
India plans coordinated FDI drive, eyes global investors in these key sectors
The plan, which will also draw on existing production-linked incentive (PLI) schemes and infrastructure development programs, involves close coordination between the Centre and states, the officials said on condition of anonymity.
They added that the idea is to align states' efforts with national priorities, address local policy bottlenecks, and strengthen the country's overall manufacturing and supply chain ecosystem as the country attempts to boost annual FDI inflows to more than $100 billion over the next few years from $80-billion levels currently.
So, what's the plan?
As a first step, the Unionministry of commerce and industryis coordinating with Invest India, the country's top investment promotion and facilitation agency, to identify key value chains and sectors that require targeted intervention.
'We are mapping the sectors and value chains where India can play a larger role and then approaching global companies operating in those areas to bring in investment," the first official cited above said.
'We are working at both the state and central levels to provide all possible facilitation required by investors," the second official said.
According to these officials, the Centre is focusing on sectors such as electronics system design and manufacturing (ESDM), chemicals, toys, and footwear—particularly non-leather footwear—where leading companies have shown strong interest in joining India's supply chain.
In the toy sector especially, several global companies have begun discussions to set up manufacturing bases in India, drawn by government incentives and the expanding domestic market, the second person said, without naming the companies planning to invest in these sectors.
The states in focus include Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh, Delhi, Madhya Pradesh, and Odisha, among others.
Queries emailed to theministry of commerce and industry, whichis spearheading this initiative, remained unanswered till press time.
Vivek Singhal, chief executive officer (CEO) of Bidso, a B2B manufacturer of outdoor toys, said that the influx of FDI can lead to a doubling of manufacturing units, adoption of advanced production technologies, and a shift from import dependence to domestic output, eventually making India a net exporter.
'India now manufactures 88% of the toys sold domestically and has a unique opportunity to become both a manufacturing powerhouse and a champion of its rich legacy in traditional toys," said Singhal. 'We are in touch with brands that lead design and innovation such as Buffalo Games and Chillafish to move their procurement to India."
Here's more details
The department for promotion of industry and internal trade (DPIIT), which comes under the Union commerce ministry, has tasked Invest India with identifying global investors, working with states to make necessary changes in the policy framework to provide a better investment ecosystem, and organising roadshows in different countries to woo investors.
The DPIIT is coordinating with other line ministries such as ministry of electronics and information technology (MeitY), food processing, textiles, and heavy industries. To ease visas for investors, the DPIIT is working with the ministries of home affairs and external affairs.
The Jan Vishwas Bill 2.0, which aims to decriminalise several Acts, has also been introduced to encourage investors by improving the overall ecosystem. The Bill is listed for presentation in the ongoing monsoon session and is likely to be tabled during the current session of Parliament, as per the officials cited above.
Adding momentum to existing initiatives
To be sure, the Centre is already offering financial support to attract investment and build more resilient supply chains within sectors–an example being the PLI scheme for electronic components administered by the MeitY.
The second official cited above pointed out that apart from the procedural framework laid out under Press Note 3, which regulates FDI from countries sharing land borders with India, there are minimal regulatory hurdles for foreign money to come into the country.
Between 2019 and 2024, the government undertook further liberalisation measures, including allowing 100% FDI under the automatic route in coal mining, contract manufacturing, and insurance intermediaries. In the 2025 Union Budget, it proposed raising the FDI limit for insurance companies from 74% to 100%, provided they invest their entire premium income within the country.
India's FDI numbers
India attracted foreign direct investment (FDI) worth $81.04 billion in FY25, marking a 14% jump from the previous year, data from the commerce ministry showed. The services sector emerged as the top recipient of FDI equity inflows, accounting for 19% of the total, with investments rising nearly 41% to $9.35 billion in FY25 from $6.64 billion a year earlier.
This was followed by the computer software and hardware sector, which attracted 16% of inflows, and the trading sector, with an 8% share. India's cumulative FDI inflow over the last eleven years (2014-25) has reached $748.78 billion, a 143% rise over the preceding eleven-year period (2003-14), which saw $308.38 billion. The number of countries investing in India also rose to 112 in FY25, compared with 89 in FY14.
FDI inflows into India peaked at $84.83 billion in the fiscal year 2021-22, according to data shared by minister of state for finance Pankaj Chaudhary in the Lok Sabha on 10 March. Thereafter, the numbers declined to $71.35 billion in FY23 and $71.27 billion in FY24, following uncertainty about a potential global recession, economic crises triggered by geopolitical conflicts and rising global protectionist measures.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

