Volunteers want help to stop takeover of invasive Himalayan Balsam
The plant, which can grow to about 6ft 5in (2m) tall, blooms with pink or purple scented flowers from June to November and was initially introduced to Britain as an ornamental garden plant.However, it now considered a problematic weed as it crowds out native species and causes soil erosion along water courses. Mr Micklethwaite said while hundreds of volunteers from different groups got together to tackle the plant at designated events in nature reserves, everyone could do their bit within their local community. He said: "If you have a local spot, or even just your garden where its encroaching, it's better to keep it out of places where it isn't, as opposed to going into areas where it is, which can feel a lot more futile.""Especially if you can plant up afterwards with native plants."
Himalayan balsam needs to be pulled out by hand or cut as low as possible before it seeds in order to be removed effectively.Roy Anderton ,90, from Hindley, Greater Manchester, said he tries to cut the plant back when he comes across it while walking his dog in the nearby Low Hall Nature Reserve. He said: "When the flowers are dying back, I cut the plant off below the node [where new stems and leaves grow]. "If you don't do that, it branches out again."
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Manchester on Sounds and follow BBC Manchester on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
16 hours ago
- BBC News
Could we recycle more rubbish in North West of England?
It is a warm afternoon and the sky above the Whinney Hill landfill site near Accrington is full of seagulls. Hundreds of them fly across the site, some landing to forage amongst the bags of rubbish. The air smells rancid. The site has been operating since the 1970s and takes household waste from across East Lancashire, but it has grown and it is now expanding towards residential areas."It's best described as being horrific," says local resident Gary Hough when I ask him what it is like to live near the site. "The mess that the gulls drop on your vehicles, on your home, onto your driveway, your garden furniture, your washing. "Depending on the wind direction, the smell can vary from mild to absolutely disgusting."Whinney Hill landfill site is run by Suez. It said the firm was regulated by the Environment Agency and also explained that Lancashire has one of the largest seagull colonies in Europe. After the coronavirus pandemic, the gulls came inland to find food. "As the birds are a protected species, we are able to take non-lethal preventative measures to ensure the seagulls do not feed from the site, such as the use of gas canons, blank firing pistols, pyrotechnics, lasers and birds of prey," a spokesman says. Suez also says it regularly meets the local community to discuss concerns and it manages the smell by covering the waste and has landfill gas controls. However, Mr Hough says residents want it closing down. "Why should we suffer in a residential community from 15 boroughs worth of household waste?"Dr Edward Randviir, senior lecturer in chemistry at Manchester Metropolitan University says: "There is a lot of environmental impacts of landfills."It creates biomethane which gets emitted to the atmosphere. "Sometimes this is captured by the companies. Some waste gets out and gets blown around. "Even though they are encased within these cells, you do get some pollution which leaches out, even though there are mechanisms to try and stop that from happening." Landfill is seen as the worst option for our black bin waste. We have been burying our rubbish for decades and despite attempts to reduce it, about 8% still goes to landfill. In the North West of England, we send 290 tonnes of household waste to landfill every year. There are 50 landfill sites in the region and 21 are already at capacity. In a bid to reduce how much we send to landfill, councils have been hit with higher charges. The main alternative is to burn it. We send about 43% of our region's waste to incinerators like the EFW Facility in Runcorn, which is run by Virador. It burns 3.5 million tonnes of rubbish every year, rubbish which can't be process creates electricity, but here too some residents are unhappy. The incinerator blocks Ralph Owen's view of the Mersey Estuary."The noise from the plant is incessant," he says."It's a dull, droning noise. I don't open my bedroom windows at night. "The noise is too disturbing…to have actually moved what is a dirty industry so close, beggars belief." He is also worried about the local air quality. Operators have an obligation to capture any toxic gases. Virador says its operation is preventing millions of tonnes of waste going to landfill and it takes its environmental responsibility seriously. It says it has "state-of-the-art processing and filtration systems that ensure emissions comply with environmental permits and wider regulation".The site here is set to expand to build a carbon capture plant. Mr Owen says that means more industry on his what about levels of recycling? And why aren't they more impressive?We recycle just 45% of household waste in the region. In Greater Manchester about a million tonnes of cans and plastic bottles a year end up at the combined authority's recycling centre in Sharston. Levels of recycling in the region are above the national average example, Stockport recycles about 60% of its household levels of recycling are stagnating. Alison Fare, from Recycling Greater Manchester, says: "I think we've hit a point nationally where most places are recycling as much as they can." She says once they have a new materials recovery facility, they will be able to recycle plastic bags, films and wrappings. But the levels are also affected by contaminated loads. 'Collective responsibility' Daniel Carolan, from Suez, which runs the centre, says: "It's a real shame if the teams have been out for two or three hours and the bin wagon is full. "They might have collected 400 or 500 bins that day, but if 10 of them have the wrong things inside, it affects the whole load."While he thinks people could recycle more he believes the answer is a much bigger issues."We can't recycle ourselves out of trouble," he says. "We need to re- educate ourselves, and ask does this need to be thrown away, or could it be reused or repaired?"And that solution is echoed by many. Dr Randviir says: "We have to have a collective responsibility for waste. "Not least because it is a wicked problem. "It is not just the collectors who have a responsibility, it is us as consumers, it is us as disposers of waste. "We all have a collective responsibility in my view." Read more stories from Cheshire, Lancashire, Greater Manchester and Merseyside on the BBC, watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer and follow BBC North West on X.
