
Fight to save ‘most beautiful snail' from most voracious predator — us
Which is why it is so ironic that those adornments are — today — the reason it is attracting the most voracious predator of all: us.
Conservationists have warned the shells of this disappearing species are being sold to collectors, who may not even realise the snails are endangered.
Now a global collaboration of scientists is looking to better understand and breed in captivity these magnificent molluscs — with the hope of preserving them.
'They are so beautiful and extraordinarily variable,' said Professor Angus Davison, from the University of Nottingham. This means that as a snail scientist he finds himself in an unusual situation. 'While all snails are interesting and beautiful to me, most snails, by and large, are not outwardly beautiful to other people.'
He has been part of a team collecting samples in Cuba, with a view to mapping their DNA. He is interested in how many species there are and how they are related. It is believed that there are six, but traditional methods of counting rely heavily on intricate analysis of their genitals. The hope is that genetic data could both be more definitive, and also provide clues not contained in their penises to explain why they are like this at all.
Paradoxically, said Davison, being colourful can be a way of evading predation — and this is his leading hypothesis. 'You might assume they stand out against the background. That's not necessarily true, depending on where they live.' But being very different from each other, in the way they are, could be a positive survival strategy.
'Most likely there's a bird out there that eats the snails. That bird gets a search image in its head for the most common snail — let's say it's a yellow snail. And then you get a gene change that makes a green snail. The green snail will not be eaten because the bird doesn't see them. And so the green snails will become more common.
'And then another mutation arises, which makes an orange snail. And so on.'
Until, eventually, there are enough different colours that while they evade birds, they catch the eyes of tourists instead.
It is illegal to collect and sell the snails, but it is hard to enforce. 'The problem is, Cuba's undergoing very great financial hardships. So there's a very great incentive for locals to collect the shells and sell them.'
Davison's worry is that publicising the beauty of the snails might increase the market. His hope, though, is that educating people about them could decrease it.
'No person in the UK would buy rhino horn if offered it on a holiday. But there are people who will happily buy a shell, not even thinking about the animal or where it came from.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Could RFK Jr's move to pull mRNA vaccine funding be a huge miscalculation?
mRNA vaccines were heralded as a medical marvel that saved lives during the Covid pandemic, but now the US is pulling back from researching them. US Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr has cancelled 22 projects - worth $500m (£376m) in funding – for tackling infections such as Covid and flu. So does Kennedy - probably the country's most famous vaccine sceptic – have a point, or is he making a monumental miscalculation? Prof Adam Finn, vaccine researcher at the University of Bristol, says "it's a bit of both" but ditching mRNA technology is "stupid" and potentially a "catastrophic error". Let's unpick why. Kennedy says he has reviewed the science on mRNA vaccines, concluding that the "data show these vaccines fail to protect effectively against upper respiratory infections like COVID and flu". Instead, he says, he would shift funding to "safer, broader vaccine platforms that remain effective even as viruses mutate". So are mRNA vaccines safe? Are they effective? Would other vaccine technologies be better? And another question is where should mRNA vaccines fit into the pantheon of other vaccine technologies - because there are many: Inactivated vaccines use the original virus or bacterium, kill it, and use that to train the immune system - such as the annual flu shot Attenuated vaccines do not kill the infectious agent, but make it weaker so it causes a mild infection - such as the MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) vaccine Conjugate vaccines use bits of protein or sugar from a bug, so it triggers an immune response without causing an infection - like for types of meningitis mRNA vaccines use a fragment of genetic code that temporarily instructs the body to make parts of a virus, and the immune system reacts to that Each has advantages and disadvantages, but Prof Finn argues we "overhyped" mRNA vaccines during the pandemic to the exclusion of other approaches, and now there is a process of adjusting. "But to swing the pendulum so far that mRNA is useless and has no value and should not be developed or understood better is equally stupid, it did do remarkable things," he says.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Why walking further and faster could cut your risk of heart attack and stroke
Walking further and faster could reduce the risk of heart attacks by almost a fifth – even if you don't reach the recommended target of 10,000 steps a day, a study has found. Analysis of more than 36,000 people with high blood pressure revealed walking more reduces the risk of major problems in the heart and blood vessels. The study published in the European Journal of Preventative Cardiology found that compared to a daily step count of 2,300 steps, every extra 1,000 steps was linked to a 17 per cent reduction in the risk of cardiovascular problems. This was the case up to a step count of 10,000 – walking more than this was associated with a lower risk of stroke. It's estimated that just over a quarter adults in the UK, around 14.4 million people, have high blood pressure, according to the British Heart Foundation. It increases the risk of heart disease, heart attacks, strokes and heart failure, according to the NHS. However, study authors say until now it has been unclear how much people with high blood pressure need to increase their physical activity to see a reduction in these risks. Professor Emmanuel Stamatakis, at the University of Sydney, Australia, who supervised the study, said: 'We found that, if you live with high blood pressure, the more you walk with greater intensity, the lower your risk for future serious cardiovascular events. 'These findings support the message that any amount of physical activity is beneficial, even below the widely recommended daily target of 10,000 steps.' Researchers analysed data from 32,192 people with high blood pressure who were part of the UK Biobank study – a cohort study of 500,000 people that collected data on diet, lifestyle, biomarkers, and health. As part of the study these participants agreed to wear an accelerometer on their wrist for seven consecutive days to measure how far and how fast they walked. The participants were followed up for eight years and during this time there were 1,935 cases of heart problems of stroke. After analysing this data researchers discovered for every 1,000 steps a day there was a 17 per cent reduction in overall risk, 22 per cent reduction in heart failure, 9 per cent reduction in risk of heart attack, and 24 per cent reduction in risk of stroke. Researchers also tracked how fast participants walked a day and recorded their fastest 30 minutes at an average of 80 steps a minute which was associated with a 30 per cent reduced risk of heart problems. However, it's not just people with high blood pressure that could benefit. Researchers also found similar results when they looked at 37,350 people without high blood pressure. Every 1,000-step increase in daily step count led to an average lower risk of overall heart problems (20.2 per cent), heart failure (23.2 per cent), myocardial infarctions (17.9 per cent) and stroke (24.6 per cent). Professor Stamatakis said: 'Clinicians should promote physical activity as standard care, especially in patients with high blood pressure. Our results can inform new, tailored public health recommendations for these patients.'


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Researchers identify cause of decline in blue whale vocalizations
A study revealed that blue whale vocalizations have decreased by approximately 40 percent over six years, raising concerns among scientists. This reduction in singing is attributed to the disappearance of their main food source, krill, caused by a marine heatwave dubbed 'The Blob'. Originating in 2013, 'The Blob' was a dense pool of warm water that significantly raised Pacific Ocean temperatures, in some places by over 4.5 Fahrenheit. The elevated temperatures fostered toxic algae blooms, which decimated krill populations and other marine life. Scientists suggest blue whales ceased singing due to the immense stress of spending all their energy searching for food, a situation exacerbated by climate change.