
You Can Change Your Personality
After consulting with the experts on personality plasticity and then setting a deadline, Khazan put herself through an intense experiment intended to make herself more likeable, to herself and others. Her evaluations were not soft and subjective but numerical; Khazan tested and scored herself on a range of key personality traits at the beginning and end of the experiment. In this episode, Khazan and I talk about two of those traits: extroversion and neuroticism. Khazan shares how for her book Me, But Better, she dragged herself to improv classes and meditation lessons, and how having a baby threw a kink in her experiment.
The following is a transcript of the episode:
Hanna Rosin: There is one thing I really don't like about myself. I mean, there are several, but I'm only going to tell you about this one right now. It can be the most beautiful day—like springtime, cherry blossoms every direction you look—and immediately, instinctively, my mind will scan for the one thing wrong. Like, Gross! There's pollen all over that car.
I have definitely tried over the years to do this or that to counteract it, like cultivate a more positive mindset or start my day by saying three things I'm grateful for. But I think there's just a part of me that thinks, Well, that's just how Hanna is, like there's some core of Hanna Rosin, whether it's genetic or epigenetic or learned, that will always scan for the negative.
I'm Hanna Rosin. This is Radio Atlantic, and today we're talking about personality—what it is and whether it's something you can actually change.
Olga Khazan: So, many decades ago, William James did come up with this theory that personality is sort of set like plaster at age 30, and it never softens again after age 30.
Rosin: That's staff writer Olga Khazan. And the William James she's talking about is considered the father of American psychology. But his view of personality doesn't hold up to modern scrutiny.
Khazan: There wasn't a whole lot of research on personality or psychology. It just wasn't really a developed science. So when researchers started doing more modern studies about this, what they found, after following the same group of people for decades and decades, is that most people actually do change, and if they do stuff to try to change, they kind of change even faster.
Rosin: Like me, Olga had things about her personality that she wished she could change. And when she learned that it's not so set in stone, she thought she'd give it a try. She made it a monthslong project, an experiment. And she wrote about it in a new book called Me, But Better.
[ Music ]
Rosin: So I love this idea. I find it very inspiring, as I'm sure a lot of people do. Why did you start it? Like, obviously, there were things about yourself that you didn't like—which there are things about all of us that we don't like, but what was it in your case?
Khazan: Yeah, so on top of not liking certain things about myself, something that I noticed is that I just wasn't very happy, and I wasn't enjoying my life to the extent that I thought that I could.
So what started this was I had just a really rough day. I was in Miami in December, so definitely nothing to complain about environment-wise. I had to go get professional photos taken for our job, and I had to get a haircut before the photos were taken. And so I go; I book a hair appointment. This haircut is terrible. It's probably one of the worst haircuts I've ever gotten in my life.
Rosin: Details. Details. Was it a bang problem?
Khazan: It wasn't a bang problem. Okay, I try to emphasize every time I get my hair cut that my hair does not take layers well. And they always do layers, despite what I explicitly said. And maybe I need to just be more straightforward about it. But anyway—so there was like a mushrooming effect because of the attempt at layers.
Rosin: (Laughs.) I'm sorry. I'm sorry, yeah.
Khazan: (Laughs.) Anyway, so I'm leaving the hairstylist's. I'm like, Oh my God. I look terrible. I had to go directly to the photo session, where I got professional photos taken that looked really bad, in my opinion, and then I had to, right away, drive on to the grocery store to get a bunch of groceries for dinner that night.
And as I was driving, I went the wrong way and got stuck on this island that cruise ships launch from. Then, once I recovered from that, I got to the grocery store, and as I was leaving, my shopping cart locked. And I had to drag the shopping cart across the parking lot to my car. And while this all was happening, my boss was Slacking me edits on a story. So I do these edits sitting in this hot car. I drive on, I get back to the Airbnb, and I just freak out.
Like, I honestly just had a meltdown—not a panic attack, but crying, chugging wine, just screaming, like, I hate everyone. And I settled down, eventually, and I was sort of like, Why do I react so badly to things that are kind of minor? Honestly, just even recounting that day as a new parent, I'm kind of like, Eh, so. That's bad, but that's not that bad.
And I kind of realized that it was my personality that was making days like that worse than they had to be, that was undermining my happiness in those moments.
Rosin: Okay, I just wanna question that for one second: First of all, I'm sorry you had that day. It sucks, and I understand you just want to be frustrated. Like, you don't wanna be screaming and crying. You don't want to have a breakdown. You just wanna be casually frustrated. I think a lot of people, when they are sad or they feel unhappy, the traditional route is: See a shrink. Get on meds. You know—whatever—journal.
I don't think that I would have thought, Okay, it's my actual personality. Like, to look at yourself, break your personality down, I mean, it's interesting. It was an interesting response you had, and I'm wondering how you even knew in that moment to look at yourself and think, Oh, it's my personality.
