
From solidarity to strategy: Richard Marles' visit to India elevates India–Australia strategic ties amid Indo-Pacific uncertainty
Dr. Ashok Sharma is a Visiting Fellow at the University of New South Wales Canberra at the Australian Defence Force Academy and is an Academic Fellow of the Australia-India Institute at the University of Melbourne. His recent roles include Visiting Fellow at the Australian National University in the Department of Strategic & Defence Studies within the Coral Bell School of Asia-Pacific Affairs, and Adjunct Associate Professor at the University of Canberra. There, he was the Head of the 'South Asia Strategic, State Fragile and Security Program' and Conjoint Head of the 'Indo-Pacific Strategic Issues and Major Powers Studies' at the National Asian Security Studies Centre. An alumnus of both Jawaharlal Nehru University and Delhi University, Dr. Sharma's academic journey includes Faculty, Fellow, and Honorary positions at the Australian National University, the University of Melbourne, the University of Auckland, and Victoria University of Wellington, as well as the University of Delhi. Notably, he served as the Deputy Chair of the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs, Auckland Branch, from February 2012 to June 2022. Dr. Sharma, one of the leading voices in the global affairs and security studies, is also the accomplished author of significant works including book titled India's Pursuit of Energy Security: Domestic Measures, Foreign Policy and Geopolitics and Indian Lobbying and its Influence in US Decision Making: Post-Cold War. LESS ... MORE
In the backdrop of the brutal Pahalgam terrorist attack and the growing instability across the Indo-Pacific, Australian Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles' June 2025 visit to India has emerged as a significant reaffirmation of India–Australia strategic ties. At a time when the region is grappling with escalating security threats and strategic ambiguities—particularly regarding the unpredictability of the United States' posture towards China—Marles' presence in New Delhi sent a strong and timely message. It underscored Australia's determination not only to deepen its engagement with India but also to jointly shoulder the responsibility of maintaining stability in the Indo-Pacific.
The timing of Marles' visit could not have been more politically and symbolically potent. Occurring just days after India conducted precision strikes in response to the Pahalgam attack, which claimed 26 lives, his presence was far from a routine diplomatic gesture. It was an act of solidarity. Marles met with Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, External Affairs Minister Dr S. Jaishankar, and later Prime Minister Narendra Modi. In all three meetings, he made it unequivocally clear that Australia stood firmly with India in its fight against terrorism, condemning the Pahalgam attack in the strongest terms. Crucially, he lauded India's calibrated response, acknowledging New Delhi's sovereign right to self-defence while commending its strategic restraint—a nuanced formulation that reflected both support and shared democratic values.
Defence Minister Singh welcomed Australia's strong show of support and reiterated that the India–Australia Comprehensive Strategic Partnership now constitutes one of the principal pillars of New Delhi's Indo-Pacific policy. Singh and Marles announced new initiatives to bolster bilateral defence-industrial cooperation, including a joint research programme on emerging defence technologies and enhanced collaboration between Indian and Australian small and medium-sized enterprises. This reflects a maturing relationship that has moved beyond symbolic military exercises and strategic dialogue into genuine co-development and capability-building. For India, striving to expand its indigenous defence manufacturing under the 'Make in India' programme, Australia's advanced defence-industrial base and innovation ecosystem provide both strategic synergy and long-term alignment.
Marles also participated in in-depth discussions on expanding maritime security cooperation. With both countries increasingly concerned about China's assertive activities across the South China Sea, Indian Ocean, and Pacific Islands, the maritime domain has naturally emerged as a focal point for collaboration. Australia's recent gifting of a patrol boat to the Maldives—viewed as a strategic response to growing Chinese influence in the Indian Ocean—resonates with India's SAGAR (Security and Growth for All in the Region) initiative. Marles' declaration that Australia seeks 'a free and open Indo-Pacific where no country is allowed to dominate by force or coercion' echoed India's own strategic lexicon, signalling a deeper convergence of geopolitical perspectives.
The broader regional environment lends further urgency to this strategic convergence. Although U.S. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth reiterated Washington's Indo-Pacific commitment at the recent Shangri-La Dialogue, lingering doubts about American reliability persist. The advent of a second Trump presidency has unsettled many regional allies. Trump's transactional view of alliances and erratic approach to China—swinging between combative trade measures and abrupt conciliatory overtures—have contributed to an atmosphere of strategic uncertainty. Against this backdrop, India and Australia appear to be recalibrating their strategic postures. The emphasis is now on building robust bilateral mechanisms that can endure shifts in US foreign policy. This does not imply a sidelining of the Quad—of which both countries are founding members—but rather a determination to ensure that Indo-Pacific stability is not solely dependent on US leadership.
This is a pragmatic recalibration. As the Indo-Pacific becomes a contested geopolitical arena, marked by economic rivalry, military build-up, and cyber threats, mid-level powers such as India and Australia have little choice but to assume greater responsibility for regional order. Marles' visit represents a deliberate move in this direction. His statement that 'India and Australia are now not just partners, but stakeholders in the region's security architecture' was far more than diplomatic nicety—it was a reflection of the shared conviction that the time has come for responsible regional powers to act proactively, not reactively.
Meanwhile, trade and economic ties continue to gather momentum. Ongoing negotiations on the Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA) aim to build on the Economic Cooperation and Trade Agreement (ECTA) signed in 2022. As global supply chains undergo strategic reconfiguration and nations seek to de-risk critical dependencies, the India–Australia economic corridor could emerge as a vital node in ensuring regional economic resilience. Additionally, both nations are cooperating on critical minerals—essential for clean energy transitions, semiconductors, and advanced defence systems. With Australia's rich mineral resources and India's burgeoning manufacturing sector, the complementarity is not only strategic but also timely.
The evolution of India–Australia relations over the past decade has been profound. What was once a cautious engagement based primarily on shared democratic values has transformed into a robust strategic partnership. Today, the two countries are at the forefront of regional security dialogues, conduct advanced military exercises such as AUSINDEX and AUSTRAHIND, and are operationalising logistics and refuelling agreements to enhance interoperability. Recent developments include joint naval patrols in the Indian Ocean, expanded information-sharing protocols, and collaboration on emerging defence technologies. The elevation of the 2+2 Ministerial Dialogue and the growing engagement between defence industries underscore this momentum. Marles' visit was not merely a continuation of these efforts—it marked an inflection point, a shift to a phase where diplomacy, defence, economics, and innovation converge under a unified strategic vision.
In an era defined by growing instability, terrorism, and shifting power dynamics, the actions of India and Australia are both bold and necessary. Together, they are crafting a reliable, rules-based, and inclusive Indo-Pacific order—anchored not in confrontation, but in cooperation, deterrence, and shared capacity-building. The June 2025 visit of Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles thus marks yet another decisive milestone—signalling the transformation of the India–Australia partnership into a linchpin of Indo-Pacific strategy and a vital counterweight to coercive geopolitical manoeuvres.
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer
Views expressed above are the author's own.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
Piyush Goyal to meet Swiss, Swedish business leaders; to discuss trade, investments
Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal will meet Swiss and Swedish business leaders this week and discuss ways to boost trade and investments, an official statement said on Sunday. Goyal is visiting Switzerland and Sweden from June 9 to 13. The visit is commencing from Bern in Switzerland, where the minister will engage with global CEOs and industry figures to explore avenues for enhanced bilateral trade and investment, the commerce and industry ministry said. He will hold discussions with companies from sectors, including pharma and life sciences, precision engineering, amid high-tech manufacturing. Goyal will also discuss potential opportunities arising from the India-EFTA Trade and Economic Partnership Agreement. In Sweden, he will co-chair the Indo-Swedish Joint Commission for Economic, Industrial and Scientific Cooperation (JCEISC) with Benjamin Dousa, Minister for Foreign Trade of Sweden. Companies like Ericsson, Volvo Group, IKEA, Sandvik, Alfa Laval , and SAAB are among those with a significant presence or interest in enhancing ties with India, it said.


News18
an hour ago
- News18
Indian Student Handcuffed, Pinned At US Airport: 'Treated Like A Criminal'
Last Updated: An Indian student was handcuffed and pinned at Newark Airport, as shared by Kunal Jain on X. The student was crying and treated like a criminal by authorities A video has been going viral on social media where an Indian student was handcuffed and pinned at a US airport. Kunal Jain, an Indo-American social entrepreneur, took to X (formerly Twitter) to share a photo of the Indian student who was being deported from Newark Airport last night. He said the student was crying and was treated like a criminal by the authorities, as he was handcuffed and pinned to the ground. I witnessed a young Indian student being deported from Newark Airport last night— handcuffed, crying, treated like a criminal. He came chasing dreams, not causing harm. As an NRI, I felt helpless and heartbroken. This is a human tragedy. @IndianEmbassyUS #immigrationraids — Kunal Jain (@SONOFINDIA) June 8, 2025 'As an NRI, I felt helpless and heartbroken. This is a human tragedy," Jain wrote on X. Jain, President of HealthBots AI, said that the student was speaking in the Haryanvi language. 'I could recognise his accent where he was saying 'I'm not insane, these people are trying to make me look insane'," he wrote. In the post, Jain said, 'These children get their visas and get on a flight in the morning. For some reason, they are unable to explain the reason for their visit to the immigration authorities and are sent back on the evening flight tied up like criminals. Every day 3-4 such cases are happening. There have been more such cases in the last few days." First Published: June 09, 2025, 18:00 IST


