With elections on the horizon, anxious Democrats fret over energy rates
New Jersey Democrats are turning their attention to electricity prices amid a furor over high utility bills this winter and looming rate hikes that will push up power rates this year at about the time of June's legislative primaries.
Democrats have introduced a seven-bill package meant to control electricity rate growth that includes measures to streamline utility assistance applications, set new processes to determine utilities' profit margins, and sunset a surcharge that increases monthly electricity bills, among other things.
Legislators' newfound focus on electricity rates comes after the Board of Public Utilities last month approved auction results that are expected to add roughly $25 to customers' monthly energy bills and amid broader concern about electricity prices. This comes as an AI boom sends energy demand surging and supply struggles to keep pace.
'What we're worried about in the immediate is the impact on ratepayers in New Jersey,' Assembly Speaker Craig Coughlin (D-Middlesex) told the New Jersey Monitor. 'There are people who are struggling because prices have gone up, and to add this on top of that is a substantial increase.'
Coughlin and Senate President Nicholas Scutari (D-Union) last week announced they will hold joint hearings to determine other methods to slow growing utility costs. Coughlin said they have yet to set dates for those hearings.
Republican officials have blamed surging costs on Gov. Phil Murphy's energy agenda, which has broadly favored renewables like wind and solar over fossil or nuclear sources that generate nearly all of the state's electricity.
'The problem is our supply has diminished incredibly and we have not done anything under these current energy policies to address it,' said Assemblyman Alex Sauickie (R-Ocean). 'That means if we don't do something like natural gas immediately, this problem is going to last for years, several years.'
Assembly Democrats in late February circulated talking points that sought to lay the blame for rising rates at the feet of the Board of Public Utilities, Republicans, and PJM Interconnection, the grid operator for New Jersey and 12 other states.
A PJM spokesperson noted New Jersey imports more energy than it produces. Some other states on its grid had not seen similar rate increases, he said, adding the state's renewable energy goals had contributed to the present cost increases.
'Policy is a major factor as to why we are experiencing this supply-demand crunch. Decarbonization policies have driven resources off of the system while demand is increasing dramatically on the system due to data center proliferation and the onshoring of the manufacturing industry,' said Dan Lockwood, the spokesperson.
He added many renewable energy projects had stumbled over hurdles — like supply chain disruptions and permitting issues — that lay well outside PJM's control.
One bill in Democrats' new package would require utilities to join regional transmission organizations like PJM.
Federal regulations allow utilities that voluntarily join these organizations to collect an extra 0.5-percentage-point return on equity — called an RTO adder — and the bill is an attempt to prevent utilities from collecting that.
'Isn't that their job to join these groups … to be able to purchase our power that we need?' said bill sponsor Assemblywoman Andrea Katz (D-Burlington). 'I don't get paid extra just for going to vote on legislation. That's my job.'
Utilities pass their expenses — including for capital investments — directly to consumers, and they are allowed to profit off their capital investments at negotiated rates. In New Jersey, that rate, called the return on equity, is typically 9.6%.
Barring New Jersey utilities from collecting money through the RTO adder would produce savings, though they would be limited.
Though Katz's bill has no fiscal note attached to it, analysis on a similar bill by Maryland's Office of People's Counsel found eliminating the RTO adder would save ratepayers there roughly $20 million each year. Maryland ratepayers spent nearly $8.9 billion on electricity in 2024, according to Energy Information Administration Data.
The savings won't be much greater for New Jersey ratepayers, who purchased nearly $12 billion of electricity last year, per federal data. In 2021, the Board of Public Utilities reduced PSE&G's return on equity rate by 1.28 percentage points — about two-and-a-half times the reduction of barring RTO adders — and said the lower rate would save PSE&G customers roughly $36 a year.
New Jersey Rate Counsel Brian Lipman, whose office advocates for ratepayers on utility matters, said his office backs the mandate, adding it would 'save ratepayers hundreds of millions of dollars.' He said his office also supports lower rates for utility providers' return on equity,
In past legislative hearings, Lipman has repeatedly urged lawmakers to forgo additional mandates on utilities, noting the cost of utilities' investments are repaid by ratepayers at a markup. Those mandates can include requirements to build infrastructure to support, for example, electric vehicles.
Coughlin declined to commit to forgoing additional mandates on utilities, saying lawmakers need more information before taking action.
'We haven't taken anything off the table, nor are we committed to doing anything specifically. That's the purpose of having the hearings,' Coughlin said.
The impact of other proposed changes, including one that calls for the Board of Public Utilities to consider the lowest reasonable rate of return when setting utility rates, rather than a fair and reasonable one, is unclear.
Murphy has sought to build renewable energy sources in New Jersey, with the goal of having New Jersey draw 100% of its from 'clean energy' sources by 2035, but renewable sources still account for an overwhelming minority of the state's power generation, about 8.3% in 2022, according to the Department of Environmental Protection.
What renewable energy projects have come online have not filled energy losses from shuttered fossil fuel plants, including its last two coal plants in 2022, and the closure of Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station in 2018. Meanwhile, public and political opposition has canceled natural gas projects proposed for Woodbridge, North Bergen, and Kearny.
The generation losses have pushed power produced in other states on PJM's grid, including in coal plants, to New Jersey, especially when usage surged in the cold of winter, said Greg Lalevee, business administrator for the International Union of Operating Engineers Local 825.
He urged the state to expand its generation capacity, even if it means standing up gas plants that could be decommissioned or converted to hydrogen as new technology becomes available or renewable projects begin operating.
'My view is this: I think we need to put as much electric in the grid as possible,' said Lalevee, whose members would benefit from jobs on energy projects.
Coughlin declined to say whether rising rates have caused him to look more favorably upon natural gas projects, which accounted for 48.7% of the state's energy generation in 2022, saying only that he was 'focused on solving the problem.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
21 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump is expected to sign his huge bill of tax and spending cuts at the White House July 4 picnic
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump is expected to sign his package of tax breaks and spending cuts into law Friday after his cajoling produced almost unanimous Republican support in Congress for the domestic priority that could cement his second-term legacy. Against odds that at times seemed improbable, Trump achieved his goal of celebrating a historic — and divisive — legislative victory in time for the nation's birthday. Fighter jets and stealth bombers are to streak the sky over the annual White House Fourth of July picnic where Trump plans to sign the bill. The legislation, the president said, is 'going to make this country into a rocket ship. It's going to be really great.' Democrats assailed the package as a giveaway to the rich that will rob millions more lower-income people of their health insurance, food assistance and financial stability. "I never thought that I'd be on the House floor saying that this is a crime scene,' Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York said during a record-breaking speech that delayed the bill's passage by eight-plus hours. 'It's a crime scene, going after the health, and the safety, and the well-being of the American people.' The legislation extends Trump's 2017 multi-trillion dollar tax cuts and cuts Medicaid and food stamps by $1.2 trillion. It provides for a massive increase in immigration enforcement. Congress' nonpartisan scorekeeper projects that nearly 12 million more people will lose health insurance under the law. The legislation passed the House on a largely party-line vote Thursday, culminating a months-long push by the GOP to cram most of its legislative priorities into a single budget bill that could be enacted without Senate Democrats being able to block it indefinitely by filibustering. It passed by a single vote in the Senate, where North Carolina Republican Thom Tillis announced he would not run for reelection after incurring Trump's wrath in opposing it. Vice President JD Vance had to cast the tie-breaking vote. In the House, where two Republicans voted against it, one, conservative maverick Tom Massie of Kentucky, has also become a target of Trump's well-funded political operation. The legislation amounts to a repudiation of the agendas of the past two Democratic presidents, Barack Obama and Joe Biden, in rolling back Obama's Medicaid expansion under his signature health law and Biden's tax credits for renewable energy. The Congressional Budget Office estimates the package will add $3.3 trillion to the deficit over the decade and 11.8 million more people will go without health coverage. Trump exulted in his political victory Thursday night in Iowa, where he attended a kickoff of events celebrating the country's 250th birthday next year. 'I want to thank Republican congressmen and women, because what they did is incredible,' he said. The president complained that Democrats voted against the bill because 'they hate Trump — but I hate them, too.' The package is certain to be a flashpoint in next year's midterm elections, and Democrats are making ambitious plans for rallies, voter registration drives, attack ads, bus tours and even a multiday vigil, all intended to highlight the most controversial elements. Upon his return to Washington early Friday, Trump described the package as 'very popular,' though polling suggests that public opinion is mixed at best. For example, a Washington Post/Ipsos poll found that majorities of U.S. adults support increasing the annual child tax credit and eliminating taxes on earnings from tips, and about half support work requirements for some adults who receive Medicaid. But the poll found majorities oppose reducing federal funding for food assistance to low-income families and spending about $45 billion to build and maintain migrant detention centers. About 60% said it was 'unacceptable' that the bill is expected to increase the $36 trillion U.S. debt by more than $3 trillion over the next decade.

Los Angeles Times
25 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump says he didn't know an offensive term he used in a speech is considered antisemitic
WASHINGTON — President Trump says he didn't know the term 'shylock' was considered antisemitic when he used it in a speech to describe unscrupulous moneylenders. Trump told reporters Friday after returning from an event in Iowa that he had 'never heard it that way' and 'never heard that' the term was considered an offensive stereotype about Jews. Shylock refers to the villainous Jewish moneylender in Shakespeare's 'The Merchant of Venice' who demands a pound of flesh from a debtor. The Anti-Defamation League, which works to combat antisemitism, said in a statement that the term 'evokes a centuries-old antisemitic trope about Jews and greed that is extremely offensive and dangerous. President Trump's use of the term is very troubling and irresponsible.' Joe Biden, while vice president, said in 2014 that he had made a 'poor choice' of words a day after he used the term in remarks to a legal aid group. Trump's administration has made cracking down on antisemitism a priority. His administration said it is screening for antisemitic activity when granting immigration benefits and its fight with Harvard University has centered on allegations from the White House that the school has tolerated antisemitism. But the Republican president has also had a history of playing on stereotypes about Jewish people. He told the Republican Jewish Coalition in 2015 that 'you want to control your politicians' and suggested the audience used money to exert control. Before he kicked off his 2024 presidential campaign, Trump drew widespread criticism for dining at his Florida club with a Holocaust-denying white nationalist. Last year, Trump made repeated comments accusing Jewish Americans who identify as Democrats of disloyalty because of Democratic leaders' criticisms of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Critics said it perpetuated an antisemitic trope about Jews having divided loyalties and there being only one right way to be Jewish. On Thursday night in his speech in Iowa, Trump used the term while talking about his signature legislation passed by Congress this week. 'No death tax, no estate tax, no going to the banks and borrowing some from, in some cases, a fine banker and in some cases shylocks and bad people,' he said. When a reporter later asked about the word's antisemitic association and his intent, Trump said; 'No, I've never heard it that way. To me, a shylock is somebody that's a money lender at high rates. I've never heard it that way. You view it differently than me. I've never heard that.' The Anti-Defamation League said Trump's use of the word 'underscores how lies and conspiracies about Jews remain deeply entrenched in our country. Words from our leaders matter and we expect more from the President of the United States.' Price writes for the Associated Press.


New York Post
26 minutes ago
- New York Post
Speaker Johnson teases more proposed budget legislation after passing One Big Beautiful Bill
House Speaker Mike Johnson is teasing plans to pass two more pieces of budget legislation over the next year in the same way Congress eked through the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The Louisiana GOPer — speaking hours after wrangling President Trump's marquee bill through Congress — said Republicans intend to take advantage of their remaining reconciliation bills: special budget-related measures that can bypass a Democratic filibuster in the Senate. 'The reconciliation bill today was a big, giant leap forward. But we're going to do this again. We're gonna have a second reconciliation package in the fall and a third in the spring of next year,' Johnson said on Fox News' 'Ingraham Angle' on Thursday — without going into specifics. Advertisement 3 House Speaker Mike Johnson hasn't delved into specifics of what the next two reconciliation bills will look like. AP 'And we're going to have rescission packages. The White House is sending us collections of items to claw back the spending that was wasted,' he said, referring to legislation that cancels previously authorized spending. 'And we're going to appropriate at lower levels.' During the roughly 29-hour slog to pass the Senate's version of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, GOP leadership had privately assured some of the holdouts that there would likely be additional reconciliation bills in the future. Advertisement 3 Republicans barely managed to wrangle the One Big Beautiful Bill Act through Congress this week. GRAEME SLOAN/EPA/Shutterstock But many Republicans were left with the impression that future reconciliation bills will be much smaller in scale and lower stakes than what they barely managed to squeak through Congress this week. 'I bet there will be another reconciliation package. I don't think it'll be as big. I think there'll be some targeted stuff,' Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) told The Post. 'But I think there's a good chance of that.' House Freedom Caucus Chairman Andy Harris (R-Md.) added to The Post, 'There's likely to be a second and third reconciliation bill that would not be as significant' as the megabill that passed Thursday. 'Obviously, we may have to clean up some matters.' Advertisement The One Big Beautiful Bill Act — which the presidennt is set to sign into law July 4 — is an 870-page piece of legislation that lays out Trump's signature legislative agenda, including an extension of the 2017 tax cuts, reduced taxes on tips and overtime pay, increased domestic energy production, bolstered border security, ramped up defense spending and spending cuts. Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio), who voted against the initial House version of the megabill in May, claimed that he flipped to vote in favor of it partly due to the promise of a future reconciliation bill. 3 President Trump predicted that Johnson 'will go down as one of the most successful Speakers of the House in history.' Getty Images Over recent years, Republicans and Democrats have leaned on reconciliation to pass partisan legislation that doesn't require votes from the other party to reach the 60-vote threshold to break a Senate filibuster. Advertisement During Trump's first term, Republicans used reconciliation to pass the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. Under former President Joe Biden, Democrats used it for the American Rescue Plan and the Inflation Reduction Act. Johnson has publicly speculated that Republicans were crushed in the 2018 midterm elections because they passed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 too late for voters to reap the benefits. It cleared Congress in December 2018. That's a big factor in why he pushed to get Trump's signature megabill across the finish line by this Fourth of July. 'We basically enacted in this agenda what we did in the first two years of the [first] Trump administration, but this time, we did it on steroids,' Johnson said. 'We added all sorts of other policies to really fuel the US economy. 'Everyone will be experiencing that before the midterms.' Republicans will face a government shutdown fight next But the next real political headache Johnson is staring down isn't the future reconciliation bills. It's the partial government shutdown that's looming in the fall. Every fiscal year, which starts Oct. 1, Congress has to fund the federal government through the appropriations process, or else its lights go out. Unlike reconciliation, appropriation bills to fund the government need to overcome a 60-vote threshold to break a filibuster in the Senate. Republicans only have a 53-seat majority, which means they'll need to get Democrats on board. Advertisement Fiscal hawks on the Republican side have been keen on maximizing spending cuts, putting leadership in a jam between its hardliners and the need to negotiate with Democrats. Right now, government funding is effectively running on autopilot after Congress barely passed a spending patch in March to avert a partial shutdown.