logo
I'm Loving Wednesday Season 2's Horror Emphasis, But There's An Even Bigger Improvement

I'm Loving Wednesday Season 2's Horror Emphasis, But There's An Even Bigger Improvement

Yahooa day ago
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
It's been literal years since the premiere of the first season of Wednesday on Netflix, when it became one of the most bingeable shows on the platform and broke plenty of records for how many people watched it, from that iconic Wednesday dance to the costumes that came from the series. Now, as part of the 2025 Netflix schedule, the first half of Season 2 has premiered.
While I'm not the biggest fan of Netflix releasing things in parts, and have regularly expressed my distaste for the pattern, I still tuned into Wednesday Season 2 Part 1, and I have to admit, the horror is amped up for Season 2. However, there's one other aspect that really stands out a lot more, and one that I think a lot of different people will notice as well.
I Know Everyone Will Talk About The Horror Of Season 2
So, first things first, I'll address the elephant in the room and state that Season 2 of Wednesday can be a little scarier than Season 1. And honestly, that's a good thing.
Jenna Ortega herself has expressed her trust in the writers to bring the character of Wednesday more into horror territory rather than anything else, and they did so this season. I mean, it makes sense considering Ortega is one of the executive producers this time around, so I'm not shocked that the series opens up with some pretty harrowing images.
I won't spoil anything for you, but I will say some more graphic moments might be a little scary for kids. Still, as the creators told me in my junket interview, it's a 'weird marriage' with horror and comedy, to make sure the series is still fun for younger audiences while also leaning more into the horror aspects of the Addams Family.
Even so, there's no denying it. Sure, it's not at the level of some of the best horror movies out there, and I don't ever expect Wednesday, of all properties, to get there. But it can be scarier, and that is a significant improvement. But there's one other aspect that I love so much more that I have to talk about.
To Me, I'm Loving How Diverse The Cast Has Become
I love this cast. I really feel like it's grown even more diverse over time.
While the Wednesday cast itself was already pretty impressive from the first season, something about Season 2 feels a lot more inclusive than ever before. Maybe it's because certain characters have gotten a glow-up in specific ways, so they are there a whole lot more, but they feel more present.
Something that I did enjoy about the first season of Wednesday is that it really was focused on her – on her story, on her family, and how she is dealing with this mystery while also dealing with two (frankly annoying) high school boys that Wednesday really gave nothing to.
It was fun, and I liked it, but if we were going to continue the show, there had to be more. Season 2 has really given us that with its storylines, and I have to address them.
Including Different Kinds Of Actors, Really Of All Skin Color And Nationality, Is So Fun And Inclusive
There are plenty of storylines in Season 2 of Wednesday that I could sing my praises to because now it's starting to really feel more like an ensemble rather than just a solo show. I'll point out a few.
One in particular that I am loving the expansion on is Bianca Barclay, played by Joy Sunday. In the first season, she was initially portrayed as a mean girl who ultimately helped Wednesday by the end of the finale. However, in Season 2, we really start to see the young woman behind the siren abilities, how she would do anything to keep her family safe and protect her mother.
There's also the fact that we're seeing them a whole lot more now than ever before. I never really wondered how a siren worked, just because it's not my favorite mythical creature. However, having Joy Sunday play one is fantastic, and she plays the role so perfectly while adding the touch of humanity the mythical creature desperately needs.
Another character that I've been loving is the expansion of Pugsley. I never would have thought I would like learning more about Pugsley, but Isaac Ordonez portrays the character so well, and he's an active part of the story this time around. He not only interacts with Wednesday but has his storyline with bringing back a crazy inventor from the dead as a zombie, and it's actually hilarious – and it leads to some humorous interactions with Eugene (Moosta Mostafa), who is his roommate. I love it.
I feel like in many other shows, we wouldn't get to dive this deep into the side characters and their lives, and it's just a happy additive that there are so many diverse actors playing these roles. It's absolutely fantastic and I adore it.
Having The Addams Family Be A Bigger Part Of It Warms My Latina Heart
The last thing I'd love to talk about is the Addams family, overall, becoming a bigger part of this series. I adore these outcasts so much, but it also makes my Latina heart so happy.
I feel that in another life, there was a chance that something like this wouldn't have happened – where the Addams Family was played by primarily Latinx actors and all of them had such fantastic chemistry, but here we are, and it makes me so happy.
I grew up with these characters, adored every single bit of them, and would literally binge episodes of the original show because I felt so connected to them. But now, as a Latina, it warms my heart to see Ortega play Wednesday so well, but also inspire millions of other young Latinas to chase their dreams because she blew up from this role.
And now having the whole family be a significant part of the show – from Isaac Ordonez to Luis Guzman – makes me happy. I know Catherine Zeta-Jones isn't Latina, but honestly, the fact that most of this family is really makes me happy – and she plays Morticia so well, I can't even be upset about it.
While we're still going to be waiting until September for Part 2, and I, for one, will be champing at the bit for any more of this diversity I can get – and I can't wait to see what is next for these characters.
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jake Paul vs. Gervonta 'Tank' Davis shows where boxing ends and sports entertainment begins
Jake Paul vs. Gervonta 'Tank' Davis shows where boxing ends and sports entertainment begins

