The dollars and sense of introducing capital gains taxation
Gerrard Eckhoff (Opinion ODT 9.6.25), railed against the possible introduction of a capital gains tax "and its numerous close relatives — the land tax, the wealth tax, asset tax, inheritance tax which all hover over those who choose to take a risk to benefit themselves and their families".
He claims that advocates of higher taxes ("the Left" and "the tax and spend gallery of the envious") "believe that a CGT is needed to offset what they see to be the original sin of being productive and successful".
That description of those arguing for CGT and/or wealth tax is about as accurate as his arithmetic, as in: "land or a building in 50 years' time will be worth a few thousand percent more than its value today ... so a $3 million home will be commonplace". Taking "a few" as three, adding 3000% to the current average house price of $914,000 would make $28.3m, not $3m.
New Zealand at present suffers from low tax income, significantly less than comparable OECD countries, and inadequate for funding its essential social services: education, healthcare, housing for the poor, and support of the disabled, sick, and unemployed, not to mention NZ Super, let alone paying for its planned defence spending growth.
He seems to regard any form of taxation of capital acquired through business as evil, comparing it to "demanding money with menaces", and asks "why it is so wrong to be able to sell your main asset untaxed after a lifetime of work and retire with some discretionary spending money?".
He doesn't show, though, why it is acceptable to tax every dollar earned by those on the minimum wage (or less), who often struggle to buy food, housing, and heating, but not the capital generated by their hard work, and eventually realised, mostly tax-free, by their employers.
Most OECD countries have a CGT, as well as steeper progressive income tax rates — Australia (which is attracting many of our young people) doesn't tax the first $18,200 earned, but has a top marginal income tax rate of 45%, plus 2% Medicare levy, on income over $190,000, compared to NZ's 39% on income above $180,000. It has a CGT (allowing for inflation, excluding the family home). Many OECD countries also have inheritance tax, ranging from 4% (Italy) to 80% (Belgium).
New Zealand already has a CGT, on rental property resale, though the present government severely reduced its scope. It could be extended to cover most realised capital profit (perhaps exempting owner-occupied homes), but that would take significant time to introduce and to start producing significant tax income.
A form of real-property tax, as proposed by economist Susan Edmunds in 2020, which would deem the value of real estate above a personal exemption threshold to be capital invested and earning a notional income, to be taxed at that taxpayer's marginal rate, could be implemented quickly, as property values are regularly measured, and the IRD could easily incorporate the necessary calculations into its systems.
An inheritance tax should also be considered, which, as Thomas Picketty has argued, would restrain the inequality explosion New Zealand has suffered over the last 40 years.
Mr Eckhoff claims "Few members of the Left have ever owned and run a business, so simply do not understand the implications of extra taxation of small businesses."
I was once an owner-operator of a small business and an employer.
The most difficult tax problem I had wasn't business-related but personal: managing the provisional tax system with a marginal tax rate of 66% (that dates me) on my personal earnings.
Personal-realised CGT, and property and inheritance taxes, aren't taxes on a business. They are taxes on individuals' income and assets, whether earned by daily work or by capital gain.
IRD research shows that from 2015 to 2021, while middle-income New Zealanders paid, including GST, an effective tax rate of 20.2% on their personal income, the equivalent for the wealthiest, thanks to realised capital gains and use of trusts, was 9.2%.
Is that fair, Mr Eckhoff?
