Winds behind fierce California wildfires will change, study finds. Here's what it means
A new study reports that these hot, dry winds will become less frequent in the future. But the more rare Santa Ana winds could bring increasing danger, researchers from Princeton University and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory found. When the winds do arrive, they will be drier than they are today and could pose greater wildfire risk to coastal Southern California, according to the study.
Southern California's Santa Ana winds are close cousins to the Bay Area's Diablo winds, which have also whipped up catastrophic blazes. The winds are a product of cold, dense air hundreds of miles away, in the Great Basin.
Temperature and pressure differences drive air toward California's coast. The air compresses as it barrels down mountain slopes, making it heat up and become drier. The resulting hot, dry winds can spread flames and even propel embers forward, causing blazes to explode in size.
The study used high-resolution computer models to simulate how Santa Ana winds will change in the future. The authors used an extreme emission climate scenario to probe the impacts of human-caused climate change.
They found that, in the future, Santa Ana winds will become less frequent, echoing previous studies. The authors propose that because land warms faster than the ocean, in the future, the temperature gradient that produces offshore winds — driven by cold air inland — will become weaker. Consequently, Santa Ana winds will occur less frequently.
High-resolution models, however, revealed that Santa Ana winds will be drier than they are today, exacerbating wildfire risk. These patterns didn't pop out when the scientists used lower-resolution models.
This could be because Santa Ana winds, as well as Diabo winds, are greatly influenced by small features in the landscape.
'If you have a higher-resolution model that can depict the topography of the region, you will have a more reliable result, ' said Janin Guzman-Morales, a regional climate scientist at San Jose State University, who wasn't part of the new research.
Guzman-Morales led a 2019 study that reported climate change suppressed Santa Ana Winds via changes to atmospheric pressure patterns. The new study makes the earlier findings more robust, Guzman-Morales said.
Alex Hall, a professor of atmospheric and oceanic science at UCLA, agreed that the main contribution of the study is 'highlighting the need for high resolution to simulate the impact of climate change on the Santa Ana wind phenomenon.'
Hall, who also wasn't part of the new research, co-authored a 2011 study that reported a reduced frequency of wintertime Santa Ana winds in the mid-21st century, due to human-caused climate.
The new research relied on one global climate model, produced by the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory. Hall said that it will be valuable to analyze additional models, to quantify uncertainty and identify the most likely magnitude of Santa Ana wind weakening.
Another question is how future changes to seasonal precipitation will impact wildfire risk associated with Santa Ana winds, Hall said. While the Los Angeles wildfires in January were driven by offshore winds, a lack of rain in preceding months set the stage for blazes to take off.
Climate change could have similar effects on Diablo winds, given their similarity to Santa Ana winds, Guzman-Morales said. But additional research needs to be done to confirm that.
'There is an absolute need for that research,' Guzman-Morales said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
16 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Largest animal on the planet spotted with her baby off CA coast. See rare moment
The largest animal on Earth and her baby were spotted off the coast of California and boaters are calling the moment 'magical.' On July 18, boaters got the chance to spot a blue whale with one of her babies, according to a Facebook post by the Monterey Bay Whale Watch. The 'inspiring' moment along with the 'beautiful, flat water' left boaters in awe, the group said. The group even got the chance to witness a blue whale show off its tail, passengers said. Onlookers said this moment served as a reminder for people 'to do everything' they can to 'protect the oceans and its inhabitants' as there are only 10,000 blue whales left in the world, the group said. Blue whales can weigh up to 330,000 pounds and grow to 110 feet long, making their length about the same as the height of a 10-story building, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. They can live up to 90 years, though there was one that famously lived to be 110 years old, according to the nonprofit Whale and Dolphin Conservation. Facebook users rushed to the comments to share their thoughts on the 'wonderful experience' with one person saying, 'Best thing we've ever done. I almost cried when that first one breached right in front of us!' 'What fantastic pics!' another wrote. 'These are terrific!! How great to see all those wonderful animals!!' someone said. Monterey is about a 120-mile drive south from San Francisco.
USA Today
18 hours ago
- USA Today
Massive 13-foot great white shark pings off New England coast
The largest Atlantic great white shark tagged by a marine research company continues to make his way north. Named after a popular boat brand, scientists reported "Contender," a great white shark, pinged dozens of miles off the coast of Nantucket, Massachusetts. The island, a popular travel destination, is about 100 miles from Boston. At nearly 14 feet in length, the adult male shark surfaced on July 17, according to Ocearch, a global non-profit marine research group tracking shark sightings and migration. 'I didn't see it': Surfer bitten by shark in second attack at Florida beach this month A ping means the tag attached to the fish's dorsal fin was spotted above the surface for a brief period as it swam, transmitting a near-live location signal to the Ocearch shark tracker. How much does the great white weigh? According to Ocearch's shark tracker page, Contender weighs 1,653 pounds and measures 13 feet, 9 inches in length. The shark is believed to be just over 30 years old. Great white sharks' life span are typically between 30 and 40 years old, but according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration some can live past age 70. 'Dancing With Sharks': Tom Bergeron heads back to a watery ballroom Where has the great white pinged? Contender's location has pinged more than 40 times after researchers tagged the beast in January off the Florida-Georgia border. After that, a Feb. 23 ping showed he'd swam as far south as just off the coast of Vero Beach in Florida, before making his trek more than one thousand miles north. And last month, the big fish resurfaced off the coast of North Carolina, just off the Outer Banks near Cape Hatteras. Natalie Neysa Alund is a senior reporter for USA TODAY. Reach her at nalund@ and follow her on X @nataliealund.
