
Air India crash investigation ‘far from over', says CEO Campbell Wilson on AAIB report: ‘No issue with fuel quality…'
Amid speculations in various quarters about the reasons for the fatal crash that killed 260 people on June 12, the Air India chief said the preliminary report identified no cause nor made any recommendations and urged everyone to avoid drawing premature conclusions as the investigation is 'far from over'.
In a message to Air India staff, Wilson on Monday said the preliminary report found no mechanical or maintenance issues with the aircraft or engines, and that all mandatory maintenance tasks had been completed, PTI reported.
"There was no issue with the quality of fuel and no abnormality with the takeoff roll. The pilots had passed their mandatory pre-flight breathalyser and there were no observations pertaining to their medical status," he said.
Further, Wilson said out of an abundance of caution and under the oversight of regulator DGCA, every Boeing 787 aircraft operating in our fleet was checked within days of the accident and all were found fit for service.
'We continue to perform all necessary checks, as we will any new ones that authorities may suggest,' he added.
The airline, he said, will continue to co-operate with the investigators to ensure they have everything they need to conduct a thorough and comprehensive enquiry.
'The release of the preliminary report marked the point at which we, along with the world, began receiving additional details about what took place. Unsurprisingly, it provided both greater clarity and opened additional questions,' Wilson said.
Over the past 30 days, he said there has been an ongoing cycle of theories, allegations, rumours and sensational headlines, many of which have later been disproven.
'Until a final report or cause is tabled, there will no doubt be new rounds of speculation and more sensational headlines... Let us not be diverted from what are our top priorities: standing by the bereaved and those injured, working together as a team, and delivering a safe and reliable air travel experience to our customers around the world,' Wilson said.
He also stressed that the airline must remain focused on its task and be true to the values of integrity, excellence, customer focus, innovation, and teamwork.
The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) on Saturday released its preliminary report on the crash of Air India's Boeing 787-8 plane that killed 260 people, including 241 people onboard. The aircraft, which was operating the flight AI171 from Ahmedabad to London Gatwick, crashed into a building soon after takeoff.
The AAIB report said the fuel supply to both engines of flight AI171 was cut off within a second of each other, causing confusion in the cockpit and the airplane plummeting back to the ground almost immediately after taking off.
The 15-page report also said that in the cockpit voice recording, one unidentified pilot asked the other why he had cut off the fuel, which the other denied.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Air India crash: Report claims state of ‘confusion' between pilots, says former DGCA flight operations inspector
Former Flight Operations Inspector with the DGCA (Directorate General of Civil Aviation), Captain Prashant Dhalla, spoke to ANI on Thursday (July 17, 2025) regarding the Wall Street Journal's news report on the Air India AI 171 crash that occurred in Ahmedabad last month. Captain Dhalla emphasised the word 'transitioned', which was mentioned in the report. He further explained that this report suggests a challenge-and-response dynamic exists between the two pilots, with one questioning the other, and a state of confusion. 'The report uses a particular word - 'transitioned'. The fuel control switches transitioned, according to the report. This report suggests that a challenge-and-response dynamic exists between the two pilots, with one questioning the other, and a state of confusion between the pilots, potentially leading to a breakdown in Crew Resource Management (CRM),' Captain Dhalla said. 'If any changes were made due to a failure in this aircraft, they would have used these switches to regain power. If there was a problem with the locking mechanism of these switches, then the pilots were also helpless,' Captain Dhalla added further. Meanwhile, the Federation of Indian Pilots (FIP) President, C.S. Randhawa, on Thursday (July 17, 2025), condemned a media report that claimed that the captain of the flight deliberately cut off fuel to the engines. Captain Randhawa emphasised that the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau's (AAIB) preliminary report makes no mention of the pilots turning off the switches controlling fuel flow to the engines. 'Nowhere in the report has it been mentioned that the fuel control switch was turned off due to the pilot's mistake. I condemn the article. They have not read the report properly, and will take action against them through FIP,' said Captain Randhawa. Furthermore, he urged people not to comment on the AAIB's preliminary report, as this might create undue fear among commuters about air travel. The two pilots involved were Captain Sumeet Sabharwal and First Officer Clive Kunder, who had a total flying experience of 15,638 hours and 3,403 hours, respectively. A preliminary report released last week by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau depicted confusion in the cockpit shortly before the June 12 crash and raised fresh questions over the position of the critical engine fuel cutoff switches, the report said. The AI 171 crash of the Boeing Dreamliner 787-8 aircraft in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, killed 260 people, including 229 passengers, 12 crew members, and 19 people on the ground.


India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
AI 171 fuel switch-off mystery: All expert theories we have heard so far
There are a lot of theories offering explanations on how the fuel control switch of Air India's Ahmedabad-London 171 flight transitioned to CUT OFF. These theories are all that victims' families and the public have until investigators publish their final report, which may take a year or what do these theories say and which one carries the most weight? To find out, we scoured through dozens of reports published in India Today and several other credible media houses based in the US and the UK. advertisementFormer pilots, engineers, air safety professionals and investigators speaking to the media have offered three potential scenarios to explain the fuel control switching turning off at 1:38:42 pm on June 12. These are:Intentional or erroneous fuel cut off by a pilot,Accidental movement of signal or chip that could have sent wrong messages to the engine's brain ie Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC), a digital electronic system managing all aspects of engine performance. The first explanation – that the switches were moved by a human hand – has been backed by the majority of experts. A report published by The Wall Street Journal, based on statements of people familiar with the US' official assessment, identified senior pilot Captain Sumeet Sabharwal as someone who is likely to have turned off the switch. Former Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) safety inspector David Saucie told CNN that the switches couldn't be moved only by a person. Many experts said the switches come with a spring-based lock feature and need to be pulled up before moving to RUN or CUT OFF second group of aviation professionals suggest a signal or a chip malfunction. 'When the fuel switch is moved, there are various micro switches that are made contact with. These micro-switches send signals to various aircraft systems, like FADEC or the engine's brain, different spar valves and fuel control valves,' Sharath Panicker, the former Air Force officer who also flew the 787s at Air India, told India Today, suggesting that possible signal malfunction. However, another set of experts cite an earlier FAA circular that said fuel control panels in some Boeing 787 planes came with the lock feature disengaged, suggesting that such a switch, had it been installed in the AI-171, could move automatically or accidentally due to aircraft vibration, contact or quadrant flex. In its preliminary report published last Friday, India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) said the fuel control switches were moved to CUT OFF barely three seconds after the aircraft's lift-off. It also quoted a pilot asking his colleagues as to why he cut off. The colleague denied having done so. The report, however, didn't reveal any cause or recommended any action, and many experts say it left more questions than it provided answers. Commercial pilot associations have cautioned people against drawing any conclusions until the investigation is into aircraft accidents are a cumbersome process and may or may not come to a conclusion. Sometimes they could take years and different investigators involved may contradict each other's findings.- EndsMust Watch IN THIS STORY#Ahmedabad Plane Crash


The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
AI 171 Crash: Fuel Cutoff and a Fatal Plunge
On a June morning, Air India flight AI171 lifted off from Ahmedabad, bound for London. The aircraft was a Boeing 787 Dreamliner — among the most advanced long-haul jets in service. But less than a minute after takeoff, the plane crashed. Two hundred and sixty people were killed. Only one survived. It was India's deadliest air disaster in nearly three decades. Now, a preliminary investigation points to a chilling cause: fuel to both engines was cut off just after takeoff. The engines lost thrust. The plane had neither the altitude nor the time to recover. What happened in those final seconds? Was it a technical failure or human error? Guest: Jagriti Chandra, Special Correspondent at The Hindu covering aviation Host: Anupama Chandrasekaran Produced and edited by Jude Francis Weston