• Tony Fitchettis is a retired doctor.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Techday NZ
08-07-2025
- Techday NZ
New Zealand government unveils national strategy for AI adoption
The New Zealand government has released its first national artificial intelligence (AI) strategy, setting out a roadmap to foster innovation and productivity while ensuring responsible and safe AI development. The strategy, titled "New Zealand's Strategy for Artificial Intelligence: Investing with Confidence," aims to provide clarity and confidence for businesses looking to integrate AI into their operations and signals a step-change in the country's approach to emerging technologies. A response to international trends and local needs Until now, New Zealand had been the only country in the OECD without a formal AI strategy, despite rapidly advancing AI uptake internationally. The new strategy is designed to help New Zealand catch up with other small, advanced economies and to address a growing gap in AI readiness among local organisations. Government analysis has found that most New Zealand businesses are still in the early stages of adopting AI, with many lacking a clear plan for integrating the technology. The government's announcement highlights the potential for AI to drive significant economic growth, with estimates suggesting the technology could add up to NZ$76 billion to the country's GDP by 2038. Recognising both the opportunities and the challenges, the strategy focuses on building local capability, promoting innovation, and managing risks responsibly. Light-touch regulation and clear guidance A key feature of the strategy is its commitment to light-touch regulation. The government has opted not to introduce new AI-specific laws at this stage, instead relying on existing legal frameworks around privacy, consumer protection, and human rights. The aim is to reduce barriers to AI adoption and provide clear regulatory guidance that enables innovation, while still protecting New Zealanders' rights and building public trust. To support safe and responsible use of AI, the government has released voluntary Responsible AI Guidance alongside the strategy. This guidance is intended to help organisations use, develop, and innovate with AI in a way that is ethical, transparent, and aligned with international best practice. The approach is informed by the OECD's AI Principles and emphasises transparency, accountability, and the importance of maintaining public confidence. The strategy also commits to monitoring international developments closely and participating in global efforts to develop consistent approaches to the governance of AI. Focus on business adoption and workforce skills Unlike some strategies that prioritise AI research and development, New Zealand's approach is focused primarily on enabling the adoption and application of AI by businesses. The government sees the greatest opportunity in supporting local firms to take up AI technologies, adapt them to New Zealand's needs, and use them to create value in key sectors such as agriculture, healthcare, and education. The strategy acknowledges several barriers to wider AI adoption, including a shortage of skilled workers, a lack of understanding about how to deploy AI effectively, and uncertainty about the regulatory environment. To address these issues, the government is supporting a range of initiatives to build AI skills within the workforce and is providing advice and support to help businesses prepare for and benefit from AI. The strategy is designed to give businesses the confidence to invest in AI, with the government promising to identify and remove any legal or practical obstacles that may hinder innovation. There is also a commitment to ensuring that AI is developed and used in a way that is inclusive and reflects the needs of Māori and other communities. Supporting both public and private sector innovation While the new strategy is primarily focused on the private sector, the government has signalled its intention to lead by example in the public sector as well. A separate stream of work, led by the Minister for Digitising Government, is underway to explore how AI can improve public services and support digital transformation across government agencies. By taking a coordinated and enabling approach, the government hopes to position New Zealand as a leader among smaller advanced economies in the responsible adoption of AI. The strategy sets out clear expectations for businesses and government agencies alike, encouraging investment in AI technologies that drive productivity, deliver better services, and help New Zealand compete on the global stage. Next steps The government will continue to monitor the rollout of the AI strategy and engage with industry, academia, and communities to ensure that New Zealand's approach remains responsive to technological and social change. The Responsible AI Guidance will be updated as required, and officials will keep a close watch on international developments to ensure New Zealand's regulatory environment remains fit for purpose. With this announcement, New Zealand signals its intention to embrace the opportunities of artificial intelligence, with a focus on responsible, inclusive, and innovation-driven adoption for the benefit of all New Zealanders.
