A drawer full of heads and 30 million bricks: inside the secret warehouse where Lego masterpieces are built
One group of six are working side by side on a giant model of a beanie, which they are creating for a motor neurone disease charity event. Another Lego builder is working on a model of a dinosaur destined for a Lego store in New Delhi in India.
No photographs are allowed that include any of the Lego builds under construction because of strict confidentiality agreements.
Overhead cameras film each Lego build on time-lapse, with the footage to be released once the build is finished, and small exhaust pipes hang from each work station to extract the fumes from all the glue.
While building Lego might be literally child's play, McNaught and his team take it very seriously.
'Everybody knows how to put two Lego bricks together, that's an easy thing to do,' he says. 'We teach a certain method and style of Lego building.'
McNaught says Lego is not designed to be made into giant structures, so there is a lot of skill and technique in the 'artistry of Lego' which needs to be taught.
He uses a method called 'north, south, east, west', which means that you alternate direction when building layers of bricks, which helps with strength and stability.
'There's also a technique we use called SNOT, which stands for studs not on top. We turn bricks in different directions, which give us shearing strength,' he says. 'There's a whole heap of things like that. On average, it takes a person about two years before they're proficient in those techniques. Call it an apprenticeship, if you will.'
The Lego builders work at adjustable tables to protect their backs, and McNaught says the main occupational hazard is calluses from the hard plastic blocks.
'We have really good calluses on our fingers,' he says. 'If you look at anyone who's a builder, you can see exactly whether they're left-handed or right-handed or both-handed, because of the calluses.'
McNaught is one of only 21 certified Lego professionals in the world, which gives him permission to use the Lego brand and to contract to Lego.
But this title does not give McNaught any discount on the crates of Lego he purchases.
'We wish,' he laughs. 'We pay a fortune for Lego. We're the No.2 or 3 consumer of Lego in the world.'
Loading
McNaught estimates he has 30 million Lego bricks in his warehouse, with the Star Wars Lego exhibition alone using more than 8 million bricks and taking McNaught and his team more than 25,000 hours to build.
The exhibition opened on Star Wars Day, May 4, and runs until the end of January; 35,627 tickets have already been sold.
Tim Rolfe, director of exhibitions and experiences at Museums Victoria, said the exhibition was on track to be a bestseller.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
2 days ago
- The Age
What if people just want better jobs, not more stuff
It's this huge improvement in our productiveness that's given us a standard of living many times better than it was 200 years ago. Our homes, our health, our food, our entertainments and our possessions are far better than they were. Loading What's worrying the great and the good is that this process of small annual improvement in our living standards seems to have stalled about a decade ago. They don't actually know why it's stalled, or whether the stoppage is temporary or permanent. But the people at the top of our economy are worried by the thought that, unless we do something, our standard of living may never go any higher. This thought appals them, and they assume it appals us just as much. We've got used to ever-rising living standards, and for this to stop would be disastrous. Well, maybe, maybe not. What no one seems to have observed is that this is a completely materialist view of how our lives could be better. Better goods, better services and a lot more of both. My guess is that, for the managerial class, more money to buy bigger and better stuff is what they most want. But I'm not sure if that's what the rest of us want – especially after we'd given some thought to the alternatives. If an ever-higher material living standard came free of charge, of course we'd all want it. But if it came at a cost – as it's likely to – we'd have to think harder about the price and what we'd have to give up to pay it. When the big business lobby groups argue that our productivity has stopped improving because their taxes are too high and the Labor government has introduced too many regulations controlling how they pay and treat their workers, sometimes I think what they're saying is: we could make you so much richer if only you'd let us make your working lives a misery. In a recent article for Project Syndicate, Dani Rodrik, a Harvard economist, argues that most working people probably want a good job more than higher pay. 'When people are asked about wellbeing and life satisfaction, the work they do ranks at the top, along with contributions to their community and family bonds,' he says. This is something economists keep forgetting. In their simple theory, work is a pain. And the only reason you do it is to get money to buy the stuff you want. The bad bit is work; the good bit is consumption. In truth, most of us get much of our identity, self-worth and satisfaction from our jobs. Some people hate their jobs, of course, but that's the point: they would be a lot happier if they could find a job they enjoyed. Loading Rodrik adds that jobs can be a source of pride, dignity and social recognition. It's clear that Australians hugely value having a secure job. One where they don't have to worry about where their next meal's coming from. Where they know they'll be able to keep up their mortgage payments. Where their job classification is permanent, not temporary. Good pay is nice, but work is about a lot more than pay. Psychologists tell us that job satisfaction is helped by having a degree of autonomy in the way you do your job. A more obvious need is a boss who treats you fairly and with respect. No one wants to work for an idiot who thinks they should treat 'em mean to keep 'em keen. I have no doubt that all workers want the pleasure of being loyal to their boss and their company. But they have to be receiving loyalty to give it back.