The Sun
a day ago
- The Sun
Locals who live near overgrown & derelict theme park inspired by King Arthur say it's better than the council's new plan
A DERELICT theme park inspired by Arthurian legend is set to be demolished - but locals aren't happy. Residents living near Camelot theme park in Chorley have expressed their frustration with the proposed plans. 8 8 8 8 Having closed down over a decade ago, the derelict site has become overgrown and littered with graffiti. It has turned the once-popular theme park into a hot spot for urban explorers and rebellious locals. Despite the 140-acre land laying unused since 2012, locals have protested against new planning proposals that could see the site repurposed. The plan centres on an £80 development that would see 350 homes built on the site. Plans were put forward by Developers Story Homes to Chorley Borough Council on June 20. However, similar plans have twice been rejected - once in 2014, and again in 2017 - since the developers bought the site in 2009. In planning documents they claim it is "well positioned" to support wider regional growth and a "prime location" for a residential development like this. They plan to keep half of the new homes as "affordable" housing after the estimated seven-year project. The developers also hope it will lead to more wide-ranging benefits for the area, bringing in jobs and higher household expenditure. Despite the optimistic proposals, residents in nearby Heskin have argued against the project, with 25 objections to the proposals and just one supporting. They are primarily concerned about the destruction of wildlife on greenbelt land. Others were worried about increased noise and traffic, with the village's population of 1,000 people having "insufficient infrastructure" to cope with new residents. One resident commenting on the proposals said: "There are not enough amenities to cope. How will the schools, GPs, roads cope? They added: "Please leave our greenery and woodland and nature alone." Other residents expressed similar concerns, with one writing: "The development lacks clear provision for new schools, healthcare or transport links - failing to meet the needs of the existing population, let alone new residents." Another resident raised concerns about existing drainage problems in the area. While the report does consider flood risks to the site, they feel it has not adequately considered risk to the existing properties. They wrote: "We have issues with drainage already and with the aforementioned sites we have no idea how this is going to impact the communities with flooding and future issues." Residents generally would rather the site be used to enhance the existing community, for example with a leisure centre, or dedicated woodland trails. Out of the 27 comments on the planning proposal, only one local expressed support for the development. They wrote: "There are some who say there isn't the infrastructure to make this development viable. I would say, there are numerous engineers whose job it is to ensure that there will be enough electricity/drainage etc to ensure the development will be ok. "As long as the development is sympathetic to the local nature, I think it is an ideal use of a brown field site." The planning application does contain reference to a 186.9 square metre community hub "with associated habitat creation, landscaping, open space, parking, footpaths / cycleways, drainage and other infrastructure." 8 8 8 8
BBC News
2 days ago
- BBC News
Roman road discovered in Manchester city centre
A well-preserved Roman road is among the finds uncovered by archaeologists in a city artefacts have been found in Manchester just below street level on Liverpool Road, near excavating the site said it was one of the most significant Roman discoveries in the city in more than 20 Mottershead, an archaeologist with Civic who carried out the dig, told BBC Radio Manchester it was an "absolutely astonishing find", adding: "I haven't seen anything this significant in Castlefield for 20 years at least." "The Romans knew what they were doing when it came to engineering," said Mr Mottershead, explaining they found multiple levels and repairs of the road, which was basically made out of compacted said it was well preserved, with "no potholes in it".He said a range of Romano-British artefacts had been found, dating from the late 1st to the 3rd and possibly even the early 4th century AD, showing the length of time the vicus - which means civilian settlement - was in road would have been the main northern exit route from the former Roman fort nearby, a Civic spokesperson hearths and domestic artefacts including pottery and decorative glassware have also been discovered on the site. Ian Miller from the Greater Manchester Archaeological Advisory Service said: "It's certainly the best Roman archaeology I've seen in the city centre for 20 years and probably more than that."He said the Roman road was "really well-preserved", which was remarkable given it was only 400mm beneath the surface in a busy site is near to the Roman fort of Mamucium, which was established around 78 AD and much of which was excavated in the 1970s, Mr Miller is also close to Roman excavations further south of the site which uncovered parts of the Roman settlement in the 1970s and 1980s. Mr Miller said that "in some respects, the latest excavation was the missing piece of the jigsaw that will hopefully link to those two together".He said it should provide more information about what sort of buildings were in the area, just outside the Roman fort, and to re-examine the discoveries of the dig has taken place as part of a development on the site being carried out on behalf of Allied London. Mr Mottershead said the uncovered artefacts would eventually go on display in the city, after they had been analysed. Listen to the best of BBC Radio Manchester on Sounds and follow BBC Manchester on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
