
‘Fortnite' unavailable on Apple devices worldwide
Hit game 'Fortnite' was unavailable on Apple's digital App Store around the world on Friday, in the latest episode of a battle between the tech titan and publisher Epic Games. While Fortnite with its millions of daily players was already unavailable to iPhone users in the United States, the block on downloads of the cartoonish multiplayer shooter now affects the entire globe. 'Apple has blocked our Fortnite submission... sadly, Fortnite on iOS will be offline worldwide until Apple unblocks it,' Epic posted on X.
Apple told AFP it had asked Epic in Sweden to resubmit its app update 'without including the US storefront of the App Store so as not to impact Fortnite in other geographies'. 'We did not take any action to remove the live version of Fortnite from alternative distribution marketplaces,' an Apple spokesperson said.
Epic has for years battled tech giants over the commissions they charge for software downloaded through the official stores on operating systems like Apple's iOS and Google's Android. These are historically the only way for most users to install programs onto their devices.
Although it has secured wins in US courts and European Union digital regulations, Epic on Friday effectively accused Apple of slow-walking the vetting process it enforces before making an app or game available for users to download. Epic said last week that it had submitted 'Fortnite' for review for listing in the App Store in the United States. As well as being 'blocked' there, the publisher added that 'Fortnite' was also unavailable in the European Union.
Fans there can usually download the game through the company's own app store as the EU's Digital Markets Act (DMA), which went into effect last year, requires Apple and other US tech giants to open up their platforms to competition.
'Fortnite' is a heavyweight of the gaming world, with Epic claiming around 500 million users in 2023. But players have grown used to upsets as the publisher has filed legal cases against both Apple and Google over what it calls 'junk fees'. Apple's commissions for App Store purchases, which can range as high as 30 percent, come 'at the expense of consumers and developers', the company wrote on X last week.
Epic has faced off against Apple in US courts since 2021, when 'Fortnite' was banned from the App Store over what Apple said was an attempt to get around the iPhone maker's payment system. A judge found that the App Store was anticompetitive as it forbade developers from offering alternative avenues for payment. But the conflict has endured past the US court order and the EU's requirement that Apple and Google allow third-party app stores on their operating systems.
A US federal judge said earlier this month that Apple was failing to comply with her three-year-old order that emerged from Epic's case, which requires the iPhone maker to allow other avenues for users to buy content or services. Epic quickly capitalized on the new court action, submitting Fortnite afresh to be vetted for inclusion in the App Store. 'We don't have an update on our Fortnite submission to the App Store. Apple has neither accepted nor rejected it,' chief executive Tim Sweeney wrote on X Thursday.
Revenue stream
Apple had made a priority of building up its services business as the Silicon Valley titan tries to reduce its reliance on iPhone sales for revenue. The unit, which includes Apple's television and music streaming services along with iCloud data storage and App Store income, now accounts for more than a quarter of the company's revenue. Apple last week sought to delay a part of the court order that blocks it from charging commissions on transactions outside the App Store, Bloomberg reported.
The App Store changes include letting app makers use alternate payment systems free or charge or commission. Epic had cast the order as an opening of the floodgates to allow other software developers to escape Apple's fees. Swedish music streaming service Spotify was among the first to take advantage of the ruling, offering links in its iOS app to purchase subscriptions outside the App Store.--AFP

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Kuwait Times
2 days ago
- Kuwait Times
‘Fortnite' unavailable on Apple devices worldwide
Hit game 'Fortnite' was unavailable on Apple's digital App Store around the world on Friday, in the latest episode of a battle between the tech titan and publisher Epic Games. While Fortnite with its millions of daily players was already unavailable to iPhone users in the United States, the block on downloads of the cartoonish multiplayer shooter now affects the entire globe. 'Apple has blocked our Fortnite submission... sadly, Fortnite on iOS will be offline worldwide until Apple unblocks it,' Epic posted on X. Apple told AFP it had asked Epic in Sweden to resubmit its app update 'without including the US storefront of the App Store so as not to impact Fortnite in other geographies'. 'We did not take any action to remove the live version of Fortnite from alternative distribution marketplaces,' an Apple spokesperson said. Epic has for years battled tech giants over the commissions they charge for software downloaded through the official stores on operating systems like Apple's iOS and Google's Android. These are historically the only way for most users to install programs onto their devices. Although it has secured wins in US courts and European Union digital regulations, Epic on Friday effectively accused Apple of slow-walking the vetting process it enforces before making an app or game available for users to download. Epic said last week that it had submitted 'Fortnite' for review for listing in the App Store in the United States. As well as being 'blocked' there, the publisher added that 'Fortnite' was also unavailable in the European Union. Fans there can usually download the game through the company's own app store as the EU's Digital Markets Act (DMA), which went into effect last year, requires Apple and other US tech giants to open up their platforms to competition. 