Appeal court overturns finding that State breached rights of homeless asylum seekers
The appeal court said the Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission (IHREC) had not proved that the situation of extreme material poverty for homeless asylum seekers undermined the physical and/or mental health of the members of that class of persons or put them in a state of degradation incompatible with human dignity.
Advertisement
Mr Justice Anthony Collins, on behalf of the three-judge Court of Appeal (CoA), allowed an appeal brought by the State over the High Court decision. He dismissed IHREC's application for judicial review.
State-funded IHREC issued its challenge in December of 2023 after the Government announced for the second time that it could not accommodate all single adult male arrivals amid 'unprecedented pressure' on services.
At that point, 259 adult male applicants were awaiting an offer of accommodation. This figure had risen to 2,987, according to Department of Integration figures.
IHREC argued the number of unaccommodated applicants has continued to rise, and the situation continued to be a humanitarian emergency.
Advertisement
The Minister for Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth, and the State said the situation for newly-arrived male asylum seekers had 'improved considerably' in the preceding months, with the State's International Protection Accommodation Services able to offer accommodation to everyone who was 'actively rough sleeping'.
In August 2024, the High Court ruled that the State's response to the needs of unaccommodated asylum seekers was 'inadequate' to the point of breaching the men's right to human dignity as set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU.
Mr Justice Collins, on Wednesday, found IHREC had an express statutory entitlement to commence proceedings for the purpose of obtaining the relief it sought.
He said in order to succeed in these proceedings, IHREC must prove, on the balance of probabilities, that a class consisting of those applicants who presented to the International Protection Office between December 4th, 2023 and May 10th, 2024, and who did not receive an offer of accommodation, were in a situation of extreme material poverty.
Advertisement
It must also prove this prevented them meeting their most basic needs and which situation undermined their physical and/or mental health or put them in a state of degradation incompatible with human dignity.
The court was prepared to infer that the members of that class of persons were thereby placed in a situation of extreme material poverty.
However, he said IHREC had not proved that that situation of extreme material poverty undermined the physical and/or mental health of the members of that class of persons or put the members of that class in a state of degradation incompatible with human dignity.
In relation to costs, he said bona fide proceedings instituted by a body funded by the public purse against the body which is funded from the same source are "a necessary, if infrequent, feature of the operation of the rule of law.
Advertisement
An order to award the costs of this appeal to either party could only increase the level of resources expended upon the legitimate purpose of resolving the issues at stake in this litigation, he said.
Accordingly, he proposed he would neither disturb the High Court costs order nor make any order as to the costs of this appeal, unless either party seeks a different order.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Ukraine war briefing: Zelenskyy rallies Europe allies before Trump-Putin meeting
Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Europe must participate in the peace process between his country and Russia after a call with the German chancellor, Friedrich Merz, on Thursday. The Ukrainian president embarked on a lightning round of calls with European leaders ahead of a meeting between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin expected soon. As the Kremlin refused a three-way meeting with Zelenskyy and Trump, Zelenskyy said: 'Ukraine is not afraid of meetings and expects the same brave approach from the Russian side.' The European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, said she had spoken with Zelenskyy about the developments of the past days and 'next steps on the way towards a negotiated peace agreement and Ukraine's future membership in the European Union as well as its reconstruction'. The French president, Emmanuel Macron, reaffirmed France's full support for a ceasefire in Ukraine and the launch of talks aimed at reaching a lasting and solid peace, after a 'long discussion' with Zelenskyy and other European leaders. 'I reiterated to the Ukrainian president France's full support for establishing a ceasefire and launching discussions toward a solid and lasting solution that preserves Ukraine's legitimate rights and guarantees its security and that of Europeans.' Zelenskyy said he had discussed a new International Monetary Fund financial assistance programme for Ukraine with the IMF's managing director, Kristalina Georgieva. 'We are prepared to carry out the necessary steps quickly. The government is already working on this.' Ukraine's current $15.5bn programme with the IMF expires in 2027. Russian drone strikes injured three women in the Bucha district of Kyiv oblast and houses caught on fire, officials said early on Friday. Kharkiv was hit by Shahed drones, causing fires; while on Thursday eight injuries were reported from Russian shelling in Donetsk oblast. The director of Russia's notorious Taganrog prison, where officials are accused of overseeing the systematic torture and starvation of hundreds of Ukrainian detainees, has been notified by authorities in Kyiv that he is suspected of having committed a war crime, write Shaun Walker and Andrew Roth. Aleksandr Shtoda, head of the Sizo 2 pre-trial detention centre in Taganrog, has been formally placed under investigation. A Russian state-owned explosives manufacturer got around sanctions by buying equipment made by Germany's Siemens through a middleman who imports technology from China, Reuters has reported based on customs data and state procurement records. The equipment was for the recently expanded Biysk Oleum Factory (BOZ) in southern Siberia, which makes the explosives TNT and HMX and is listed as a supplier to the Russian defence ministry. Reuters said it found no evidence Siemens knowingly supplied BOZ. A Siemens spokesperson said it strictly complied with international sanctions and demanded the same from its customers, but some goods could reach Russia without it knowing. It would report any sanctions contraventions to the authorities. Questions sent to BOZ and its parent company went unanswered, said Reuters. Russia does not produce much of its own automated machine tooling – and Konrad Muzyka, director of the Rochan military consultancy in Poland, said continued delivery of western-made machines was helping Russia prolong the war. 'Without them, Russia's capacity to sustain or scale its war effort would be more time consuming, expensive and place a bigger burden on the labour market.'
