Paid sick leave carveouts for smallest Nebraska businesses, minors, temp ag workers advance
LINCOLN — Nebraska state lawmakers advanced a bill Friday that seeks additional carveouts to the language of the new paid sick leave law voters approved in 2024 before it takes effect this fall.
Lawmakers voted 34-14 to advance Legislative Bill 415, with all Republicans and one Democratic senator voting to advance the bill in the officially nonpartisan body.
The split vote came largely because of the folding in of LB 698, from freshman State Sen. Paul Strommen of Sidney, which opponents said would undercut the recently passed law. The amended LB 415 would not require paid sick leave to be given to 14 or 15 year olds, temporary or seasonal agricultural workers or workers in businesses with 10 or fewer employees.
Businesses could still choose to offer such leave to these employees.
State Sen. John Fredrickson of Omaha did not vote for or against advancing the amended bill in part because he viewed the underlying LB 415, as introduced, as an important bill. He said his 'present, not voting' position was a 'show of good faith' that Strommen might listen to some concerns raised during debate in future rounds of debate on the bill.
Beginning Oct. 1, under the currently approved law, businesses with fewer than 20 weekly employees would allow employees a process to accrue up to five days' worth of paid sick leave a year (40 hours), or seven days for larger businesses (56 hours). An hour of leave could be earned for every 30 hours worked.
Employees can use paid sick leave for themselves or a family member for mental or physical illness, injury or a health condition or for a medical diagnosis or preventive medical care. Paid sick time could also be used during a public health emergency that closes a business or school.
Voters adopted the paid sick leave ballot measure with nearly 75% of the vote in November, including majority support across all 49 legislative districts. The measure was heavily supported by Nebraska labor groups.
Strommen said he believed it was the Legislature's duty to 'iron out details' and make the laws 'make sense for everyone, workers and businesses alike.'
'It is incumbent upon the legislature to ensure it is workable,' he said.
The Paid Sick Leave for Nebraskans coalition said Friday that voters were clear in November about providing earned paid sick leave to all Nebraskans, regardless of age, sector, workforce status or business size.
'We are extremely disappointed by the Nebraska Legislature's egregious disregard of the will of Nebraska voters,' the coalition said in a statement.
LB 415 was originally introduced by State Sen. Beau Ballard of Lincoln as a 'cleanup bill' that he worked on with the Nebraska Chambers of Commerce and advocates for paid sick leave. The campaign manager of last year's paid sick leave measure told the Nebraska Examiner in January they were 'not concerned' with the changes but would oppose any more expansive amendments.
Ballard's bill would clarify that businesses that meet or exceed the new law would not need to change their existing leave policies, including accrual or carryover components. It would also clarify how leave can be requested and when employees could begin to accrue sick leave.
'LB 415 is a cleanup bill meant to clarify some of the concerns of members in the business community,' Ballard said of his introduced bill.
Multiple senators had spoken in favor of Ballard's bill but withdrew their support after Strommen's bill was attached.
While well-intentioned, Strommen said, he argued the new 'mandate' — his word for what voters passed — could raise costs or lead to lost jobs or wages, or some small businesses shutting down altogether.
He said his bill recognized the will of voters while 'avoiding a few serious detriments.'
'While the idea of paid sick leave is appealing, government mandates on businesses can create unintended negative consequences for employees, specifically those who work for small businesses,' he said.
Strommen's additions would also give the Nebraska Department of Labor sole authority to enforce the act, rather than private lawsuits.
The bill will likely need to be amended in the future to maintain at least 33 votes, the minimum amount needed to change the voter-approved measure, under the Nebraska Constitution. Strommen has filed to add back in the private lawsuits enforcement, as has State Sen. Dave Wordekemper of Fremont. Other supporters said they wanted that change to be added back in.
Two other amendments lawmakers could consider would keep the paid sick leave requirements for minors and ag workers and the right to sue if the paid sick leave is not granted. Both would continue to exempt the smallest businesses from the new requirement, as Strommen proposed.
State Sen. George Dungan of Lincoln proposed keeping the 10 or fewer employee level, while State Sen. John Cavanaugh of Omaha has proposed lowering that to three or fewer employees, which is the cut-off for minimum wage.
Across a full week of debate, opponents sought to frame the measure as one in a string of emerging bills that they said would hurt working families and roll back or sidestep recently approved ballot measures.
In a heated exchange with Strommen, for example, Conrad asked why he would 'honor election elections for your race, but not for ballot initiatives?' Strommen said he voted against the measure in November.
'If you do not trust the election results, you should resign your position,' Conrad told Strommen.
Strommen, who was visibly taken aback, scoffed and told her, 'That's fantastic.' He immediately put the question back on Conrad, asking if she was comfortable telling her constituents she opposed his changes that 'had the opportunity to ensure that they [her constituents] were going to have their jobs.'
Conrad interrupted and said that wasn't her question, nor was it the question before voters.
Whether lawmakers should amend any ballot measure shortly after its passage was another theme of the debate, teeing up an expected fight next week on whether to create exceptions or cap annual increases to the state minimum wage, which passed in 2022.
State Sen. Jane Raybould of Lincoln, the Democratic lawmaker who supported the Strommen and Ballard bills, is leading the minimum wage changes in her 2025 priority bill: LB 258. Raybould's family created and owns B&R Stores, the parent company of Super Saver, Russ's Market and more. The company announced this week that she will step down as vice president of the company Monday.
Raybould and State Sen. Bob Hallstrom of Syracuse pointed to the Nebraska Constitution allowing lawmakers to change ballot measures with a 33-vote supermajority.
Raybould described that higher threshold as a 'balance' that is necessary when voters have a 'take it or leave it' option at the polls.
'To suggest that it is wrong for the Legislature to deliberate and bring thoughtful changes to legislation passed by initiative is like you're saying it is wrong for the people to have the right to a referendum,' Raybould said.
If a ballot measure fails, supporters are prohibited under state law from advancing a similar measure at a future election for at least two years. The petition process must also be repeated.
State Sen. Tony Sorrentino of the Elkhorn area said that if lawmakers truly didn't want to touch initiatives and consider them settled, he expected 'pro choice' lawmakers to never push to expand abortion in the state.
'I'm just following up on your ideas,' Sorrentino said. 'I have a feeling that probably won't happen, but I think you have to hear both sides of the logic.'
State Sens. Terrell McKinney and Wendy DeBoer, both of Omaha, argued there was no binary option and that voters had the right to vote as they wanted to.
DeBoer said if senators disagreed with voters, that's OK, but that it is the people who get to decide what government looks like. She said lawmakers 'do not have veto power over the people.'
'In every election as long as I can remember, there has been at least one result that I did not like, that I thought was foolish, that I thought was the wrong decision,' DeBoer said.
She continued: 'If someone can say, 'No, we veto what the people say,' then we are no longer a government where the people choose.'
Hallstrom described that as a 'false narrative' and said he didn't think anyone was saying voters were wrong or misinformed.
Multiple senators said during the debate or off the floor that voters couldn't have possibly envisioned the full implications of the law. Some senators said they believed voters were likely more focused on abortion, school choice or marijuana last fall, not paid sick leave.
No campaign was waged against the paid sick leave campaign, which Conrad said was 'because they knew they couldn't win' and that opponents wanted to 'sneak into the Legislature to undermine the will of the voters.'
'They did not do so with their fingers crossed behind their backs,' Conrad said. 'The election results were not notched with an asterisk saying, 'Oh, yes, it received 70% support, but we in leadership think Nebraska voters were not smart enough to understand what they were voting for.''
Conrad challenged those opposing the current law to run a ballot initiative themselves. Sorrentino, Conrad and McKinney are among those who brought measures this year related to recently approved ballot measures.
In Sorrentino's case, he is seeking to revive a defeated school choice program via tax credits for scholarships, or vouchers, to private schools. Conrad and McKinney were among four senators to bring measures to clarify or change how medical cannabis should be implemented.
State Sen. Mike Moser of Columbus said being told to offer increased minimum wage to all employees, no matter their work ethic, is one thing, while the addition of another 'mandate' like paid sick leave, 'again, without merit,' he said, is 'not an economic benefit to the employer.'
'Business owners are not bottomless wishing wells full of money for the benefit of their employees,' Moser said.
Hallstrom said some businesses would face a 'double whammy' in paying someone out sick and paying a temporary worker.
State Sen. Jana Hughes of Seward noted her children have done detasseling for several weeks in the summer, and she said they didn't need sick leave during that time.
'If they were sick, they stayed home and didn't get paid,' she said.
Supporters of the paid sick leave law have said businesses are better off offering paid sick leave by being able to retain employees and avoiding workforce churn. They've also argued workers benefit from the paid time off because it gives them the flexibility to attend to their families and recover from illness without financial loss.
