logo
US tariffs on European goods threaten to shake up the world's largest trade relationship

US tariffs on European goods threaten to shake up the world's largest trade relationship

Global News10 hours ago
The European Union expects to find out on Monday whether President Donald Trump will impose punishing tariffs on America's largest trade partner in a move economists have warned would have repercussions for companies and consumers on both sides of the Atlantic.
Trump imposed a 20% import tax on all EU-made products in early April as part of a set of tariffs targeting countries with which the United States has a trade imbalance. Hours after the nation-specific duties took effect, he put them on hold until July 9 at a standard rate of 10% to quiet financial markets and allow time for negotiations.
Expressing displeasure the EU's stance in trade talks, however, Trump said he would increase the tariff rate for European exports to 50%, which could make everything — from French cheese and Italian leather goods to German electronics and Spanish pharmaceuticals — much more expensive in the U.S.
The EU's executive commission, which handles trade issues for the bloc's 27-member nations, said its leaders hope to strike a deal with the Trump administration. Without one, the EU said it was prepared to retaliate with tariffs on hundreds of American products, ranging from beef and auto parts to beer and Boeing airplanes.
Story continues below advertisement
US-EU trade is enormous
The EU's executive commission describes the trade between the U.S. and the EU as 'the most important commercial relationship in the world.'
The value of EU-U.S. trade in goods and services amounted to 1.7 trillion euros ($2 trillion) in 2024, or an average of 4.6 billion euros a day, according to EU statistics agency Eurostat.
The biggest U.S. export to Europe is crude oil, followed by pharmaceuticals, aircraft, automobiles, and medical and diagnostic equipment.
Europe's biggest exports to the U.S. are pharmaceuticals, cars, aircraft, chemicals, medical instruments, and wine and spirits.
EU sells more to the US than vice versa
Trump has complained about the EU's 198 billion-euro trade surplus in goods, which shows Americans buy more stuff from European businesses than the other way around.
However, American companies fill some of the gap by outselling the EU when it comes to services such as cloud computing, travel bookings, and legal and financial services.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
The U.S. services surplus took the nation's trade deficit with the EU down to 50 billion euros ($59 billion), which represents less than 3% of overall U.S.-EU trade.
What are the issues dividing the two sides?
Before Trump returned to office, the U.S. and the EU maintained a generally cooperative trade relationship and low tariff levels on both sides. The U.S. rate averaged 1.47% for European goods, while the EU's averaged 1.35% for American products.
Story continues below advertisement
But the White House has taken a much less friendly posture toward the longstanding U.S. ally since February. Along with the fluctuating tariff rate on European goods Trump has floated, the EU has been subject to his administration's 50% tariff on steel and aluminum and a 25% tax on imported automobiles and parts.
Trump administration officials have raised a slew of issues they want to see addressed, including agricultural barriers such as EU health regulations that include bans on chlorine-washed chicken and hormone-treated beef.
Trump has also criticized Europe's value-added taxes, which EU countries levy at the point of sale this year at rates of 17% to 27%. But many economists see VAT as trade-neutral since they apply to domestic goods and services as well as imported ones. Because national governments set the taxes through legislation, the EU has said they aren't on the table during trade negotiations.
'On the thorny issues of regulations, consumer standards and taxes, the EU and its member states cannot give much ground,' Holger Schmieding, chief economist at Germany's Berenberg bank, said. 'They cannot change the way they run the EU's vast internal market according to U.S. demands, which are often rooted in a faulty understanding of how the EU works.'
'Consequence for many companies'
Economists and companies say higher tariffs will mean higher prices for U.S. consumers on imported goods. Importers must decide how much of the extra tax costs to absorb through lower profits and how much to pass on to customers.
Story continues below advertisement
Mercedes-Benz dealers in the U.S. have said they are holding the line on 2025 model year prices 'until further notice.' The German automaker has a partial tariff shield because it makes 35% of the Mercedes-Benz vehicles sold in the U.S. in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, but the company said it expects prices to undergo 'significant increases' in coming years.
Simon Hunt, CEO of Italian wine and spirits producer Campari Group, told investment analysts that prices could increase for some products or stay the same depending what rival companies do. If competitors raise prices, the company might decide to hold its prices on Skyy vodka or Aperol aperitif to gain market share, Hunt said.
Trump has argued that making it more difficult for foreign companies to sell in the U.S. is a way to stimulate a revival of American manufacturing. Many companies have dismissed the idea or said it would take years to yield positive economic benefits. However, some corporations have proved willing to shift some production stateside.
France-based luxury group LVMH, whose brands include Tiffany & Co., Luis Vuitton, Christian Dior and Moet & Chandon, could move some production to the United States, billionaire CEO Bernaud Arnault said at the company's annual meeting in April.
Arnault, who attended Trump's inauguration, has urged Europe to reach a deal based on reciprocal concessions.
'If we end up with high tariffs, … we will be forced to increase our U.S.-based production to avoid tariffs,' Arnault said. 'And if Europe fails to negotiate intelligently, that will be the consequence for many companies. … It will be the fault of Brussels, if it comes to that.'
Story continues below advertisement
'Road could be rocky'
Some forecasts indicate the U.S. economy would be more at risk if the negotiations fail.
Without a deal, the EU would lose 0.3% of its gross domestic product and U.S. GDP would fall 0.7%, if Trump slaps imported goods from Europe with tariffs of 10% to 25%, according to a research review by Bruegel, a think tank in Brussels.
Given the complexity of some of the issues, the two sides may arrive only at a framework deal before Wednesday's deadline. That would likely leave a 10% base tariff, as well as the auto, steel and aluminum tariffs in place until details of a formal trade agreement are ironed out.
The most likely outcome of the trade talks is that 'the U.S. will agree to deals in which it takes back its worst threats of 'retaliatory' tariffs well beyond 10%,' Schmieding said. 'However, the road to get there could be rocky.'
The U.S. offering exemptions for some goods might smooth the path to a deal. The EU could offer to ease some regulations that the White House views as trade barriers.
'While Trump might be able to sell such an outcome as a 'win' for him, the ultimate victims of his protectionism would, of course, be mostly the U.S. consumers,' Schmieding said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump reassures base after Iran strikes with Ukraine freeze
Trump reassures base after Iran strikes with Ukraine freeze

