logo
UK politics latest: Reeves refuses to rule out more cuts amid growing Labour backlash

UK politics latest: Reeves refuses to rule out more cuts amid growing Labour backlash

Independent27-03-2025
Rachel Reeves has refused to rule out further cuts or future tax hikes, as she faces criticism from members of her own party following her spring statement.
The Chancellor did not deny more measures could be announced at her next budget in response to speculation she will be forced to find more money to balance the books.
'I'm not going to write four years of budgets, I've just delivered a spring statement today,' she said.
Delivering her spring statement on Wednesday, the chancellor unveiled a £14bn package to repair the UK economy that included cuts to welfare, prompting criticism from Labour MPs who urged her to reverse cuts amid warnings they will lead to increased poverty.
Labour MP Debbie Abrahams, who chairs the Work and Pensions Committee, told the Commons: 'All the evidence is pointing to the fact that the cuts to health and disability benefits will lead to increased poverty, including severe poverty, and worsened health conditions as well.
'How will making people sicker and poorer help in terms of driving our economy up and people into jobs?'
Rachel Reeves defends freebies: 'I'm not personally a huge Sabrina Carpenter fan, being a 46-year-old woman'
Athena Stavrou27 March 2025 05:01
Comment: No matter what Rachel Reeves says, Labour is delivering austerity 2.0
Labour faces two major battles after the chancellor's spring statement, writes Andrew Grice – keeping the UK economy on track while facing rebellion from MPs and the public.
No matter what Rachel Reeves says, Labour is delivering Austerity 2.0
Labour faces two major battles after the chancellor's spring statement, writes Andrew Grice – keeping the UK economy on track while facing rebellion from MPs and the public
Athena Stavrou27 March 2025 04:01
Reeves rejects own government's findings of cuts pushing 250,000 into poverty
Rachel Reeves has denied her own government's findings that her welfare reforms will push 250,000 people into poverty while refusing to rule out further cuts.
The chancellor wants to save £5 billion from the UK's ballooning welfare bill by making it harder to claim Personal Independence Payments and cutting Universal Credit.
An impact assessment, published today by the Department of Work and Pensions, said 3.2 million families – including current and future benefit claimants – will lose an average of £1,720 a year as a result of the changes.
An impact assessment, published today by the Department of Work and Pensions, said 3.2 million families will lose an average of £1,720 a year as a result of the changes
Athena Stavrou27 March 2025 03:01
Watch: Key takeaways from Rachel Reeves' spring statement
27 March 2025 02:00
Comment: With Reeves's disability cuts in the spring statement, Labour really has become the 'nasty party'
So now we know: it is disabled Britons who will carry the burden of ensuring that Rachel Reeves can remain within her self-declared fiscal rules while the economy stumbles. Some £4.8bn of cuts to welfare benefits are planned.
First off, there's Universal Credit, which provides a top-up payment for those with 'limited capability for work and work-related activity' (LCWRA). The government is set to halve this health-based payment, after which it will be frozen for new claimants. People already have to have their ability to work assessed before they can claim.
Those assessments are neither pleasant nor easy: you have to be really quite disabled to get past first base. The hated Work Capability Assessment (WCA) is slated to be scrapped. Instead, only those who qualify for the daily living component of the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) will be eligible for the top-up.
James Moore writes:
With Reeves's monstrous disability cuts, Labour really has become the 'nasty party'
Forget the economics: The chancellor's cuts to welfare risk junking this government's reputation – and legacy – for years to come, warns James Moore
Tara Cobham27 March 2025 01:00
Rachel Reeves hikes fines for paying tax returns late
Taxpayers face higher fines for not paying VAT and income tax self assessment (Itsa) on time under new rules announced as part of Chancellor Rachel Reeves' spring statement.
Late payment penalties for the two levies are to rise in April as part of a Government push to raise more than £1 billion in extra tax revenue.
People who file their Vat and Itsa tax returns late will have to pay 3 per cent of the outstanding bill when it is overdue by 15 days, up one percentage point on the current level.
After 30 days, the penalty rises by another 3 per cent, up from 2 per cent currently, while there will also be a 10 per cent charge per annum when tax is overdue by 31 days or more, up from 4 per cent.
Labour also said it is also expanding its rollout of its scheme to digitise the tax system, called Making Tax Digital.
The system will be expanded to sole traders and landlords with incomes over £20,000 from April 2028.
And the Treasury 'will continue to explore how it can best bring the benefits of digitalisation' to the roughly four million taxpayers whose income is below the £20,000 threshold, it said.
Tara Cobham27 March 2025 00:00
What would you like to see from Rachel Reeves' spring statement? Join The Independent Debate
Rachel Reeves' spring statement is fast approaching, and on Wednesday, people across the UK will learn how her announcements will impact their finances, sparking renewed debate about the future of living standards in the country.
A new forecast from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation suggests that average disposable incomes could fall by 3 per cent by 2030, with the lowest earners affected the most.
The chancellor has hinted at spending cuts to address a £20bn gap in public finances while ruling out tax rises as a solution.
What should the chancellor's top priority be? Vote in our poll below and share your thoughts in the comments:
Tell us what you would you like to see from Reeves' spring statement
Have your say: The chancellor's spring statement is just around the corner, bringing with it new concerns about the future of living standards in the UK
Tara Cobham26 March 2025 23:30
Ban on outdoor smoking in hospitality settings not being considered, says minister
Extending an outdoor smoking ban to hospitality settings is not being considered 'at this time', a health minister told the Commons.
The government distanced itself from plans to ban smoking in the gardens of pubs, bars and restaurants last year, following concerns raised by the hospitality sector.
Smoking outside schools, children's playgrounds and hospitals will be prohibited under the Tobacco and Vapes Bill.
The Bill also aims to create a smoke-free generation with anyone born after January 1 2009 to be prevented from legally smoking, by gradually raising the age at which tobacco can be bought.
A total ban on vape advertising and sponsorship, including displays seen by children and young people such as on buses, in cinemas and in shop windows, is also included in the Bill, bringing them in line with tobacco restrictions.
Speaking at the Bill's report stage, health minister Ashley Dalton urged MPs not to listen to the 'tobacco industry's arguments and myths about how people should be free to make their own choices'.
She added: 'Smoking kills two-thirds of its users, three-quarters of people wish they'd never started smoking, and the majority want to quit. That's not freedom of choice, the tobacco industry took away their choice with addiction, usually at a young age.
'In relation to smoke-free places, we've been clear, in England we intend to consult on extending smoke-free outdoor places to outside schools, children's playgrounds and hospitals – but not outdoor hospitality settings, at this time.'
Tara Cobham26 March 2025 23:00
Trump announces 25% tariffs on vehicle imports in fresh blow to Reeves
Donald Trump has announced 25 per cent tariffs on all motor vehicle imports to the United States, in a move that will inflict another blow on the UK economy.
During a press conference in the Oval Office, the US president announced that cars and light trucks imported into the US would be subject to the levy in the latest escalation of the Trump administration's far-reaching trade war.
'What we're going to be doing is a 25% tariff for all cars that are not made in the United States,' Trump said.
The announcement raises fears of greater economic pain in the UK, whose largest vehicle export market is the US, having exported £6.4bn in motor vehicles to the United States in 2023, according to the Office of National Statistics.
Athena Stavrou26 March 2025 22:37
Comment: Rachel Reeves's sticking-plaster solutions won't fix the economy
The hole in Rachel Reeves's spring statement was that she all but admitted she had failed to 'fix the foundations' – her big boast in the Budget just five months ago.
She had come to the Commons to announce policy changes because 'the world has changed'. But the whole point of fixing the foundations was to strengthen the public finances so that they could withstand unexpected pressures.
The chancellor was coy, in any case, about the way in which the world had changed. She mentioned Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine, but that really got going three years ago. So she said vaguely that it had 'since escalated further', which is a strange way of saying that, in the past five months, Donald Trump has threatened to pull the plug on the Ukrainians.
The Independent 's chief political commentator John Rentoul writes:
Rachel Reeves's sticking-plaster solutions won't fix the economy
Tara Cobham26 March 2025 22:30
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Eco-hypocrite' Miliband refuses to reveal his number of domestic flights
‘Eco-hypocrite' Miliband refuses to reveal his number of domestic flights

Telegraph

time20 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

‘Eco-hypocrite' Miliband refuses to reveal his number of domestic flights

Ed Miliband has been branded an eco 'hypocrite' after refusing to reveal how many domestic flights he has taken. Ministers insisted the Energy Secretary would not disclose any details about his air travel within the UK since he entered office last July. Claire Coutinho, shadow energy secretary, said the refusal represented 'one rule for him and another for everyone else' given that the Left-wing frontbencher has been a vociferous opponent of domestic air travel. Labour has also forced through significant increases to air passenger duty that have added hundreds of pounds to some family holidays. The accusation came after a Conservative MP challenged the Energy Secretary to publish details of the internal UK flights he has taken since the last election. Answering on Mr Miliband's behalf, Michael Shanks, the energy minister, replied: 'Details of internal domestic flights are not published.' Claire Coutinho, the Tory shadow energy secretary, said: 'As Ed Miliband sticks a holiday tax of up to £400 on a family of four, it does seem the height of hypocrisy that he won't reveal his own flights, which are funded by the taxpayer. 'People expect transparency and fairness from their politicians, but when it comes to the most stringent net zero costs, it's one rule for him and another for everyone else.' Mr Miliband's stance is in line with other Whitehall departments, which also do not release details of ministers' domestic flights. The Government said it was 'the practice of successive administrations', including Tory ones, not to 'publish granular information' about their movements. Mr Miliband, who is in charge of net zero policies, has previously said Britons should cut down on such flights 'as much as we possibly can'. But he was embarrassed earlier this year when it emerged his department is spending more on internal flights under his watch than the Tories. Figures released in April revealed it spent £44,000 on domestic flights for ministers and officials between July and December last year. That was more than the £40,000 spent in the first half of 2024 by the Tories, when Ms Coutinho was in charge of the net zero ministry. Mr Miliband has previously suggested that the Government should encourage ordinary voters to take trains and buses rather than flying. Asked when he was shadow business secretary whether domestic flights should be banned, he said: 'Not completely, but as much as we possibly can.' Speaking to the BBC in 2021, he added: 'Fairness and giving people alternatives is an absolutely key part of making this transition happen.' Labour repeatedly criticised the Conservatives for taking flights and pledged before the election to clamp down on ministers' use of jets. But since taking office, Mr Miliband has been heavily criticised for jet-setting, which has seen him spend 10 times more on foreign trips than Ms Coutinho. The Energy Secretary spent £62,712 on overseas travel in his first six months in office, according to Taxpayers' Alliance analysis, In contrast, his Tory predecessor spent just £6,155 during her first half-year in the role.

Now we have proof free speech is a joke in two-tier Britain
Now we have proof free speech is a joke in two-tier Britain

Telegraph

time35 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Now we have proof free speech is a joke in two-tier Britain

After Labour councillor Ricky Jones stood at a demonstration in Walthamstow decrying 'disgusting Nazi fascists' and telling a crowd through a microphone that 'we need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all', a jury of Mr Jones's peers cleared him of any offence. When Lucy Connolly – married to a Tory councillor – posted on social media 'set fire to all the f-----g hotels full of all the b------s for all I care… if that makes me racist so be it', she chose to plead guilty under apparent pressure from the state. Ms Connolly is currently serving a 31-month prison sentence, at times on a 23-hour lockdown confined to her cell with no privileges, for her ill-tempered words. Others, who stood their ground, walked free. The results were still unpleasant – the process is in part the punishment – but better than they might otherwise have been. It is hard not to feel that the difference between the two cases is less a matter of law than politics. Lucy Connolly was denied bail as Sir Keir Starmer and the judiciary worked on their 'shared understanding' that anyone expressing sentiments that could have encouraged last year's riots needed to be made an example of. Sir Keir himself told the nation that individuals would be held on remand. The Home Office openly risked prejudicing trials by labelling those arrested, charged but not yet convicted as 'criminals'. If there's a lesson here, it may well be that people can say stupid things without the world collapsing around them. And that the public – which did not visibly respond to either exhortation – can be trusted, for the most part, to recognise the distinction between genuinely threatening language and idiocy, both on the streets and in jury deliberations. Unlike our American cousins, British people have only a very qualified right to free speech. While the human rights system appears to go out of its way to undermine attempts to control borders or crack down on crime, protection of speech is heavily caveated. And the British state makes full use of these carve-outs in its attempt to maintain its fragile grip on the country it has built. Its most important aim is to prevent tensions between groups. Speech that might inflame them is subject to stringent oversight and exacting scrutiny by officials terrified of what might spiral out from a frank examination of the country as it is. People on the Left, however, can speak with relative security. The result, in the words of Reform's Zia Yusuf, appears to be 'a country in which those who have the correct 'regime' political views can openly call for their political opponents to be brutally murdered, be filmed doing so, and face no criminal consequences'.

Labour drops plans to restrict LTNs in ‘secret war on motorists'
Labour drops plans to restrict LTNs in ‘secret war on motorists'

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Labour drops plans to restrict LTNs in ‘secret war on motorists'

Labour has renewed its ' war on motorists ' by dropping plans to limit new Low Traffic Neighbourhoods and 20mph zones. Ministers have quietly ditched reforms that would have curbed council powers to restrict traffic and levy 'unfair' fines and parking charges. The Conservatives, which drew up the changes, branded the move 'a kick in the teeth to motorists' and warned it would hit struggling high streets. But Labour ministers dismissed the proposals as 'speculative suggestions' and said they 'would have made no positive difference for drivers'. Sir Keir Starmer has been repeatedly accused of pursuing heavy-handed policies against motorists, most notably in London and Wales. In the latest example, Labour-run Southwark council on Sunday was forced to admit it illegally fined thousands of people for driving in bus lanes. Richard Holden, the shadow transport secretary, said scrapping the Tory plans represented a 'secret war on drivers' that was not in Labour's manifesto. 'Labour has been caught red handed as it steps up its targeted war on motorists,' he said. 'Conservatives led the charge against unfair and over-zealous enforcement but our work has been ripped up in underhand attacks without any public consultation or manifesto pledge. 'This is a kick in the teeth to motorists, set to punish beleaguered local high streets and will slam the brakes on the economy even more than Rachel Reeves has done so far.' Rishi Sunak announced a 'Plan for Drivers' in October 2023, which would have made it harder for local councils to introduce anti-car schemes. It included draft guidance on the introduction of LTNs, which would have forced councils to focus more on the views of local residents and businesses. As a 'minimum' authorities would have had to hold a series of public meetings with residents and to leaflet every household in the affected area. The changes were planned over concerns councils have been railroading through LTNs on the back of support by green and pro-cycling groups. Ministers have now confirmed that the draft guidance, which was not formalised in time for last year's general election, has been effectively shelved. Lilian Greenwood, the roads minister, said that as a result, work had been 'put on hold and the Government is now considering appropriate next steps'. 'As has always been the case, local authorities are responsible for managing their roads and are accountable to their communities,' she said. Lord Hendy, a transport minister, also suggested that the Government does not plan to change the current guidance in force on LTNs. 'Traffic management measures such as low traffic neighbourhoods are a matter for local authorities as they know their areas best,' he said. The last Tory government had planned a series of pro-driver reforms, including new guidance to 'prevent inappropriate blanket use of 20mph zones'. The Tories sought to roll out more pro-driver policies in the wake of the Labour administration in Wales controversially enforcing a default 20mph zone across all formerly 30mph areas in 2023. Following a huge outcry the Senedd is now reviewing the policy, with the architect of the scheme admitting 'more common sense' should have been deployed. Ms Greenwood said the Government has 'no current plans' to review the guidance around the setting of 20mph speed limits in England. 'We believe that traffic authorities are best placed to decide where lower limits will be effective on the roads for which they are responsible, and that consultation and community support should be at the heart of the process,' she added. Other planned Tory measures that would have limited the use of '15-minute cities' have also been ditched. Under those measures, Conservative ministers would have revoked council's access to DVLA data, which they use to enforce traffic filters. The 15-minute city concept were designed so residents could access all basic services within a quarter of an hour walk or bike ride from home. It has become controversial with some on the Right who see the car as pivotal to freedom and attempts to curb driving as the spread of state control. 'No positive difference' Mr Sunak also pledged to reduce 'unfair' traffic fines, such as yellow box penalties, including by restricting councils' ability to raise revenue from them. Under the measures new guidance would have been brought forward giving residents the formal right to challenge their council's parking policies. Labour ministers confirmed that all three proposals had been dropped. 'Those policies in 'The Plan for Drivers' that would have made no positive difference for drivers have been discontinued,' Ms Greenwood said. Mr Holden said that Sir Sadiq Khan would be 'licking his lips now he has been given the green light to hammer drivers even more'. The Mayor of London has overseen a rapid expansion of LTNs in the capital and the introduction of blanket 20mph limits across the city. The Department for Transport was approached for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store