McKinney and other opponents repeatedly read district-by-district election margins on the issue, which ranged from 60% in ruby-red north-central Nebraska for freshman State Sen. Tanya Storer all the way up to 92% support in McKinney's North Omaha district.
'Supporting 'family values' means supporting families, and that starts with letting people take care of sick kids or elderly parents without losing their income or taking care of themselves in time of sickness,' McKinney said.
State Sens. Dunixi Guereca and Margo Juarez, both of Omaha whose districts were among those with the highest support for the measure, said they trusted voters to make the right choice. Guereca said the changes seek to exclude the 'very people' that some voters had in mind, such as a single mother who is a waitress or a worker in a small fabrication shop, who 'just need a little help.'
Sorrentino said Strommen's bill was an 'extremely friendly amendment.' He noted the federal Family Medical Leave Act, to preserve employee's jobs up to 12 weeks of unpaid labor, applies to businesses with 50 or more employees in a 75-mile radius.
'It was administratively and financially a huge burden on them. There's no reason to burden 10 lives or less with this law,' he said. 'I think [LB] 415 was a good law. I think as amended, it's a better law.'
Nebraska Examiner senior reporter Cindy Gonzalez, political reporter Juan Salinas II and editor-in-chief Aaron Sanderford contributed to this report.
The Paid Sick Leave for Nebraskans campaign raised a total of $3.4 million, the vast majority in 2023, and spent $3.3 million on the campaign, according to most recent filings with the Nebraska Accountability and Disclosure Commission. Nearly all funds came from organizations; $460 came from individuals.
By December 2023, the D.C.-based Sixteen Thirty Fund had donated $1.92 million. The fund is managed by Arabella Advisors, which was founded by a former administration appointee by former President Bill Clinton. It oversees a hub of other left-leaning nonprofits that have received donations from billionaire George Soros in the past. It doesn't disclose its donors.
The campaign has also received $350,000 from the Open Society Policy Center, a principal financial arm founded by Soros, and about $280,000 from the D.C.-based The Fairness Project.
The Fairness Project donated to various ballot measure campaigns in Nebraska's past three statewide elections to increase Nebraska's minimum wage, curb predatory payday lending and expand Medicaid.
The largest local donating group to the sick leave campaign was Nebraska Appleseed — a local nonprofit focused on child welfare, immigration, health care and poverty. It gave about $555,520.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
31 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Washington Should Be a ‘Freedom City,' Not a Police State
As a longtime resident of our nation's capital, and even as I strenuously object to Donald Trump seizing control of our city's police force, I would like to make a suggestion: Mr. President, you took over the wrong department. As a former developer, you should know that the real power to change a city is in its planning office. I am not being entirely facetious. If Republicans are going to treat DC as a vassal state, they should at least have the courage of their convictions and try do something constructive. Specifically, they could make Washington the first of the 10 ' Freedom Cities ' Trump has pledged to build on federal land.


CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Texas redistricting battle to start new phase with Democrats expected return to Capitol
For the second week, Republicans and Democrats have continued their showdown over new congressional maps in Texas, which will result in five new GOP-majority districts at the expense of Democrats. But the fight is about to enter a new phase on Monday, Aug. 18. Democrats who broke quorum and left Texas, killed the first special session, and didn't show up for the start of the second special session — many believe they will Monday. Speaker Dustin Burrows said House members must be at the Capitol at noon. Friday, Aug. 15, Burrows ended the first special session after the House once again fell short of a quorum, which requires 100 lawmakers to be present. The Senate ended its first special session, too, and then Governor Greg Abbott called for the start of the second special session, with the same agenda, to start a couple of hours later Friday, at noon. Democrats said they wanted to kill the first special session, which allowed them time to go to other states, such as California, where Governor Gavin Newsom said if Texas approves its new maps, California will do the same to neutralize any GOP gains. "We can't stand back and watch this democracy disappear district by district all across the country," Newsom said. "We are not bystanders in this world. We can shape the future." The difference there is that voters in California will have to approve it, something that won't happen in Texas. During an unrelated news conference on Friday, Aug. 15, CBS News Texas's Jack Fink asked Gov. Abbott about Newsom's plan. In an exclusive interview, Abbott spoke about his ongoing lawsuit to remove House Democratic Caucus Chairman Gene Wu from office and whether Republicans will try to increase the number of new GOP majority congressional seats to not just five, but as many as eight or more. Abbott said, " They are [Democrats] are required by the Texas Constitution to actually show up and cast votes on bills. That's what the Constitution requires. That's why I'm seeking to remove Gene Wu, because he's not fulfilling his constitutional duty." As for adding more seats, Abbott said, " In reference to the lawsuit, Wu shared his thoughts concerning Abbott and when Democrats will return. For the past couple of weeks, House Republicans have expressed frustration about Democrats breaking quorum. Representative Shelley Luther of Grayson County about the end of the first special session and what she wants to happen next with redistricting. For now, Republicans have proposed adding the same five GOP majority districts in Congress as they have before. Abbott has not added redistricting for State House seats, and he was asked about it. "Every strategy is at play... if we need to," said Abbott. Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett, of Dallas, said she's considering running in a different Congressional district in North Texas than the one she represents now. In North Texas now, there are three Democrats who serve in Congress, but under the new maps, there will only be two districts. That's because District 32, now represented by Democrat Julie Johnson, will become a Republican majority district and extend to East Texas. District 33, now represented by Democrat Marc Veasey, of Fort Worth, includes both Tarrant and Dallas Counties, but under the new maps, will only be in Dallas County. Crockett said she's considering running in the newly drawn 33rd Congressional District, because her home will be in that district, instead of the 30th District she represents now. Last week, Congressman Veasey and Congresswoman Johnson both said they are focused on the fight against the new maps first, and will then consider their options for re-election. A new poll shows mixed results about how Texans feel about the newly proposed Congressional maps. Regarding the five new GOP majority Congressional seats, the Emerson College poll of 1,000 registered voters in Texas found 36% support the new maps, while 38% oppose them, and 26% are unsure. But when asked if Republicans in Texas are entitled to five more seats, something President Trump said, 40% of those surveyed said they agreed, 38% disagreed, and 22% were neutral. Burrows signed civil arrest warrants against the Democrats who broke quorum. The new poll showed 41% agreed they should be arrested, 37% disagreed, and 22% were neutral. And in the bitter Republican primary for the Texas Senate race, the poll found 30% support for incumbent Senator John Cornyn, with Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton one point behind at 29%. Five percent said they want someone else, and 37% are undecided. Previous polls have shown Paxton leading Cornyn.


San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Letters: Democrats are running state into the ground. Why would you want more of them in office?
If Gov. Gavin Newsom succeeds in getting a redistricting measure passed that will favor Democrats, California will suffer. All red states will retaliate and legislate Democrats out of Congress, while California remains deep blue. It will be another victory of virtue signaling over results, something Newsom has excelled at throughout his career. But it will cement Democrats' absolute dominance in state politics and crush Republican resistance. If Republicans ever get smart enough to offer candidates that aren't welded to President Donald Trump's stern and offer realistic solutions to the state's problems, I'm ready to vote for one — and I'm a Democrat. Democratic voters must ask themselves, are you better off than you were 14 years ago? By any objective measure, the world's fourth-largest economy is a failed state. It has some of the country's highest taxes, insurance rates, poverty rates, utility rates and homeless population, but is ranked near the bottom in education, despite wasted billions. Larry Bothen, Pacifica Create a new New Deal I worry about the Democrats. Oh, I'm all for fighting fire with fire. But getting down and dirty with the Republicans is not a program. Democrats have to tackle the problems that threaten America and the human race. And that involves doing everything differently from President Donald Trump. This is not the time to shrink the role of government. We need to invest in our future — in science, education and health care; we need to create new green technologies that can enable us to make peace with our stressed-out planet. The Democrats have to resuscitate the values of the New Deal. In order to get everybody on board, we need to better share our country's great wealth. One lesson we have learned from Trump: If people feel the American Dream is beyond their reach, they are easy targets for demagogues. Saving democracy and a commitment to care about each other go hand in hand. Matthew Hallinan, Berkeley Make U.S. truly great The Jeffrey Epstein debacle should wake up every citizen in this country to the incompetence of the Trump administration. President Donald Trump seems more interested in fulfilling his own needs and grievances, which are not making America great again, but making this country look ridiculous. Some people have been waiting for someone like him whom they can use for their agenda of furthering their economic interests on the backs of everyone else. I hope that those who optimistically voted for Trump will come to understand how each of them will be personally affected by the cuts to services. Elizabeth Rogers, Alameda