'Fortnite' is a heavyweight of the gaming world, with Epic claiming around 500 million users in 2023. But players have grown used to upsets as the publisher has filed legal cases against both Apple and Google over what it calls 'junk fees'. Apple's commissions for App Store purchases, which can range as high as 30 percent, come 'at the expense of consumers and developers', the company wrote on X last week. Epic has faced off against Apple in US courts since 2021, when 'Fortnite' was banned from the App Store over what Apple said was an attempt to get around the iPhone maker's payment system. A judge found that the App Store was anticompetitive as it forbade developers from offering alternative avenues for payment. But the conflict has endured past the US court order and the EU's requirement that Apple and Google allow third-party app stores on their operating systems. A US federal judge said earlier this month that Apple was failing to comply with her three-year-old order that emerged from Epic's case, which requires the iPhone maker to allow other avenues for users to buy content or services. Epic quickly capitalized on the new court action, submitting Fortnite afresh to be vetted for inclusion in the App Store. 'We don't have an update on our Fortnite submission to the App Store. Apple has neither accepted nor rejected it,' chief executive Tim Sweeney wrote on X Thursday. Revenue stream Apple had made a priority of building up its services business as the Silicon Valley titan tries to reduce its reliance on iPhone sales for revenue. The unit, which includes Apple's television and music streaming services along with iCloud data storage and App Store income, now accounts for more than a quarter of the company's revenue. Apple last week sought to delay a part of the court order that blocks it from charging commissions on transactions outside the App Store, Bloomberg reported. The App Store changes include letting app makers use alternate payment systems free or charge or commission. Epic had cast the order as an opening of the floodgates to allow other software developers to escape Apple's fees. Swedish music streaming service Spotify was among the first to take advantage of the ruling, offering links in its iOS app to purchase subscriptions outside the App Store.--AFP


Arab Times
26-05-2025
- Arab Times
Why Google's Gmail upgrade demands a new, shielded email address
NEW YORK, May 26: Google's two billion Gmail users are facing a critical choice as the tech giant rolls out a new upgrade. The update gives Gemini, Google's AI system, unrestricted access to past emails and stored files — but only if you allow it. The key question for users is whether to grant Gemini access, while Google itself faces a significant decision in how to balance innovation and privacy. Last week, Google confirmed that Gmail's latest update would feature personalized smart replies that reflect your typical tone and context. 'Draft replies will sound authentically like you, as the responses are created from past emails and Drive files,' the company stated. However, concerns about the privacy and security implications of these changes remain, as the AI system learns from personal data without full transparency. Additionally, this upgrade presents a conflict with Gmail's recent encryption improvements, raising further doubts about the trade-offs between AI advancements and privacy safeguards. What users really need is a feature similar to Apple's Hide My Email, which allows users to shield their personal email addresses. Hide My Email is a service that enables users to keep their primary email address private when signing up for new accounts, making online purchases, or even sending emails to unfamiliar contacts. For iPhone users, it's been described as 'the best Apple product you aren't using,' and it helps reduce the burden of spam — a problem that AI filtering still struggles to fully address. But for Android and Gmail users, the lack of a similar feature is becoming more apparent. According to How-To-Geek, data breaches involving online accounts are becoming more frequent, with users receiving notifications about their compromised data. With this in mind, a service like Hide My Email becomes increasingly important. Fortunately, there's hope for Android users. Last November, Google introduced Shielded Email, a feature designed to function similarly to Apple's service. Shielded Email will be integrated into Android's Autofill system, allowing users to shield their personal email addresses in apps or on websites. A recent teardown of Google's Play Services APK revealed that Shielded Email will appear as an option when users fill in their email address on certain platforms. For example, when signing up for Amazon, users will be prompted with both their usual email address and a 'Use Shielded Email' option. While the feature is not yet live, it's in advanced stages of development. The need for such email protection has never been more urgent. Following a major data breach uncovered by Jeremy Fowler of vpnMentor, which exposed 184 million login credentials, the necessity of services like Shielded Email and Hide My Email is more pressing than ever. Fowler reported finding thousands of files containing emails, passwords, usernames, and sensitive account information from banks, healthcare platforms, and government portals. The breach highlighted just how vulnerable personal data can be, and how email addresses are often the key identifier for many accounts. By masking email addresses, users can make it significantly harder for attackers to access their accounts through phishing or other socially-engineered attacks. A shielded email address allows you to deactivate a compromised email without exposing your primary one, adding an extra layer of security. When combined with strong, unique passwords, two-factor authentication (2FA), or even passkeys, this strategy effectively locks down your online life. One of the most critical weaknesses in online security today is the use of email addresses as the primary identifier across multiple accounts. Masking email addresses helps protect your identity, making it harder for attackers to track your activities across platforms. But this only works if users take full advantage of the feature. As Google continues to develop its Shielded Email system, users must be proactive. While the feature is not yet available, once it is, users should start using shielded email addresses for all new accounts. The release of this feature will be crucial in helping protect users from the growing threat of data breaches and online identity theft. The launch of Gmail's AI-powered features presents a significant crossroads for Google, with privacy and user consent hanging in the balance. As the tech giant navigates these complexities, users will need to carefully consider how much personal information they are willing to share and how they can protect their identities in an increasingly interconnected world.