India Today
3 hours ago
- India Today
India asserts, Pak deflects: Tale of two narratives in Washington after Operation Sindoor
Two important missions in a week for India: while Indian astronaut Shubhanshu Shukla is set to fly on Axiom's private space mission on June 10, another Indian expedition has just wrapped up in Washington, DC — a strategic one rather than a scientific one. Over the past weeks, in the aftermath of Operation Sindoor, an all-party delegation of Indian lawmakers, diplomats, and strategic thinkers descended upon the capital of the United far too long, India's response to cross-border terrorism has been measured, calculated, and at times, at least from the West's perspective, conveniently easy to overlook. Not anymore. This time, India made it abundantly clear: terrorism will be named, sponsors will be exposed, and retaliation will not be cloaked in Indian delegation's meetings weren't symbolic tick-box diplomacy. They were substantive, high-level, and unapologetically pointed. From engagements with the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, the House Armed Services Committee, senior senators from both Democratic and Republican ranks, and US Vice President JD Vance, India's presence was heavy, and its messaging, unmistakably not plead India didn't come to plead for support. It came to assert its geopolitical standing. As the world's fourth-largest economy, a strategic partner in Indo-Pacific stability, and a responsible democracy, India arrived in Washington, DC, with a simple truth: while it exports coders, astronauts, and innovation, Pakistan, decade after decade, has exported only the National Press Club, where India's sharpest minds, including Dr Shashi Tharoor and Ambassador Taranjit Singh Sandhu, took the stage, the story was laid out with brutal clarity. Terror networks that operate under different banners, like Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed, often trace their roots back to Pakistani soil. These are not old accusations; they are well-documented facts. Osama bin Laden didn't appear in Abbottabad by accident. The killers of Wall Street Journal journalist Daniel Pearl didn't just disappear — they were sheltered. The 2008 Mumbai attacks, which killed six American citizens, were orchestrated by groups that still operate openly in Pakistan while India was building partnerships, Pakistan was attempting to mount a desperate diplomatic counteroffensive. A parallel delegation led by Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, the political heir to a dynasty that symbolises both Pakistan's tragedy and dysfunction, landed in DC with a familiar playbook: downplay, deflect, and deny. But the international reception this time was different: colder, more Congressman Brad Sherman, a senior member long involved in US-South Asia relations, used his meeting with Bhutto not to placate, but to publicly demand action against terror groups like Jaish-e-Mohammed, underlining how far Pakistan's credibility has Indian critics were quick to suggest that New Delhi's diplomatic push in the US was reactive, that it followed rather than led the narrative. They asked: Should India have preempted Pakistan's visit with an earlier engagement? Perhaps. But diplomacy is not theatre. It is momentum and memory, and come Thursday, India had seized a high-profile dinner hosted at Indian House, the symbolic epicentre of India's diplomatic presence in the US, the full weight of India's soft power was on display. Eighteen members of the US Congress, senior White House staff, and prominent members of the Western press, including Wolf Blitzer of CNN, gathered not for formality, but for frank dialogue. It was a show of respect. It was a signal of India's elevated status in the US policy just when the week seemed to be winding down, India pulled one more diplomatic lever. On Friday, the delegation met with Deputy Secretary of State Landau, one of US President Donald Trump's most seasoned players, who reaffirmed US support for India's counter-terror response. This wasn't a nod. It was strategic nations, two narrativesWhat played out in Washington was more than a series of bilateral meetings. It was a tale of two nations, heading in opposite a rising democratic power, reaching for the stars, sending astronauts aboard private missions, innovating in technology, and commanding a leadership role in global South politics. The other, a failing state, ruled by dynasts and generals, addicted to strategic blackmail, and clinging to the outdated weapon of showed up with moral authority, economic weight, and strategic vision. The other showed up with excuses, blame, and a fading last message in Washington was not just about Pakistan. It was also about India's evolving posture on the world stage. New Delhi is shifting toward strategic clarity that calls out state sponsors of terror, demands reciprocal partnerships, and refuses to play second fiddle in multilateral spaces. This transformation isn't just diplomatic. It's psychological. It's a declaration that India will define its red lines, enforce its deterrents, and no longer allow narrative capture, whether in Kashmir, Kabul, or the corridors of Capitol Shukla is preparing to float in zero gravity above Earth, India's diplomatic machinery was grounded, especially in purpose. This wasn't outreach. This was a projection. India, once described as a reluctant power, has stopped whispering. It is now speaking, and the world — especially the West — is finally listening. And Pakistan? It is running out of time, currency, and stories.(Rohit Sharma is an award-winning journalist residing in Washington DC)(Views expressed in this opinion piece are those of the author)Tune InTrending Reel