New Indian Express
18 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Kerala govt moves SC seeking rejection of Presidential reference, calls it 'misuse of power'
"A reference under Article 143 cannot be used to overrule findings of law and fact in earlier judgments," the Kerala government stated. It further pointed out that the Union government has not filed any review or curative petition against the April 8 ruling, making it binding under Article 141. "The President and the council of ministers must act in aid of the Supreme Court under Article 144," the plea added. The state also accused the reference of misinterpreting Article 200 by falsely claiming that no timeline exists for governors to act on Bills. "The foundational issues in queries 1 to 11 have already been settled in the Tamil Nadu, Punjab, and Telangana cases," Kerala argued, urging the court to reject the reference as "misleading." The Supreme Court, meanwhile, has agreed to examine the Presidential reference and has sought responses from the Centre and all states by July 29. A five-judge Constitution bench, headed by Chief Justice BR Gavai, will hear the matter on August 29, with the assistance of Attorney General R Venkataramani. The court will determine whether judicially enforceable timelines can be imposed on Governors and the President regarding pending Bills. The controversy stems from the April 8 ruling by a two-judge bench, which held that Governors must act within three months if withholding assent to a bill and within one month if a bill is re-enacted. The court had invoked Article 142 to declare Tamil Nadu Governor R N Ravi's inaction as "illegal" and deemed 10 pending Bills as approved. President Murmu's reference challenges this verdict, raising questions on whether Governors are bound by ministerial advice and if their discretion under Article 200 is subject to judicial review. With Kerala now accusing the reference of being a "backdoor attempt" to undo settled law, the Supreme Court's upcoming decision could have far-reaching implications on Centre-state relations and the powers of constitutional authorities. Out of 14 crucial questions, the majority and important were as follows: 1) What are the constitutional options before a Governor when a Bill is presented under Article 200 of the Constitution of India? 2) Is the Governor bound by the aid & advice tendered by the Council of Ministers while exercising all options available with him when a Bill is presented before him under Article 200 of the Constitution of India? 3) Is the exercise of constitutional discretion by the Governor under Article 200 of the Constitution of India justiciable? 4) Is Article 361 of the Constitution of India an absolute bar to the judicial review in relation to the actions of a Governor under Article 200 of the Constitution of India? 5) In the absence of a constitutionally prescribed time limit, and the manner of exercise of powers by the Governor, can timelines be imposed and the manner of exercise be prescribed through judicial orders for the exercise of all powers under Article 200 of the Constitution of India by the Governor?


Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Maunvrat, maunvrat': How Shashi Tharoor deflected a question on Operation Sindoor; watch video
Shashi Tharoor (PTI photo) NEW DELHI: Senior Congress leader and MP Shashi Tharoor avoided media questions on Operation Sindoor on Monday, responding with just one word -- "Maunvrat, Maunvrat" -- as he entered Parliament, signalling his refusal to comment. His reaction came ahead of a scheduled 16-hour-long Lok Sabha debate on Operation Sindoor, as announced by the parliamentary affairs minister Kiren Rijiju . Tharoor's silence carries weight. The Thiruvananthapuram MP was selected by the BJP-led Centre to represent India's position on terrorism and counterterrorism in the aftermath of the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack , which killed 26 people. Under Operation Sindoor, launched on May 7, India struck key terror camps in Pakistan. Tharoor led the diplomatic delegation to the United States and several countries across the Americas to garner international support. However, Tharoor's strong backing of the government's stance sparked friction within the Congress party . His public alignment with Operation Sindoor led to internal criticism and pushback from the party high command, further intensified by his cryptic social media posts seen as indirect jabs. Now, questions linger over whether the Congress will allow Tharoor to speak in today's debate. His outspoken endorsement of the Centre's action post-Pahalgam has deepened the rift with party leadership, casting uncertainty on his role in the discussion.


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Operation Sindoor debate: Opposition questions — ‘huge security lapse', ‘no proof terrorists came from Pakistan'
Parliament is gearing up for a fierce debate over Operation Sindoor and the Pahalgam terror attack on Monday. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh is expected to address the Lok Sabha around noon, while Congress leader Gaurav Gogoi is likely to lead the debate from the Opposition's side. Ahead of the Parliament session, Gaurav Gogoi said, "...the government will have to tell the truth, today." Reacting to Congress leader P Chidambaram's "no proof Pahalgam terrorists came from Pakistan" comment, Gogoi said, "He [Chidambaram] will be able to give more information on this." Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut also said, "Chidambaram sahib might be saying the right thing." He also said that Home Minister Amit Shah should have resigned over the Pahalgam terror attack incident. "The Pahalgam attack was a huge security lapse in Centre-governed J&K. The terrorists entered 400 km inside J&K. These terrorists have not been found yet. This is a lapse on the part of the Home Ministry. The Home Minister should have resigned," Sanjay Raut said. He also questioned the government over US President Donald Trump claims about the "US-brokered' ceasefire deal between India and Pakistan during May conflict. "I think the Prime Minister will not come as he will have to answer questions about President Trump," he said. Meanwhile, Samajwadi Party MP Akhilesh Yadav said, "Firstly, one has to accept that there are two separate issues. Firstly, we congratulate the Armed Forces for their bravery and valour during Operation Sindoor. If they had got a chance, they might have even taken PoK." "Before the Pahalgam attack, there was another incident that the public has not yet been informed about. The question is - why are terrorist incidents happening again and again under the BJP government? Where did the Pahalgam terrorists go? The government should answer where these terrorists went," Yadav asked. A fiery debate on the Pahalgam attack and Operation Sindoor is expected to unfold in Parliament between top leaders from the ruling alliance and the opposition. Lok Sabha List of Business for Monday states, "Special Discussion on India's strong, successful and decisive 'Operation Sindoor' in response to terrorist attack in Pahalgam". Twenty-six civilians were killed in the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam in Jammu and Kashmir, after which India retaliated through precision strikes under Operation Sindoor, targeting terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK).