Newsom's political future 'practically nonexistent' as LA devolves into riots, social media critics predict
Newsom has been floated as a likely 2028 Democratic contender for the White House as he wraps up his second term as governor in 2026. Riots plaguing the city in response to the Trump administration's efforts to remove illegal immigrants residing in Los Angeles, which come on the heels of massive wildfires that rocked southern California this winter, have left Newsom on precarious political ground, according to conservatives who are balking at his response to the LA chaos.
"Gavin Newsom's odds of clinching the 2028 presidential race are practically nonexistent," X user Angela Belcamino posted Monday. "Across the country, Americans are eyeing California's struggles under his watch, convinced he'd unleash the same chaos nationwide if he ever won the White House."
"Gavin Newsom's handling of the LA riots should be considered an in-kind contribution to the @JDVance2028 presidential campaign. Newsom is providing a lot of ad material for free," one social media account posted on Sunday.
Jonathan Turley: Democrats' Rabid Anti-ice Resistance In La Against Trump Could Backfire
"Notice how Newsom has no adverse commentary about the rioters – he saves all his venom for American authorities," author and retired Army Col. James Hutton posted to X Sunday. "This is why he has no chance to be president one day. Most Americans tend to believe in this country."
Read On The Fox News App
Many critics of the riots unfolding in Los Angeles argued that photos of the scene would live in infamy and dash any hopes Newsom may hold on running for president. Some users remarked that the photos depicting rioters surrounded by flames and smoke while waving a Mexican flag "will cost Newsom his 2028 presidential run," and that the Trump administration "couldn't have asked for better" representation of California politics captured in photos.
"Gavin Newsom is refusing to help stop the riots AND denying their existence because he bows to open borders donors... hoping they'll fund his 2028 Presidential run. Do not forget this!," Club for Growth senior analyst Andrew Follett posted to X, accompanied by a photo showing a rioter with a Mexican flag on a motorbike as smoke billowed behind him.
California Lt. Governor Says Los Angeles Riots Are 'Generated By Donald Trump'
"Newsom 2028 off to a 🔥 start," editor-in-chief of the DC Report Matt Foldi posted, accompanied by a similar photo showing a rioter waving what appeared to be the Mexican flag as a fire raged in front of him.
"Gavin Newsom 2028," DC Draino, a popular conservative X account, posted accompanied by a photo of a pair of masked rioters standing on a destroyed car waving the Mexican flag.
Newsom spokesperson Lindsey Cobia told Fox News Digital when approached for comment on the matter: "President Trump's actions are straight out of a dictator's playbook. Governor Newsom won't stop protecting California and the rule of law from Trump's unprecedented assault on American freedom. "
Newsom is viewed as a potential leader of the Democratic Party as it navigates its future following the disastrous 2024 election cycle that saw President Joe Biden exit the race just over 100 days from Election Day and former Vice President Kamala Harris fail to rally support against now-President Donald Trump. The Democratic governor has not yet said whether he would launch a presidential run in 2028.
Ny Times Says 'Real Emergency' Is Trump Sending Troops To Los Angeles
Riots broke out in the left-wing city Friday evening after federal law enforcement officials converged on Los Angeles to carry out immigration raids as part of Trump's vow to deport illegal aliens who flooded the nation under the Biden administration. Local leaders such as Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and Newsom, however, quickly denounced the raids in public statements while offering words of support for illegal immigrants in the state.
Protests over the raids soon devolved into violence as rioters targeted federal law enforcement officials, including launching rocks at officials, as well as videos showing people looting local stores, setting cars on fire and taking over a freeway.
Trump announced Saturday that he was deploying 2,000 National Guard members to help quell the violence, bypassing the governor, who typically activates the National Guard and sparking Newsom to file a lawsuit against the Trump administration for efforts to allegedly "federalize the California National Guard."