Kuwait Times
26-05-2025
- Kuwait Times
Little, little screws' one of many hurdles to US-made iPhones
NEW YORK/WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump's bid to bring manufacturing of Apple's iPhone to the United States faces many legal and economic challenges, experts said on Friday, the least of which are the insertion of 'little screws' that would need to be automated. Trump threatened on Friday to impose a 25 percent tariff on Apple for any iPhones sold, but not made, in the United States, as part of his administration's goal of re-shoring jobs. He told reporters later on Friday that the 25 percent tariff would also apply to Samsung and other smartphone makers. He expects the tariffs to go into effect at the end of June. 'Otherwise it wouldn't be fair' if it did not apply to all imported smartphones, Trump said. 'I had a understanding with (Apple CEO) Tim (Cook) that he wouldn't be doing this. He said he's going to India to build plants. I said that's OK to go to India but you're not going to sell into here without tariffs.' Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CBS last month that the work of 'millions and millions of human beings screwing in little, little screws to make iPhones' would come to the United States and be automated, creating jobs for skilled trade workers such as mechanics and electricians. But he later told CNBC that Cook told him that doing so requires technology not yet available. 'He said, I need to have the robotic arms, right, do it at a scale and a precision that I could bring it here. And the day I see that available, it's coming here,' Lutnick said. The fastest way for the Trump administration to pressure Apple through tariffs would be to use the same legal mechanism behind punishing tariffs on a broad swath of imports, trade lawyers and professors said. The law, known as the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, allows the president to take economic action after declaring an emergency that constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the United States. 'There's no clear legal authority that permits company-specific tariffs, but the Trump administration may try to shoehorn it under its emergency power authorities,' said Sally Stewart Laing, a partner at Akin Gump in Washington. Other means of levying company-specific tariffs rely on lengthy investigations, Laing said. But tariffs on only Apple 'would provide a competitive advantage for other important phones, which undermines Trump's goals of bringing manufacturing to the United States,' Liang said. Experts said Trump has viewed IEEPA as a flexible and powerful economic tool because it is not clear that courts have the power to review the president's response to a declared emergency. 'In the administration's view, as long as he enacts the ritual of declaring an emergency and pronouncing it unusual or extraordinary, there is nothing a court can do,' said Tim Meyer, an international law professor at Duke University. In a case brought by 12 states challenging Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs in the Manhattan-based Court of International Trade, the court is considering that issue, and whether IEEPA authorizes tariffs at all. If the Trump administration wins that case, 'the president is not going to have any trouble coming up with an emergency as a justification to impose tariffs on Apple iPhone imports,' Meyer said. Trump could even simply include iPhones under the trade deficit emergency that already formed the basis for tariffs declared earlier, Meyer said. But moving production to the United States could take up to a decade and could result in iPhones costing $3,500 each, Dan Ives, an analyst at Wedbush, said in a research note. Apple's top-of-the-line iPhone currently retails for around $1,200. 'We believe the concept of Apple producing iPhones in the US is a fairy tale that is not feasible,' Ives said. Even without getting that far, a tariff on iPhones would increase consumer costs by complicating Apple's supply chain and financing, said Brett House, an economics professor at Columbia. 'None of this is positive for American consumers,' he said. – Reuters