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Plan to reintroduce banned pesticide in France overruled by constitutional council
France's top constitutional authority has ruled against the reintroduction of a pesticide that is harmful to ecosystems, saying it is unconstitutional. The decision on Thursday night deals a blow to the government. It comes after weeks of opposition from the left, environmentalists and doctors, and a record-breaking 2m signatures on a petition against a bill that would have allowed a pesticide banned in France in 2020 to come back into use. The 'Duplomb law' – named after the conservative lawmaker Laurent Duplomb who proposed it – had been presented in parliament as a bid to free up French farmers, who have repeatedly expressed frustration over bureaucratic constraints on the agricultural sector, unfair foreign competition, and what they called stringent regulations, including on pesticides. But in a rebuke of the government on Thursday night, the constitutional council found that the law's provision to reintroduce acetamiprid – a chemical known to be toxic to pollinators such as bees – did not abide by France's environmental charter, which guarantees the 'right to live in a balanced and healthy environment'. The constitutional authority also raised questions over provisions for water reservoirs in the bill. The president, Emmanuel Macron, had 'taken good note of the decision', his office said on Thursday night, and was expected to swiftly validate the bill without these contested sections. The Green leader, Marine Tondelier, said she was 'very relieved' by the verdict. The Socialist party said the verdict was a rebuke to the 'irresponsibility of the prime minister, François Bayrou, and his government'. The insecticide in question was particularly sought after by beet and hazelnut growers, who said they had no alternative against pests and faced unfair competition. Some growers also argued that acetamiprid, allowed in other EU countries, was vital to fight virus yellows, which cut yields by 30% in 2020 and slashed sugar output. The petition on the website of France's lower-house National Assembly called the measure a 'frontal attack on public health'. Beekeepers have described the chemical as 'a bee killer', and its effects on humans are also a source of concern, though its risk remains unclear in the absence of large-scale studies. Sign up to Down to Earth The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential after newsletter promotion The student-led petition against the bill garnered more than 2m signatures after lawmakers adopted its reintroduction on 8 July, when it was rushed through a deeply divided lower house of parliament without a proper debate. Agence France-Presse contributed to this report
Sky News
4 hours ago
- Sky News
Rushanara Ali: Humiliating demise for Labour minister after a most egregious case of double standards
Rushanara Ali's swift and humiliating demise is a classic example of paying the price for the politician's crime of "do as I say, not as I do". She was Labour's minister for homelessness, for goodness' sake, yet she ejected tenants from her near-£1m town house and then hiked the rent. A more egregious case of ministerial double standards it would be difficult to imagine. She had to go and was no doubt told by 10 Downing Street to go quickly. 'A heavy heart' - really? MP for the East End constituency of Bethnal Green and Stepney, Ms Ali was the very model of a modern Labour minister: A degree in PPE from Oxford University. In her resignation letter to Sir Keir Starmer, she said she is quitting "with a heavy heart". Really? She presumably didn't have a heavy heart when she ejected her four tenants. She'd previously spoken out against "private renters being exploited" and said her government would "empower people to challenge unreasonable rent increases". The now former minister was charging her four former tenants £3,300 a month. Yet after they moved out, she charged her new tenants £4,000 - a rent increase of more than 20%. A fragile constituency for Labour? In an area represented by the left-wing firebrand George Galloway from 2005 to 2010, Ms Ali had a majority of under 1,700 at the election last year. Ominously for Labour, an independent candidate was second and the Greens third. No doubt Jeremy Corbyn's new party will also stand next time. In her resignation letter to the PM, Ms Ali said continuing in her ministerial role would be a distraction. Too right.
