
Limited results from EU-China summit, India's visa resumption, and the Chinese mega dam
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said in her speech that EU-China trade ties were at a 'clear inflection point,' citing their trade imbalance of $358 billion, which is in China's favour. She also raised the issue of recent restrictions on rare earth minerals' exports, in which China is a global leader.
In last week's tracker, we mentioned the meeting between External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar and Chinese President Xi Jinping, during the minister's first visit to China in five years. The minister noted the ongoing efforts to normalise bilateral relations after the 2020 standoff along the Line of Actual Control (LAC). This week, India said it will resume issuing tourist visas to Chinese nationals after a five-year pause, beginning Thursday.
Finally, China announced that construction had begun at a mega hydropower project on the Yarlung Tsangpo river, which also flows through India as the Siang and the Brahmaputra. Upon completion, this would be the largest project of its kind. India has previously raised concerns about it as the lower riparian country (one located downstream).
Here is a closer look at these developments:
EU officials met with China's President, Xi Jinping, and Premier Li Qiang. The summit saw stark reminders from Europe on some persistent trade issues, such as cheap Chinese goods in EU markets due to the 'overcapacity' of China's industrial sector.
Von der Leyen largely attributed the trade imbalance to 'an increasing number of trade distortions and market access barriers.' She added, 'Unlike other major markets, Europe keeps its market open to Chinese goods… However, this openness is not matched by China.'
The EU expressed its expectation for access to China's market in priority areas such as meat, cosmetics and pharmaceuticals. It highlighted the negative impact of China's export controls on rare earths, which are crucial to the functioning of several key industries, and on rare earth magnets used in the automobile industry, urging China to lift restrictions.
UPSHOT: A report in the Chinese Communist Party's mouthpiece Global Times described the ties as 'one of the world's most influential bilateral partnerships – an exemplary model of peaceful coexistence and win-win cooperation across different systems and civilizations.' However, this language is not reflective of the current state of the relationship. Expectations were low going into the meeting because the two sides have not made progress in resolving longstanding issues.
One reason, according to analysts, is that the need for cooperation is no longer being felt as urgently. While the EU may soon sign a deal on tariffs with the United States, Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng will be in Sweden from July 27 to 30 for economic and trade talks with the US. Thus, the one factor that was seen as driving their closeness is, for now, being managed.
Further, Europe continues to have several grievances with Beijing, including over its support for Russia in the Ukraine war. Von der Leyen said they expected China to use its influence to bring Russia to accept a ceasefire.
Even as China is yet to agree on the question of Russia, senior leaders and officials, including Xi Jinping, are increasingly recognising the need to correct industrial overcapacity for a host of reasons. Not antagonising trade partners is one of them. As Von der Leyen said, 'Rebalancing our bilateral relation is no longer optional, it's essential.'
Another key shared interest between the two is climate change and green energy investments. While the two sides released a joint statement, noting goals like accelerating the global renewable energy deployment, no major commitments were made.
Earlier this week, India announced that Chinese nationals can now apply for visas through application centres in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou. The pause came amid the Covid-19 pandemic and was later extended following the LAC stand-off.
As The Indian Express earlier reported, about 2 lakh visas were issued to Chinese nationals in 2019, and about 1.63 lakh in 2018, according to official data.
UPSHOT: It comes alongside other recent measures intended to normalise the bilateral relations, including the resumption of the Kailash Mansarovar yatra. In June, the two countries' officials also discussed the resumption of direct flights.
While the number of visas issued to China has been low in the past, Chinese nationals' entry into India also matters from an economic perspective. Last year, The Indian Express reported that at least two Union ministries — Electronics and Information Technology and Commerce and Industry — were pushing for easier visa norms for the entry of Chinese technicians. India's domestic industry had raised concerns that export orders were not being fulfilled due to delays in granting visas.
One example was how the leather sector, which imported and installed Chinese machinery, was finding it difficult to operationalise plants without the requisite personnel.
On its part, China announced the resumption of all types of visas for Indian travellers in March 2023. However, one industry body chair in India previously said that visas have long been a problematic issue between the countries, and that 'the Chinese tend to approve visas applied by Indian importers but delay or block visa requests by government officials and exporters.'