Khazan: Yeah, so, actually, seeing a shrink and taking medication do change your personality, also.
Rosin: Interesting!
Khazan: And that is to say that personality change is kind of the root of a lot of different types of personal growth and self-improvement. So what I was kind of describing just now is a high level of neuroticism, which I did have.
And so bringing that down is personality change. And one way to do that is through therapy and medications. But I think kind of beyond just neuroticism, I was also just kind of unhappy with other parts of my life. Like, I honestly just didn't socialize much. I kind of reflexively didn't socialize.
I didn't have a lot of friends, which to me was a different thing than neuroticism. And then I kind of just was really snippy with my boyfriend at the time—my husband now—and honestly, would get in a lot of fights with my friends, which is, like, this other trait called 'agreeableness.'
So I don't know. It felt more, like, all-encompassing than just the I need to handle my stress better.
Rosin: Right. Okay. So you've been mentioning some of the main traits that you outline in your book. Can you just lay out the different components so we can follow you through this experiment?
Khazan: So there's five traits that make up personality, and we all have these five traits inside of us. And they can be remembered with the acronym OCEAN.
So it's o for 'openness to experiences,' which is like creativity and imaginativeness; c for 'conscientiousness,' which is like being on time, being super organized, being really diligent; e for 'extroversion,' so being sociable, cheerful, active; c for 'agreeableness,' which is being warm and empathetic and trusting; and n for 'neuroticism,' which is being neurotic, being anxious and depressed.
Rosin: Okay. So that's how you started to break your own problems down. Like, there's this bucket, that bucket, that bucket. We won't do the whole OCEAN of personality, but I really want to talk about a few that interest me the most. Maybe we'll start with extroversion, because being outgoing is a common goal.
Lots of people say, Oh, I want to have more friends, particularly post-pandemic. How extroverted were you at the start of this process?
Khazan: Let me look up my exact score.
Rosin: Oh, there were scores?
Khazan: Yes!
Rosin: Okay, so you actually get a number.
Khazan: Yeah, when you take the personality test I was taking, you do get a number.
Rosin: That's a little brutal.
Khazan: Yeah. Oh, okay—I scored in the 23rd percentile, which is very low, especially when it came to being friendly or cheerful.
Rosin: Uh-huh. Interesting. Okay. (Laughs.) When you first got that number, how did that feel?
Khazan: I was like, That checks out.
Rosin: (Laughs.) Uh-huh. You weren't surprised. Okay. So how did you go about this? Like, that's the kind of thing where someone would say, Okay, well, I'm just not that extroverted, and one road would be acceptance: I'm just not that extroverted. I'm going to stay home and watch TV a lot.
Khazan: Yeah, and I did that road for a long time. So one kind of interesting twist here is that when psychologists take a bunch of introverts and they tell them, Go out and act like extroverts for a few minutes. Go socialize. Go hang out. And then they come back and they're like, How do you feel? They actually say they feel happier. And they also say they feel more like themselves.
Rosin: Something about your saying that makes me nervous. I think it's just because of the Susan Cain book Quiet, where we've come to appreciate the power of introverts, you know? What do you say about that?
Khazan: So yeah, I really, really liked the book Quiet, and I really like Susan Cain personally. I just think that there are benefits for introverts to occasionally act like extroverts. I think it's okay to still identify as an introvert and to appreciate all of the perks that come with that, but to also occasionally be able to at least try on this more outgoing personality trait.
Rosin: So when you set out to try and change this part of yourself, you know, raise your score—we'll just put it that way, concretely—were you saying to yourself, I want to change Olga and make Olga not an introvert? Or, I want to try on extraversion sometimes, like a costume? Or, I want to change my score? Like, what was your goal?
Khazan: My goal was to change my score, so to be more extroverted. I didn't think it would work well enough to make me an extrovert. In the end, I think my latest test that I took did put me technically in the extrovert category. But I didn't think that it would work that well.
Rosin: Okay. So how did you do it?
Khazan: I signed up for a bunch of activities and went to them. I signed up for improv comedy, a sailing club, a bunch of meetups. And I threw a party at my house for the first time.
Rosin: Wow. And all the while, just so people understand what this kind of experiment is like, in case they want to try it, are you uncomfortable? Like, surely, you're going against your, what you initially called, natural inclinations.
Khazan: So I ended up doing improv for about eight months or so. And probably for the first six months, every time I went, I felt this overwhelming sense of dread. Like, you almost wish that you could get in a car accident on the way there so that you wouldn't have to go.
Rosin: That is extreme. I totally sympathize. I understand. Yeah.
Khazan: Like, is there any way to get out of this? Any way? Like, Please, God, don't make me go. Like, I have extreme stage fright. And so you get there, and you're all sitting in a circle, and then at some point you get up, and you just start doing improv with the other people who are there.
Rosin: And the reason it helps you become extroverted is because it's relational. Like, you have to be deeply attuned to this total stranger. You have to be on the stage. You have to perform. Like, it just forces you into actions that are extroverted.