Trump and Newsom have long sparred, stretching back to the first Trump administration, including when Newsom installed coronavirus restrictions in the state during the pandemic, such as mask and vaccine mandates and social distancing rules, as well as Trump slamming Newsom for California's spiraling crime rate as a national crime wave spiked in 2020. Trump also frequently refers to the California Democrat as "Newscum" as an ongoing jab at the governor.
The pair, however, have most frequently and recently traded barbs over California's fire response, which came under fierce scrutiny in January when wildfires plagued the Los Angeles area and Trump pinned blame on Newsom.
"Governor Gavin Newscum refused to sign the water restoration declaration put before him that would have allowed millions of gallons of water, from excess rain and snow melt from the North, to flow daily into many parts of California, including the areas that are currently burning in a virtually apocalyptic way," Trump posted to Truth Social as the fires raged just weeks ahead of Trump's inauguration.
Newsom's Office Compares La Riots Against Federal Agents To Sports Celebrations
"He wanted to protect an essentially worthless fish called a smelt, by giving it less water (it didn't work!), but didn't care about the people of California. Now the ultimate price is being paid. I will demand that this incompetent governor allow beautiful, clean, fresh water to FLOW INTO CALIFORNIA! He is the blame for this. On top of it all, no water for fire hydrants, not firefighting planes. A true disaster!"
Newsom's office shot back that "there is no such document as the water restoration declaration – that is pure fiction. The Governor is focused on protecting people, not playing politics, and making sure firefighters have all the resources they need."
Trump has a long history of putting Newsom's handling of wildfires under the microscope across his first four years in the White House, including in January 2019 when he threatened to cut off federal funds to California if reforms were not made to the state's forest management services.
California Republicans Slam Newsom, Bass For Letting La Burn With Riots Amid Trump Immigration Blitz
"Billions of dollars are sent to the State of California for Forest fires that, with proper Forest Management, would never happen," he posted to X that year. "Unless they get their act together, which is unlikely, I have ordered FEMA to send no more money. It is a disgraceful situation in lives & money!"
Newsom and other Democrats have historically pushed back that wildfires in the state are due to climate change and global warming.
"You don't believe in climate change," Newsom shot back at Trump in 2019, for example, after the president slammed him for his wildfire leadership. "You are excused from this conversation."
Los Angeles Wildfires: California Gov. Newsom Slammed For 'Sideshow' As He Defends State's Response
The riots gripping LA following the massive Palisades wildfires in January stack the odds against a potential Newsom presidential run, other commenters argued on social media.
"Let's evaluate this, Gav. First... devastating fires due to you and your state's negligence. Second, riots... once again due to your love for illegals, sanctuary cities, etc. Your aspirations for 2028 have gone up in the flames you are responsible for," one social media commented posted to X on Monday.
"The LA fires and the LA riots have burned Newsom's chances of a successful presidential run to the ground," another X user posted.
Others on X argued the riots in Los Angeles would help Newsom's chances should he run in 2028.
