Van driver dies after crash on busy A-road
A van driver has died after a serious two-car crash on Thursday.
Emergency services were called to the junction of the A414 Ongar Road and Wyse's Road, near Chelmsford, Essex, just before 11:00 BST.
The driver of a Peugeot Partner vanr in his 30s died at the scene and a Fiat lorry driver was taken to hospital, where he remains in a serious but stable condition.
Essex Police has appealed for more information and said specialist officers were supporting those affected by the incident.
Follow Essex news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Busy A-road closed after serious collision
Essex Police
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
42 minutes ago
- Forbes
EU Must Cap SUV Hood Heights Urges Report. Crash Test Body Says Not As Simple As That
Child walks in front of SUV in London. The increasing hood heights of new cars in Europe pose a threat to public safety, according to the advocacy group Transport & Environment (T&E). However, in response, crash-testing organization EuroNCAP, or New Car Assessment Program, says 'frontal design and reduction in aggressivity is more important than a single metric.' Higher fronts on cars—especially SUVs, which now account for more than half of the European new car market—significantly increase the death rate when pedestrians and cyclists are struck, says a report issued today by T&E. 'The rise in high-fronted SUVs poses a clear and growing threat to public safety, especially for children,' states the report. 'With no benefit to society, it's time for lawmakers at all levels to act.' T&E found that the average hood height— or Bonnet Leading Edge, BLE—of new cars sold in Europe rose from 77cm in 2010 to 84cm in 2024. Illustrations in the report show that drivers in the tallest cars could not see children as old as nine when they were directly in front of the vehicles. Jeep and Land Rover SUVs have average hood heights over 100cm. T&E's report accused such auto companies of 'trading on the intimidation that comes with high-fronted vehicles [and] ignoring their related dangers.' The organization is calling on the EU to cap hood heights at 85cm by 2035. The higher the hood, the bigger the blind spot: More high-fronted SUVs would mean more children ... More drivers don't see, says T&E. 'EuroNCAP is not against the 85cm BLE concept,' says EuroNCAP's director of strategic development Matthew Avery. However, he stresses that capping just hood height wasn't a panacea. 'Bonnet Leading Edge is one of the attributes that can be used to measure pedestrian safety, but geometry, homogeneity of features, and stiffness are all important,' he says. 'Larger cars with taller [hoods] are not necessarily less safe than smaller ones with lower [hoods]. We have many cases where the SUV is better for pedestrians than the small car. Research and testing tells us that frontal design and reduction in aggressivity is more important than a single metric.' In crashes, says T&E's report, SUVs are more likely to strike the vital organs in the core of adults' bodies and the heads of children. Hitting pedestrians above their center of gravity means they are more likely to be knocked forward and down and then be driven over. Cars with lower hood heights tend to hit pedestrians' legs, giving them a greater chance of being deflected to the side. Higher bonnets more often knock pedestrians under the vehicle rather than deflect them, says T&E. Auto manufacturers claim they are committed to high safety standards, and most new vehicles are now equipped with advanced features, including pedestrian and cyclist detection technologies and autonomous emergency braking (AEB). The T&E report says AEB can prevent some crashes but that 'a car with a good AEB system and a [hood] height between 60cm and 75cm will always be safer than a [taller] vehicle with the same AEB.' T&E commissioned Loughborough University School of Design to test the visibility of children from tall cars. The research found that a driver of a Ram TRX was unable to see children aged up to nine who were standing directly in front, while a driver of a Land Rover Defender could not see children aged up to four and a half. T&E also called out the often aggressive marketing slogans used in car advertising. RAM advertises some of its vehicles as 'Built to impress, known to intimidate.' 'The intention is clear,' says T&E. 'Such companies are trading on the intimidation that comes with high-fronted vehicles, ignoring their related dangers.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Is this the most confusing car brand of all time?