Khazan: Oh, yes, and it makes you become way more comfortable with chaos because everyday conversation is chaotic, but improv is even more chaotic than that.
Rosin: Right. And then, so let's say the 20th time you're going to improv class, does the initial dread fade, or it's always that cycle?
Khazan: I think, over time, it did fade, but even before it completely went away naturally, I would start to feel it, and I would kind of tell myself, like, No, you're gonna be fine. It's just improv. It's okay—you're gonna feel good after. You know, it's very similar to how I talk to my son now. It's like, No, you like this formula. This is the good kind. (Laughs.)
Rosin: That's so funny. So this is tricky to understand. So by the end, you're doing it with a little bit less dread. You're still talking yourself into it. You're able to do it, so you're not avoiding it; you're doing it. You're, at times, enjoying it, but it's still not your natural inclination.
Khazan: So I would say it's not to do improv, but it's to connect with other people when I'm feeling down. Like, if I'm feeling isolated and withdrawn, I don't feel like the solution is just to spend more time by myself. I feel like it's to connect with others and sort of get out of my head a little.
Rosin: But that actually seems revolutionary. Like, if you think of one of our largest problems now, which is lack of connection, the idea that you can actually work at it, you know, approach it like a project and change it slowly, such that what you got—okay, maybe you're not going to be on SNL, so that's not your destiny—but what does change is that you don't go deeper into yourself when you are feeling whatever you're feeling. Like, you seek some kind of connection. And research does show that that's healthy.
Khazan: Yeah, and that's kind of the science behind why extroverts tend to show up as happier. They kind of just spend a lot of time around other people, and other people tend to make us happy, even though we can all think of times when other people have not made us happy.
But, you know, I'm really glad I did that before having a baby, because I think that my approach to new motherhood would have been totally different otherwise and much more isolating if I hadn't done this experiment to see, Okay, actually, being around others and connecting socially, and even in a way that's silly and doesn't totally make sense is, like, still a good thing.
Khazan: Right now, my extroversion—it says it's very high.
Rosin: Very high. So it went from very low to very high.
Khazan: Yes, it's not in the top 10 percent. I would say it's probably, like—I don't know—60th percentile now.
Rosin: I know, but you're getting all ambitious now. Like, you want to be in the top ten percent.
Khazan: I didn't get into the Harvard of extroversion. (Laughs.)
Rosin: Exactly. (Laughs.)
Khazan: But yeah.
Rosin: That's amazing. Okay. Very, very impressed. And I feel like people should try it.
[ Music ]
Rosin: So that was extroversion—the e in OCEAN. After the break, Olga takes us through another section of her book: the n —the negative, nervous, capital- n 'Neurotics.'
[ Break ]
Rosin: Okay. Let's move on to the second trait that I want to talk about, which is neuroticism, the n of OCEAN. That is one that I think many people would like to change about themselves, myself included. What did your starting point there look like?
Khazan: I think I scored higher than, like, literally everyone else on earth.
Rosin: (Laughs.)
Khazan: Oh, I was in the 94th percentile.
Rosin: So you did get into the Harvard of neuroticism.
Khazan: Yes. Yeah. Yeah, I'm graduating.
Rosin: Excellent. And we're laughing, but the feeling—I mean, everyone's version of neurotic is different, but can you talk a little bit about your own version? Like, what is it that bothered you about your neuroticism?
Khazan: So I was basically always anxious. Like, there just wasn't a time when I wasn't anxious. I was constantly thinking about stuff in the future that could go wrong, or stuff in the past that did go wrong, and, like, Why did I allow it to go wrong? When good things would happen, there was no living in the moment or appreciating the good thing.
It was, like, onto the next thing that could go wrong. Or like, Oh, this sunset is great, but the one yesterday was better. You know, like on vacation, we would get to some beautiful attraction or landmark of some kind, and I'd be like, Okay, what's next?
Rosin: Right.
Khazan: That kind of thing. Yeah.
Rosin: So you started out with Harvard-level, high-baseline neuroticism. This one is hard to face, I will say, so what was your process of trying to change it?
Khazan: So I followed this one study that's been done on personality change, but a lot of those suggestions were, like, a lot of gratitude journaling—and I did do that—but a lot of it was also meditation.
Rosin: Ugh.
Khazan: —which, I know.
Rosin: Is there anything else?
Khazan: I know. I was, like, Seriously? I was diving so deep into the psychology. Is there something where I can, like, walk backwards for a mile and be cured?
Rosin: You know how there are headlines sometimes that are like: 'This is the One Thing You Need to Do.' It's always meditation. So I'm like, You're not surprising me in this headline.
Khazan: Yes, yes. Yeah, it's always meditation. It was indeed meditation. So it was a meditation class that I took. It was, like, kind of like Buddhism for Dummies —like, during the day, we would all gather and they would do this PowerPoint with kind of very basic Buddhist ideas.