Sydney Morning Herald
2 days ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
What if people just want better jobs, not more stuff
It's this huge improvement in our productiveness that's given us a standard of living many times better than it was 200 years ago. Our homes, our health, our food, our entertainments and our possessions are far better than they were. Loading What's worrying the great and the good is that this process of small annual improvement in our living standards seems to have stalled about a decade ago. They don't actually know why it's stalled, or whether the stoppage is temporary or permanent. But the people at the top of our economy are worried by the thought that, unless we do something, our standard of living may never go any higher. This thought appals them, and they assume it appals us just as much. We've got used to ever-rising living standards, and for this to stop would be disastrous. Well, maybe, maybe not. What no one seems to have observed is that this is a completely materialist view of how our lives could be better. Better goods, better services and a lot more of both. My guess is that, for the managerial class, more money to buy bigger and better stuff is what they most want. But I'm not sure if that's what the rest of us want – especially after we'd given some thought to the alternatives. If an ever-higher material living standard came free of charge, of course we'd all want it. But if it came at a cost – as it's likely to – we'd have to think harder about the price and what we'd have to give up to pay it. When the big business lobby groups argue that our productivity has stopped improving because their taxes are too high and the Labor government has introduced too many regulations controlling how they pay and treat their workers, sometimes I think what they're saying is: we could make you so much richer if only you'd let us make your working lives a misery. In a recent article for Project Syndicate, Dani Rodrik, a Harvard economist, argues that most working people probably want a good job more than higher pay. 'When people are asked about wellbeing and life satisfaction, the work they do ranks at the top, along with contributions to their community and family bonds,' he says. This is something economists keep forgetting. In their simple theory, work is a pain. And the only reason you do it is to get money to buy the stuff you want. The bad bit is work; the good bit is consumption. In truth, most of us get much of our identity, self-worth and satisfaction from our jobs. Some people hate their jobs, of course, but that's the point: they would be a lot happier if they could find a job they enjoyed. Loading Rodrik adds that jobs can be a source of pride, dignity and social recognition. It's clear that Australians hugely value having a secure job. One where they don't have to worry about where their next meal's coming from. Where they know they'll be able to keep up their mortgage payments. Where their job classification is permanent, not temporary. Good pay is nice, but work is about a lot more than pay. Psychologists tell us that job satisfaction is helped by having a degree of autonomy in the way you do your job. A more obvious need is a boss who treats you fairly and with respect. No one wants to work for an idiot who thinks they should treat 'em mean to keep 'em keen. I have no doubt that all workers want the pleasure of being loyal to their boss and their company. But they have to be receiving loyalty to give it back.
Sydney Morning Herald
23-07-2025
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘It's challenging': Sydney's median house price hits record high $1.7m
'House prices are soaring in western areas which are more affordable for houses, but it's challenging for first home buyers as that's where we are seeing the greatest rates of price growth,' she said. The strongest house price growth was in the south-west region, up 10 per cent to a median $1.21 million over the year to June. That was followed by Parramatta, where the median rose 8.8 per cent to $1.45 million. The outer south-west recorded the strongest median price growth for units – up 6.7 per cent to $570,000. That was followed by more affluent regions including the northern beaches (up 4.4 per cent) and North Sydney and Hornsby (up 4.2 per cent). Powell said while affluent regions tend to lead price cycles, a surge in more affordable areas in the west is pushing prices up. 'First home buyers are going there, they're using government schemes such as Help to Buy, and they're being supported by a reduction in the cash rate and a boost in borrowing capacity,' she said. ANZ economist Madeline Dunk said housing affordability would remain a challenge if supply is not addressed. 'Supply and affordability are the long-term factors that are likely to shape the market. They are interlinked in many ways because a lack of supply does tend to drive up prices,' she said. 'Listings aren't particularly strong, so I don't think demand is overwhelmingly strong either. But there's just a lack of supply in the market to support house prices right now.' Loading Equilibria Finance managing director Anthony Landahl said rate cuts had given some buyers a false sense of security. 'There's been a shift in sentiment and buyers are looking for opportunities. Their borrowing capacity is up by say $70,000, and while it's not insignificant, it's created an increase in demand in some areas,' he said. 'It's almost like there's concentrated competition in some of the more affordable areas, whether houses or units.' Landahl said sellers could sense competition is back. 'People are making offers that might have been accepted six months ago when the market was quieter. Vendors are now knocking these back, making counteroffers or deciding to go to auction.' Annie Li, 29, began looking for a unit in Sydney's inner west in January, and never considered a house. 'I knew it was going to be a unit from the get-go,' the speech pathologist said. Li hopes to purchase a two-bedroom unit with car space, but after being priced out of Ashfield and Dulwich Hill she is looking in Croydon Park or Earlwood. 'I know that I might have to sacrifice a balcony or an internal laundry in the areas I want,' she said. Li has noticed a lack of supply and is researching comparable sales and attending auctions. 'As a first home buyer and doing this on my own, it almost feels like you're in the middle of a game where everyone knows the rules except you and you have to fake it until you make it,' she said. Her buyer's advocate, Inner West Nest's Hamada Alameddine, said some first home buyers are compromising on apartment size, balconies and internal laundries. 'If it's got two bedrooms and a bathroom, an internal laundry is something they can compromise on,' he said. 'Many people want a balcony, but it could cost you an extra $50,000 to $70,000 in some cases, so giving that up puts you in a better position.'
