Serving the nation: A legacy in Indo-Pak war hero's native village
Gumla: Villages in the
Albert Ekka
(Jari) block of
Gumla district
, particularly the
Jari village
and its neighbouring areas, have maintained a strong legacy of their young men joining the armed forces and various central security organisations over the years.The distinguished son of Jari village, Lance Naik Albert Ekka, who sacrificed his life in the 1971 Indo-Pak War, received the nation's highest military decoration, the
Param Veer Chakra
(PVC).
He is the only PVC recipient from eastern India, so far. Two of Ekka's siblings, Ferdinand Ekka (now retired) and Lt Jerom Ekka, also served in the Army.In these regions, mothers have immense honour and pride when their sons join the Army and other central forces, including the BSF. The residents of all 52 villages in this block have at least one or two family members serving in the Army or other security forces. Currently, Basant Minj from nearby Asro village, which boasts of having 40 Army personnel, is defending the nation against adversaries in Kashmir.Reacting to the ceasefire announcement between India and Pakistan, Abrensia Tirkey, mother of Dinesh Tirkey and wife of an ex-Army man of Kanji village, told TOI, "I sent my son to serve the country.
Operation Sindoor
Pak drones enter Indian airspace, explosions heard just hours after truce deal
Sirens, explosions in border districts after Pak breaks deal: What we know so far
'What happened to ceasefire?' J&K CM after explosions heard across Srinagar
It gives immense pleasure. He was posted in Kashmir. Mothers like me from our area feel proud of sending sons to safeguard the country."Similarly, Tarsheela Lakra, the mother of BSF jawan Bimal Lakra, said, "Our children joined the Army to serve the country. I was very happy when my son was selected for the BSF. He went to protect the border areas of the country in Jammu & Kashmir. He returned home after completing his job last month."On the ceasefire, the elderly Tarsheela added, "It's also a matter of relief for those who worked in the very difficult situations to safeguard the country."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Flashback: When BSF aircraft crash killed 10 on board
New Delhi: Winter's chill was just beginning to settle over the city on Dec 22, 2015, when a wave of dread swept across southwest Delhi's Dwarka. A Beechcraft Super King aircraft, operated by Border Security Force, took off from Indira Gandhi International Airport in Delhi for Ranchi. Within minutes, the routine flight, carrying 10 people, including three crew members, plummeted to the ground, crashing into a water treatment plant within the airport compound. Residents of Shahbad Mohammadpur in Bagdola rushed after seeing the aircraft flapping and tossing before hitting the outer peripheral wall. A ball of fire and plumes of black smoke could be seen from afar. Fire trucks from the Dwarka fire station were rushed to the spot. A couple of people were rescued, but they were ground workers caught in the crash. There were huge aviation fuel bunks near the crash site, but the pilots managed to avoid the fuel tanks and the densely populated village, averting a bigger tragedy. The impact was brutal, leaving no chance of survival. The devastating crash claimed the lives of Bhagwati Prasad Bhatt, the experienced chief pilot, co-pilot Rajesh Shivrain and eight other BSF personnel. The plane was a VIP aircraft, frequently utilised by high-ranking govt functionaries, including senior home ministry officials and ministers. The inquiry panel report recommended the overhaul of BSF's air wing and concluded that "there was non-existence of safety culture, non-existence of safety management systems and nil supervision of the operations at ground level". The flight crew had contacted the air traffic control (ATC) Delhi for clearance to operate the flight to Ranchi. The aircraft was cleared, and the runway was given as 28. After the clearance, the aircraft stopped for some time while taxiing on taxiway E1. The pilot informed ATC that there would be a 10-minute delay due to some administrative reasons. Shortly after takeoff, the aircraft progressively turned left with a simultaneous loss of height. Finally, it impacted terrain and came to a final rest in the holding tank of the water treatment plant. There was a post-impact fire, and the aircraft was destroyed. This crash was a rare occurrence for Delhi. Prior to this, a mid-air collision happened way back in 1996 over Charkhi Dadri. On Nov 12, 1996, Saudi Arabian Airlines Boeing 747 and Kazakhstan Airlines Ilyushin Il-76 collided near Delhi, killing all 349 people on board. The cause was pilot error and miscommunication with ATC. Poor understanding of English by a pilot was reported as a contributing factor behind the tragedy. Follow more information on Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here . Get real-time live updates on rescue operations and check full list of passengers onboard AI 171 .