And then, we had to meditate for 45 minutes a day.
[ Music ]
Rosin: As beginners?
Khazan: Yes.
Rosin: That's an intimidating amount of time.
Khazan: It was really, really, really hard. I honestly don't think I could do it with a kid now. I don't really have 45 minutes anymore. But I think if people are trying this at home, I think they should start with way less, because it can feel so daunting that you're like, Why even bother? You know? And there's a lot of meditations out there that I also found effective that are much shorter, like 10 or 15 minutes.
Rosin: So you, starting out as the person with high neuroticism, face meditation as a person who sees meditation all over the culture, so there's already a barrier to entry. So how do you slide into that one? Because I actually understand the benefits of meditation; I just also understand the cultural ubiquity of meditation and, thus, the resistance to it, you know? So how do you sneak your way in so that it's helpful?
Khazan: Yeah, so I basically was, like, dragged kicking and screaming. And unlike with improv, I didn't enjoy it at any point. So we would have these phone calls with our meditation teacher to see how things were going, and basically all my phone calls were all about how much I hated meditation.
Rosin: Which is maybe neurotic, like—
Khazan: I'm not doing it right. I was like, Can I listen to music? Can I listen to a podcast? Can I wash the dishes? She's like, No, you need to be there and, like, sit with whatever comes up. And whatever stuff she said, I was like, That doesn't make any sense.
We had an all-day meditation retreat, where all we did was meditate all day. It was, like, the worst day of my life. I hated it so much, like—oh my God. And they were—at one point I think they got frustrated with me, because they're like: You sound like you're striving, and you're not supposed to strive in meditation.
And I was like, Yeah, of course I'm striving. So, yeah, it was just so hard and so painful. And it worked.
Rosin: Whoa! Okay, so can you describe how the turn happened? I think many people would want to know.
Khazan: So I don't think there ever was a turn. I sort of hated it all the way through the retreat. And then I took the test not long after the retreat. And my neuroticism had actually fallen so much that it was considered low. It was in the 39th percentile.
Rosin: Wait—you went from 97 percent to low?
Khazan: Yeah, I no longer scored, like, extremely high or whatever it was. But I will say, it was mostly because of a change in my depression score. Like, so I have really, really high anxiety, and I also had high depression, and my depression went down by a lot, and my anxiety also went down a little but not by as much.
Rosin: And what do you attribute that to? I mean, that's amazing. Like, you know, going down on depression or anxiety is fantastic. So what do you attribute it to? Do you attribute it to the meditation or to the act of focusing on yourself for some amount of time so that you're taking your depression seriously, or what was it?
Khazan: So two-part answer here. One is that—so this class that I took called MBSR has gone head-to-head with the antidepressant Lexapro, and it actually works, allegedly, as well as Lexapro. So there is kind of precedent for it bringing down anxiety and depression.
And I think the answer—maybe it was the meditation just working in the background, like sweeping away the cobwebs or whatever without me noticing. You know, because you're supposed to just let your thoughts pass like clouds or whatever. But I think the more kind of immediately efficacious thing was that these Buddhism for Dummies lessons were very helpful for me.
Even though I thought they were kind of stupid, I found them really helpful. And in particular, my meditation teacher would always say, Things happen that we don't like. And I realized that I was someone who was very filled with self-blame for things not going the way they were, quote-unquote, 'supposed' to go.
Like getting stuck in traffic—I would get this overwhelming rage at myself whenever I was stuck in traffic. And it was—it's traffic. Like, you know, there's nothing you can do about it. But I realized that I had this, I don't know, wrong image of other people's lives as perfect because they manage them perfectly, and that I'm the only one who can't.
And for some reason, this, like, PowerPoint-focused Buddhism class helped me get rid of some of that.
Rosin: I believe everything the Buddhists say. I have never found any of it unhelpful. It's always incredibly helpful if I can just get myself to sit down and pay attention.
Khazan: Yes.
Rosin: Okay, so basically, this experiment was successful for you.
Khazan: Yes, yes.
Rosin: And when did you do it?
Khazan: I did this right before I got pregnant.
Rosin: All right. So that's an important marker. So that would be, like, two years ago you did this experiment. Now what has stayed with you about it?
Khazan: S I will say that right after I had Evan, my scores got all—like, I'm looking at my graphs of my scores, and there's like a huge dip on all of them right after the baby came, because postpartum depression can affect all these things. Also, you're not socializing, you're not being nice, you're not being conscientious, you're not showering in that immediate postpartum period.
So they all crashed and burned right after the baby came. But I actually just recently took the tests again. You know, he's 1-year-old now, and I just took them again, like, a month ago. And they actually went back up—not quite to the level as they were when I was doing the book, but back up for the most part, I would say, across all the traits.
And I think that's just because I've been able lately to get back more into some of what I was doing for the book, not all of them.