RNZ News
08-07-2025
- RNZ News
Government unveils its first-ever national artificial intelligence strategy
In the plan's forward written by Science and Technology Minister Shane Reti he said New Zealand was the last OECD country to publish such a strategy. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii New Zealand has - at last - joined other countries in tackling the AI opportunity and challenge, with the government unveiling its first-ever national artificial intelligence strategy. The plan - titled "Investing with Confidence" - has been met with enthusiasm from the business sector, but concern from critics who say it sets a "dangerous path forward" and is "worryingly light" on ethical considerations. In a foreword, Science and Technology Minister Shane Reti said New Zealand needed to get moving on AI, noting it was the last OECD country to publish such a strategy. "Artificial intelligence represents one of the most significant technological opportunities of our time," Reti said. "For New Zealand, embracing AI is not merely an option - it is essential." The plan - which was developed with the assistance of AI - positions New Zealand as a "sophisticated adopter" rather than as an inventor of new foundational models. For its part, the government is promising a "light-touch and principles-based" approach using existing legislation and regulations, rather than introducing new ones. "The government aims to encourage investment in AI adoption by reducing uncertainty, removing unintended and unwanted barriers to AI in legislation, and providing clear guidance on responsible AI innovation within New Zealand's existing legal framework." As well, the strategy includes a commitment to grow AI expertise in New Zealand, noting that this year's Budget includes more than $200 million for tuition and training subsidies and more than $60m for STEM and priority areas. Dr Andrew Lensen, a senior lecturer in Artificial Intelligence at Victoria University, said the strategy was heavy on economic growth opportunities but "worryingly light" on ethical and societal issues. "The strategy suggests that new legislation is unnecessary, which I, and many other AI researchers, disagree with," Lensen said. "Having 'principles' is not nearly sufficient to reduce AI-induced harm, bias, and inequity. We need clear legislation and well-resourced enforcement mechanisms to ensure AI does not further harm New Zealanders." Lensen, who also co-directs an AI consultancy, raised the risks of sourcing modern healthcare AI systems from overseas, for example, which might have no regard for New Zealand's unique demographics. "This AI Strategy sets a dangerous path forward for New Zealand, with an attitude of economic growth above social good." In contrast, the Auckland Business Chamber chief executive Simon Bridges applauded the new strategy, saying it would give "clarity and confidence" to many small and medium enterprises which were currently unsure where to start. "This strategy cuts through the fog," Bridges said. "It's practical, not hype. If we don't get moving, we'll fall behind - but this gives Auckland a real platform to lead." A 2024 Datacom survey found that 67 percent of larger New Zealand businesses utilised some form of AI, up from 48 percent in 2023. However, a separate Spark-NZIER survey, also last year, said 68 percent of SMEs had no plans to explore the technology. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
1News
07-07-2025
- 1News
Are NZ banks being taxed properly?
The Government is looking at whether banks in New Zealand are taxed appropriately. Finance Minister Nicola Willis said she is continuing to receive advice from IRD on how income tax laws applied to the major banks in New Zealand, particularly compared with Australia. Willis asked for the advice last year, but said no announcements would be made until Budget next year. The key issues were around how the "parent banks" and branch banks in New Zealand interacted for tax purposes. She said there was some "very arcane and complex tax law" in that area where the OECD had guidance, but New Zealand operated slightly differently. ADVERTISEMENT Willis was also looking at the Australian "major bank levy" which New Zealand did not have. This forced banks with more than $100 billion in liabilities to pay a levy to the government, raising significant sums a year. Willis would not rule out applying something similar here, but she did confirm the Government was not looking at a windfall tax. "There's a range of highly technical, highly complex issues with the way that banks are taxed, and we're just doing a check in to make sure that it's resulting in an overall fair system." Willis said it was possible more revenue could be generated for the Crown if the Government found banks were not paying the full amount of tax expected. Acting Prime Minister David Seymour was asked about the issue on Monday and said he believed banks were being fairly taxed. "Some of the biggest taxpayers in New Zealanders are banks," he said, and stated they were all paying the 28% average tax rate as their company tax. "There's nothing to suggest that they are not paying the same share that they would if they were any other kind of business." ADVERTISEMENT Asked about Willis' work, Seymour said, like most ministers, she was "always asking for advice, always tossing around the ideas". He suspected the result of that work would show banks were fairly taxed. Seymour said, from what he saw, there seemed to be a "consistent pattern" in terms of what banks paid, and the question around any proposals to change the settings would need to be based on "fairness". He pointed to a dairy, retail or manufacturing company that were doing "pretty much the same stuff, making the same profit and paying the same tax, would you treat them differently"? "One of the core principles of taxation is that 'like taxpayers pay tax alike', and 'unlike, taxpayers pay tax un-alike' based on the size of the difference. "So you'd start with fairness as your principle." He acknowledged there may be more information he was not aware of. He also wanted more information on the major bank levy. "I've seen the argument for that, and it goes something like this: Banks inevitably get bailed out. ADVERTISEMENT "If they're so big that their failure would affect the entire economy, maybe they should be putting something aside for that rainy day, if it happens one day. That's the argument. "It's, in a way, a form of de facto deposit insurance." He said it was an interesting argument, but would need to see the detail before deciding on supporting a proposal or not as ACT leader.