"Trump is making a strong case for Newsom '28," Fox News' Jessica Tarlov posted to X.Original article source: Newsom's political future 'practically nonexistent' as LA devolves into riots, social media critics predict
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
3 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
The cookies that unite California's politicians, no matter their party
Fox 11 anchor Elex Michaelson is one of the nice guys in L.A. media. His tough-but-fair-and-especially-polite lines of questioning made him a natural to help moderate debates for the L.A. mayoral and sheriff's races three years ago. The 38-year-old Agoura Hills native is so nice that he's known not just for his work but also … his mom's cookies and brownies. Michaelson gifts every guest who treks up to Fox 11's West L.A. studios for his weekly public affairs show 'The Issue Is' a box of the desserts. We're talking former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, billionaire Rick Caruso, L.A. County Dist. Atty. Nathan Hochman, Democratic Rep. Nancy Pelosi and dozens of other political heavyweights on both sides of the proverbial aisle. U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) once brought a bag of Porto's to Michaelson's team in gratitude for all the cookies and brownies he had received over the years. Former Congress member and current California gubernatorial candidate Katie Porter sent Elex's mom, Crystal, a handwritten thank-you note. 'Every single time I see [L.A. County Sheriff] Robert Luna, he brings them up without fail,' Michaelson said with pride in a phone interview. One not-so-famous person who has been lucky enough to enjoy them? Me. Elex recently gave me a box when I appeared on 'The Issue Is' just after U.S. Border Patrol sector chief Gregory Bovino, who took time off from bloviating about the border to accept the goodies because even la migra gets sweets, I guess. Crystal Michaelson's cookies and brownies are worthy of a stall at the Hollywood farmers market, and I'm not saying that just so I can appear on 'The Issue Is' again soon. The cookies last time around were blondies studded with chocolate chips and M&Ms. Slightly toasted on the outside, chewy on the inside, thick yet airy and spiked with an extra dash of vanilla, the blondies were beautiful. Just as delicious were the brownies, all about the firm, dark-chocolate-derived fudge that crackled with each bite. Both featured a generous sprinkling of sea salt, the crystals perfectly cutting through all the sugar and butter. They didn't last the drive back to Orange County. When Elex took his mom to a holiday party hosted by then-Vice President Kamala Harris some years back, most of the movers and shakers greeted her with the same enthusiasm they showed her son because of what she bakes. 'I'm not really a baker!' insisted Crystal, an artist by trade. She makes the goodies every Thursday afternoon, the day before 'The Issue Is' tapes, with an occasional assist by Elex. 'But it's turned into a whole thing!' The tradition dates back to elementary school, when Crystal treated Elex's teachers and classmates to them as 'a thank you.' Elex took some to the first and last day of his college internship for Fox 11 to hand out to the newsroom, then repeated the gesture when he worked at XETV in San Diego and ABC 7 in Los Angeles before returning to Fox 11. 'Their first and last impression of me,' he said, 'were these cookies.' Michaelson repeated the move every day for the first week of 'The Issue Is.' The inaugural guests were Newsom, then-Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff (now California's junior U.S. senator), and commentator Areva Martin. 'Everyone loved the cookies so much that they joked, 'We won't return unless we get more cookies,'' Michaelson said. The crew insisted they get treated to them one more week, 'and my mom just never really stopped since then,' even baking and shipping them to regular guests during the COVID era as a Christmas gift. 'One of the only things that seems to unite Republicans and Democrats [in California] is these cookies and brownies,' Elex said. 'There's nothing like the unifying power of food to bring people together to not just talk, but listen to each other.' Crystal gets a shout-out in the show's closing credits for 'cookies, brownies and moral support.' She learned the recipes as a teen, from a family friend. They're baked in a Pyrex baking dish, sliced into squares, then put in cardboard boxes that she decorates by writing, 'The Issue Is ... ' People have suggested Crystal sell them, but she declines: 'I'm not a baker.' For now, she's flattered by all the attention — Newsom once wrote a letter on his official letterhead raving about them. The only issue she sees with them …is Elex. 'He eats them too much,' Crystal said. 'I've said before that maybe I should make them a little bit healthier. And everyone said, 'No, don't do that!'' Today's photo of the day is from photographer Tyler Matthew Oyer of a 200-person literary reading inside of a pool at the Korean Spa. Jim Rainey, staff writerDiamy Wang, homepage internIzzy Nunes, audience internKevinisha Walker, multiplatform editorAndrew Campa, Sunday writerKarim Doumar, head of newsletters How can we make this newsletter more useful? Send comments to essentialcalifornia@ Check our top stories, topics and the latest articles on
Newsweek
4 minutes ago
- Newsweek
South Korea Makes Gesture of Reconciliation to North Korea
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. South Korea has started to dismantle loudspeakers along the border with North Korea that broadcast anti-Pyongyang messaging. The move was initiated by the new Lee Jae Myung administration in Seoul as part of a series of conciliatory gestures aimed at de-escalating tensions on the peninsula. As of Monday, North Korea had yet to respond by removing its own front-line loudspeakers. Newsweek reached out to the North Korean Foreign Ministry for comment. Why It Matters South Korea's move comes 14 months after speakers along the border were reactivated to broadcast K-pop music and anti-North Korean rhetoric. This was in response to Pyongyang's provocative trash balloon campaigns, which carried waste across the border, causing chaos in the south. Their dismantling comes amid efforts by the Lee administration to pivot away from a hardline stance taken under the previous government of Yoon Suk Yeol, who was removed from office in April over his ill-fated imposition of martial law. A South Korean soldier is seen in a watchtower at the border with North Korea, divided by the Imjin River in Paju, north of Seoul, on June 5, 2025. A South Korean soldier is seen in a watchtower at the border with North Korea, divided by the Imjin River in Paju, north of Seoul, on June 5, To Know South Korea's military began dismantling fixed loudspeakers along the border with North Korea on Monday in a move that follows the government's June 11 decision to stop anti-North broadcasts. This decision came just a week after Lee took office and six months after Yoon plunged South Korea into a political crisis when he sent troops to parliament to stop lawmakers voting down his declaration of martial law. South Korea's defense ministry said that the military had started on Monday to remove 24 fixed loudspeakers installed near the military demarcation line (MDL) in a process that is expected to take several days. Since the end of last year, 16 mobile units have already been out of operation. The defense ministry said the move was aimed at reducing tensions between the north and the south and would not affect military readiness, South Korean outlet JoongAng Daily reported. There had been no consultation with Pyongyang, which as of Monday had yet to remove its own front-line loudspeakers. South Korea's presidential office said Lee made the decision given the absence of recent major provocations by North Korea and aimed to de-escalate military confrontation and open the door to rebuilding mutual trust. However, Pyongyang has rejected that it would soften its stance with the South, and experts have warned that dismantling the loudspeakers may hamper the South's ability to respond credibly to future provocations, including floating trash balloons over the border. What People Are Saying South Korea's defense ministry said it has begun "removing loudspeakers from today. This is a practical measure to help reduce tensions between the North and the South, taken within a scope that does not affect our military readiness." Kim Yo-jong, North Korean leader Kim Jong-un's sister and a senior party official: "No matter how desperately the Lee Jae Myung government they do all sorts of righteous things to attract our attention and receive international attention, there can be no change in our state's understanding of the enemy." What Happens Next South Korean media reported that the dismantling of the speakers could help revive the 2018 inter-Korean military agreement, which called for a halt to hostile acts within a 5-kilometer (3.1-mile) zone around the MDL, which was one of Lee's campaign pledges. However, critics said that Seoul's action could play into Pyongyang's hands as the presence of the loudspeakers made them one of the few ways to pressure North Korea, which last week rejected any softening of its position toward the South.