Rosin: Interesting. Okay. So how you're using this in your life, this whole experiment that you did, is: First of all, it convinced you that you can change things about elements of your personality. You know that to be true now. And so you have these markers, and they essentially serve as goals.
And if you're finding yourself to be unhappy, then you can work on one or another of these goals. Like, it just allows you to be more self-aware, notice things about yourself. And it gives you some very concrete tools to fix it.
Khazan: Yeah, that's how I see it. And that's—I mean, Nate Hudson, the researcher whose work kind of forms the backbone of the book, he really describes personality traits as tools. Like, they help you get what you want in life. Which is why I kind of shy away from the, like, Don't change your personality if you like yourself, because, you know, I liked myself before, and I like myself now. But now I feel like I know how to get more out of life.
Rosin: That's really, really interesting. You wouldn't have minded yourself if you'd been a somewhat isolated mother who didn't see that many mothers.
Khazan: Yeah, I don't think I would've. You know, I think I would have had a much lonelier and more stressful postpartum experience. I think I would have just thought that's what it is like.
Rosin: Like, that's Olga's version of parenting, and that's okay. Like, you wouldn't have hated yourself for it.
Khazan: Yeah, exactly. But instead what I did is I joined this new-moms group, and in general I just have made more of a point of reaching out to other new moms, and just kind of getting together as much as possible, or even just keeping in touch over WhatsApp or whatever—sharing experiences or just, like, What the hell is this? Is this normal? That type of stuff.
That has honestly made it so much less bad, I think, and less isolating. Like, I wouldn't say that I have a village, but it's just nice to not feel like you're the only person in the world who's ever had a baby.
Rosin: Yeah. So you have the advantage of going into motherhood with all of this understanding of personality. Have you found yourself talking about your son or thinking about your son with some of this research in mind?
Khazan: Yeah, you know, Evan is very smiley, and he's just very happy. He smiles very easily. He smiles at people he knows and likes. And my parents tell me that I was not like that. (Laughs.)
Rosin: (Laughs.) Thanks, Mom. Yeah.
Khazan: So the way I talk about it, I'm like, Oh, he gets that from my husband, Rich. And I don't know. I'm just like, I really—sorry, I'm trying not to choke up.
Rosin: That's okay.
Khazan: I really, like, want to not mess that up for him. Like, I want to—I don't know. Sorry.
Rosin: No, that's okay. You want to keep him happy.
Khazan: Yeah, not keep him happy, but I hope that that continues. I don't know.
Rosin: Yeah. No, I thought you were going somewhere different. I thought what you were going to say is, I don't want to think about his personality as fixed. Like, I want to allow him—like, if he wants to be unhappy, or if he wants to be a different way, or throw a temper tantrum, that's okay. Like, I will keep in mind that we can, you know, move towards a goal later.
But I think what you're saying is more simple and beautiful, and I appreciate that. I'm sorry that your mom was—it was like when my mom used to tell me how much cuter my brother was than me as a baby, every single time we look at baby pictures.
Khazan: Lovely.
Rosin: Yeah. Well, Olga, thank you so much. I feel like this will inspire a lot of people to try it. So thank you so much for writing it down.
Khazan: Yeah, absolutely. Thanks so much for having me on.
[ Music ]
Rosin: This episode of Radio Atlantic was produced by Kevin Townsend and edited by Claudine Ebeid. We had engineering support from Rob Smierciak and fact-checking by Genevieve Finn. Claudine Ebeid is the executive producer of Atlantic audio, and Andrea Valdez is our managing editor.