Percy Lambert became the first person to do 100mph in this 1913 Talbot What is the most confusing car brand of all time? It's an intriguing question – and we reckon the answer might well be Talbot. The story started all the way back in 1888, when Charles Chetwynd-Talbot, the 20th Earl of Shrewsbury, founded a London taxi firm with the competitive advantage of using newfangled pneumatic tyres. Eight years later, the Earl entered business with one Adolphe Clément, who had made a fortune from said invention, to sell the Frenchman's tyres, bicycles and cars in London. In 1902, the pair strengthened their partnership, rebranding the cars Clément-Talbot. But after just a year they bisected their business: the Earl would sell cars badged Talbot in Britain, his partner cars badged Clément-Bayard in France. Amusingly in hindsight, adverts in Autocar stated that this change was being made 'in order to prevent confusion in the mind of the public'. In 1906, the Earl's London factory began making cars of its own design, separating the two firms yet further. Talbot soon started succeeding in races and reliability trials, earning it the nickname 'Invincible Talbot'. Its biggest coup came in 1913, when Percy Lambert became the first person to do 100 miles in an hour, lapping Brooklands in a 25hp special – even though 'he could hardly see for several laps' due to thick fog. Enjoy full access to the complete Autocar archive at the The Great War badly disrupted the London firm and literally gutted the Paris firm, and both struggled to recover afterwards. So in late 1919 the Earl sold up to Darracq, a British-owned French car maker; and in 1921 Clément sold his factory to local upstart André Citroën. The new owners of the Earl's old firm kept the Talbot brand for London-made cars and started using Talbot-Darracq for Paris-made cars. In short order, they bought Wolverhampton's Sunbeam and put the lot under the unfortunately named umbrella of STD Motors. Real excitement came in 1930 as Talbot ventured to Le Mans for the famous 24-hour race and upset the big players. Bentley scored a one-two with its 6.6-litre monsters, but Bugatti, Alfa Romeo, Mercedes and MG were all outclassed by Talbot's 2.3-litre 90s – 'really remarkable', said Autocar. It then twice repeated this impressive feat in the following years with its enhanced 105s. However, all was not well, as the Western world had plunged into a terrible economic depression and Sunbeam had long been unable to replicate Talbot's prosperity, eventually dragging STD under. Rootes, owner of Britain's Hillman and Humber car brands, came to the rescue of Sunbeam and Talbot, leading Autocar to proclaim: 'Under this energetic new management, there is no doubt that the Talbot name will continue to rank high in automobile circles.' It looked as though the Talbot-Darracq business would vanish – until an unexpected buyout by its managing director, the 'large and determined' Italian Antonio Lago. Henceforth two separate firms would use the Talbot brand, but to avoid confusion Lago's cars were usually referred to in Britain as Darracqs or Talbot-Lagos. The two firms trod diverging paths: Talbot built restyled humble Hillmans while Talbot-Lago went upmarket with its cars, provided chassis for coachbuilt stunners and competed in grands prix. In 1938, Rootes decided to merge Talbot and Sunbeam, introducing yet another hyphenated name to this already muddled lineage. Both Talbots enjoyed the 1950s: Talbot-Lago won grands prix and Le Mans with its T26 and crafted some beautiful luxury and sporting cars for the road, while Sunbeam-Talbot attracted envy for its saloons and convertibles – one of which also won the Coupes des Alpes in the hands of Stirling Moss. However, confusion persisted, leading Rootes to shorten Sunbeam-Talbot to just Sunbeam in 1954 – 'a short life but a merry one', we said. And five years later, Talbot-Lago's prolonged suffocation by postwar austerity and heavy taxation on luxury cars finally killed it, its assets being bought by Simca. But that was not the end of the story. Simca and Rootes both later became part of Chrysler Europe, and when that rotten business was dumped at PSA's door in 1979, guess which of its defunct brands – Alvis, Bugatti, Delage, Delahaye, Panhard, Simca, Sunbeam and Talbot – was deemed ripest for revival? 'It has the best image of strength with the European public,' president François Perrin-Pelletier explained to Autocar. 'Most of all, however, it is perceived by 80% of the British public as an English make and 80% of the French as a French make.' It didn't last long. Talbots either overlapped with other PSA models or were duds, so the next-generation models were redirected to Peugeot and the brand was consigned to die again with the Express van in 1994. Honestly, what a mess. ]]>
Fast Company
an hour ago
- Fast Company
What's it like to use this new strong and light inflatable bike helmet
I'll admit it: I don't always wear a bike helmet. That's especially true for short, unplanned rides using bike share—it doesn't make sense to carry around a bulky helmet when I might not even use it. A new inflatable bike helmet, the Ventete aH-1, was designed to help tackle that problem. When the helmet's not in use, it flattens so it can more easily fit in a bag. When you need to use it, it comes with a tiny battery-powered pump that fully inflates it in 30 seconds. After a decade of development by a London-based startup, the helmet came out in the U.K. last year and immediately sold out. It's not yet available in the U.S., but I had the chance to try it out. (The design was one of the winners of Fast Company 's 2025 World Changing Ideas Awards.) It looks nothing like any helmet I've ever seen. Instead of foam, it's made from a series of ribs covered in strong, triple-laminated nylon. The flattened version isn't small—it's roughly as long as a laptop. Even when it's not inflated, it's still somewhat thick. But unlike a typical helmet, it did easily squeeze into my backpack. It took me a couple of attempts to figure out how to inflate it, although the company has now tweaked the design so that the pump can be operated hands-free. In the version I tested, I had to hold the pump at a particular angle on the helmet's Presta valve to work correctly. (When it did work, the buzz of the pump was also very loud: I was slightly embarrassed to use it in public.) But it was fast. A tiny level on the side shows when it's correctly inflated. A strap at the back helps customize the fit. The design actually outperforms typical helmets on safety. When Imperial College London ran a study testing 30 different bike helmets, the aH-1 scored 44.1% better than the others in linear impact tests. 'It's incredibly strong,' says Colin Herperger, cofounder and CEO of Ventete, the startup that designed the helmet. 'One of the founders drove his car on it. If you think about any other helmet, it would be in pieces. When people think about an inflatable structural system, they think it's probably soft or squishy, and in fact, it's the opposite. It's actually super stiff.' The design is also comfortable to wear. When I tried riding with it on a hot day, my head stayed cool. Herperger points out that EPS foam, the material used in conventional bike helmets, is the same material used to insulate coolers to keep ice from melting. In a standard foam helmet, 'heat is trying to leave your head, and it's reflecting it back down and causing you to further overheat,' Herperger says. In the new design, 'because of the chamber system, it's actually lifted off the head, and you get a conductive airflow between the head and the helmet. So the hot air is just drawn away from your head.' I liked the way the origami-like design looked, too. It's something I'd definitely be willing to wear—though at £350 (around $475) for the helmet and pump, it isn't cheap. And because it's still waiting for regulatory approval in the U.S., I can't keep using it now. While the timeline for approval isn't clear, it may roll out here later this year.