Canada News.Net

timean hour ago

  • Canada News.Net

Trump reassures base after Iran strikes with Ukraine freeze

WASHINGTON, D.C.: President Donald Trump is drawing praise from his core supporters after halting key arms shipments to Ukraine, a move seen as reinforcing his promise to reduce U.S. involvement in foreign wars. The pause affects critical air defense systems, including Patriot missiles and precision artillery. It comes just weeks after Trump ordered strikes on Iranian nuclear sites—actions that had alarmed some in his base. Following the Iran strikes, many "America First" advocates questioned whether Trump was straying from his pledge to avoid "stupid wars." But the Ukraine decision appears designed to reassure them. Trump has repeatedly criticized U.S. aid to Ukraine, calling it a waste of taxpayer money. Dan Caldwell, a former senior defense adviser, said the choice was between equipping American troops or aiding a conflict where U.S. interests are limited. "We chose our own troops," he said. Jack Posobiec, a far-right commentator, echoed that sentiment on X: "America FIRST." The Pentagon insists the pause aligns with Trump's campaign platform. "The president was elected to put America first," said Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell. However, the move has divided Republicans. More hawkish members are alarmed, especially as Russia steps up attacks in Ukraine. Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania wrote to Trump and the Pentagon requesting an emergency briefing, warning that the timing could embolden Russian President Vladimir Putin. Rep. Michael McCaul, a Texas Republican, emphasized continued support for Ukraine: "Now is the time to show Putin we mean business," he posted. "That starts with delivering the weapons Congress approved." On July 3, Trump held a phone call with Putin—their sixth conversation since Trump returned to office. Putin's aide, Yuri Ushakov, confirmed they discussed Ukraine and Iran but did not specifically address the weapons freeze. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said during a visit to Denmark that he hopes to speak with Trump soon. The White House says the pause is part of a broader review of U.S. military readiness, following US$70 billion in arms transfers to Ukraine since 2022. Elbridge Colby, the Pentagon's top policy official, led the review. At his Senate hearing, Colby stressed the U.S. lacks the capacity for multiple wars and should prioritize threats from China. Analysts supporting a more cautious U.S. posture say the arms pause is overdue. "We're reaching a point where continued aid to Ukraine could weaken our ability to respond to future crises," said Jennifer Kavanagh of Defense Priorities. "You have to be cautious."

Italy watchdog lists US, UK, Russia as risk zones for lenders
Italy watchdog lists US, UK, Russia as risk zones for lenders

Canada News.Net

timean hour ago

  • Canada News.Net

Italy watchdog lists US, UK, Russia as risk zones for lenders

MILAN, Italy: Italian regulators have flagged four non-EU countries—including Russia—as carrying systemic financial risk for domestic lenders, citing significant banking exposure in those regions. The Bank of Italy said on July 4 that it had designated the United States, Great Britain, Switzerland, and Russia as countries where Italian banks have material exposure, based on end-2024 data. The classification was made under EU guidelines aimed at monitoring and mitigating systemic financial risks. The assessment considers the extent of Italian banks' exposure to these countries relative to their total global exposure. Among the institutions operating in the listed regions are Intesa Sanpaolo and UniCredit, Italy's two largest lenders. Intesa Sanpaolo maintains a corporate-only presence in Russia, while UniCredit continues to operate a retail banking unit there. In a recent investor document tied to its takeover offer for Banco BPM, UniCredit disclosed that its Russian unit increased its holdings of local government bonds in Q1 2025. The assets rose from 574 million euros in December to 754 million euros (US$888.06 million) by March.

First indirect Hamas-Israel ceasefire talks ended inconclusively, Palestinian sources say
First indirect Hamas-Israel ceasefire talks ended inconclusively, Palestinian sources say

CTV News

timean hour ago

  • CTV News

First indirect Hamas-Israel ceasefire talks ended inconclusively, Palestinian sources say

Palestinians walk next to a tent camp for displaced by the Israeli air and ground offensive on the Gaza Strip in west of Gaza Strip, Tuesday, March 25, 2025. (AP Photo/Jehad Alshrafi) CAIRO — The first session of indirect Hamas-Israel ceasefire talks in Qatar ended inconclusively, two Palestinian sources familiar with the matter said early on Monday, adding that the Israeli delegation didn't have a sufficient mandate to reach an agreement with Hamas. The talks resumed on Sunday, ahead of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's third visit to the White House since U.S. President Donald Trump returned to power nearly six months ago. 'After the first session of indirect negotiations in Doha, the Israeli delegation is not sufficiently authorized ... to reach an agreement with Hamas, as it has no real powers,' the sources told Reuters. Netanyahu said, before his departure to Washington, that Israeli negotiators taking part in the ceasefire talks have clear instructions to achieve a ceasefire agreement under conditions that Israel has accepted. On Saturday evening, crowds gathered at a public square in Tel Aviv near the defense ministry headquarters to call for a ceasefire deal and the return of around 50 hostages still held in Gaza. The demonstrators waved Israeli flags, chanted and carried posters with photos of the hostages. The latest bloodshed in the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict was triggered on October 7, 2023, when Hamas attacked southern Israel, killing around 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages, according to Israeli tallies. Around 20 of the remaining hostages are believed to be still alive. A majority of the original hostages have been freed through diplomatic negotiations, though the Israeli military has also recovered some. Gaza's health ministry says Israel's retaliatory military assault on the enclave has killed over 57,000 Palestinians. It has also caused a hunger crisis, displaced the population, mostly within Gaza, and left the territory in ruins. Reporting by Nidal Al Mughrabi; Writing by Yomna Ehab; Editing by Lisa Shumaker, Kim Coghill and Lincoln Feast.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store