Newsweek
4 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Doubles Down on Mathematically Impossible Drug Price Cuts
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump has doubled down on his claim of reducing drug prices by amounts that are mathematically impossible. Trump told reporters on Sunday that his administration had cut the price of some prescription drugs by as much as 1,500 percent. "Well, one of the things they're going to be talking about pretty soon are the tremendous drop in drug prices. You know, we've cut drug prices by 1,200, 1,300, 1,400, 1,500 percent. I don't mean 50 percent. I mean 14-, 1,500 percent," the president said. When asked to clarify the president's remarks, White House spokesperson Kush Desai told Newsweek, "It's an objective fact that Americans are paying exponentially more for the same exact drugs as people in other developed countries pay, and it's an objective fact that no other Administration has done more to rectify this unfair burden for the American people." Why It Matters Trump's remarks signal a misunderstanding of how pricing and percentages work, which could undermine public confidence in his ability to tackle problems such as drug pricing. President Donald Trump speaks with reporters near Air Force One at the Lehigh Valley International Airport in Allentown, Pennsylvania, on August 3. President Donald Trump speaks with reporters near Air Force One at the Lehigh Valley International Airport in Allentown, Pennsylvania, on August To Know Reducing the price of a drug by 100 percent would make it free, and a reduction greater than 100 percent suggests pharmaceutical companies would pay their customers to take their prescription drugs. Commenting on Trump's claims, Jeffrey Frankel, a professor of capital formation and growth at Harvard University, told Newsweek that the numbers were "indeed mathematically impossible." On Friday, the president made similar claims of bringing drug prices down by "1,000 percent, 1,200 percent" in an interview with Newsmax's Rob Finnerty. That came a day after the White House said Trump had written to the heads of 17 pharmaceutical companies outlining steps they needed to take to bring down the prices of drugs sold in the U.S. to match the lowest price paid by a group of other economically advanced countries. According to a fact sheet the White House released on Thursday, Trump's letters said the pharmaceutical manufacturers' proposals for implementing his May executive order—which seeks to achieve "most favored nation" pricing in the United States—had "fallen short." However, it did not mention the percentage reductions the president has discussed in recent days. What People Are Saying Jeffrey Frankel, a professor of capital formation and growth at Harvard University, told Newsweek: "They are indeed mathematically impossible. If he cut prices 90 percent, the drugs would cost 1/10 as much as before. If 100 percent, then they would cost zero. If cutting 1,000 percent means a thing, then it means that the drug company pays you (a lot) to take the drug." He added: "It's almost as if Trump is making fun of his supporters, seeing what increasingly absurd statements he can get away with." Justin Wolfers, a professor of economics and public policy at the University of Michigan, told Newsweek: "This is not a question for an economist, but rather a sixth grader. After all, the Common Core curriculum standard states that students should know how to 'find a percent of a quantity as a rate per 100 (e.g., 30 percent of a quantity means 30/100 times the quantity).'" Wolfers added: "I just checked with my sixth grader (Oliver Wolfers), and he confirmed that he has studied percentages and that the president's math does not make sense 'because then the prices would be negative.' He added, 'Is he an idiot?' before returning to watching YouTube. Oliver's father agrees with Oliver's mathematical analysis and encourages him to use more positive language when engaging with fellow kids." Pau Pujolas, a professor of economics at McMaster University, told Newsweek: "If your grocery bill is $100 and you get a 50 percent reduction in price, you pay $50. If you get a 75 percent reduction, you pay $25. If you get a 99 percent reduction, you pay $1. If you get a 100 percent reduction, you pay $0. You can't get a reduction larger than that ... so 1,200 percent doesn't make sense. "Talking about bad math: Firing Erika McEntarfer, the director of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), is way worse than a POTUS not knowing how to operate with basic percentages. Let's not miss the forest for the trees." President Donald Trump said at a Republican dinner in July: "This is something that nobody else can do. We're gonna get the drug prices down—not 30 or 40 percent, which would be great, not 50 or 60 percent. No, we're gonna get them down 1,000 percent, 600 percent, 500 percent, 1,500 percent. Numbers that are not even thought to be achievable." The White House fact sheet said: "From this point forward, President Trump will only accept from drug manufacturers a commitment that provides American families immediate relief from vastly inflated drug prices and an end to the freeriding by European and other developed nations on American innovations." Journalist James Surowiecki wrote on X in response to Trump's comments on Sunday: "It's not just that the math here is nonsensical. It's that Trump hasn't actually cut drug prices yet at all. He's literally just sent letters to drugmakers telling them to cut prices. Does he know that and is lying? Or is he deluded? We have no idea." What Happens Next Trump and the White House have not clarified what he means when he says drug prices will come down by as much as 1,500 percent. The president's letters to pharmaceutical companies give them a 60-day window to present a viable plan to reduce U.S. drug prices.
