Vivo VR Headset Takes Inspiration From Apple Vision Pro
Apple's Vision Pro has famously not been as big a hit as Apple initially hoped, but that has not stopped rivals including Vivo from taking cues from Apple's headset.
China's Vivo has just announced its Vision headset, which has several elements in common with the Vision Pro, announced in June 2023.
It shares the Vision Pro's dark-but-shiny front panel, its cable-tethered battery pack, similar use of colour and a corrugated look to the rear head strap design. To those familiar with VR headsets, the likeness is unmistakeable.
There are some signs the Vivo Vision may bear some of improvements made possible by arriving two years later, though. The main body of the headset appears a little less bulky than Apple's, and there's no sign of a front-mounted screen. That was one of the less well-received elements of Apple's headset.
Vivo's unveiling of the Vision headset served as just that, though, an unveiling. It has not yet announced technical specs for the device, like its processor, screen panel tech or resolution.
A pair of downward-facing cameras suggest the headset may use advanced hand tracking gestures, though, as seen in Apple's Vision Pro. The use of an external battery pack also implies it will have its own fairly powerful processor and baked-in interface. A headset that needs to be plugged in at all times might as well be plugged in for power too.
Vivo is expected to give the headset a full introduction in mid-2025.
In its statement, Vivo suggested the mixed reality headset will be positioned as both a consumer device and to develop 'the "brain" and "eyes" of robots.'
The headset was announced as part of a Boao Forum event, held in Hainan.
It's easy to underestimate the importance of Vivo from a western perspective. According to Counterpoint Research data for Q4 2024, Vivo commands 8% of global market share for smartphones, positioning it behind only Apple, Samsung and Xiaomi.
Vivo is part of BBK Electronics, the umbrella company that owns OPPO, OnePlus, Realme and IQOO.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
24 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
There's only one thing I want from the AirPods Pro 3 — and it's not a heart rate monitor
The AirPods Pro 2 are old now. They're certainly the oldest of the "big buds," with more years on the clock than both the Sony WF-1000XM5 and the Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds. And no, the USB-C update does not count as a new pair of buds. So now we're expecting the new AirPods Pro 3. There are signs pointing to an imminent release for Apple's next entrant into the best earbuds category, pegged for this year's September Apple event. We've even got a picture of what kind of features to expect from the buds, from a built-in heart rate monitor to live translation. But there's only one thing I care about when it comes to Apple's next pair of earbuds, and it's none of those. It's the sound. Unfortunately, a sonic upgrade isn't a given. I should start by reminding myself that the AirPods Pro 2 don't sound bad. Far from it, in fact — they sound quite good. Apple always opts for a more detailed and neutral sound profile than its closest rivals, and it's earned them some extra brownie points amongst audio fans. Unfortunately, the competition has moved on and built even better sound into their buds. When you compare the AirPods Pro 2 to the earbuds of their day, such as the WF-1000XM4, they stack up well. Against more recent options, they fall over. There's a wider soundstage and more clarity to Sony's XM5 in-ears, and more bass depth in the QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds. Upstarts have arrived too, which prove you don't have to spend loads to get epic sound. Take the $299 Noble Fokus Amadeus and their incredible, audiophile sound that completely smokes the AirPods, for example. Apple is good at sound. The AirPods Max sound very good to this day, and the HomePod 2 is a great-sounding smart speaker. So I'd really like to see some sonic updates come to the firm's earbuds. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Greater detail in the top end is the order of the day. I want the cymbals to ring out and each pluck of a guitar string to be crystal clear. I'd like to be able to hear the nuances of my favorite classical tracks, like when the conductor shuffles their papers. The bits of audio that Sony and Bose struggle with, and what the AirPods Max do pretty well. I'd also like more bass depth, and a wider soundstage beyond Spatial Audio in Apple Music. More impact on drum beats and bass notes, so that you can really get involved in your music. Spatial imaging improvements so that I can place the instruments better in the mix, while providing greater immersion. I know Apple has it in it, but there is part of me that's slightly concerned I'm not going to get what I want. Let me tell you why. It's no great secret that I'm not the biggest fan of the AirPods 4. They weren't the upgrade I was hoping for in the audio department, instead sounding vastly the same as the AirPods 3 that came before them. Instead of an upgrade to the sound, we got worse battery life, Spatial Audio and a version with noise canceling. There is a small part of me that's worried the AirPods Pro 3 will suffer a similar sonic fate. I'm worried that the AirPods Pro 3 will sound the same as the AirPods Pro 2, and that concerns me for the future of sound quality in Apple gear altogether. I was really hoping that "improvements to audio quality" would be a given. That I could count on sound improving steadily throughout a line's lifetime, without worrying about feature creep getting in the way. The AirPods 4, unfortunately, have proved me wrong. There are, apparently, loads of features we've got to look forward to in the upcoming AirPods Pro 3. There are potential upgrades to some of the buds' health features, like hearing health, to make them even better for those who are hard of hearing. There are other health measuring sensors coming as well, with rumors pointing towards the heart rate monitor in the Beats PowerBeats Pro 2 as evidence. There might even be