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Jake Paul vs. Gervonta 'Tank' Davis shows where boxing ends and sports entertainment begins

Boxers of yesteryear used to dream of seeing their name across one of the oversized billboards that decorate the length of Las Vegas Boulevard, otherwise known as The Strip. Today, the neon dims but the names Jake Paul and Gervonta Davis are still legible. Their announcement to box on Nov. 14, which Paul confirmed Wednesday, is no longer a Fight Capital banner but a signpost for how far boxing has drifted from sport, and toward sports entertainment. Since UFC and WWE merged in 2023, industry observers raised concerns that the MMA market-leader would be at risk if Vince McMahon's playbook infected the booming combat sport. But, in 2025, it's not the UFC that is blurring the line of showdown and spectacle. It's boxing. One of the sport's pound-for-pound stars, a thunderous puncher called "Tank" Davis, who had promised to retire after 2025, has chosen to take part in an sideshow bout with the internet sensation Jake Paul, rather than honor a legacy-defining rematch. Earlier in the year "Tank" took on Lamont Roach Jr. — a super featherweight champion who dared to be great by challenging Davis at lightweight. Roach shook up the world by outworking Davis early. He landed clean combinations, and even wobbled "Tank" with a counter right uppercut in the eighth round of their March 1 fight at Barclays Center in New York City. So stunned was Davis with Roach's abilities that he turned his back on the fight in the ninth round, and had referee Steve Willis given a proper count, Roach would have scored one of the more monumental wins of the year. Instead, judges awarded each man a draw. A rematch had been tentatively planned for the summer, but Davis' arrest on July 11 for a domestic battery incident from the prior month scuppered the do-over. When the case was dismissed on Aug. 12, it paved the way to reignite talks for Davis vs. Roach 2. It would have been a meaningful fight for the 135-pound landscape, and the sport in general. Instead, we have a fight that very few asked for, on one of the grandest stages imaginable, as Netflix readies to air the event from State Farm Arena in Atlanta to a significant global audience. Boxing has had crossover fights before. Notably, in 2017, there was boxing royalty Floyd Mayweather Jr. against Conor McGregor, the former two-weight UFC champion. But this didn't actually take anything away from the sport. It didn't hold up a division. Mayweather wasn't a titleholder at the time. All it did was provide boxing with another date. Paul has taken part in these kinds of events before, too, when he took on Nate Robinson on the undercard of Mike Tyson's exhibition with Roy Jones Jr. during the early stages of the coronavirus pandemic. That show, like Mayweather vs. McGregor, didn't hold the sport up. Again, it provided a date in the calendar when boxing was in desperate need of one due to lockdowns, and the subsequent shuttering of sports. There is a holdup this time, though. Davis is the WBA lightweight champion. He's denied Roach, who arguably already deserved a win against him earlier this year. And he's denied other fighters in the WBA rankings, like the No. 1-ranked contender Floyd Schofield. He's even denied a box-office unification with WBC ruler Shakur Stevenson — a fight that fans have demanded for years. Paul, too, could have more meaningful matchups if he wanted. In his latest bout, he out-pointed the former middleweight champion Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. on June 28 in Anaheim — the same Southern California card in which Gilberto "Zurdo" Ramirez defeated Yuniel Doricos. Ramirez's promoter, Oscar De La Hoya of Golden Boy Promotions, even said a fight between his cruiserweight boxer and Paul was 'realistic.' The bout would have provided Paul with legitimacy in boxing, if he does indeed crave that. But an injury Ramirez sustained from that fight, and a subsequent shoulder surgery, curtailed it from being discussed for the time being. An Anthony Joshua fight was also entertained by the heavyweight's representative Eddie Hearn, and Paul had been linked to IBF cruiserweight champion Jai Opetaia as well. Instead, we get a fight announcement designed for content, clicks and reach — one that shows it's the sport of boxing all along, not the UFC, that was prime for WWE treatment. And, do you want to know the sickest part? I like it. Yes, boxing traditionalists will loathe it. I'm not one of them. Yes, this matchup delays far more meaningful fights, and it blurs the sport's integrity. But spectacle is a power in and of itself. This keeps boxing in the news cycle, and pushes Davis into a more mainstream audience than he's ever been exposed to before. With the right kind of promotion and shoulder-programming, "Tank" can tap into an audience that he can leverage should he unify his WBA title with Stevenson's WBC belt, next year. The exhibition also keeps Paul on the right track. Perhaps the plan is to challenge Ramirez for his WBC cruiserweight crown next year, too. Even an exhibition with Davis, in what would only be Paul's 15th boxing event (13 professional fights), is a marked step up than anything the internet content creator has done before. As much as it may sting purists, this is a money-spinner and an attention-grabber. And it's already grabbed mine — because, love it or loathe it, Paul vs. Davis isn't just an exhibition. It's a spectacle — and the clearest mirror yet of where boxing stands. In 2025, boxing's biggest fights aren't for championship titles — they're for cultural relevance.