Work has begun on what Chinese Premier Li Qiang recently called the 'project of the century'. Discussed for years in China, the dam in Medog County will have a capacity of generating 60,000 MW. This would be thrice the current largest hydro power project in the world, the Three Gorges Dam, which is also located in China.
In the past, Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Pema Khandu has described it as a ticking time bomb for India, saying, 'The issue is that China cannot be trusted. No one knows what they might do.' The Indian External Affairs Ministry said it conveyed its concerns to China last year, but on Wednesday, a Chinese official spokesperson said it will not have 'any negative impact on the downstream regions', presumably referring to India and Bangladesh.
UPSHOT: The project is undoubtedly significant, just in terms of its sheer size. For China, it is an opportunity to ensure energy security and push forward with its green energy goals.
However, as experts have previously told The Indian Express, even in the absence of any ill intentions from China, there are good reasons to be concerned. The size of the reservoir and the fact that the Himalayas are young mountains prone to landslides and other geological activities heighten the risks of a major ecological disaster.
What complicates the matter is the limited avenues for bilateral cooperation on such issues. While the sharing of river data was also one of the intended goals under the normalisation process, no major breakthrough on that front has been announced so far. Additionally, India has proposed an 11.2 GW Upper Siang Multipurpose Project in Arunachal Pradesh to guard against future changes in the river's water flow. However, it has faced some opposition on the ground and has seen slow progress.
Rishika Singh is a Senior sub-editor at the Explained Desk of The Indian Express. She enjoys writing on issues related to international relations, and in particular, likes to follow analyses of news from China. Additionally, she writes on developments related to politics and culture in India.
... Read More
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Trump new tariff rates ‘pretty much set,' says US trade representative
Speaking on Sunday, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said the rates, set to take effect on August 7, are 'pretty much set,' defending the president's strategy as both economic and geopolitical. read more US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer gives a live TV interview about tariffs at the White House in Washington, DC, US. Reuters New US tariff rates are 'pretty much set' with no immediate possibility for discussion, Donald Trump's trade advisor said in remarks broadcast Sunday, justifying the president's politically motivated charges against Brazil. Trump, who has used tariffs as an instrument of American economic supremacy, has set tariff rates for dozens of economies, including the European Union, at 10 to 41 percent starting from August 7, his new hard deadline for the tariffs. In a pre-recorded interview broadcast Sunday on CBS's 'Face the Nation,' US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said that tariff rates are unlikely to see changes in 'the coming days'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'A lot of these are set rates pursuant to deals. Some of these deals are announced, some are not, others depend on the level of the trade deficit or surplus we may have with the country,' Greer said. 'These tariff rates are pretty much set.' Undoubtedly some trade ministers 'want to talk more and see how they can work in a different way with the United States,' he added. But 'we're seeing truly the contours of the president's tariff plan right now with these rates.' Last Thursday, the former real estate developer announced hiked tariff rates on dozens of US trade partners. They will kick in on August 7 instead of August 1, which had previously been touted as a hard deadline. Among the countries facing steep new levies is Brazil. South America's largest economy is being hit with 50 percent tariffs on exports to the United States – albeit with significant exemptions for key products such as aircraft and orange juice. Trump has openly admitted he is punishing Brazil for prosecuting his political ally Jair Bolsonaro, the ex-president accused of plotting a coup in a bid to cling to power. The US president has described the case as a 'witch hunt.' Greer said it was not unusual for Trump to use tariff tools for geopolitical purposes. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'The president has seen in Brazil, like he's seen in other countries, a misuse of law, a misuse of democracy,' Greer told CBS. 'It is normal to use these tools for geopolitical issues.' Trump was 'elected to assess the foreign affairs situation… and take appropriate action,' he added. Meanwhile White House economic advisor Kevin Hassett said that while talks are expected to continue over the next week with some US trade partners, he concurred with Greer's tariffs assessment in that the bulk of the rates 'are more or less locked in.' Asked by the host of NBC's Sunday talk show 'Meet the Press with Kristen Welker' if Trump could change tariff rates should financial markets react negatively, Hassett said: 'I would rule it out, because these are the final deals.' Legal challenges have been filed against some of Trump's tariffs arguing he overstepped his authority. An appeals court panel on Thursday appeared skeptical of the government's arguments, though the case may be ultimately decided at the Supreme Court. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Misunderstanding India's advocacy for multipolarity
