logo
What if people just want better jobs, not more stuff

What if people just want better jobs, not more stuff

The Age4 days ago
It's this huge improvement in our productiveness that's given us a standard of living many times better than it was 200 years ago. Our homes, our health, our food, our entertainments and our possessions are far better than they were.
Loading
What's worrying the great and the good is that this process of small annual improvement in our living standards seems to have stalled about a decade ago. They don't actually know why it's stalled, or whether the stoppage is temporary or permanent.
But the people at the top of our economy are worried by the thought that, unless we do something, our standard of living may never go any higher. This thought appals them, and they assume it appals us just as much. We've got used to ever-rising living standards, and for this to stop would be disastrous.
Well, maybe, maybe not. What no one seems to have observed is that this is a completely materialist view of how our lives could be better. Better goods, better services and a lot more of both.
My guess is that, for the managerial class, more money to buy bigger and better stuff is what they most want. But I'm not sure if that's what the rest of us want – especially after we'd given some thought to the alternatives.
If an ever-higher material living standard came free of charge, of course we'd all want it. But if it came at a cost – as it's likely to – we'd have to think harder about the price and what we'd have to give up to pay it.
When the big business lobby groups argue that our productivity has stopped improving because their taxes are too high and the Labor government has introduced too many regulations controlling how they pay and treat their workers, sometimes I think what they're saying is: we could make you so much richer if only you'd let us make your working lives a misery.
In a recent article for Project Syndicate, Dani Rodrik, a Harvard economist, argues that most working people probably want a good job more than higher pay. 'When people are asked about wellbeing and life satisfaction, the work they do ranks at the top, along with contributions to their community and family bonds,' he says.
This is something economists keep forgetting. In their simple theory, work is a pain. And the only reason you do it is to get money to buy the stuff you want. The bad bit is work; the good bit is consumption.
In truth, most of us get much of our identity, self-worth and satisfaction from our jobs. Some people hate their jobs, of course, but that's the point: they would be a lot happier if they could find a job they enjoyed.
Loading
Rodrik adds that jobs can be a source of pride, dignity and social recognition. It's clear that Australians hugely value having a secure job. One where they don't have to worry about where their next meal's coming from. Where they know they'll be able to keep up their mortgage payments. Where their job classification is permanent, not temporary.
Good pay is nice, but work is about a lot more than pay. Psychologists tell us that job satisfaction is helped by having a degree of autonomy in the way you do your job. A more obvious need is a boss who treats you fairly and with respect. No one wants to work for an idiot who thinks they should treat 'em mean to keep 'em keen.
I have no doubt that all workers want the pleasure of being loyal to their boss and their company. But they have to be receiving loyalty to give it back.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Australians are working more hours, and it might be hurting our living standards
Australians are working more hours, and it might be hurting our living standards

Sydney Morning Herald

time3 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Australians are working more hours, and it might be hurting our living standards

Australian workers could be putting in nearly half the hours they were 45 years ago but have instead tended to work longer hours to upgrade their lifestyles, sacrificing work-life balance for more income. Productivity Commission research economist Rusha Das found average working hours for Australians had shrunk only modestly from about 34 to 31 hours a week over the past few decades, while incomes had risen significantly. 'Overall, Australians have opted to use their [increased productivity] to upgrade their lifestyles, like buying fancier coffee and taking more expensive holidays, rather than shorten their workdays,' Das said in the commission's June bulletin. She noted that, with the growth in productivity since 1980, Australians could have instead worked an average of 15 hours less each week without lowering consumption levels. But given productivity – the amount of goods and services produced for a given level of resources, including hours worked – has stagnated over the past decade, Australians may be compensating by putting in more legwork. Federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers, who has said productivity is the primary focus of his second term in government, will host a roundtable this month in Canberra with representatives from industry, unions and government to find ways to lift the country's living standards. The Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union and the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation have called for shorter working hours and more annual leave in return for productivity gains ahead of the roundtable. AMWU national secretary Steve Murphy told The Australian that 'productivity can't be at the expense of the wellbeing of workers'. Cronulla real estate agent Domenico Santaguida, 24, works 7am to 6pm on weekdays and 7am to 5pm on Saturdays while fielding calls and questions from buyers and sellers around the clock.