Scream 7 star Jasmin Savoy Brown hopes the horror franchise's Core Four are reunited on screen someday "even if it's 20 years from now"
Scream 7 star Jasmin Savoy Brown hopes the horror franchise's Core Four are reunited on screen someday "even if it's 20 years from now"

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Scream 7 star Jasmin Savoy Brown hopes the horror franchise's Core Four are reunited on screen someday "even if it's 20 years from now"

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Scream star Jasmin Savoy Brown has said that she hopes the franchises's 'Core Four' will be reunited someday, despite her former co-stars Melissa Barrera and Jenna Ortega not returning for the upcoming seventh installment. "I can't imagine making this movie without Melissa and Jenna," Brown said in a new book, Your Favorite Scary Movie: How the Scream Films Rewrote the Rules of Horror by Ashley Cullins (via Entertainment Weekly). "It won't be the same. On the flip side, I do care about this character so much, and I care so much about the people that care about her. I hope that someday – even if it's 20 years from ­now – the Core Four gets back together on screen." Savoy Brown has played Mindy Meeks-Martin since 2022's Scream. Making up the rest of the Core Four is Mindy's twin brother Chad (Mason Gooding), their friend Tara (Ortega), and Tara's older sister Sam (Melissa Barrera). Alongside Savoy Brown and Gooding, the cast of Scream 7 includes Neve Campbell's return as Sidney Prescott, along with Courteney Cox as Gale Weathers and David Arquette as Dewey Riley – despite his character meeting an untimely end in 2022's Scream. And he's not the only one: Matthew Lillard, who played Stu Macher in the first Scream movie, and Scott Foley, who played Roman Bridger in Scream 3, are also both returning for round seven despite both their characters dying in previous installments. Scream 7 arrives in theaters on February 27, 2026. In the meantime, check out our guide to the other upcoming horror movies to add to your watchlist. Solve the daily Crossword

'The Biggest Loser' Winner Danni Allen Defends Show After Netflix Doc, Says It Was ‘Extreme' but a ‘Positive Experience'
'The Biggest Loser' Winner Danni Allen Defends Show After Netflix Doc, Says It Was ‘Extreme' but a ‘Positive Experience'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

'The Biggest Loser' Winner Danni Allen Defends Show After Netflix Doc, Says It Was ‘Extreme' but a ‘Positive Experience'

''The Biggest Loser' was not without its flaws, but it also gave me lasting friendships and lessons,' season 14 winner Danni Allen said NEED TO KNOW Danni Allen, season 14 winner of 'The Biggest Loser,' took to social media to defend the weight-loss competition series Although she wasn't a part of Netflix's new bombshell documentary, Fit for TV: The Reality of The Biggest Loser, she said her experience on the show was positive She reminded her followers that the show is 'not without its flaws,' but it gave her lasting lessons Dannielle "Danni" Allen — season 14 winner of The Biggest Loser — is speaking out about Netflix's new tell-all documentary centered on the weight loss competition show. On Monday, August 18, Allen posted on Instagram and defended the NBC show, which has sparked controversy following Netflix's new documentary, Fit for TV: The Reality of The Biggest Loser. 'Here's the deal…I can only speak to my season,' she wrote. 'Was it extreme? Oh, absolutely. Working out 8-10 hours a day on very few calories isn't exactly the picture of balance. But for me, it was still a positive experience.' 'Did the show want ratings and money? 100%. It was television, not summer camp,' she continued. 'But I chose to be part of it, and I'm forever grateful for the family I gained from the experience (love you, BL fam🩷).' Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Allen then gave a shout out to the 'unsung heroes' — those who worked behind the scenes — noting that they cared about the contestants and 'never made it into drama.' 'I didn't participate in the doc; I never know which 'storyline' they're going to spin. (And trust me, I've had enough slow-mo weigh-in shots for a lifetime😂) But I do plan to watch eventually, and if I feel compelled, I'll share my POV,' she wrote. 'For now, just remember: it was TV. Sometimes dramatized, sometimes inspiring, always sweaty.' In the caption, Allen added, 'I'll say this: The Biggest Loser was not without its flaws, but it also gave me lasting friendships and lessons. What I believe strongly is that we can all keep learning about health, and when we're able, invest in ourselves.' Five years after The Biggest Loser ended for good, the alleged darker side of the show has been examined in Fit for TV: The Reality of The Biggest Loser, which began streaming on Aug. 15. ! The new three-episode Netflix docuseries covers not only the show's public missteps, including a 2016 bombshell medical study that claimed contestants permanently had damaged their metabolic rates, but new behind-the-scenes details about some of the unhealthy decisions allegedly made by its cast, crew and showrunners during The Biggest Loser's 18-season run. Allen won Biggest Loser in 2013. She began the series at 258 lbs. and lost 121 lbs., finishing at 137 lbs. (a 47% weight loss). Shortly after her win, she became the marketing director for a Chicago-area Planet Fitness. In May 2019, she told the Chicago Tribune that she weighed around 175 to 180 lbs., which she considered a "healthy, happy weight for me to maintain without going crazy in the gym." Read the original article on People

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store