logo
2407msletters3

2407msletters3

The Age02-07-2025
Coalition bulldozed heritage
No one should be surprised at the lack of protection of heritage assets in NSW (' Heritage watchdog's database in woeful state ', July 24). The previous NSW government, with its thinly disguised contempt of all things heritage, made it a mission to eradicate any historic building or structure that was in the way of its ill-conceived and unwanted pet projects. A lot of damage has been done: Windsor Bridge, Willow Grove, Royal Oak Hotel, Parramatta Park and more. The current government needs to act swiftly to prevent further damage and protect our precious heritage assets.
Bob Edgar, Westmead
Thank you so much, Sydney Morning Herald, for exposing how bad the care of heritage has been in NSW for years. So now surely something will happen. What is left of old Parramatta might survive, perhaps the Powerhouse will survive as the world-class museum it was, perhaps Sydney Living Museums might get back on track and look after the state's most important domestic buildings, including the historic towns on the Hawkesbury River. The NSW Coalition government was a disgrace when it came to heritage.
Clive Lucas, Neutral Bay
The NSW Auditor-General's findings are a timely and sobering read. This dire situation is no surprise to all who have fought for years for the state heritage listing of the Powerhouse Museum.
In fact, the 2022 Robertson & Hindmarsh report, Architectural Heritage of the Last Quarter of the 20th Century, commissioned at the request of the Heritage Council, recommends its listing. However, the nomination of the museum has been constantly 'deferred' for more than two years by the Heritage Council. Meanwhile, the previous government's plans for the demolition and destruction of this much-loved museum are still in play. Minister Penny Sharpe should ensure that members of the Heritage Council have professional expertise and knowledge in the field. The people's museum, one of NSW's four foundational cultural institutions, deserves better.
Jennifer Sanders, Russell Lea
Hot houses
Why have planning authorities continued to allow huge houses with no gables and dark Colorbond roofs to be packed into newer suburbs over the last few decades (' Summer heat stress worst in treeless suburbs, new estates ', July 24)? Is it the greed of developers? Is it the aspiration to have a large house with little gardening maintenance required? Tree cover will never be possible in these estates as tall trees all invade gutters and drains if planted close to houses. Street and park planting have to be presented as an alternative.
Katriona Herborn, Blackheath
Surely it is obvious that houses, masses of them all together with no trees in sight, is a huge contributor to unbearable heat in summer. What is needed is a canopy of green to stop the heat on roofs. Where was the planning for this? It should be obvious by now that our summers are getting longer and hotter. Building codes must be changed as soon as possible, if it is not already too late.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

2407msletters3
2407msletters3

Sydney Morning Herald

time02-07-2025

  • Sydney Morning Herald

2407msletters3

Coalition bulldozed heritage No one should be surprised at the lack of protection of heritage assets in NSW (' Heritage watchdog's database in woeful state ', July 24). The previous NSW government, with its thinly disguised contempt of all things heritage, made it a mission to eradicate any historic building or structure that was in the way of its ill-conceived and unwanted pet projects. A lot of damage has been done: Windsor Bridge, Willow Grove, Royal Oak Hotel, Parramatta Park and more. The current government needs to act swiftly to prevent further damage and protect our precious heritage assets. Bob Edgar, Westmead Thank you so much, Sydney Morning Herald, for exposing how bad the care of heritage has been in NSW for years. So now surely something will happen. What is left of old Parramatta might survive, perhaps the Powerhouse will survive as the world-class museum it was, perhaps Sydney Living Museums might get back on track and look after the state's most important domestic buildings, including the historic towns on the Hawkesbury River. The NSW Coalition government was a disgrace when it came to heritage. Clive Lucas, Neutral Bay The NSW Auditor-General's findings are a timely and sobering read. This dire situation is no surprise to all who have fought for years for the state heritage listing of the Powerhouse Museum. In fact, the 2022 Robertson & Hindmarsh report, Architectural Heritage of the Last Quarter of the 20th Century, commissioned at the request of the Heritage Council, recommends its listing. However, the nomination of the museum has been constantly 'deferred' for more than two years by the Heritage Council. Meanwhile, the previous government's plans for the demolition and destruction of this much-loved museum are still in play. Minister Penny Sharpe should ensure that members of the Heritage Council have professional expertise and knowledge in the field. The people's museum, one of NSW's four foundational cultural institutions, deserves better. Jennifer Sanders, Russell Lea Hot houses Why have planning authorities continued to allow huge houses with no gables and dark Colorbond roofs to be packed into newer suburbs over the last few decades (' Summer heat stress worst in treeless suburbs, new estates ', July 24)? Is it the greed of developers? Is it the aspiration to have a large house with little gardening maintenance required? Tree cover will never be possible in these estates as tall trees all invade gutters and drains if planted close to houses. Street and park planting have to be presented as an alternative. Katriona Herborn, Blackheath Surely it is obvious that houses, masses of them all together with no trees in sight, is a huge contributor to unbearable heat in summer. What is needed is a canopy of green to stop the heat on roofs. Where was the planning for this? It should be obvious by now that our summers are getting longer and hotter. Building codes must be changed as soon as possible, if it is not already too late.

2407msletters3
2407msletters3

The Age

time02-07-2025

  • The Age

2407msletters3

Coalition bulldozed heritage No one should be surprised at the lack of protection of heritage assets in NSW (' Heritage watchdog's database in woeful state ', July 24). The previous NSW government, with its thinly disguised contempt of all things heritage, made it a mission to eradicate any historic building or structure that was in the way of its ill-conceived and unwanted pet projects. A lot of damage has been done: Windsor Bridge, Willow Grove, Royal Oak Hotel, Parramatta Park and more. The current government needs to act swiftly to prevent further damage and protect our precious heritage assets. Bob Edgar, Westmead Thank you so much, Sydney Morning Herald, for exposing how bad the care of heritage has been in NSW for years. So now surely something will happen. What is left of old Parramatta might survive, perhaps the Powerhouse will survive as the world-class museum it was, perhaps Sydney Living Museums might get back on track and look after the state's most important domestic buildings, including the historic towns on the Hawkesbury River. The NSW Coalition government was a disgrace when it came to heritage. Clive Lucas, Neutral Bay The NSW Auditor-General's findings are a timely and sobering read. This dire situation is no surprise to all who have fought for years for the state heritage listing of the Powerhouse Museum. In fact, the 2022 Robertson & Hindmarsh report, Architectural Heritage of the Last Quarter of the 20th Century, commissioned at the request of the Heritage Council, recommends its listing. However, the nomination of the museum has been constantly 'deferred' for more than two years by the Heritage Council. Meanwhile, the previous government's plans for the demolition and destruction of this much-loved museum are still in play. Minister Penny Sharpe should ensure that members of the Heritage Council have professional expertise and knowledge in the field. The people's museum, one of NSW's four foundational cultural institutions, deserves better. Jennifer Sanders, Russell Lea Hot houses Why have planning authorities continued to allow huge houses with no gables and dark Colorbond roofs to be packed into newer suburbs over the last few decades (' Summer heat stress worst in treeless suburbs, new estates ', July 24)? Is it the greed of developers? Is it the aspiration to have a large house with little gardening maintenance required? Tree cover will never be possible in these estates as tall trees all invade gutters and drains if planted close to houses. Street and park planting have to be presented as an alternative. Katriona Herborn, Blackheath Surely it is obvious that houses, masses of them all together with no trees in sight, is a huge contributor to unbearable heat in summer. What is needed is a canopy of green to stop the heat on roofs. Where was the planning for this? It should be obvious by now that our summers are getting longer and hotter. Building codes must be changed as soon as possible, if it is not already too late.

State environment department recommends heritage listing Victoria Park, but Olympic stadium will still go ahead
State environment department recommends heritage listing Victoria Park, but Olympic stadium will still go ahead

ABC News

time14-05-2025

  • ABC News

State environment department recommends heritage listing Victoria Park, but Olympic stadium will still go ahead

The state's environment department has recommended heritage listing the site for Brisbane's 2032 stadium, as the government prepares to pass legislation to override dozens of protections if they get in the way of Olympic venues. Premier David Crisafulli announced a new Olympic and Paralympic Games stadium would be built at Victoria Park in March. Just weeks later, Department of the Environment director Xanthe O'Donnell recommended expanding the park's heritage protection and revising the statement of cultural heritage significance. The recommendation made to the Heritage Council described Victoria Park as "important in demonstrating the establishment and evolution of Queensland's early public recreation reserves". The application will now be considered by the Queensland Heritage Council. The government's bill, introduced earlier this month, will give the Games Independent Infrastructure and Coordination Authority (GIICA) power to override 15 planning laws. Deputy Premier and State Development Minister Jarrod Bleijie said the new legislation will allow the government to deliver Games infrastructure "on time and on budget". "After more than 1,200 wasted days under Labor, we are getting on with the job of delivering a winning legacy for Queensland," he said. "The decision to introduce these new laws was not taken lightly but they are necessary to make up for Labor's wasted three years, which require a specific streamlined approval process to implement the 2032 Delivery Plan." David Hinchliffe, from Save Victoria Park, said the recommendation strengthened the group's argument against the stadium. "To encompass the whole of the park is a major statement about the history and the importance of Victoria Park," he told ABC Brisbane Local Radio. Mr Hinchliffe said the group was confident in its planned legal challenge to building the stadium at Victoria Park. "The government ought to have a plan B in their back pocket, because it's not a lay down misère, it's not definite," he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store