A growing number of liberal American geopolitical analysts and Donald Trump, whom they despise, have a few things in common — they are opposed to India's relationship with Russia, its association with Brics, and advocacy for multipolarity. Trump's criticism of India is sharp and direct, of course. The Trump presidency will end in another three-and-a-half years, but this rare consensus in Washington DC, on India's search for multipolarity will remain. This is something, therefore, Indian strategic thinkers must reflect on. Put differently, with or without Trump around, India's advocacy for multipolarity will continue to haunt New Delhi, particularly given the structural transformations underway in the international system today. India's foreign policy is not about indecision. It is a constant search for autonomy, balance and agency. (AFP) Let's begin by unpacking some important aspects of multipolarity, given its many layers of complexity and ambiguity. First, notwithstanding the general perception about the virtues of multipolarity, it is becoming somewhat clear that a multipolar world is not as pretty as we had imagined it to be. Even the imperfect multipolarity that we have today — with poles of various sizes and influence competing for power — seems messy, incoherent, confusing and hard to navigate. If this is what a system that is not even really multipolar looks like, what will a true multipolar system look like? Second, notwithstanding the messy nature of the quasi-multipolar order today, New Delhi remains committed to a multipolar world. The desire for multipolarity is deeply entrenched in India's tradition of non-alignment, which is one of the first principles of Indian foreign policy. When faced with a difficult choice, the first strategic instinct of political New Delhi is to be non-aligned, neutral, and multi-aligned. Mostly in that order. I would not view that as strategic escapism. It is very much part of the DNA of Indian foreign policy. It would also be wrong to mistake non-alignment (or a variation thereof) as not valuing friendships, loyalty or solidarity: In fact, India's foreign policy history is rich with examples of friendships, loyalty and solidarity. In that sense, India's foreign policy is not about indecision; it's a constant search for autonomy, balance and agency. This is where the country's fascination with a multipolar world becomes crucial, for there is no genuine autonomy, balance and agency in world affairs without true multipolarity. Third, India's complaints about American unipolarity are on a steady decline, even as the rhetoric remains. It would be a mistake, however, to view New Delhi's rhetoric against unipolarity as merely, or primarily, directed against the US because today, New Delhi is less anxious about America's global unipolarity than a potential Chinese unipolarity in Asia. While America's declining global unipolarity is mostly a theoretical concern for New Delhi, the prospect of a China-led unipolar Asia is the true source of anxiety. In that sense, New Delhi's desire for multipolarity is also an attempt at ensuring the absence of a unipolar (China-dominated) Asia. Therefore, even if New Delhi is more focused on countering Chinese unipolarity in Asia rather than US unipolarity globally, opposing regional unipolarity without opposing global unipolarity will ring hollow. There are two reasons why New Delhi would be concerned about China's unipolarity in Asia. One, this could mean that China might set the rules of geopolitical engagement in Asia. Once much of Asia falls under China's influence, it will be harder for New Delhi to push back Chinese hegemony. Two, a rise of Chinese unipolarity in Asia might prompt the US to think of accommodating China in a G2 format, especially if the American nativist and isolationist tendencies persist. In an ideal world, New Delhi's articulations must make a clear distinction between American unipolarity and Chinese attempts at unipolarity in Asia, but doing so is not easy for a variety of reasons, including that New Delhi continues to resist aspects of American unipolarity and is not yet willing to acknowledge the possibility of Chinese unipolarity in Asia. But New Delhi's rhetoric against American unipolarity and hegemony, without openly resisting the growing Chinese regional hegemony or a potentially unipolar Asia, could have unintended consequences. Some US administrations, especially the current one, might interpret India's rhetoric against American unipolarity as personal rather than an academic exercise, for the most part. This could prompt an unhappy Washington to undercut India's geopolitical standing in the region, thereby indirectly aiding China's attempts at regional hegemony. This creates a paradox: India aims to counter Chinese unipolarity in Asia by promoting global multipolarity, which annoys the US, prompting it to marginalise India in the region, thereby ultimately aiding Beijing's efforts to establish hegemony in Asia. New Delhi's rhetoric against American unipolarity and hegemony could also prompt the US, which is losing influence in various parts of the world, to seek ways of strengthening its influence in spaces where it can — this could lead to accepting Chinese unipolarity in Asia. More so, if the US reacts negatively towards India, as it is doing now, it could create a fertile ground for China and Russia to fan the Indian rhetoric against the US, encourage India to proactively participate in forums and arrangements aimed at undermining US unipolarity, and generate confusion within India's strategic community about the true motives behind India's multipolarity rhetoric. All of this will further drive the geopolitical wedge between New Delhi and Washington DC. There is no easy way out. New Delhi will need to have a lot more conversations and build trust with the US. That is not easy when a president like Trump occupies the White House. Happymon Jacob is the founder and director of the Council for Strategic and Defense Research and the editor of INDIA'S WORLD magazine. The views expressed are personal.