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Gujaratis hold prayer meet for crash victims
1 2 3 Kolkata: The death and devastation played in loop on TV and social media left several Kolkata homes shocked and anxious on Thursday. Rishabh Kothari, Hindustan Club president and ex-MCCI president, was shattered. Among the victims were his close family friends from Baroda, Neeraj Lavanya and his wife Aparna. "My friends were on that flight, going to meet their daughter in London. It's very difficult to come to terms with this. Hundreds of flights take off everyday, but this is just fate, and bad luck. I hope authorities take appropriate actions and my prayers and condolences are with the families who lost their loved ones," he said. Members of the Gujarati community in Kolkata held a prayer meeting at BAPS Swaminarayan temple in Bhowanipore for those killed in Thursday's flight crash. "We held a special prayer for the victims of the flight crash after Thursday evening's assembly at the temple," said Manish Jasani, a volunteer at the temple. Kamal Parekh, chairman of Stewart Security Limited, was worried about his son, Parimal, who lives in Ahmedabad and had just flown in from Delhi. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This Device Made My Power Bill Drop Overnight elecTrick - Save upto 80% on Power Bill Pre-Order Undo "Though I knew he wasn't on that plane, a sense of insecurity lingered. He assured me we would talk on Friday, but I was frantic. Thankfully, no one we know was on the flight, but the loss of any life is a tragedy." Nafeeza Pavri, a Kolkata resident and a frequent flyer, said: "How does something like this happen, especially with all the modern aviation technology we have today? I'm supposed to travel tomorrow, and I'm already feeling the anxiety kick in. It's heartbreaking for the victims and their families." Management consultant Jayanta Chakraborty, who has been living in Ahmedabad since 2009 and travels frequently for work, was "deeply unsettled" by the crash. "I live around 25 km from the crash site. Currently, all flights have been suspended, and the area has been cordoned off with traffic completely blocked. This is a grave incident, and I hope an independent investigative board is appointed to probe the cause," Chakraborty said. Pharmaceutical professional Siddhartha Sen landed in Ahmedabad on Wednesday on an IndiGo flight that reached around midnight. "Knowing how close in timing and location it was to the tragic crash fills me with a sense of fortune, as well as deep sorrow. The crash occurred in a densely populated area, which only worsens the scale of the disaster. People have been reaching out to check if I'm safe. While I'm grateful, I can't help but think of those who weren't as lucky," he said. Residents living near the Ahmedabad airport are shaken. Shristi Vinod Pandey, an advocate at Civil Sessions Court, Ahmedabad, who lives 10 km from the crash site, said, "It could've been us. It crashed into a residential society. That's too close for comfort." Follow more information on Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here . Get real-time live updates on rescue operations and check full list of passengers onboard AI 171 .
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Ahmedabad plane crash: What caused the crash? Engine failure, bird hit among several theories
MUMBAI: Two short videos surfaced after AI 171 crashed outside Ahmedabad airport - many questions followed, from those who have flown commercial airliners. On social media, pilots were asking: 1. Why was the aircraft landing gear not retracted? 2. Did the aircraft suffer a dual engine failure? 3. Did the engines die because of possible fuel contamination or blockage? 4. Were the flaps on the wings lowered for take-off? 5. Could a bird hit have contributed to the crash? The final investigation report into the AI-171 accident, set to be released before June 12 next year, will have a detailed analysis of probable causes and contributory factors. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now But for aviation professionals, the two videos offered many clues. "Within 5 secs of lift off, pilots normally put the landing gear up," said Capt Amit Singh, an air safety expert. Capt Manoj Hathi, ex-Air India official who has held posts of director (ops) and director (air-safety) said: "As soon as a positive rate of climb is reached, the landing gear is retracted." A lowered landing gear increases drag and fuel consumption, while reducing aircraft speed. Retracting the landing gear allows for a smooth aerodynamic flow helping the aircraft climb up. But the clips showed the landing gear extended even as the plane climbed to over 400 feet above ground. DGCA statement hints at dual engine failure | What could be the reason why AI-171 had not retracted its landing gear although it had climbed to a height of around 400 feet? "In case there is a distraction the pilots could forget to put the gear up. The distraction could be dual engine failure, bird hit or combination of both. The plume of dust as the aircraft crosses the runway end shows it was low on power and possibly a dual engine problem," said air safety expert Capt Amit Singh. Capt Manoj Hathi, a former AI official, said, "It's possible that a dual engine flame-out was the reason the landing gear could not be retracted. Dual engine failure could occur due to bird ingestion or fuel contamination. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Looking at the trajectory and body angle of the aircraft, it appears as if the aircraft has stalled because of loss of speed." Other pilots, who requested anonymity, too, spoke about dual engine failure and possible fuel contamination. The possibility of a dual engine failure is a rare event with about seven documented accidents in the past seven decades. DGCA in its statement said the pilots gave a MAYDAY call seconds after take-off, further supporting the theory that a dual engine failure occurred probably after the aircraft crossed the speed beyond which a take-off cannot be safely aborted. Video clips show the aircraft gliding and descending over a congested area chock-a-block with buildings. Seconds later, the aircraft nose is raised - AI-171's pilots were probably trying to keep the aircraft from crashing in a congested locality. But raising the nose results in loss of airspeed. The clip shows the aircraft disappear from view and crash. But even if the pilots had not pulled up the nose it would have continued to glide, descend and eventually crash, said Capt Singh. The other point was the flaps - aerodynamic devices that are lowered to increase lift on the wing. While some pilots said the flaps were not lowered as is the norm during take-off, others said the pictures show they were lowered. Investigation into aircraft accidents carried out by civil aviation authorities such as the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) follow norms laid down in the International Civil Aviation Organisation's Annex 13. It states that the primary objective of an investigation should not be to assign blame, but to identify and prevent future similar incidents. Under Annex 13, a preliminary report should be ready within 30 days of the event. But ICAO leaves it to the state (India, in this case) to decide whether to make it public or keep it private. The final report, though, which should be published within a year of the accident, is made public.
