Pakistan, Bangladesh agree on visa-free entry for diplomats, officials
Pakistan and Bangladesh have agreed to grant visa-free entry for holders of diplomatic and official passports, as part of efforts to strengthen bilateral ties, Radio Pakistan reported.
The agreement was reached during a meeting between Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi and his Bangladeshi counterpart, Lieutenant General (retired) Jahangir Alam Chowdhury, in Dhaka on Wednesday.
The two sides also discussed increasing cooperation in internal security, police training, anti-narcotics, and anti-human trafficking. In addition, they explored joint counter-terrorism measures and the possibility of exchange programmes between police academies of the two nations.
ڈھاکہ۔وفاقی وزیرداخلہ محسن نقوی کی بنگلہ دیش کے وزیر داخلہ لیفٹیننٹ جنرل(ر) جہانگیر عالم چودھری سے ملاقات
وفاقی وزیرداخلہ محسن نقوی کا وزارت داخلہ آمد پر بنگلہ دیشی ہم منصب نے پرتپاک خیرمقدم کیا
وزیرداخلہ محسن نقوی کو گارڈ آف آنرز پیش کیا گیا pic.twitter.com/MAN9YLPV1K
— Ministry of Interior GoP (@MOIofficialGoP) July 23, 2025
Upon his arrival at the Bangladesh Home Affairs Ministry, Chowdhury welcomed Naqvi with a guard of honour. Speaking on the occasion, Chowdhury expressed the importance of Naqvi's visit for promoting bilateral cooperation between Islamabad and Dhaka. He also thanked Naqvi for offering police training to Bangladeshi officials.
A joint committee, headed by Interior Secretary Khurram Agha, has been formed to further boost cooperation between the two countries. Chowdhury confirmed that a high-level Bangladeshi delegation would soon visit Islamabad to tour the Safe City Project and National Police Academy.
Earlier in February, Pakistan and Bangladesh resumed direct trade on an official level for the first time since the 1971 separation, with the first government-approved cargo departing from Port Qasim.
Read More: Bangladesh resumes direct trade with Pakistan for first time since 1971
This marks a historic step in bilateral trade relations, as Bangladesh agreed to purchase 50,000 tonnes of Pakistani rice through the Trading Corporation of Pakistan (TCP).
In April, Pakistan and Bangladesh resumed high-level diplomatic consultations for the first time in 15 years. Senior officials from both sides met in Dhaka to revive bilateral engagement and address regional and international matters of mutual interest.
The Foreign Office Consultations (FOC) were held at the State Guest House Padma and led by Pakistan's Foreign Secretary Amna Baloch and her Bangladeshi counterpart, Md Jashim Uddin. The meeting marks the first formal FOC between the two countries since 2010, signalling renewed efforts to rebuild trust and cooperation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
14 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
Pakistan, US conclude trade deal; Washington to help Islamabad develop oil reserves
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday his administration struck a deal with Pakistan in which Washington would work with Islamabad in developing the South Asian nation's oil reserves. 'We have just concluded a Deal with the Country of Pakistan, whereby Pakistan and the United States will work together on developing their massive Oil Reserves,' Trump wrote on social media. 'We are in the process of choosing the Oil Company that will lead this Partnership. Who knows, maybe they'll be selling Oil to India some day!' Pakistan says it's close to US trade deal, Washington gives no timeline Trump's social media post did not provide further details on the deal between the US and Pakistan. The Pakistani embassy in Washington had no immediate comment. Last week, Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar said the United States and Pakistan were 'very close' to a trade deal that could come within days, after he met with Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Friday. Under Trump, Washington has attempted to renegotiate trade agreements with many countries that he threatened with tariffs over what he calls unfair trade relations. Many economists dispute Trump's characterization. Trade talks: Finance minister Aurangzeb leaves for US The US State Department and Pakistan's foreign ministry, in separate statements after Rubio's meeting with Dar, said last week the two top diplomats stressed in their discussion the importance of expanding trade and ties in critical minerals and mining. 'Our teams have been here in Washington discussing, having virtual meetings and a committee has been tasked by the prime minister to fine tune now,' Dar said last week about U.S.-Pakistan talks.
Business Recorder
44 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
Trump says US and Pakistan have concluded a trade deal
WASHINGTON: U.S. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday his administration struck a deal with Pakistan in which Washington will work with Islamabad in developing the South Asian nation's oil reserves. 'We have just concluded a Deal with the Country of Pakistan, whereby Pakistan and the United States will work together on developing their massive Oil Reserves,' Trump wrote on social media. 'We are in the process of choosing the Oil Company that will lead this Partnership.' Trump's social media post did not provide further details on the deal between the U.S. and Pakistan. The Pakistani embassy in Washington had no immediate comment. Last week, Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar said the United States and Pakistan were 'very close' to a trade deal that could come within days, after he met with Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Friday. Under Trump, Washington has attempted to renegotiate trade agreements with many countries that he threatened with tariffs over what he calls unfair trade relations. Many economists dispute Trump's characterization. The U.S. State Department and Pakistan's foreign ministry, in separate statements after Rubio's meeting with Dar, said last week the two top diplomats stressed in their discussion the importance of expanding trade and ties in critical minerals and mining. 'Our teams have been here in Washington discussing, having virtual meetings and a committee has been tasked by the prime minister to fine tune now,' Dar said last week about U.S.-Pakistan talks.