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Attacks on Indian migrants are against Ireland's values
India and Ireland share deep historical and cultural roots that have allowed our two countries, despite our vastly different sizes, to form close and enduring bonds. Today, India and Ireland share a relationship built on shared values and strong educational and economic ties. Central to this are the tens of thousands of Indian nationals who call Ireland home. Outside of citizens from the UK or EU, Indians account for the largest migrant population in Ireland. Ireland has long prided itself on its warm welcome and hospitality. The overwhelming majority of Irish people welcome migrants into their society, workplaces, and homes. (ANI Photo) The Indian community is an integral and valued part of Irish society. Indians living in Ireland are contributing immensely to our economy, our education and health care sectors, our research institutions, and our cultural life. From IT professionals and scientists, to doctors, nurses, students and entrepreneurs, Indians are helping to shape our present and our future. Their contribution is not only recognised — it is appreciated and celebrated. That is why Ireland has been so stunned by a number of recent assaults on Indians living in Dublin, our capital city. These assaults have been widely reported, both in Ireland and India, and have rightly caused deep concern across both our nations. As Ireland's ambassador to India, I wish to express our strongest condemnation of these appalling and senseless acts. These attacks — carried out by a small number of young people fuelled by misinformation — are deeply at odds with the values of the Irish people. I understand that each incident reported to Ireland's national police service is being investigated rigorously, with a view to apprehending the perpetrators and ensuring that justice will be served for the victims. The Irish embassy in New Delhi and the Irish foreign ministry in Dublin are in close and continuous contact with the Indian embassy in Dublin to share updates and express our support for affected individuals. We understand the anxiety and concern that these recent incidents have caused, both among Indians living in Ireland and their families back home in India. We are taking this matter with the utmost seriousness. These mindless actions could not be further from the values Ireland holds dear. They have generated widespread outrage across Irish society. They are not representative of who the Irish are as a people or as a country. Following a recent assault on an Indian man in the Dublin suburb of Tallaght, the local community responded by holding a rally attended by hundreds of people showing their solidarity with their Indian neighbours. Shamrock Rovers, Ireland's largest and most successful football club, invited members of the Indian community as special guests to their UEFA Conference League match at Tallaght Stadium. This initiative sent a strong, unambiguous message: Hate has no home in Ireland. The gesture by Shamrock Rovers embodied the Ireland we know — a country rooted in decency, openness and respect. Ireland has long been a nation shaped by migration. Five million people live in Ireland, but around the world, 70 million people claim Irish heritage. We are a migrant nation. This history has made us deeply aware of the immigrant experience and instilled in us a lasting commitment to inclusion and empathy. We are proud of the growing Indian diaspora in Ireland and want to see them live in safety, prosperity, and with a sense of belonging. That is, I strongly believe, the experience of the overwhelming number of migrants, from India and elsewhere, in Ireland. Ireland has long prided itself on its warm welcome and hospitality. The overwhelming majority of Irish people welcome migrants into their society, workplaces, and homes. The emergence over recent years of a tiny — but sadly vocal — anti-immigrant movement, largely fuelled by online misinformation, is a new phenomenon for us. We are grappling with it. Thankfully, the vast majority of people utterly reject their attempts to sow division. There is virtually no public support for their manifesto of hate. The hateful actions of a few must never overshadow the goodwill of the many. Let us not allow the voices of division to drown out the voices of friendship, solidarity and respect. The people of Ireland stand with the Indian community and will continue to stand firmly against racism in all its forms. Kevin Kelly is Ireland's ambassador to India. The views expressed are personal.