Listeners, if you like what you hear on Radio Atlantic, remember you can support our work and the work of all Atlantic journalists when you subscribe to The Atlantic at TheAtlantic.com/listener.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
36 minutes ago
- New York Post
The ‘Nordic diet' can help you lose weight and prevent heart attacks — stock up on these foods
Forget the Mediterranean — the land of snow and salmon is serving up a fresh way to eat that gives your heart a healthy boost. A growing body of research suggests the Nordic diet can help trim your waist, tame your cholesterol levels and keep your blood pressure in check. That could be a game-changer in the fight against cardiovascular disease, which kills an American every 34 seconds. 4 The Nordic diet is packed with fiber, fatty fish and cold-weather produce. Getty Images This northern European way of eating leans heavily on whole foods that retain their natural nutrients, in sharp contrast to the US food supply, where up to 70% is ultraprocessed. It revolves around seasonal, locally sourced ingredients found across Nordic nations like Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden. '[The Vikings] were limited to the foods available to them at the time,' Lauren Harris-Pincus, a registered dietitian, told Fox News. 'Their diet focused on clean, sustainable foods, which is why we are discussing its health benefits today.' Like the Mediterranean diet — long hailed for its heart-healthy power — the Nordic style is plant-forward, high in fiber and packed with seafood. 4 Fatty fish are excellent sources of omega-3 fatty acids, which are linked to reduced risk of heart disease. artemidovna – But while the Greeks rely on olive oil, the northern approach leans on rapeseed (or canola) oil, another heart-friendly monounsaturated fat, according to Harvard Health. Rapeseed oil is also a source of alpha-linolenic acid, a plant-based omega-3 fatty acid similar to the kind found in fatty fish like salmon, mackerel, sardines and herring — all staples of the Nordic kitchen. Followers typically eat two to three servings of these fish each week. The omega-3s delivered by both the oil and fish have been shown to reduce the risk of heart rhythm issues, slow plaque buildup in arteries and lower fat levels in the blood, key factors in protecting cardiovascular health. The Nordic diet also emphasizes low-fat dairy, such as yogurt, and incorporates eggs and poultry in moderation. Red and processed meats, on the other hand, rarely make it onto the plate. 4 Root vegetables are loaded with vitamins, minerals, antioxidants and fiber. Viktor Iden – Whole grains such as oats, barley and rye are another cornerstone in this eating pattern. These fiber-rich 'complex' carbs digest slowly, helping to curb cravings and keep blood sugar steady — unlike refined grains in processed staples like white bread. Cold-weather veggies like turnips, carrots, parsnips, cabbage and cauliflower are also featured prominently. They're packed with fiber and nutrients that have been shown to help lower cholesterol and blood pressure. Berries like blueberries, strawberries, cranberries and lingonberries play a starring role, too. Rich in antioxidants called anthocyanins, these fruits help keep arteries flexible and may also lower blood pressure. Unlike many American eating habits, the Nordic diet also goes easy on alcohol and avoids foods high in added sugar and sodium. By avoiding processed junk, saturated fats and high-cholesterol meats while loading up on fiber-rich whole foods, studies suggest the Nordic diet can lead to significant weight loss — a major win for heart health. 4 Every year, about 805,000 people in the US have a heart attack. Pixel-Shot – In one study, people who followed the Nordic diet for just six weeks lost 4% of their body weight — significantly more than those eating a standard western diet. In another trial, people with obesity who stuck to it for six months dropped about 10 pounds — roughly triple the weight loss seen in a typical diet group. And it's not just about the scale. In a 2022 analysis, researchers found that the Nordic diet helped lower cholesterol and blood sugar levels independent of weight loss. 'The group that had been on the Nordic diet for six months became significantly healthier, with lower cholesterol levels, lower overall levels of both saturated and unsaturated fat in the blood, and better regulation of glucose, compared to the control group,' study author Lars Ove Dragsted said in a statement. Other studies have found that the Nordic diet can have a positive impact on blood pressure and inflammation. Taken together, and experts say this cold-climate cuisine could be just what the doctor ordered for your heart. A 2023 review even found that the Nordic diet might reduce the risk of death from cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of death in the US. However, more research is needed to nail down exactly how much. Still, experts say Americans could learn a thing or two from their northern neighbors — especially when it comes to cutting processed meats and sugar-laden snacks. 'People who really like berries, rye bread, and canola oil should go ahead and enjoy a Nordic-style diet rather than waiting 10 years to get more evidence,' advised Dr. Frank Hu, professor of nutrition at the Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health.


New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Rehab can keep you out of jail — but become a prison itself
Chris Koon didn't read the fine print. Sitting in the Cenikor Baton Rouge rehab center's intake office in 2015, flanked by his mom and grandmother, he signed where told. 'A lot of it read like legalese,' writes Shoshana Walter in 'Rehab: An American Scandal' (Simon & Schuster, Aug. 12). 'Incomprehensible but also innocuous, like something you might see before downloading an app on your phone.' Koon felt lucky. He wasn't going to prison. Just days earlier, he'd been arrested for meth possession. The alternative to five years in state prison? A brutal two-year Cenikor inpatient program. Koon took the deal. In signing the intake documents, he agreed to 'receive no monetary compensation' for work he did, with wages going 'directly back to the Foundation.' He signed away his right to workers' compensation if injured. He forfeited his food stamps, disability payments and any other government assistance. And he agreed to 'adopt appropriate morals and values as promoted by the program.' Koon's story isn't an outlier — it's a glimpse into what Walter calls 'America's other drug crisis.' While overdoses and opioid deaths dominate headlines, far less attention goes to the 'profit-hungry, under-regulated, and all too often deadly rehab industry,' writes Walter. Across the country, thousands of treatment programs are propped up by federal policies and rooted in a distinctly American blend of punishment and personal responsibility. People were 'lured to rehab with the promise of a cure for what ailed them,' Walter writes, 'only to repeatedly falter and fail inside a system that treated them like dollar signs.' The idea hard labor can cure someone isn't new. After the Civil War, US slavery was abolished except as punishment for a crime. That loophole became the foundation for a forced-labor system that conveyed newly freed black people into prisons and chain gangs. Over time, prison officials began marketing this arrangement as 'rehabilitation.' As Walter writes, this legacy has been repackaged for the modern drug crisis. The Affordable Care Act promised expanded treatment access through Medicaid. But the rehab industry that exploded in response was lightly regulated, profit-driven and increasingly dangerous. The result: thousands of people like Chris Koon, lured into treatment by courts, cops or family members, only to find themselves stuck in a system that looked less like therapy and more like punishment. They include women like April Lee, a black woman from Philadelphia. Despite growing up in addiction's long shadow — her mother died from AIDS when Lee was just a teenager, after years of selling sex to support a crack habit — Lee didn't start using drugs herself until after having her second child, when a doctor prescribed her Percocet for back pain. That opened the door to addiction. Child-welfare authorities eventually took her kids. Fellow users nicknamed her 'Mom' and 'Doc' for her uncanny ability to find usable veins, no matter how damaged. April Lee returned to her recovery house — as an unpaid house monitor. April Lee / ACLU She entered recovery in 2016. Every morning at 6, 18 women gathered in the dining room of one of two overcrowded houses to read from the Bible. Lee stayed 10 months. With nowhere else to go, she returned — this time as a house monitor, working without pay in exchange for a bed. 'She was still early into recovery, and she felt stressed by the intensity of the job,' Walter writes. 'On top of that, she wasn't getting a paycheck, so she couldn't save up money to leave.' 'Don't really know how to feel right now,' Lee wrote in her journal. 'The lady I work for — for free, mind you — wont me to watch over women witch mean I have to stay in every night.' She felt physically and emotionally trapped. 'I wanted to snap this morning. Miss my children so much.' Like so many others, Lee found herself stuck in the recovery-house loop — forced to work, unable to leave and earning nothing. She helped with chores, mainly cooking and cleaning. Residents' food stamps stocked the kitchen. Lee loved to cook, and she made comfort food for the house: mac and cheese, fried chicken, beef stew. But all the warmth she gave others couldn't buy her a way out. For others, like Koon, it was about more than just forced labor. During his first 30 days at Cenikor, the other patients policed each other. If one person broke a rule, the entire group might be punished with a 'fire drill' in the middle of the night. 'If anyone stepped out of line or did something wrong during the drill, they'd have to stay awake even longer,' Walter writes. Discipline was obsessive. In his first month, Koon sat in a classroom with about 30 other residents, most sent by courts like he was, reciting rules out loud, line by line. There were more than 100. 'He could get in trouble for not having a pen, not wearing a belt, for an untied shoelace, for leaving a book on the table, for his shirt coming untucked,' Walter details. Koon learned the punishment system fast. A common one was 'the verbal chair,' in which any participant could order him to sit, arms locked and knees at a 90-degree angle, and stare silently at the wall while others screamed at him. 'Go have a seat in the verbal chair. Think about having your shirt untucked,' they'd say. And Koon, like everyone else, was expected to respond, 'Thank you.' There were others. 'Mirror therapy,' where he'd stand and yell his failings at himself in the mirror. 'The dishpan,' where he'd be dressed in a neon-green shirt, scrubbing floors and dishes while loudly reciting the Cenikor philosophy, 'a paragraph-long diatribe about self-change,' Walter writes. And the dreaded 'verbal haircut,' when another resident, sometimes even a staff member, would berate him as part of his treatment. Dressed up as a therapeutic community, Koon thought instead, 'This is like a cult.' Walter believes he wasn't far off. Everyone was required to tattle. Koon had to turn in weekly at least 10 'pull-ups' — written reports detailing rule infractions committed by fellow residents. If he didn't, he could lose points and with them privileges like phone calls, family visits or permission to grow a mustache. Confrontations were public and ritualized: Residents would sit in a circle around one or two people forced to listen as everyone else denounced them. 'They took turns confronting that person, professing their faults and errors, while the person was permitted only to say 'thank you,'' Walter writes. Staff called it 'The Game.' He saw grown men cry. He heard women called bitches and sluts. He realized many employees were former participants enforcing the system that once broke them. Not everyone saw a problem. Many in the legal system embraced tough-love rehab programs, especially judges looking for alternatives to jail. One of Cenikor's biggest champions was Judge Larry Gist, who ran one of the first drug courts, in Jefferson County, Texas, in the 1990s. 'The vast majority of folks that I deal with are basically bottom-feeders,' Gist told the author. 'They've been losers since the day they were born.' Cenikor's extreme model was ideal for 'the right people,' he believed. Cenikor rewarded such loyalty, giving judges and lawmakers steak dinners served by participants and annual awards banquets, complete with gleaming, diamond-shaped trophies. Gist 'proudly displayed his' in 'his chambers, where he liked to host his happy hours with prosecutors and defense attorneys.' Koon was booted out of Cenikor after just two years, for faking a urine sample and contracting a contagious staph infection, but managed to stay sober on his own. He proposed to his childhood sweetheart, Paige, moving in with her two daughters, and finding the stability he'd been chasing for years. He went back to school to learn welding, and the daily rhythms of family life kept him grounded. 