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Operation Mahadev and India's shifting role in South Asia
The writer is a public policy analyst based in Lahore. She can be reached at durdananajam1@ Listen to article India recently launched Operation Mahadev in Lidwas, near Srinagar, targeting militants allegedly involved in the April 22 Pahalgam attack. While the government called it a success, there is still no verified evidence linking those killed to the Pahalgam attack. This recurring gap between military actions and verifiable outcomes is eroding India's credibility, both domestically and internationally. What complicates matters further is the abrupt transition from Operation Sindoor to Operation Mahadev, not due to a strategic pause initiated by India, but because of a ceasefire — one reportedly brokered by the United States. This shift in the tempo of military actions highlights something deeper: India's discomfort in navigating a region where it is no longer the sole power broker. And that discomfort has only grown more visible as India struggles to balance its internal political narrative with external strategic realities. In the ongoing Monsoon Session of Parliament, the Pahalgam attack and India's retaliatory actions have sparked heated debate. Home Minister Amit Shah claimed those killed in Operation Mahadev were carrying Pakistani voter IDs and — oddly enough — Pakistani chocolates, as supposed proof of foreign involvement. But across the aisle, former Home Minister P Chidambaram cautioned against drawing premature conclusions. He pointed out that no independent investigation had yet established Pakistan's direct role in the Pahalgam attack. His remarks echoed concerns of many analysts who questioned whether India had once again rushed into a military response without solid ground. Rahul Gandhi added fuel to the fire, claiming that Indian pilots were given strict instructions not to engage Pakistan's defence systems, and that Islamabad had prior knowledge of the strike's limits. Whether these claims are fully accurate or politically motivated, they raised doubts over the true intent and efficacy of Operation Sindoor — was it a military response or a public performance? The four-day standoff between May 7 and May 11 brought South Asia to the brink. India claimed to have struck nine terror sites and disrupted eleven Pakistani air bases. Pakistan responded with Operation Bunyan-ul-Marsoos, claiming it had downed six Indian jets, including Rafales, and intercepted several drones. Then came a sudden ceasefire — not the result of bilateral talks, but reportedly due to US intervention. Former President Donald Trump didn't hesitate to take credit, claiming it was his diplomatic pressure that ended the hostilities. He even endorsed Pakistan's claim of shooting down Indian jets. Strikingly, New Delhi offered no rebuttal, no clarification, not even a token denial. That silence was more than a diplomatic gesture. It suggested an unease within India about how to handle its diminishing ability to control the narrative - both at home and abroad. India has long projected itself as South Asia's natural leader — economically, militarily and diplomatically. But in this episode, the heavy lifting to halt escalation came not from New Delhi, but from Washington. That exposed a growing dependency on Western partners to manage regional crises, calling into question India's cherished notion of "strategic autonomy." The broader message from this episode is that South Asia is no longer India's undisputed sphere of influence. The region has entered a new phase, where external actors like the US — and increasingly, China — shape events with more agility than India does. China, while officially silent during this latest crisis, remains a critical player. Its growing ties with Pakistan, military infrastructure in disputed regions and deep economic engagement with South Asian countries make it a strategic counterweight to India. While New Delhi focuses on containing Pakistan, Beijing continues to expand its footprint — not just in military terms, but also through economic corridors, port access and diplomatic alliances. India's strategic myopia risks ceding more ground to China than it can afford. India stands at a crossroads. Its aspiration to lead South Asia is real — and achievable. But that requires shifting from theatrics to transparency, from overstatement to credibility. Here's what New Delhi should consider moving forward: If military operations are to gain public and global support, India must present transparent, independently verifiable proof. That includes forensic intelligence, clear identification of targets and post-operation disclosures. The age of unquestioned nationalistic fervour is waning — citizens and allies alike demand facts. India needs to redefine what autonomy means in a multipolar world. Relying on US intervention, while convenient, cannot be the default. Strategic autonomy doesn't mean going solo; it means building coalitions that share your long-term vision. That includes mending ties with neighbours rather than attempting to dominate them. India's greatest challenge today is not Pakistan. It is in managing its own ambitions in a region that is no longer playing by the old rules. Operations like Sindoor and Mahadev may offer political capital in the short run, but true leadership will come only when India chooses clarity over confusion, and substance over showmanship.