Australians are working more hours, and it might be hurting our living standards
Australians are working more hours, and it might be hurting our living standards

The Age

time3 hours ago

  • The Age

Australians are working more hours, and it might be hurting our living standards

Australian workers could be putting in nearly half the hours they were 45 years ago but have instead tended to work longer hours to upgrade their lifestyles, sacrificing work-life balance for more income. Productivity Commission research economist Rusha Das found average working hours for Australians had shrunk only modestly from about 34 to 31 hours a week over the past few decades, while incomes had risen significantly. 'Overall, Australians have opted to use their [increased productivity] to upgrade their lifestyles, like buying fancier coffee and taking more expensive holidays, rather than shorten their workdays,' Das said in the commission's June bulletin. She noted that, with the growth in productivity since 1980, Australians could have instead worked an average of 15 hours less each week without lowering consumption levels. But given productivity – the amount of goods and services produced for a given level of resources, including hours worked – has stagnated over the past decade, Australians may be compensating by putting in more legwork. Federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers, who has said productivity is the primary focus of his second term in government, will host a roundtable this month in Canberra with representatives from industry, unions and government to find ways to lift the country's living standards. The Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union and the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation have called for shorter working hours and more annual leave in return for productivity gains ahead of the roundtable. AMWU national secretary Steve Murphy told The Australian that 'productivity can't be at the expense of the wellbeing of workers'. Cronulla real estate agent Domenico Santaguida, 24, works 7am to 6pm on weekdays and 7am to 5pm on Saturdays while fielding calls and questions from buyers and sellers around the clock.

Working from home could be a legal right for millions of Aussies under new plan
Working from home could be a legal right for millions of Aussies under new plan

7NEWS

time5 hours ago

  • 7NEWS

Working from home could be a legal right for millions of Aussies under new plan

A state government has revealed plans to enshrine the right to work from home for both public and private-sector employees. The premier behind the Australian-first push hails its as the next frontier in worker rights that would benefit working parents. However a legal right to work from home would be divisive and likely send jobs elsewhere, business groups say. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation in 2026 for the right to work from home on two days per week, in contrast to other states that want public servants to spend more time in the office. The proposed law would apply to all public and private sector employees in Victoria who can reasonably do their job from home. Details are yet to be worked through and Premier Jacinta Allan signalled the changes could come into effect under Victoria's Equal Opportunity Act, as private workplaces are regulated by federal laws. Allan promoted the plan as beneficial to both the economy and families, likening it to other significant workplace changes in recent decades including more women entering the workforce. 'There's been many, many gains over many, many generations that have supported women's opportunity to increase their workforce participation, this is just another important, big step,' she told reporters. Issues such as the definition of remote work, who can do it, how it would affect part-time workers and the types of businesses to which the law would apply, will be figured out through a consultation process. Allan said the decision had gone through cabinet and brushed off suggestions it could trigger a court challenge. The plan drew sharp criticism from business groups, with Australian Industry Group Victorian head Tim Piper describing it as serious government overreach that undermines business autonomy. He described it as 'pure political theatre' designed to wedge the opposition while also running counter to both global trends and business best practice. 'These policies foster an 'us versus them' dynamic, privileging some white-collar workers while leaving blue-collar employees with no choice,' he said. 'It's divisive, disruptive, and dangerous.' Victorian Chamber of Commerce and Industry chief executive Paul Guerra claimed businesses would move interstate and jobs would be lost if Victoria moved away from the legislated national system. '(Work from home) certainly works well in some contexts, but that should be determined by the employer in consultation with the employee,' he said. Allan promised to introduce the law in 2026 prior to the state election. Polls indicate Labor is on track to win a fourth term but the November 2026 poll will be the first as premier for Allan, who lags opposition leader Brad Battin as preferred state leader. Battin said working from home was a valuable option for many workers and families. 'We support measures that help Victorians enjoy a better work-life balance, and will review any legislation closely, to ensure it supports flexibility, productivity and personal choice,' he said. The federal coalition's push to end to working-from-home for public servants was partly blamed for its unsuccessful result at the May federal election, despite abandoning the policy before polling day. NSW Premier Chris Minns has described remote-work provisions as a thing of the past but stopped short of seeking an end to working from home, instead ordering public servants to work principally in offices. More than one third of Australian employees usually work from home but that number swells to 60 per cent of managers and people in professional services, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The bureau says 43 per cent who work from home do overtime, compared to one quarter of those who do not.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store