergency, when the security of the country, or any part of it, is threatened by war, external aggression or armed rebellion. As we know, there were no such triggers in 1975.
The Nav Nirman student movement in Gujarat and the student agitation by the Bihar Chhatra Sangharsh Samiti (supported by the highly respected Gandhian socialist Jayaprakash Narayan, popularly known as JP), raised the level of popular anger against the ruling Congress, especially among the youth. As the anti-corruption movement snowballed into a massive countrywide campaign, JP called for 'total revolution' in June 1974.
JP urged students, peasants, and workers' unions to bring about non-violent change in Indian society, and his popularity began to grow with each passing day. As these protests were brewing, on June 12 1975, Justice Jagmohan Lal Sinha of the Allahabad High Court declared Prime Minister Indira Gandhi's election to the Lok Sabha invalid on account of electoral malpractices. With this landmark judgment, the court unseated Mrs Gandhi from the Lok Sabha and banned her from contesting elections for an additional six years.
Mrs Gandhi went to the Supreme Court in appeal. On June 24, the Supreme Court stated that Mrs Gandhi could continue as Prime Minister pending the resolution of her appeal, but barred her from voting in parliamentary proceedings. Desperate to cling to her position, Mrs Gandhi took the unprecedented step of imposing a state of Emergency through a proclamation issued by President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed on June 25 under Article 352 (1) of the Constitution of India, citing prevailing 'internal disturbance.'
The government suspended fundamental civil liberties, including free speech, freedom of the press, and habeas corpus. Censorship was swiftly imposed, and media outlets critical of the regime were forcibly shut down. In a particularly shocking move, power supply to newspaper offices was abruptly cut off, silencing dissent overnight. Opposition stalwarts like Jayaprakash Narayan, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, Lal Krishna Advani, Morarji Desai, George Fernandes, Jyotirmoy Basu, Charan Singh, J B Kripalani and many others, were detained.
Exercising unbridled power, Mrs Gandhi used the 42nd Amendment to extend the terms of the Lok Sabha and state legislative assemblies from five to six years. The original five-year term was later reinstated by the 44th Amendment.
The government employed harsh preventive detention provisions nationwide to suppress dissent. Opposition leaders were detained across the country, and activists and students were held for an indefinite period. I was a young student leader at the time, and was arrested and kept in detention for nearly a year and a half in the erstwhile undivided Andhra Pradesh. Some of the prominent Opposition leaders in AP, such as Tenneti Viswanadham and Gouthu Latchanna, among others, were jailed.
Looking back, I see the seventeen-and-a-half-month period of my incarceration as a turning point in my journey. Had I not been jailed during this time for my student activism, I would probably have become a lawyer to fulfil my mother's wishes. The Emergency changed the course of my life and career in one stroke.
Organic protests by Opposition parties and students erupted against the Emergency, building up a powerful movement of resistance. The media, to a large extent, buckled and came in for severe criticism. Notable exceptions were The Indian Express under the fiery Ramnath Goenka, The Statesman headed by C R Irani and Nikhil Chakravarty's The Mainstream. L K Advani's famous words to journalists after the Emergency had been lifted come to mind: 'You were asked only to bend, yet you crawled.'
The historic general elections of 1977 constituted a watershed moment because they brought about a major transition reflecting the will of the people. The Janata Party's triumph brought an end to the Emergency and was a victory for democratic ideals, reaffirming the supremacy of the ballot. It underscored the power of democratic participation as a peaceful and effective means of achieving change — in this case, by overthrowing a powerful dictatorial regime. This is perhaps the most glowing example of the power of the ballot in our recent history.
The lessons we learnt from this dark era must be passed on to India's younger generation. They must be firm in standing up to safeguard democratic principles, protect civil liberties, and ensure a foolproof system of checks and balances. Let us not forget that the role of the judiciary and media freedom also came under the lens during this draconian phase. The Emergency reminded us that 'eternal vigilance is the price of liberty'.
The writer is former Vice President of India
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
18 minutes ago
- The Hindu
‘Undeclared Emergency@11': Congress says democracy under ‘five-fold assault' under Modi government
In a scathing attack on the Modi government, the Congress on Wednesday (June 25, 2025) alleged that over the past eleven years, Indian democracy has been under a "systematic and dangerous" five-fold assault that can be best described as "Undeclared Emergency@11". With the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in an all-out attack mode on the Congress on the 50th anniversary of the imposition of the Emergency by then Indira Gandhi government, the Congress launched a counter-offensive and alleged that the government was weakening Parliament and eroding the autonomy of Constitutional bodies. The Opposition party also claimed that there has been "unbridled hate speech and crackdown on civil liberties." In a statement, Congress general secretary in-charge communications Jairam Ramesh alleged that government critics have been routinely vilified, hate and bigotry is deliberately spread by the ruling establishment, protesting farmers were labelled "Khalistanis", and advocates of caste census were dismissed as "urban Naxals." "The killers of Mahatma Gandhi are glorified. Minorities live in fear of their lives and property. Dalits and other marginalised groups have been disproportionately targeted and Ministers making hate speeches have been rewarded with promotions," he claimed. Congress distances itself from Tharoor's comments on Modi His remarks came on a day when the government is marking 'Samvidhan Hatya Diwas' on the anniversary of imposition of Emergency. In his statement, Ramesh said, "Over the past eleven years and thirty days, Indian democracy has been under a systematic and dangerous five-fold assault that can be best described as Undeclared Emergency@11." Besides "unbridled hate speech and crackdown on civil liberties", he also cited alleged "attacks on the Constitution, tax terrorism and intimidation of businesses and institutions, control over the media and misuse of investigative agencies", to claim that an "undeclared emergency" was in place. Claiming that attacks were being launched on the Constitution, Ramesh claimed that during the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, the prime minister sought a '400 Paar' mandate for a new Constitution and to betray Babasaheb Ambedkar's legacy. Congress condemns atrocity against Dalit men in Odisha, seeks action against cow vigilantes "The people of India denied him that mandate. They voted for preserving, protecting, and further promoting economic, social, and political justice enshrined in the existing Constitution," the Congress general secretary said. He also alleged that the Modi government was 'weakening Parliament' and has consistently shredded Parliamentary norms. 'MPs have been arbitrarily suspended merely for raising issues of public concern and the government has refused to discuss critical national issues,' he said. "Key legislations are bulldozed through. Parliamentary committees have been by-passed," he added. Mr. Ramesh also accused the government of "eroding autonomy of Constitutional bodies". "The CAG has become irrelevant. The Election Commission's integrity has been severely compromised. Serious questions about the integrity of the assembly elections in some States have been ignored. Poll timings and phases are tailored to benefit the ruling party. The Commission has remained silent in the face of divisive rhetoric from the Prime Minister and senior BJP leaders," he alleged. The Congress leader further alleged that Centre-State relations have been destroyed and the BJP has used money power to engineer the fall of Opposition-led State Governments, frequently buying over legislators. "The office of the Governor has been misused to block bills in Opposition-ruled States and to interfere in university appointments. The Centre has bypassed constitutional fiscal arrangements by overusing cesses to deprive States of their rightful revenue share," he said. Mr. Ramesh also accused the government of "damaging judiciary" and said there has been a definite policy of quiet threats to the judiciary, primarily through delayed elevations, punitive transfers, post-retirement sinecures for pliant judges, and selective implementation of collegium recommendations. Alleging tax terrorism and intimidation of businesses and institutions, Mr. Ramesh said the fear of regulatory retaliation has had a chilling effect on previously outspoken business leaders. "Investigative agencies have been weaponised to patronise a favourite business group. Major assets, including airports, ports, cement plants, and even media houses, have been handed over to this group," Mr. Ramesh alleged. 'He also claimed that prominent educational institutions have faced arbitrary tax demands. Around 20,000 independent civil society voices have been silenced,' he claimed. Mr. Ramesh further claimed that the media has come under unprecedented pressure with journalists and news outlets critical of the government facing intimidation, arrests, and raids. "Owners are pressured to hire government-friendly journalists, and government advertising and permits are used as tools to control editorial content. Taxpayer-funded State broadcasters have been reduced to trolling the Opposition and pushing divisive narratives," he said in his statement. Listen to your conscience, Congress tells its leaders picked by government for all-party delegations 'The Right to Information, a powerful tool in the hands of the powerless, has been neutered,' Mr. Ramesh alleged. Alleging rampant misuse of investigative agencies, Mr. Ramesh claimed that institutions such as the Enforcement Directorate, the CBI and the Income Tax Department have been deployed to harass and defame leaders of various Opposition parties. 'Investigative agencies were used to facilitate the illegal collection of ₹8,000 crore in Electoral Bonds for the BJP,' he said. Those who switch parties and join the BJP automatically become ED-mukt and CBI-mukt,' Mr. Ramesh claimed.


Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
Telangana HC sets 3-month deadline for conducting panchayat elections; directs state to furnish voters within a month
HYDERABAD: Justice T Madhavi Devi of the Telangana high court on Tuesday directed the state election commission (SEC) to conduct polls for panchayats in the state within three months from now. The judge also directed the state to furnish to the SEC the list of voters, duly classified into SC, ST, BC, General, men and women etc categories within one month from now. This would enable the SEC to commence the election process. The judge pronounced this order after hearing a batch of petitions filed by sarpanches of various gram panchayats in the state seeking timely conduct of elections to the gram panchayats in tune with the mandate of the Constitution. The term of the sarpanches was over in January 2024. The sarpanches were opposing any rule by special officers. They were urging the court to direct the state to either conduct the polls or to continue them till the elections are conducted. Justice T Madhavi Devi, turned critical towards the state for not furnishing the required information to the SEC for the last one and half years. Additional advocate general Imran Khan sought 25 days. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo Senior counsel G Vidya Sagar appeared for the state election commission and said they need two months from the time the state furnishes them the details of voters, etc. Taking both these requests into consideration, the judge has set a 3-month deadline for completing the poll process for panchayats in the state. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad Gummalla Bhaskar Reddy, the counsel for the petitioners, said that the term of the current sarpanches was over on January 31, 2024. Though the state is under a constitutional obligation to conduct polls within six months, this was not done so far. The non-conduct of poll is violative of Articles 243E and 243K of the Constitution of India, besides being contrary to the provisions of the Telangana Panchayat Raj Act, 2018, he said.


News18
23 minutes ago
- News18
Pakistan Army Major Who Claimed Abhinandan Varthaman's Capture Killed In Encounter With TTP
Major Syed Moiz Abbas Shah had shot to limelight in 2019 after claiming credit for the capture of IAF Group Captain Abhinandan Varthaman during an aerial dogfight Major Moiz Abbas Shah, the Pakistani officer who had claimed to have captured Indian Air Force Group Captain Abhinandan Varthaman in 2019, was killed on Tuesday in a major assault by the terrorist group Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). The attacks on the Pakistani Army in South Waziristan's Sargodha and Kurram areas come at a time when Pakistan is facing growing unrest with terrorists in its own territory, despite its history of supporting terror groups. According to sources, the TTP's attacks resulted in the deaths of 14 Pakistani personnel, including Major Shah. Meanwhile, some pro-Pakistan social media accounts have claimed that six personnel, including Shah, were killed in the Sargodha clash. According to a report by Dawn, the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) stated that Pakistani security forces carried out an intelligence-based operation (IBO) on June 24, 2025, in Sararogha following reports of the presence of militants. The statement claimed that during the operation, troops targeted the militant hideout, killing 11 individuals and injuring seven others. The ISPR confirmed that Major Syed Moiz Abbas Shah, 37, from Chakwal, and Lance Naik Jibran Ullah, 27, from Bannu, were killed in the exchange of fire. Major Moiz, who was leading the mission, was praised for his bravery and his role in multiple operations against the group. The statement added that clearance operations were ongoing to eliminate any remaining militants in the area. The Dawn reported that in July 2024, the Pakistani government officially labeled the outlawed Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) as Fitna-al-Khawarij Khariji —a term meaning outcast. What Brought Major Syed Moiz Abbas Shah To Limelight In 2019 Major Syed Moiz Abbas Shah rose to attention in 2019 after claiming credit for capturing Indian Air Force pilot Group Captain Abhinandan Varthaman during an aerial dogfight following Indian strikes on terror bases in Balakot. The capture followed a fierce aerial clash on February 27, during which Varthaman's MiG-21 Bison was shot down after he brought down a Pakistani F-16. He was later returned to India by Pakistan on the night of March 1, 2019. The dogfight occurred a day after Indian Air Force jets carried out an airstrike on a Jaish-e-Mohammed training facility in Balakot. The strike came in response to the Pulwama terror attack that killed 40 Indian paramilitary personnel. On February 27, Pakistan launched a counteroffensive, attempting to strike Indian military installations in response to the Balakot airstrike. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! First Published: