logo
Federal cuts affect regional food access; more uncertainty to come

Federal cuts affect regional food access; more uncertainty to come

Yahoo27-05-2025
Ashley Baker, strategic initiatives coordinator at the Great Plains Food Bank, stocks food in a wellness pantry. (Courtesy of Great Plains Food Bank)
Proposed cuts to the federal food assistance program are coming at a time when agencies addressing hunger in North Dakota are already facing lost revenue and increased need.
'There's a lot of uncertainty right now,' said Darby Njos, spokeswoman for Great Plains Food Bank in Fargo. 'We're still urging lawmakers to support programs that help people get back on their feet while knowing that the needs of people continue to shift.'
The most recent hit to federal food assistance are proposed cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
Known as SNAP, this is a federally funded program that gives money for groceries to eligible low-income households – mostly older adults, people with disabilities, and families with children. A budget bill passed by the U.S. House of Representatives last week would end federal nutrition benefits for millions and shift some costs to states, according to an analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.
The bill still needs to be considered by the U.S. Senate.
More than 3 million people would lose SNAP benefits under GOP bill, nonpartisan report says
Great Plains Food Bank is the only food bank in North Dakota and distributes food to those in need throughout the state and Clay County, Minnesota.
Earlier this year it lost about $1.3 million in funding and food because of federal cuts, Njos said.
Some of those cuts were through a program that allowed the food bank to purchase meat and produce from local farmers. This year Great Plains Food Bank expected three rounds of funding, each around $1 million. The first round came through, the second round of funding was paused and then reinstated.
The food bank has been informed it won't receive the third round, Njos said.
'We worked directly with several farmers, and we had to have some tough conversations,' she said. 'We don't have the ability to make those purchases without that funding.'
In addition, the food bank will not receive summer deliveries of food through The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP). These deliveries equaled about $300,000 in food.
The nonprofit was able to raise about $250,000 in private funds to help offset those losses, but the cuts are still felt.
'Those cuts impact our day-to-day work,' Njos said. 'We're working hard to fill in those gaps.'
States on the hook for billions under U.S. House GOP bill making them help pay for SNAP
In 2024, the food bank served 151,000 people in North Dakota and Clay County. About one-third of those served are children; 16% are seniors, Njos said.
'These are vulnerable populations that don't have a lot of options if they're hungry,' Njos said. 'You don't want them worrying about where to get their next meal.'
About 28% of Great Plains Food Bank's food sourcing traditionally comes through government programs. While some funding and commodities are still being received, the loss of purchasing power strains resources.
'We've had to adapt quickly,' Njos said. 'These cuts are real, and they're being felt at every level.'
Susie Boelter is executive director of North Country Food Bank, which serves part of Grand Forks County in North Dakota and 21 counties in northwestern and western Minnesota. This food bank has seen what Boelter calls 'staggering increases' of use over the past three years.
Cutting federal food assistance would add to that need.
'If there are cuts to SNAP that would have a huge impact on us,' Boelter said. 'For every meal we provide (through the food bank), SNAP provides nine.'
North Country Food Bank has seen some shifts in which federal contracts are funded but it hasn't seen a loss in overall federal revenue. Boelter said it's still time for additional help – not less.
'Any additional cuts will put a ton of pressure on our emergency food system,' she said. 'Food banks are good at getting food into the hands of people who need it, but it's time to sound the alarm.'
One bright spot in food assistance is that federal funding for summer food programs remains in place, according to Melissa Anderson, assistant director for Child Nutrition and Food Distribution Programs at the state Department of Public Instruction.
Two federal programs – Summer Food Service and the Summer EBT – provide nutrition for North Dakota students who have access to free and reduced-cost meals during the school year.
This summer 42 schools and nonprofits are offering a free meal or snack at over 130 sites throughout North Dakota.
In addition, the state Department of Public Instruction works with the Department of Health and Human Services to distribute EBT cards worth $120 to eligible students. Households have 120 days to use those dollars to purchase groceries, Anderson said.
The state expects about 44,000 students will be eligible.
These summer programs are successful in getting food to those who need it, and Anderson is optimistic the funding will remain. She also acknowledges that policies and funding streams can change quickly.
'Every day there's new information,' Anderson said. 'We're trying to stay positive but there are a lot of unknowns.'
Lawmakers earlier this year approved $5 million in grant funding for the Great Plains Food Bank through the state Department of Agriculture to support the construction of a new statewide distribution center. The state's investment will be matched by private donations raised by the agency.
The food bank is preparing to break ground in 2027.
This investment reflects the region's commitment to taking care of their neighbors, Njos said.
'We've always thrived in times of crisis,' said Njos. 'North Dakotans stand up when their neighbors are in need, and we'll continue doing whatever it takes to ensure no one goes hungry.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republicans look to make a U-turn on federal commitment to electric vehicles for the Postal Service
Republicans look to make a U-turn on federal commitment to electric vehicles for the Postal Service

San Francisco Chronicle​

time9 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Republicans look to make a U-turn on federal commitment to electric vehicles for the Postal Service

WASHINGTON (AP) — A year after being lauded for its plan to replace thousands of aging, gas-powered mail trucks with a mostly electric fleet, the U.S. Postal Service is facing congressional attempts to strip billions in federal EV funding. In June, the Senate parliamentarian blocked a Republican proposal in a major tax-and-spending bill to sell off the agency's new electric vehicles and infrastructure and revoke remaining federal money. But efforts to halt the fleet's shift to clean energy continue in the name of cost savings. Donald Maston, president of the National Rural Letter Carriers' Association, said canceling the program now would have the opposite effect, squandering millions of dollars. 'I think it would be shortsighted for Congress to now suddenly decide they're going to try to go backwards and take the money away for the EVs or stop that process because that's just going to be a bunch of money on infrastructure that's been wasted," he said. Beyond that, many in the scientific community fear the government could pass on an opportunity to reduce carbon emissions that contribute to global warming when urgent action is needed. Electrified vehicles reduce emissions A 2022 University of Michigan study found the new electric postal vehicles could cut total greenhouse gas emissions by up to 20 million tons over the predicted, cumulative 20-year lifetime of the trucks. That's a fraction of the more than 6,000 million metric tons emitted annually in the United States, said professor Gregory A. Keoleian, co-director of the university's Center for Sustainable Systems. But he said the push toward electric vehicles is critical and needs to accelerate, given the intensifying impacts of climate change. 'We're already falling short of goals for reducing emissions,' Keoleian said. 'We've been making progress, but the actions being taken or proposed will really reverse decarbonization progress that has been made to date.' Many GOP lawmakers share President Donald Trump's criticism of the Biden-era green energy push and say the Postal Service should stick to delivering mail. Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, said 'it didn't make sense for the Postal Service to invest so heavily in an all-electric force." She said she will pursue legislation to rescind what is left of the $3 billion from the Inflation Reduction Act allocated to help cover the $10 billion cost of new postal vehicles. Ernst has called the EV initiative a 'boondoggle' and "a textbook example of waste,' citing delays, high costs and concerns over cold-weather performance. 'You always evaluate the programs, see if they are working. But the rate at which the company that's providing those vehicles is able to produce them, they are so far behind schedule, they will never be able to fulfill that contract," Ernst said during a recent appearance at the Iowa State Fair, referring to Wisconsin-based Oshkosh Defense. 'For now,' she added, "gas-powered vehicles — use some ethanol in them — I think is wonderful.' Corn-based ethanol is a boon to Iowa's farmers, but the effort to reverse course has other Republican support. Rep. Michael Cloud, R-Texas, a co-sponsor of the rollback effort, has said the EV order should be canceled because the project "has delivered nothing but delays, defective trucks, and skyrocketing costs.' The Postal Service maintains that the production delay of the Next Generation Delivery Vehicles, or NGDVs, was 'very modest" and not unexpected. 'The production quantity ramp-up was planned for and intended to be very gradual in the early months to allow time for potential modest production or supplier issues to be successfully resolved,' spokesperson Kim Frum said. EVs help in modernization effort The independent, self-funded federal agency, which is paid for mostly by postage and product sales, is in the middle of a $40 billion, 10-year modernization and financial stabilization plan. The EV effort had the full backing of Democratic President Joe Biden, who pledged to move toward an all-electric federal fleet of car and trucks. The 'Deliver for America' plan calls for modernizing the ground fleet, notably the Grumman Long Life Vehicle, which dates back to 1987 and is fuel-inefficient at 9 mpg. The vehicles are well past their projected 24-year lifespan and are prone to breakdowns and even fires. 'Our mechanics are miracle workers,' said Mark Dimondstein, president of the American Postal Workers Union. 'The parts are not available. They fabricate them. They do the best they can.' The Postal Service announced in 2022 it would deploy at least 66,000 electric vehicles by 2028, including commercial off-the-shelf models, after years of deliberation and criticism it was moving too slowly to reduce emissions. By 2024, the agency was awarded a Presidential Sustainability Award for its efforts to electrify the largest fleet in the federal government. Building new postal trucks In 2021, Oshkosh Defense was awarded a contract for up to 165,000 battery electric and internal combustion engine Next Generation vehicles over 10 years. The first of the odd-looking trucks, with hoods resembling a duck's bill, began service in Georgia last year. Designed for greater package capacity, the trucks are equipped with airbags, blind-spot monitoring, collision sensors, 360-degree cameras and antilock brakes. There's also a new creature comfort: air conditioning. Douglas Lape, special assistant to the president of the National Association of Letter Carriers and a former carrier, is among numerous postal employees who have had a say in the new design. He marvels at how Oshkosh designed and built a new vehicle, transforming an old North Carolina warehouse into a factory along the way. 'I was in that building when it was nothing but shelving,' he said. 'And now, being a completely functioning plant where everything is built in-house — they press the bodies in there, they do all of the assembly — it's really amazing in my opinion.' Where things stand now The agency has so far ordered 51,500 NGDVs, including 35,000 battery-powered vehicles. To date, it has received 300 battery vehicles and 1,000 gas-powered ones. Former Postmaster General Louis DeJoy said in 2022 the agency expected to purchase chiefly zero-emissions delivery vehicles by 2026. It still needs some internal combustion engine vehicles that travel longer distances. Frum, the Postal Service spokesperson, said the planned NGDV purchases were "carefully considered from a business perspective' and are being deployed to routes and facilities where they will save money. The agency has also received more than 8,200 of 9,250 Ford E-Transit electric vehicles it has ordered, she said. Ernst said it's fine for the Postal Service to use EVs already purchased. 'But you know what? We need to be smart about the way we are providing services through the federal government,' she said. 'And that was not a smart move.' Postal vehicles, he said, have low average speeds and a high number of stops and starts that enable regenerative braking. Routes average under 30 miles and are known in advance, making planning easier. 'It's the perfect application for an electric vehicle," he said, 'and it's a particularly inefficient application for an internal combustion engine vehicle.'

Texas redistricting battle to start new phase with Democrats expected return to Capitol
Texas redistricting battle to start new phase with Democrats expected return to Capitol

CBS News

time10 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Texas redistricting battle to start new phase with Democrats expected return to Capitol

For the second week, Republicans and Democrats have continued their showdown over new congressional maps in Texas, which will result in five new GOP-majority districts at the expense of Democrats. But the fight is about to enter a new phase on Monday, Aug. 18. Democrats who broke quorum and left Texas, killed the first special session, and didn't show up for the start of the second special session — many believe they will Monday. Speaker Dustin Burrows said House members must be at the Capitol at noon. Friday, Aug. 15, Burrows ended the first special session after the House once again fell short of a quorum, which requires 100 lawmakers to be present. The Senate ended its first special session, too, and then Governor Greg Abbott called for the start of the second special session, with the same agenda, to start a couple of hours later Friday, at noon. Democrats said they wanted to kill the first special session, which allowed them time to go to other states, such as California, where Governor Gavin Newsom said if Texas approves its new maps, California will do the same to neutralize any GOP gains. "We can't stand back and watch this democracy disappear district by district all across the country," Newsom said. "We are not bystanders in this world. We can shape the future." The difference there is that voters in California will have to approve it, something that won't happen in Texas. During an unrelated news conference on Friday, Aug. 15, CBS News Texas's Jack Fink asked Gov. Abbott about Newsom's plan. In an exclusive interview, Abbott spoke about his ongoing lawsuit to remove House Democratic Caucus Chairman Gene Wu from office and whether Republicans will try to increase the number of new GOP majority congressional seats to not just five, but as many as eight or more. Abbott said, " They are [Democrats] are required by the Texas Constitution to actually show up and cast votes on bills. That's what the Constitution requires. That's why I'm seeking to remove Gene Wu, because he's not fulfilling his constitutional duty." As for adding more seats, Abbott said, " In reference to the lawsuit, Wu shared his thoughts concerning Abbott and when Democrats will return. For the past couple of weeks, House Republicans have expressed frustration about Democrats breaking quorum. Representative Shelley Luther of Grayson County about the end of the first special session and what she wants to happen next with redistricting. For now, Republicans have proposed adding the same five GOP majority districts in Congress as they have before. Abbott has not added redistricting for State House seats, and he was asked about it. "Every strategy is at play... if we need to," said Abbott. Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett, of Dallas, said she's considering running in a different Congressional district in North Texas than the one she represents now. In North Texas now, there are three Democrats who serve in Congress, but under the new maps, there will only be two districts. That's because District 32, now represented by Democrat Julie Johnson, will become a Republican majority district and extend to East Texas. District 33, now represented by Democrat Marc Veasey, of Fort Worth, includes both Tarrant and Dallas Counties, but under the new maps, will only be in Dallas County. Crockett said she's considering running in the newly drawn 33rd Congressional District, because her home will be in that district, instead of the 30th District she represents now. Last week, Congressman Veasey and Congresswoman Johnson both said they are focused on the fight against the new maps first, and will then consider their options for re-election. A new poll shows mixed results about how Texans feel about the newly proposed Congressional maps. Regarding the five new GOP majority Congressional seats, the Emerson College poll of 1,000 registered voters in Texas found 36% support the new maps, while 38% oppose them, and 26% are unsure. But when asked if Republicans in Texas are entitled to five more seats, something President Trump said, 40% of those surveyed said they agreed, 38% disagreed, and 22% were neutral. Burrows signed civil arrest warrants against the Democrats who broke quorum. The new poll showed 41% agreed they should be arrested, 37% disagreed, and 22% were neutral. And in the bitter Republican primary for the Texas Senate race, the poll found 30% support for incumbent Senator John Cornyn, with Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton one point behind at 29%. Five percent said they want someone else, and 37% are undecided. Previous polls have shown Paxton leading Cornyn.

California parents have a new option to save for K-12 private school — but there's a catch
California parents have a new option to save for K-12 private school — but there's a catch

San Francisco Chronicle​

time39 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

California parents have a new option to save for K-12 private school — but there's a catch

The GOP tax megabill signed into law in July had a provision tucked into it that could help parents who send their kids to private school. As students head back to school this month, a disproportionate number in the Bay Area will be at private schools: In several counties, rates of attendance are more than double the 8% statewide average. Nearly one-third of K-12 students in San Francisco attend a private school, according to data website Private School Review. That attendance comes with a hefty price tag. The average amount a family would spend to send their child to private school in San Francisco from kindergarten through high school graduation is about $520,000, according to a Chronicle data analysis. To help cover those costs, parents will soon be able to leverage an increased amount from 529 education savings plans. What are 529 plans and how are they changing? Created by Congress in 1996 and named for a section of IRS code, 529 plans are tax-advantaged investment accounts operated by states or educational institutions designed to help save for a child's education. They were originally intended to cover college or trade school costs, but since 2018, the law has allowed families to withdraw up to $10,000 annually from 529 plans for K-12 tuition without paying a penalty or federal taxes on the growth. Starting next year, under the tax and spending bill signed by President Donald Trump on July 4, the K-12 withdrawal limit increases to $20,000. The bill also expanded what K-12 expenses could be covered. Under previous law, only tuition for K-12 was eligible for federal penalty-free 529 withdrawals; under the new law, expenses like books, tutoring, standardized and AP test fees, and educational therapies for students with disabilities are all considered qualified expenses. Some states have changed their laws so parents don't pay a state penalty or tax on those K-12 withdrawals either. But not in California. K-12 expenses are still considered nonqualified expenses, so you'll pay a 2.5% penalty plus state income taxes (as high as 13.3%, depending on your household income) on the taxable growth when you withdraw 529 funds for those purposes. Given that, does it ever make sense in this state to use your kid's 529 funds to pay for their private school tuition or other pre-college educational costs in California? It could. Here's what experts say. The case against using a 529 for K-12 expenses Richard Pon, a certified public accountant and certified financial planner, has a son who's enrolled in private school in San Francisco. He said he doesn't use 529 money to pay for it. The first reason is the state income taxes and the 2.5% penalty. The other reason is the flexibility of 529 funds: Even if your child gets a free ride to college with room and board paid for, those funds could be used to pay for graduate school, professional certifications like a CPA license or nursing license, or get rolled into an IRA. You could also roll the 529 funds into an account for another child or relative, or a friend. And if you're using 529 funds to pay for elementary school, that means they don't have time to grow in the market before your child goes to college — though, of course, there's always a chance they could drop between now and then, too. If you're really in a financial bind and paying for your kid's private school tuition from their 529 means the difference between paying your mortgage or not, then yes, it could make sense to tap those funds — though many 529 accounts are protected by federal law in bankruptcies, so if you're truly at the edge of financial peril, you may want to leave the money in that account alone. In general, Pon said, 'I would think about holding this (money) as long as possible instead of saying, 'Hey, I'll use it for K-12.'' The case for using a 529 to pay K-12 expenses For some families in California, it might make sense to pay K-12 educational costs from a 529, said Sean Pyles, a certified financial planner and the host of NerdWallet's 'Smart Money' podcast. He said to think of 529s less as college savings accounts and more like flexible education savings accounts. When it comes to the tax question, parents can do the math and see if using the funds for K-12 expenses pencils out. 'What it's going to come down to for each person is figuring out whether they are going to be coming out ahead by actually reaping tax benefits from this account, or if, given the amount (of taxes and penalties) that California imposes, it's just not going to be financially beneficial to them at this point,' he said. For parents making the investment in private schools for their kids, it's probably worth checking with an accountant, financial planner or other tax pro to see if the math makes sense.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store