Scientists Build Device to Generate Electricity Using the Earth's Rotation
In a controversial experiment, a team of physicists investigated whether we could harness the Earth's rotational energy to generate electricity.
It's a deceptively simple idea that researchers have only started to grapple with over the last decade. But whether the concept will ever turn into a feasible source of renewable energy remains to be seen, with the team's peers noting their skepticism of the results.
As detailed in their paper published in the journal Physical Review Research, the team led by Princeton University physicist Christoper Chyba, aligned a special device made up of a weak manganese-zinc ferrite conductor and electrodes at each end, at a 57 angle, making it perpendicular to our planet's rotational motion and its magnetic field.
They observed that the device generated 17 microvolts of electricity, which as Nature points out is a fraction of the voltage released by a single neuron firing.
It's a "controversial but intriguing" result, as researchers told the science journal, especially considering the minuscule voltage is extremely difficult to isolate from other physical influences.
"The idea is somewhat counter-intuitive and has been argued since Faraday," University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire emeritus physicist Paul Thomas, who wasn't involved in the research, told Nature.
Retired physicist Rinke Wijngaarden, who found the effect didn't work in his own 2018 experiments added that he's "still convinced that the theory of Chyba et al. cannot be correct."
The device could theoretically work by having the generator pass through the Earth's magnetic field, parts of which remain static, producing a current. However, as the journal points out, electrons could end up rearranging themselves as a result to create an opposing force, negating the effect.
Chyba and his team claim to have corrected for this by coming up with a special material that isn't prone to rearranging itself in this way by maintaining the same electrostatic force inside the device.
In short, plenty of research has yet to be done before we can definitively say that we could harness the Earth's rotational energy to generate power.
But the team of physicists is planning to do just that, attempting to scale up their experiment to generate an actually useful amount of energy.
Intriguingly, assuming that the system would work and would be scaled up to meet the demands of the entire planet, the Earth's rotational spin would only slow by seven milliseconds over the next 100 years, the researchers found — which is in the same ballpark as the amount the Moon's pull slows the Earth's rotation over the same period.
More on renewable energy: Capitalists Alarmed as Renewables Keep Making Electricity Temporarily Free
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
When is the full moon in June? Strawberry moon in Indiana will be a sweet sight
The month of June is going to be a sweet feast for Indiana skywatchers. Not only can Hoosiers witness the Strawberry Moon but also the Milky Way, "the bright central bulge of our galaxy," writes NASA, which should be visible through August. Here are some quick facts about the Strawberry Moon that skywatchers can snack on as it soars across the heavens. Wednesday, June 11, 2025, is when the sweet Strawberry Moon shines in the night sky. The moon's phases in June are: 🌓 First Quarter: June 3. 🌕 Full Moon: June 11. 🌗 Last Quarter: June 18. 🌑 New Moon: June 25. According to the Old Farmer's Almanac, moonrise for the Indianapolis area will happen by roughly 10:09 p.m. Wednesday, June 11, crossing the meridian at 1:38 a.m. before setting at 6:01 a.m. Thursday. You can check moonrise and moonset times for your zip code by visiting the Old Farmer's Almanac online. Story continues after photo gallery. Skies around Indianapolis are predicted to be mostly clear Wednesday night, June 11, with a low of around 60, according to an advanced forecast from the National Weather Service. Similar to the Pink Moon, June's Strawberry Moon takes its name from seasonal plant growth, according to the Old Farmer's Almanac. Many ripening berries were ready to be harvested around this time in the northeastern United States. Other names for June's full moon from Native American tribes include the Birth Moon, Hot Moon, Blooming Moon, and the Green Corn Moon. The Milky Way can best be viewed somewhere far away from bright city lights. Beverly Shores, near Gary, is an International Dark Sky location and therefore an excellent place for stargazing. You can also travel to Kemil Beach at Indiana Dunes State Park and Dr. T.K. Lawless County Park in Michigan, which also are designated dark sky locations, according to DarkSky International. According to NASA, traces of the Milky Way will appear as a "faint, cloud-like band arching across the sky toward the south." If you plan on observing the night sky this month, writes NASA, keep the following dates in mind for June 2025: June 16, 17 – Mars & Regulus – Mars passes closer to the bright bluish-white star Regulus, known as the "heart" of the lion constellation, Leo. They will appear about as far apart as the width of the full moon, and should be easy to spot with binoculars or a small telescope. June 19 – Moon & Saturn – The third-quarter moon appears right next to Saturn on Thursday morning in the hours before dawn, according to NASA. They rise in the east together at around 1:30 a.m. June 20 – June Solstice – The summer solstice is on June 20 in the northern hemisphere, tilting its maximum toward the Sun. This means the Sun will travel its longest, highest arc across the sky all year, writes NASA, resulting in the longest period of daylight for those north of the equator. June 21-30 – Mercury becomes visible – For those with a clear view to the western horizon, Mercury becomes visible for a brief period each evening at the end of June. Look for it to appear low in the sky starting 30 to 45 minutes after the Sun sets. June 22 – Moon & Venus – Venus rises this morning next to a slender and elegant crescent moon. Look for them in the east between about 3 a.m. and sunrise. All month – Mars: The Red Planet can be observed for a couple of hours after dark all month. It is noticeably dimmer than it appeared in early May, as Earth speeds away in its orbit, putting greater distance between the two worlds. All month – Milky Way core: The bright central bulge of our home galaxy, the Milky Way, is visible all night through August. It is best observed from dark sky locations far from bright city lights, and appears as a faint, cloud-like band arching across the sky toward the south. The following free astronomy apps can help you locate stars, planets, and constellations. SkyView Lite for iPhone | Google Play Star Walk 2 for iPhone | Google Play Star Chart for iPhone | Google Play for iPhone | Google Play The full Buck Moon should reach peak illumination by Thursday, July 10, 2025. When is the next full moon?: When every full moon shines in 2025. Dates, times and the history behind each name. John Tufts covers trending news for IndyStar and Midwest Connect. Send him a news tip at JTufts@ Find him on BlueSky at JohnWritesStuff. This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: Full moon June 2025: Seeing the Strawberry Moon, Milky Way in Indiana
Scientific American
9 hours ago
- Scientific American
A Japanese Spacecraft Has Crash-Landed on the Moon—Again
3 min read Investigations by the Japanese company ispace identified issues with speed and an altitude sensor that likely doomed the lander By & Nature magazine A Japanese spacecraft has probably crashed on the Moon, the second failed landing attempt for Tokyo-based private firm ispace. The HAKUTO-R Mission 2 (M2) lander — also called Resilience — began its landing sequence from a 100-kilometre-altitude orbit at 3.13am local time on 5 June. The craft was due to land near the centre of Mare Frigoris (Sea of Cold) at 4.17am. The ispace team said at a press conference that it lost contact with M2 when the craft was 192 metres above the Moon's surface and descending faster than expected. An attempt to reboot M2 was also unsuccessful. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. M2 didn't receive measurements of the distance between itself and the lunar surface in time to slow down and reach its correct landing speed, the team said. 'It eventually slowed down, but not softly enough,' says Clive Neal, who studies the Moon at the University of Notre Dame in Indianapolis, US. He speculates that the failure was probably caused by a systems issue that wasn't identified and addressed during the M1 landing attempt. 'It's something that I believe will definitely be fixable, because getting that close means there's a few tweaks that are going to be needed for the next one,' he adds. If M2 had successfully landed on the lunar surface, the mission would have been the second time a commercial company had achieved the feat and a first for a non-US company. ispace's Mission 1 (M1) probably crashed during a landing attempt in April 2023. Second chance Lunar landings are challenging. When M1 crashed, Ryo Ujiie, ispace's chief technology officer said the telemetry — which collects data on the craft's altitude and speed — estimated that M1 was on the surface when it wasn't, causing the lander to free fall. Speaking to Nature last week, Ujiie said the company had addressed the telemetry issue with M2 and modified its software. 'We also carefully selected how to approach the landing site,' he added. Had M2 landed successfully, the craft would have supplied electricity for its cargo, including water electrolyzing equipment and a module for food production experiments — developed by Japan-based Takasago Thermal Engineering and biotechnology firm Euglena. A deep space radiation probe made by Taiwan's National Central University, and the 54-centimetre Tenacious rover were also be on board. The rover, created by ispace's European subsidiary in Luxemburg, was going to be released from the lander to collect imagery, location data and lunar sand known as regolith. Tenacious also carries a small red house made by Swedish artist Mikael Genberg. Commercial pair The craft launched on 15 January from Cape Canaveral, Florida, onboard a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket. The rocket was also carrying the Blue Ghost Moon lander — developed by Firefly Aerospace, an aerospace firm based in Texas — which landed on the Moon on 2 March. M2 took a longer path to the moon than Blue Ghost, performing a lunar flyby on 15 February and spending two months in a low-energy transfer orbit before entering lunar orbit on 7 May. Ujiie says the path was slower because it was a low-energy trajectory, meaning that less fuel was used to move between Earth and lunar orbit. Richard de Grijs, an astronomer at Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia, says there will likely be more private companies trying to land their own crafts on the Moon. 'It seems that the big government players like NASA are quite keen to partner with commercial companies,' he says, because they can develop and launch crafts more cheaply than government bodies. He also expects that more missions will be launched in clusters, like the launch of M2 and Blue Ghost.
Gizmodo
13 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Trump Pulled His NASA Pick, But Jared Isaacman Would've Rebuilt the Moon Program
Shortly after Donald Trump withdrew his nomination for Jared Isaacman to lead NASA, the billionaire private astronaut revealed what he would have changed at the agency had he been given the role of administrator. The most notable change would have been to NASA's Artemis program, which is struggling with cost overruns and a super expensive, disposable rocket. During an interview with the All-in Podcast on Wednesday, Isaacman spoke about his nomination for the role of NASA administrator and where his priorities would have lied at the agency. 'Let's complete our lunar obligations, because that's a whole other story with China,' Isaacman said. 'At the same time, in parallel, develop the capabilities to get to Mars.' If Isaacman had taken the helm at NASA, however, he would've focused on reusable hardware to reach the Moon. NASA's Artemis program has come under heavy criticism for its use of the agency's Space Launch System (SLS), an expendable super-heavy-lift rocket designed to launch the Orion capsule towards the Moon. The 5.75-million-pound rocket was built using components from NASA's Space Shuttle program, which ran from 1981 to 2011. 'It's a giant disposable rocket program that repurposes shuttle hardware,' Isaacman said during the interview. 'It's expensive, it's disposable. It is not the way to do affordable, repeatable, efficient exploration, whether it's to [the] Moon, Mars, or anywhere else.' So far, NASA has poured billions into SLS before admitting that it's ultimately unaffordable. SLS has already gone $6 billion over budget, with the projected cost of each SLS rocket being $144 million more than anticipated. That would increase the overall cost of a single Artemis launch to at least $4.2 billion, according to a report released in May by the office of NASA's inspector general. Instead of relying on SLS, Isaacman suggests focusing on reusable launch vehicles for Artemis 3 onwards. 'There's enough hardware now to fly a couple of missions and make sure you beat China back to the Moon,' Isaacman said. 'But you can't be stuck on this forever. This is literally the equivalency, by the way, of taking P-51 Mustangs [a fighter aircraft] from World War II and using them in Desert Storm, because we got to keep the plants open. And that obviously makes no logical sense whatsoever.' He went on to criticize other aspects of NASA's Artemis program. 'We signed up a lot of international partners to support it because we like collecting flags, and it doesn't necessarily always mean that what they're contributing to is in the best interests of the program,' Isaacman said. 'This is going down a rabbit hole of a lot of things because of the shortcomings of the vehicle.' This week, President Trump withdrew his nomination of Isaacman to lead NASA. The move was disappointing for the space community, which largely viewed Isaacman's prospective role as a welcomed change for the agency as it struggles with budgetary constraints and bureaucratic red tape. Trump's decision coincided with SpaceX founder and CEO Elon Musk's supposed departure from the government, which Isaacman suggests was the reason behind the president's sudden change of heart. 'I'm not going to play dumb on this – I don't think timing was much of a coincidence,' Isaacman said. 'Obviously, there was more than one departure that was covered on that day. There were some people who had some axes to grind, and I was a good, visible target.' With Isaacman gone, NASA's future is filled with uncertainty, particularly in relation to its Artemis program. The administration's proposed budget for NASA suggests phasing out its SLS rocket and the Orion capsule, and replacing them with commercial alternatives. There is a lot of emphasis on returning astronauts to the Moon, but no clear way on how to do it.