'He hasn't taken a drug recreationally for eight years,' Walter writes. Lee's path out took longer, and her recovery was, as Walter writes, 'in some ways a stroke of luck.' She left the house after landing a job at a law firm that helped women reunite with their children in foster care — a world away from the nights she'd once spent tricking at the Blue Moon Hotel but one that barely covered her bills and pushed her just over the poverty line, cutting off assistance. She earned her GED, took online college courses, regained custody of her kids and bought her own home by 2021. 'And yet many days she felt she was teetering on the edge, one crisis or unpaid bill away from making a terrible mistake,' Walter writes. That year, she returned to Kensington, where her addiction had once thrived, bringing fresh food and water to people still living on the streets. As for Cenikor, its time in the shadows ended, at least temporarily. Investigators found evidence of exploitation: residents forced to work without pay, unsafe housing conditions, staff-client relationships, even overdoses inside the facilities. The state of Texas fined Cenikor more than $1.4 million in 2019, but the agency struck a settlement, and it continued to operate. Koon and Lee don't represent everyone who's experienced addiction, treatment or recovery. But they do reflect a system that often promises far more than it delivers. 'When rehab works, it can save lives,' Walter writes. 'It can mend families and be among the most redemptive narrative arcs in a person's life.' But sometimes, rehab not only fails to help people, it actively harms them, recycling them through a gauntlet of relapse, shame and risk: 'Despite the rehab industry's many claims, there is no magical cure for addiction.'


Time Business News
20 hours ago
- Time Business News
Debbie Wasserman Schultz on the Legislative Frontlines
Debbie Wasserman Schultz has built a reputation in Congress as a determined advocate for civil rights, healthcare reform, and public safety. Representing Florida in the U.S. House of Representatives since 2005, she has consistently championed legislation that addresses the needs of vulnerable communities while working to strengthen the nation's democratic values. Throughout her career, Debbie Wasserman Schultz has been a strong defender of civil rights. She has taken bold positions on issues ranging from voting rights to LGBTQ equality. As a member of Congress, she has supported legislation aimed at expanding voter access, opposing discriminatory practices, and ensuring that every citizen has an equal voice in the democratic process. Her advocacy extends to protecting religious and ethnic minorities. Most recently, she has been at the forefront of efforts to create a national strategy to combat antisemitism, working across party lines to address the rise in hate crimes and extremist rhetoric. She views these initiatives not only as a matter of protecting one community, but as a fundamental defense of American democracy. For Debbie Wasserman Schultz, healthcare reform has always been more than a talking point. A breast cancer survivor herself, she has been a leading voice for policies that expand access to preventive care and early detection services. Her leadership on the EARLY Act has helped fund breast cancer education programs for young women, potentially saving thousands of lives through increased awareness and timely screenings. She has also recently introduced the Reducing Hereditary Cancer Act, a bipartisan bill designed to make genetic cancer testing more accessible to Americans who are at risk. By removing financial and coverage barriers, she hopes to create a healthcare system that focuses on prevention and equity, ensuring no patient is denied care because of cost or insurance limitations. In addition to her work on civil rights and healthcare, Debbie Wasserman Schultz has been an advocate for public safety measures that protect communities while respecting individual rights. She has supported common-sense gun safety reforms, investments in law enforcement training, and improved coordination among public safety agencies. Her legislative work also extends to protecting children and families. She has championed laws like the Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act, which addresses child drownings by requiring safety standards for public pools and spas. These efforts reflect her broader commitment to legislation that has a tangible impact on everyday lives. While Congress is often marked by partisan gridlock, Debbie Wasserman Schultz has shown an ability to collaborate with colleagues from both sides of the aisle. Her bipartisan efforts on anti-hate initiatives, healthcare reform, and safety legislation demonstrate her belief that meaningful change requires cooperation and dialogue, even among political opponents. This approach has allowed her to move forward on initiatives that might otherwise stall in a divided political climate. By focusing on shared values such as safety, health, and equality, she has been able to advance legislation that benefits a broad range of Americans. As she continues her work in Congress, Debbie Wasserman Schultz remains committed to her core mission: defending civil rights, improving healthcare access, and safeguarding communities. She has made it clear that she sees these priorities as interconnected, with each influencing the strength and resilience of the nation as a whole. Her ongoing legislative efforts, from combating hate crimes to expanding medical testing access, are grounded in a belief that the government should be both responsive and proactive in addressing the needs of its people. This vision, combined with her experience and willingness to work across political divides, positions her as a significant force in shaping policy on some of the most pressing issues facing the country today. For constituents in Florida and for Americans across the nation, Debbie Wasserman Schultz continues to serve as a steadfast advocate, ensuring that civil rights, healthcare, and public safety remain at the top of the congressional agenda. TIME BUSINESS NEWS