logo
Developers accused of 'immoral cash grab' over housing land in County Durham

Developers accused of 'immoral cash grab' over housing land in County Durham

Yahoo26-07-2025
The Northern Echo has been running a series of articles into the state of housebuilding across the region. In one of his final pieces, Patrick Gouldsbrough looks at the issue of 'land banking'.
Developers have been accused of an 'immoral cash grab' when it comes to banking up land and building on it when it's most profitable in County Durham.
Amid mounting resident frustrations and a string of unfinished developments across the region, local politicians are calling for national law changes to force developers to build the homes they've promised or risk losing planning permission altogether.
'In Durham, we are actually at a point where we have a surplus of approved housing developments,' said Alex Neil, Liberal Democrat councillor for Langley and Esh.
'We have the houses we need locally and are meeting current national house building targets despite approving many more developments than said target.
Alex Neil, Liberal Democrat councillor for Langley and Esh (Image: DURHAM COUNTY COUNCIL) "We are now at the point where the national targets are going up.
"This is going to mean excessive house building for our local needs and would likely lead to housing developments being accepted where they aren't at the same quality as some of our other developments in recent years.'
Mr Neil has also highlighted what he describes as a "broken national planning system" where councils lack the authority to ensure the timely completion of developments.
'Unfinished housing is a key concern of the council and is a major issue that needs a solution.
"As it stands, national law prevents councils, such as Durham, from forcing the building of houses once approved."
A housing estate site (Image: SARAH CALDECOTT) "Our local Lib Dem councillors are keen to see national legislation changed to allow councils like ours to force builders to construct their planned developments in a timelier manner or risk the removal of their planning permission,' he said.
'The banking of land to wait until houses will be more profitable is not just an issue to meet housing requirements, but is also an immoral cash grab from large corporations.
'This response represents the stance of me and my Liberal Democrat colleagues on Durham County Council as Durham's official opposition party."
In response to accusations of the practice of land banking, Colin Willetts, deputy managing Director at Homes by Esh, said: 'I can confirm that Homes by Esh does not land bank – our process is to commence work on developments as soon as planning permission is granted.'
Colin Willetts, deputy managing Director at Homes by Esh (Image: HOMES BY ESH) Other housebuilders have also denied that land banking is part of their practices.
The Home Builders Federation (HBF), which is the representative body of the home building industry in England and Wales, has also denied that it uses the practices across the UK.
A spokesperson for the HBF said: 'Repeated independent investigations have concluded that house builders do not land bank.
"Having made a significant investment in land and navigated the lengthy and costly planning process, there is absolutely no benefit in delaying construction and getting a return on investment by selling homes.
"There is often a misunderstanding of the various stages in the planning process, but until developers have an implementable permission, which can take years from when an initial outline permission is granted, no work is allowed to start on site.'
Councillor Chris Lines (Image: SARAH CALDECOTT) Elsewhere in County Durham, in the town of Sedgefield, which has seen its population surge by over 30 per cent in the past decade, Councillor Chris Lines warns that runaway development is placing unsustainable pressure on infrastructure and community identity.
'They're changing all the time,' he said of local and neighbourhood plans.
'We're in danger of places growing at such a vast rate that the supporting infrastructure simply can't keep up.'
He added: 'Yes, it's positive to see new families, vibrant businesses, and homes for young people. But we must ask: at what cost?'
Cllr Lines cited unfinished roads, schools at capacity, and merging town boundaries as signs that growth is now outpacing planning.
The Taylor Wimpey Eden Gardens estate in Sedgefield, County Durham (Image: SARAH CALDECOTT)
Using the sprawling Wynyard development as an example, he cautioned against the 'join-up' risk, where distinct towns blur into one another due to vanishing green buffers.
'We need to protect the shape and identity of our places,' he added.
'Growth should never come at the expense of community character.'
His concerns echoed issues seen across the Eden Gardens estate in Sedgefield.
'People have moved in, yet the footpaths and parts of the road network are still incomplete,' Cllr Lines said.
'It's a classic story. Residents are left in limbo while councils can't adopt the site because the basics simply aren't finished.'
Story Homes' 59 house development in Blackwell, Darlington (Image: SARAH CALDECOTT) In neighbouring Darlington, a pattern of delayed completion and deteriorating trust between developers and residents is playing out in multiple neighbourhoods.
At the 59-home Carmel Road South estate by Story Homes—where homes sell from £520,000—residents have raised serious safety concerns over what they call 'dangerously unfinished' roads and pavements.
Despite the final home being completed in April, basic infrastructure remains incomplete.
The Central Park North development in Darlington (Image: SARAH CALDECOTT) The developer blames 'unforeseen technical challenges and ecological requirements,' but assures residents that it is 'fully committed to completing the outstanding works.'
In Central Park North, a Keepmoat development launched in 2015 with plans for 350 homes, residents say the estate still resembles a construction site.
Safety fences, patchy roads, and unkept green spaces mar what was supposed to be a flagship project.
Bellway's housing development in Hurworth, near Darlington (Image: SARAH CALDECOTT) Keepmoat insists it remains 'committed to completing their work on the site in the coming months.'
In Hurworth, Bellway Homes faces intense criticism from Cllr Lorraine Tostevin, who called the estate 'a disgrace' six years after its construction began.
Unfinished footpaths and roads, she says, are particularly hazardous for disabled residents.
Read more:
Echo Comment on incomplete Darlington estates
Darlington estate is 'complete mess' with 'accident waiting ...
New rules could see housebuilders who leave sites unfinished ...
Central Park North, Darlington "massive joke," say residents
Bellway claims it is now addressing the issue 'as a matter of urgency.'
And in Heighington, Bellway's Meadow Rise development has remained in limbo for more than two years since the final house was sold.
'People have paid upwards of £250,000 for their homes. They rightly expect better, not years of delay and a landscape of broken promises,' said Cllr Gerald Lee, who covers the area.
Bellway now says it will begin 'adoption works' on July 21, with completion expected within four weeks.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Balance of Power: Europe Races to Leverage Trump's Support
Balance of Power: Europe Races to Leverage Trump's Support

Bloomberg

time24 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Balance of Power: Europe Races to Leverage Trump's Support

Bloomberg Washington Correspondents Joe Mathieu and Kailey Leinz deliver insight and analysis on the latest headlines from the White House and Capitol Hill, including conversations with influential lawmakers and key figures in politics and policy. On this edition, Bloomberg's Tyler Kendall and Michael Shepard are in for Joe and Kailey. They speak with: Bloomberg National Security and Intelligence Reporter Natalia Drozdiak. Former UK Ambassador to the US Sir Peter Westmacott. Bloomberg Politics Contributor Jeanne Sheehan Zaino and BGR Group International Practice Principal Lester Munson. Former Deputy National Security Advisor for Cyber and Emerging Technology in the Biden Administration Anne Neuberger.

Swinney has ‘no intention' of reshuffling Scottish cabinet before May election
Swinney has ‘no intention' of reshuffling Scottish cabinet before May election

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Swinney has ‘no intention' of reshuffling Scottish cabinet before May election

John Swinney has made clear he has 'no intention' of reshuffling his cabinet team at Holyrood, despite a number of key figures in his government stepping down at next May's Scottish elections. More than 20 SNP MSPs are set to leave Holyrood when voters north of the border go to the poll next year. Mr Swinney's deputy First Minister Kate Forbes is among them, along with Finance Secretary Shona Robison, Transport Secretary Fiona Hyslop and Rural Affairs Secretary Mairi Gougeon. However, Mr Swinney made clear he has no plans to reshape his top team in the light of the planned departures. Speaking at an event in Edinburgh organised by the think tank Enlighten, Mr Swinney said: 'I have no intention of reshuffling my team before the election.' While he spoke about his 'regret' about fellow MSPs leaving Holyrood, including 'close colleagues, friends and confidantes', he said he had reshuffled his cabinet team after government minister Mairi McAllan returned to work earlier this year following her maternity leave. She was given the newly created post of housing secretary, with Mr Swinney tasking her with tackling the housing 'emergency' in Scotland. Asked if the impending departure of senior members of his government would bring about a reshuffle ahead of May's Scottish elections, the SNP leader said he had 'decided, actively and purposefully' that he had people in his cabinet with 'experience and expertise in a number of roles that would help me to deliver to government's programme before the election'. And he argued that if he was to 'put in a whole host of new faces' then 'it would take a while to get things back up to the level of delivery' So he insisted: 'I have no plans to reshuffle the government.' His comments came as he spoke of his 'regret' over SNP MSPs leaving Holyrood, with the First Minister saying he 'very much' regretted Ms Forbes' decision to quit the Scottish Parliament. She announced earlier this month she would not be running for election next year, saying she did not want to 'miss any more of the precious early years of family life'. Meanwhile, former first ministers Nicola Sturgeon and Humza Yousaf are also stepping down. Mr Swinney said: 'Some of my colleagues are stepping down because they have done a very long shift.' While he said he was the 'longest serving' parliamentarian at Holyrood, having been first voted in as an MP 28 years ago before being elected as an MSP in the first devolved elections, he noted a number of those quitting had also been first elected in 1999. However, he added some MSPs were leaving because of the 'tough' nature of politics. 'We have to acknowledge that for many, I think particularly younger women, the climate is horrendous,' Mr Swinney said. He continued: 'The social media endurance is hard to bear for some people, and it makes public service look frankly unattractive at times.' In these circumstances, he said, he tries to 'support my colleagues, understand and be an ally'. But the SNP leader added: 'Ultimately, I can not protect people from what is thrown at them, and some of the behaviours are appalling, so that affects a number of people as well.'

County councils say rural taxpayers to face unfair burden under funding reforms
County councils say rural taxpayers to face unfair burden under funding reforms

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

County councils say rural taxpayers to face unfair burden under funding reforms

Council taxpayers in rural areas will contribute unfair levels of funding for services in urban communities under proposed Government reforms, county councils have warned. Large rural authorities have also highlighted that maximum council tax increases will be needed to deliver necessary core budget increases for essential services over the next three years. In its submission to the Government's consultation on planned reforms, known as the 'fair funding review 2.0', the County Councils Network (CCN) said the proposals were 'better than feared'. The network welcomed some elements that determine funding levels, such as an indicator for remoteness and a new formula for social care and school transport allocations, which it said 'better recognise the needs' of the 38 county areas. But CCN called on the Government to reconsider its broader approach, insisting the proposals 'place a disproportionate burden on council taxpayers in county areas to fund local services and redistribute funding to urban areas'. Modelling showed that under the proposals £1.6 billion in council tax income generated in county areas will be redistributed across the country. This is due to a decision by ministers to include 100% of local council tax receipts when allocating funds in a bid to 'equalise' revenue across the sector, in a departure from the previous approach which took in 85%. CCN said this means 32 of the 38 county and rural authorities will lose an additional £400 million in a process that would represent an 'overwhelming' benefit for urban metropolitan boroughs. The analysis showed 22 authorities will receive increases in direct Government funding totalling £845 million under the plans. But on average these councils will receive 70% of their overall increase in core spending power, the official measure of funding available for services, from council tax rises specifically. In addition, 16 other councils, including some located in the North and the Midlands, will experience funding cuts totalling £470 million. With no increase in direct Government funding, the entire increase in core spending power for these authorities will come from council tax rises, CCN said. 'One third of council tax income raised in these areas over the three-year period is needed to offset cuts to funding and prevent them falling below a proposed 0% funding floor,' the network added. Across all 38 county and rural unitary councils, direct grant funding will increase by £374 million, with 90% of the total uplift in core spending power coming via maximum 5% annual council tax rises. The modelling suggests this scenario is in stark contrast to the impact on councils in urban areas, with nearly 50% of metropolitan authorities' extra resources coming from additional grant funding of £1.2 billion over three years. Overall, in the absence of maximum annual council tax rises over the period, the analysis showed 33 of the 38 county and rural unitary authorities would experience a real-terms reduction in funding, CCN said. The new Government grant would fund just 9% of the estimated £4.4 billion increase in the cost of providing services in county and rural areas over three years, while the boost in Government funding for metropolitan authorities would fund half of the total £2.4 billion increase in estimated costs of services in those areas. CCN said it is 'simply unrealistic' to expect some of England's largest social care councils to 'provide life critical services while receiving deep cuts in Government grant' and called for 'significantly' more funding to prevent 'unsustainable cuts'. Chairman of the CCN Tim Oliver said: 'Some 16 county and rural councils across the length and breadth of the country will see reductions in grant funding, while the Government's proposals place a disproportionate burden on council taxpayers in county areas to fund local services and redistribute funding to urban areas. 'Those facing cuts in Government funding will inevitably have to reduce vital frontline services, while the reliance on council tax rises leaves even those with modest funding increases facing an extremely challenging funding outlook. 'While we recognise the need to take account of how much councils raise in local taxation, the Government's proposals to fully equalise unfairly redistribute hundreds of millions of local council tax to other areas, while weakening the incentive to build homes.' Sir Stephen Houghton, chairman of the Special Interest Group of Municipal Authorities, backed the Government's approach. He said: 'It is absolutely right that any new funding system must fully reflect the wide disparities in councils' ability to raise income through council tax. 'The failure to do so over the past decade has led to disproportionately deep cuts in the most deprived areas, worsening inequality across the country.' The Government's consultation on the reforms closed on Friday. A Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government spokesperson said: 'We do not recognise the (CCN) analysis. The current, outdated way in which local authorities are funded has left communities behind and damaged local services. 'This must change and is why we are taking decisive action as part of our Plan for Change to reform the funding system so we can improve public services, while maintaining the previous government's referendum threshold on council tax rises so taxpayers have the final say and are protected from excessive increases.' Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said: 'Yet again the Labour government are showing utter contempt for people living in rural Britain. 'The family farms tax has been devastating for British farming and scrapping the rural services grant has put rural councils under enormous pressure. Now this latest spiteful change will steal more money out of the hands of county councils and send it straight into Labour-run urban areas. 'Only the Conservatives are serious about standing up for our rural communities' Liberal Democrat local government spokeswoman Vikki Slade said the reforms could be severely detrimental to some areas. Ms Slade said: 'Councils across the country are already teetering on the edge after years of Conservatives' neglect of local funding and services – from bus services cuts in rural areas to the rising costs of social care. These ill-thought-out reforms only risk leaving parts of the country significantly worse off. 'To truly help local authorities, the Government should urgently look at supporting councils who receive the least grant funding and those that face additional pressure on services in rural and coastal areas, to help them with spiralling costs.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store