Erwin Tulfo: Duterte impeachment not a ‘teleserye,' vows fair judgment in senate trial
'This isn't a teleserye. We're talking about removing the second-highest official in the land from office, and possibly barring her from running again. That's not something we take lightly,' Tulfo told NewsWatch Plus in an interview.
The incoming senator, who placed fourth in the May 2025 elections, said his background in journalism will help him navigate the proceedings with fairness and objectivity.
'As journalists, we're trained to look at both sides. May nag-aakusa—what's your evidence? The defense—what do they have? You weigh the facts. Ganun din dapat dito,' he said.
Tulfo emphasized that any ruling should rely strictly on the merits of the case.
'Kung mali, then so be it. Bahala nang magalit ang iba. But if it lacks merit, then we dismiss it. Why waste time? The public will be watching us closely,' he added.
Tulfo's comments reflect a broader call from newly elected senators to uphold fairness and transparency. Senator Bong Go, who topped the senatorial race, said the trial must depend entirely on evidence: 'Kung walang ebidensya, eh 'di wala. Sayang lang 'yung oras kung ipipilit.'
Returning Senator Ping Lacson said the House must present strong and credible proof to persuade at least 16 senators to convict Duterte. 'We will be answerable to the Filipino people,' he said.
Other senators echoed similar sentiments. Senator Imee Marcos pledged to scrutinize the evidence thoroughly, while Duterte ally Senator Rodante Marcoleta claimed the case was flawed from the beginning.
The Senate trial is scheduled to begin on July 30.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Filipino Times
4 hours ago
- Filipino Times
Dela Rosa Sees No Need for Senate Debate on Supreme Court's Sara Duterte Ruling
Senator Ronald 'Bato' Dela Rosa expressed his belief that there is no longer a need for the Senate to debate the Supreme Court's decision to dismiss the impeachment case filed against Vice President Sara Duterte. The Senate is scheduled to vote on the High Court's ruling, but Dela Rosa said the matter has already been resolved by the judiciary. The Supreme Court, in a unanimous ruling, declared the impeachment case against the Vice President unconstitutional. The decision was based on the violation of the one-year ban on filing successive impeachment complaints. According to the Constitution, no impeachment proceeding shall be initiated against the same official more than once within a year. Although Dela Rosa is not a lawyer, he emphasized that he recognizes the Supreme Court's authority as the final interpreter of legal and constitutional issues. He said that while the three branches of government are equal, it is only the judiciary that is empowered to make final decisions on such matters. He added that no one is above the Supreme Court except God. Despite his personal stance, Dela Rosa said he will respect Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Escudero's call to allow debate on the floor. Escudero earlier asked senators to listen to arguments from both sides before making a final vote on whether to abide by the High Court's ruling. Dela Rosa, however, maintained that for him, the issue has already been settled by the country's highest court.
Filipino Times
5 hours ago
- Filipino Times
Villar Seeks Senate Probe on Skyrocketing, Predatory Domestic Airfare Rates
Senator Mark Villar has filed a Senate resolution calling for an investigation into what he described as 'predatory' and excessively high pricing of domestic airline tickets in the Philippines. The senator raised concerns following a spike in complaints from the public over the steep cost of air travel within the country. Villar cited cases where ticket prices have risen dramatically in recent years. For example, a Manila to Siargao one-way ticket that cost P3,000 in 2017 is now priced at around P18,000. He also pointed to a recent instance where a two-person flight from Tacloban to Manila was charged at a shocking P77,720. He said such prices make domestic travel inaccessible for ordinary Filipinos, particularly those who travel for work or to reunite with their families. The senator noted the disparity between local and international fares, with round-trip tickets to countries like Hong Kong, Singapore, and Japan ranging from P10,000 to P30,000—often cheaper than some domestic routes. Villar emphasized that these pricing issues affect not only mobility but also tourism, commerce, and social cohesion across the archipelago. As the principal author of the Magna Carta of Commuters, Villar underscored that the inquiry is part of his advocacy for affordable, inclusive transportation. He has called for the Civil Aeronautics Board to be part of the investigation, urging the agency to review and potentially revise regulatory frameworks to ensure better pricing practices and consumer protection in the aviation sector.
Filipino Times
5 hours ago
- Filipino Times
Escudero files bill penalizing misuse of AI to replicate physical identity
Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Escudero has filed Senate Bill No. 782, also known as the Physical Identity Protection Act, which seeks to penalize the unauthorized use of a person's physical attributes through artificial intelligence (AI). Under the proposed measure, anyone who creates, generates, reproduces, simulates, distributes, or publishes content using another person's likeness without consent—regardless of platform—will face criminal liability. Escudero said the bill aims to address the risks posed by generative AI technologies, which, despite their potential in various fields, can be exploited to harm individuals or erode public trust. Penalties include imprisonment of one to two years or a fine of up to ₱200,000, or both, for unauthorized use of a person's image. If the act is committed for profit, the penalty increases to two to four years imprisonment or a fine ranging from ₱200,000 to ₱400,000. For content used to facilitate a crime or fraud, the penalty will be four to six years imprisonment or a fine of ₱400,000 to ₱600,000. If done both for profit and to commit a crime or fraud, the offender may face up to 12 years in prison or a fine of ₱600,000 to ₱1 million. Public officials found guilty will also face absolute perpetual disqualification from holding public office, on top of the maximum penalties. Escudero emphasized that the bill promotes accountability in AI use while safeguarding legitimate activities such as journalism, academic research, and documentary work.