The Hill
3 days ago
- The Hill
Without weather forecasters, our canaries in the storm, expect disaster
Before modern forecasting, hurricanes were mass casualty events. The 1900 Galveston Hurricane killed over 8,000 people, wiping out an entire city with a 15-foot storm surge. Less than a century ago, Hurricane Okeechobee killed over 2,500 Floridians in a tragedy that today would be largely preventable. We've come a long way since the days when hurricanes struck without warning. I know, because I helped develop the systems that save countless lives and give communities time to prepare. That was my job until February, when I was terminated by President Trump and Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency alongside hundreds of other scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Since then, I have continued my work in hurricane forecasting through Cooperative Institute research; however, the cuts left deep holes across NOAA's forecasting teams that've not been filled. This purge isn't 'cutting waste' — it is dismantling America's hurricane monitoring systems. At the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, I worked on the next-generation Hurricane Analysis and Forecast System. This system enabled emergency managers to issue timely evacuation orders during life-threatening hurricanes like Helene and Milton, helping prevent thousands of potential fatalities. Yet even with cutting-edge forecasting, Helene revealed new, urgent challenges. In the last decade, freshwater flooding surpassed storm surge as the leading cause of hurricane-related deaths. Helene's victims were coastal residents and mountain communities, caught unprepared by catastrophic inland flooding. Dozens more died — victims of power outages, delayed medical care and collapsed infrastructure in the days after the storm passed. If our warning systems don't evolve to keep pace with rapidly changing storms, Helene's damage may seem merciful compared to future disasters. Precisely when adaptation is most urgent, political decisions have systematically dismantled our protective infrastructure. Key vacancies remain across NOAA's local forecast offices, satellite operations and modeling teams — many of which are already stretched thin this hurricane season. Without continuous investment in modeling and surveillance, hurricane season, which officially began June 1, will become even deadlier and harder to predict. DOGE's decimation of the forecasting workforce unravels a century of progress in hurricane survival rates. While the full impact of these cuts won't be seen overnight, the damage will compound the longer these positions go unfilled. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration isn't just a research agency; it's America's first line of defense against natural disasters. Forecasting is the foundation of all response efforts. While scientists aren't knocking doors with evacuation orders ourselves, we're the ones telling first responders when, if, and whose doors they should knock on. When NOAA functions at full capacity, emergency managers have the tools they need to prepare their communities. NOAA's remaining scientists and National Weather Service forecasters will give their all this hurricane season to deliver the most accurate forecasts possible, but dedication can't make up for a system that's been hollowed out, and grit can only hold together this critical system for so long. Privatizing these forecasting services creates a dangerous 'pay-to-play' model for life-saving information. This approach wouldn't just create barriers for low-income families; it would hamstring small municipalities and volunteer emergency services trying to protect their communities. The private sector cannot fill this void. The National Weather Service processes over 6 billion observations daily and issues approximately 1.5 million forecasts and 50,000 warnings annually. No private entity possesses infrastructure that can match this scale and reliability. There is a better path forward. By recommitting to public science and restoring forecasters' positions, we can build systems that adapt to changing storms, accurately track flood zones and storm paths, and provide both inland and coastal communities with the advanced warning they need to stay safe. We owe this to every family who will face the next Helene or Milton. Congress must act urgently to restore NOAA's full operational capacity and reject all efforts to privatize these essential services. The FY26 federal budget proposes a $1.3 billion cut to NOAA's core operations, such as satellite programs essential to forecasting, programs supporting climate modeling and even public education. NOAA can't issue life-saving warnings if its data stream has gone dark. And the research that drives improvements in modeling and forecasting is threatened if some of the budget proposals come to fruition. There have been some positive developments from Congress. The House Republicans' fiscal 2026 Commerce-Justice-Science spending bill, announced on Monday, proposes a much-smaller cut of $387 million, bringing the NOAA budget to $5.8 billion. While it's a modest improvement, it still does not fully cover the financial needs of an agency tasked with protecting hundreds of millions of Americans. Hurricane forecasting shouldn't be treated like a luxury or a political football. It's public infrastructure that's as essential as our power grids or water systems. Storm surges don't check voter registrations before flooding homes, and hurricanes won't stop based on who occupies the White House. Without urgent action in this year's budget, we risk turning the worst-case scenario into reality. The question isn't whether the storms are coming. It's whether we'll be ready when they do.