a body temperature sensor for even more health metrics. There are rumblings about AI features as well, including some form of live translation. Duolingo, eat your feathered heart out — I don't need to learn Spanish anymore, my buds do it for me. But that raises further concerns. As more and more "things" get packed into what are already incredibly small devices, something has to take a back seat — and as we've seen with the AirPods 4, those things tend to be audio quality and battery life. Battery life, I can just about get over, but the sound? No, I need that to be good. As audio devices first and foremost, earbuds should sound good. That, in my mind, should be where the attention goes. Making sure that the music my buds play sounds incredible, so that I can enjoy my music on the go. But it occurs to me that Apple might not agree. The AirPods are an extension of an ecosystem of devices, which need to be good at lots of things so that the ecosystem can thrive. Sound might not be a priority anymore, as earbuds become more ingrained in health and fitness. To me, that feels like a shame — and it worries me for the future of the earbuds category. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Forbes
26 minutes ago
- Forbes
Apple Encryption Fight—U.S. Forces U.K. To Drop ‘Back Door'
This could be the biggest Apple update of 2025, surpassing anything that comes from the release of iOS 26 and even iPhone 17. It seems that rumors the U.S. has forced the U.K. to end its demand for Apple to compromise its own encryption are real. 'Over the past few months,' Tulsi Gabbard posted on X, I've been working closely with our partners in the UK, alongside @POTUS and @VP, to ensure Americans' private data remains private and our Constitutional rights and civil liberties are protected." 'As a result,' America's Director of National Intelligence confirmed late on Monday, 'the UK has agreed to drop its mandate for Apple to provide a 'back door' that would have enabled access to the protected encrypted data of American citizens and encroached on our civil liberties.' If this pans out, it ends the saga of the secret / not secret furor over a National Security directive placed on Apple by the U.K. government to provide access to fully encrypted iCloud data. That resulted in the iPhone-mazker dropped its most secure encryption in the U.K. for new users and a widespread backlash amongst the privacy lobby. This comes as the other privacy furor of 2025 — age verification for online content — has resulted in a raft of complaints about the implications on a free and open internet. But the encryption back door is much more serious. There's no such thing as selective compromises when it comes to encryption. Any back door of any sort can be exploited by bad actors, and Apple has been right to dig its heels in. It has been joined by Meta and others in the fight to keep privacy data private. This is a breaking story and we await confirmation and further details.
CNBC
30 minutes ago
- CNBC
CCTV Script 14/08/2025
In recent years, technology has been a major global investment hotspot. Wall Street investment banks have been researching and forecasting specific areas within this field. For example, a Morgan Stanley report this year predicts that the global humanoid robot market could reach $5 trillion by 2050. This projection includes the industry's related supply chain, as well as maintenance, repair, and support services. Morgan Stanley estimates that by 2050, there could be over 1 billion humanoid robots in use worldwide. In terms of usage scenarios, Morgan Stanley expects that by 2050, about 90% of humanoid robots will primarily serve industrial and commercial sectors, performing repetitive, simple, and structured tasks. Among these, China is projected to become the country with the highest number of humanoid robots in use, exceeding 300 million units, while the U.S. is expected to have around 77.7 million units. In contrast, Morgan Stanley's forecast for the household market is more conservative, estimating that the total number of humanoid robots entering homes by 2050 will be around 80 million. Analysis points out that for humanoid robots to truly enter households, breakthroughs in both hardware and AI models are needed, a process that may take around a decade. Additionally, prices must drop significantly, and societal and regulatory acceptance must also improve. Another critical aspect in the tech sector is the ongoing fierce competition in the AI race. Overnight, Bloomberg cited sources familiar with the matter, reporting that Apple is planning to re-energize its efforts in the AI space, with a slate of new products in the pipeline. It is reported that a desktop robot, designed to serve as a virtual companion, is considered the centerpiece of Apple's AI strategy, with a target launch in 2027. Additionally, a smart speaker with a display is expected to debut next year, aiming to capture the entry-level smart home market. Finally, Apple may also focus on home security cameras, hoping to enhance user engagement within its product ecosystem. Following the news, Apple's stock price rose, closing up 1.6% overnight. Apple isn't alone—several global tech giants continue to heavily invest in artificial intelligence. Recently, Microsoft announced a record-breaking capital expenditure of $24.2 billion in its quarterly earnings report, a 27% year-on-year increase. Microsoft also plans to further increase its investment to $30 billion this quarter to expand its AI data centers. Additionally, Meta (Facebook's parent company) and Alphabet (Google's parent company) have recently raised their capital expenditure targets for the year. However, the market is now beginning to focus on a significant risk: the issue of concentration. Funds are increasingly being concentrated in the hands of a few tech giants. Analysis points out that among the top 10 stocks in the S&P 500 index, most are tech stocks, accounting for 40% of the total market capitalization and contributing 33% of the profits. "When we think about portfolio construction. We want to make sure that we have a diversified concentration is scary, and it's all around AI..."
