logo
Navigating private credit – how it compares with T-bills and publicly issued bonds

Navigating private credit – how it compares with T-bills and publicly issued bonds

Business Times16-06-2025
[SINGAPORE] Private credit is rapidly gaining traction among retail investors as regulators around the world are giving these individuals more access to private markets in general.
Private credit refers to a type of debt negotiated between non-bank lenders and companies that are often below investment grade and unlisted.
The asset class flourished after the global financial crisis, when banks cut lending amid fears that they would not be able to recover the debt. Since 2009, the global private-credit market has grown more than 10 times, with assets under management exceeding US$3 trillion as at end-2024.
In Singapore, the size of retail demand for private credit could grow to as much as S$100 billion, said Hugh Chung, chief investment officer at Endowus. This is assuming that 5 per cent of the S$1.9 trillion of total household financial assets is allocated to the asset class.
How should retail investors navigate this asset, particularly as the Monetary Authority of Singapore is assessing feedback to its proposal to broaden access to it?
First, let us have a look at how private credit usually works.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Assuming you are the chief executive officer and majority owner of an unlisted company, with earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation of between US$50 million and US$100 million.
You want to raise capital but cannot access traditional bank lending because your business is too small. You may not have an extensive credit history, which would limit your ability to raise funding through debt markets. You also want to keep your ownership, so you do not want to sell a stake to private-equity firms or investors.
Why borrowers turn to private credit
In such a scenario, the most feasible option is private credit. This is where you negotiate a loan with lenders such as insurers, pension funds, or high-net-worth individuals who are more comfortable with your risk profile than banks are.
Listed companies may choose private credit as well, such as when they want to finance a project in a politically unstable country.
In uncertain economic environments, such as the current one in which US tariffs and their frequent changes are complicating business planning, demand for private credit may still be robust.
Sally Yim, managing director of financial institutions at Moody's Ratings, told The Business Times: 'There might be a more volatile environment, causing banks to be more cautious about lending to borrowers of lower credit quality... so private credit can help fill the gap.'
Private credit also enables borrowers and lenders to structure more tailored deals than traditional lending.
Creditors often price the loans at a premium to the prevailing benchmark interest rates, as these loans are seen as being more risky than those taken up by bigger corporates with more extensive credit histories.
As with other private assets, private-credit investors also receive the illiquidity premium, to compensate for the lack of liquidity in holding such alternative investments.
Debtors are willing to pay higher rates, given that they have limited access to other funding routes in the first place. They can also get loans tailored to their needs, with more flexible terms.
In theory, this results in a win-win situation for lenders and borrowers.
Returns vs risk
Mark Glengarry, Blackstone's head of Asia-Pacific for private-credit strategies, said: 'Private credit can offer companies a more direct and efficient way to access capital, resulting in greater speed, certainty in execution, and flexibility of structure. For investors, there's a broader receptivity to private markets, with more (of them) recognising that assets such as private credit can be a core portfolio building block, potentially helping to improve returns, to lower volatility and diversify portfolios.'
While private-market players position private credit as long-term investments that generate high yields, they caution that, ultimately, returns are not guaranteed. Investors may also not recover their full investment if the borrower defaults.
In contrast, government-backed Treasury bills (T-bills) guarantee capital and typically present the lowest risk, with a nearly zero chance of default.
Investment-grade corporate bonds are also less risky than private debt, since the issuers tend to have higher credit quality. Asset manager Schroders pegs the average annual default rate of such debt at 0.1 per cent over the long run.
Shihan Abeyguna, managing director for South-east Asia at Morningstar, said: 'The risk for private-credit funds is high simply because of the risk of default by companies that could be sub-investment-grade.'
In the United States, the 25-year average of leveraged loan default rate is 2.4 per cent, said US private-markets investment firm Hamilton Lane.
As with most investment tools, higher risks are usually accompanied by higher returns.
A US middle-market debt offering, while illiquid and unrated, can generate a potential return premium of 400 to 600 basis points over US high-yield bonds, together with added protections such as covenants and collateral, said Dennis Quah, head of Singapore wealth at BlackRock.
According to MSCI, global private-credit funds generated returns of 10.2 per cent in 2023, and 6.9 per cent in 2024 – higher than their private-equity counterparts. They also outperformed investment-grade bonds, which yielded returns of 8.3 per cent and 2.5 per cent for those two years, respectively.
However, during those two years, private-credit funds underperformed the MSCI high-yield corporate bond index, which tracks US dollar-denominated bonds that are not investment grade.
One-year Singapore T-bills, on the other hand, averaged 3.75 per cent in 2023 and 2.78 per cent in 2024. In the latest auction in April, the yield fell further, to 2.29 per cent.
Buyer beware
While the higher returns are tempting, investors need to bear in mind that private-credit funds are long-term investments, with the maturities of the underlying debt going beyond a decade. In contrast, T-bills can mature after a month.
BlackRock's Quah said 'private-credit instruments are still generally longer-dated investments than public equity and bonds, so investors should seek investment managers with deep expertise and experience navigating multiple market cycles'.
Private-credit funds are also less liquid than investment-grade bonds that are publicly traded.
Moody's Yim said: 'It's something that we need to be more cautious about when retail investors get into these private-credit funds – whether they understand the differences in terms of liquidity risk.'
To lower such risks, retail investors could consider allocating 5 per cent of their portfolios to private credit, with at least a six to 10-year horizon, said Abeyguna. 'These assets can complement traditional fixed income by offering differentiated sources of income and risk, but should be sized carefully, based on an individual's overall objectives and risk tolerance.'
To generate resilient incomes, Blackstone's Glengarry said the firm targets high-growth and low-loss sectors. It also structures its loans as senior secured, 'with significant equity cushion or credit enhancement'.
Secured by collateral, senior secured loans are at the top of a company's capital structure, meaning they are repaid first in the event of bankruptcy or liquidation.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

World economies reel from Trump's tariffs punch
World economies reel from Trump's tariffs punch

Business Times

time6 hours ago

  • Business Times

World economies reel from Trump's tariffs punch

[WASHINGTON] Global markets reeled on Friday (Aug 1) after US President Donald Trump's tariffs barrage against nearly all US trading partners as governments looked down the barrel of a seven-day deadline before higher duties take effect. Trump announced late Thursday that dozens of economies, including the European Union, will face new tariff rates of between 10 and 41 per cent. However, implementation will be on Aug 7 rather than on Friday as previously announced, the White House said. This gives governments a window to rush to strike deals with Washington, setting more favourable conditions. Neighbouring Canada, one of the biggest US trade partners, was hit with 35 per cent levies, up from 25 per cent, effective Friday, but with wide-ranging, current exemptions remaining in place. The tariffs are a demonstration of raw economic power that Trump sees putting US exporters in a stronger position, while encouraging domestic manufacturing by keeping out foreign imports. But the muscular approach has raised fears of inflation and other economic fallout in the world's biggest economy. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Stock markets in Hong Kong, London and New York slumped as they digested the turmoil, while weak US employment data added to worries. Trump's actions come as debate rages over how best to steer the US economy, with the US Federal Reserve this week deciding to keep interest rates unchanged, despite massive political pressure from the White House to cut. Data Friday showed US job growth missing expectations for July, while unemployment ticked up to 4.2 per cent from 4.1 per cent. On Wall Street, the S&P 500 dropped 1.6 per cent, while the Nasdaq tumbled 2.2 per cent. Political goals Trump raised duties on around 70 economies, from a current 10 per cent level imposed in April when he unleashed 'reciprocal' tariffs, citing unfair trade practices. The new, steeper levels listed in an executive order vary by trading partner. Any goods 'transshipped' through other jurisdictions to avoid US duties would be hit with an additional 40 per cent tariff, the order said. But Trump's duties also have a distinctly political flavour, with the president using separate tariffs to pressure Brazil to drop the trial of his far-right ally, former president Jair Bolsonaro. He also warned of trade consequences for Canada, which faces a different set of duties, after Prime Minister Mark Carney announced plans to recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September. In targeting Canada, the White House cited its failure to 'cooperate in curbing the ongoing flood of fentanyl and other illicit drugs', although Canada is not a major source of illegal narcotics. By contrast, Trump gave more time to Mexico, delaying for 90 days a threat to increase its tariffs from 25 to 30 per cent. But exemptions remain for a wide range of Canadian and Mexican goods entering the United States under an existing North American trade pact. Carney said that his government was 'disappointed' with the latest rates hike but noted that with exclusions, the US average tariff on Canadian goods remains one of the lowest among US trading partners. 'Tears up' rule book With questions hanging over the effectiveness of bilateral trade deals struck, including with the EU and Japan, the outcome of Trump's overall plan remains uncertain. 'No doubt about it, the executive order and related agreements concluded over the past few months tears up the trade rule book that has governed international trade since World War II,' said Wendy Cutler, senior vice president of the Asia Society Policy Institute. On Friday, Trump said that he would consider distributing a tariff 'dividend' to Americans. Notably excluded from Friday's drama was China, which is in the midst of negotiations with the United States. Washington and Beijing at one point brought tit-for-tat tariffs to triple-digit levels, but have agreed to temporarily lower these duties and are working to extend their truce. Those who managed to strike deals with Washington to avert steeper threatened levies included Vietnam, Japan, Indonesia, the Philippines, South Korea and the European Union. Among other tariff levels adjusted in Trump's latest order, Switzerland now faces a higher 39 per cent duty. AFP

Brunei tweaks Bridgewater bet to a lucrative 20% stake in firm
Brunei tweaks Bridgewater bet to a lucrative 20% stake in firm

Business Times

time8 hours ago

  • Business Times

Brunei tweaks Bridgewater bet to a lucrative 20% stake in firm

[NEW YORK] Brunei's sovereign wealth fund pulled money from an investment in a Bridgewater Associates strategy to buy an almost 20% stake in the hedge fund manager's holding company, a move that has helped spur higher gains for other institutional investors. The Brunei Investment Agency is the latest longstanding client to buy a piece of the firm founded by Ray Dalio, which managed US$92 billion as at Dec 31. It's unclear which Bridgewater vehicle Brunei pulled money from, although the sovereign wealth fund remains an investor in all of the firm's funds, according to a source familiar with the money manager. Bridgewater's flagship Pure Alpha II, like many macro funds, has improved its performance in the past few years, but over a longer period, returns have been uneven. That means a long-term investment in the firm itself can be more lucrative than betting on its most popular product. Bridgewater has been selling stakes to institutions for more than a decade. The Teacher Retirement System of Texas, the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System, Singapore's sovereign wealth fund and the International Monetary Fund have all purchased a piece of the Westport, Connecticut-based firm. The Texas teachers pension fund invested US$250 million in Bridgewater's holding company in 2012 and reported making an annualised return of 8.7 per cent to Mar 31. An investor in Pure Alpha would have gained an annualised 2 per cent from the beginning of 2012 to June 2025. Last year, the fund climbed 11.3 per cent and it's up 17 per cent in the first half of this year. Dalio recently completed his exit from the company, selling the final slug of his remaining shares in the money manager he started 50 years ago, and resigning from the board. BLOOMBERG

Airbnb touts good talks with New York City mayor candidates on rental ban
Airbnb touts good talks with New York City mayor candidates on rental ban

Business Times

time8 hours ago

  • Business Times

Airbnb touts good talks with New York City mayor candidates on rental ban

[CHICAGO] After pouring more than US$1 million into New York's mayoral race, Airbnb said that it's having 'really good conversations' with candidates about restrictions that wiped more than 80 per cent of its listings in the city. Chief business officer Dave Stephenson said that he is optimistic and that politicians are starting to realise the rules have not been good for residents, who cannot supplement their incomes with short-term rentals. It has also sent hotel prices in the city soaring, he said. Airbnb plans to spend US$10 million on getting homesharing-friendly politicians into New York City and state offices just this year. The company is pushing back on New York City's Local Law 18 regulation, which outlawed most of its short-term rental listings when it came into effect in 2023. 'Conversations are happening there, top-level conversations with the mayor and with mayoral candidates,' Stephenson said on Thursday (Jul 31). 'We are having really good conversations about the importance of supporting the communities and the economics in those communities and I think that they are realising that the law is not serving the community well.' New York politicians have argued short-term rentals have exacerbated the city's housing affordability crisis. The measure, which wiped out more than 18,000 of Airbnb's listings in the city within a year of coming into force, was strongly supported by the powerful hospitality workers union, the Hotel and Gaming Trades Council. Stephenson, who was in Chicago to mark Airbnb's first global live music partnership with Lollapalooza festivals around the world, blamed the restrictions for rising hotel prices in New York. The average cost of a room in the city surged to a record US$439.71 in December, according to CoStar data. He also said smaller neighbourhoods are missing out on economic activity. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Tuesday, 12 pm Property Insights Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond. Sign Up Sign Up 'There are so many boroughs that are struggling now, because you can't stay in Brooklyn, you can't stay in Queens, you can't stay in Staten Island – there are no hotels,' he said. 'People are not able to earn income from their homes, so they're actually seeing the negative side of this.' The company's super-PAC spent over US$1 million in the Democratic primary, targeting three candidates who did not support rolling back the short-term rental ban during the race: Zohran Mamdani, Scott Stringer and Brad Lander, Politico reported at the time. In a separate statement, Airbnb said it's 'committed to supporting candidates who champion common-sense solutions to the affordability crisis, including empowering everyday New Yorkers, especially one- and two-family homeowners, to share their own homes as a way to afford their mortgages'. New York City Mayor Eric Adams did not respond to a request for comment. Remaining candidates, Mamdani, Andrew Cuomo and Curtis Sliwa, did not respond to requests for comment. Jim Walden, who is also running, declined to comment. Stephenson did not specify which candidates the company was speaking to. Advocates for short-term rentals are trying to revise the law ahead of next summer, when New York will be one of several North American host cities for the 2026 FifaWorld Cup, an event franchise Airbnb has also partnered with. In March, the chambers of commerce for New York City's five boroughs sent a joint letter to the city council saying the regulations have had 'devastating consequences for small businesses'. A bill relaxing some of New York's stringent ban has been introduced in the city council, but it's a long way from viability, the bill has only a few sponsors and has yet to receive a hearing. Cities across the US are grappling with an affordable housing crisis, and several have turned to the regulation of short-term rentals after concerns that real estate speculators are entering the market, purchasing housing and then renting it on platforms such as Airbnb and Vrbo. Chicago limits how many units within an apartment building can be used for short-term rentals and requires city approval and registration. While the city is weighing an ordinance that would allow council members to ban short-term rentals within their wards, the proposal has stalled. 'We found very specifically in Chicago that the actual residents of many of these neighbourhoods, we have civil rights people in the neighbourhoods, are actually advocating to keep Airbnbs because it's an important way for people to earn income,' he said. 'I'm really happy with where we are at in Chicago, because I think the neighbourhoods are actually starting to see the benefit and are speaking up.' BLOOMBERG

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store