Fatwa against Donald Trump? Shia cleric's ‘red line' on US president for ‘threatening' Iran's Supreme leader Khamenei
According to Tehran Times, in a written note, Ayatollah Makarem Shirazi has declared, 'Any regime or individual threatening the leaders of the Islamic Ummah and acting on those threats qualifies as a Muharib.'
Under Shia Islamic jurisprudence, a 'Muharib' is defined as someone who wages armed rebellion, terrorism, violent crimes, or other unlawful acts that spread fear and disorder in society. The prescribed punishment for such offenses is death.
Ayatollah Makarem Shirazi's remarks are being interpreted as a "Fatwa," a religious edict, the Tehran Times report added. Iran's Ayatollah Nouri Hamedani and Iraq's Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani have published similar statements seen as Fatwas.
1. Accusation of Defeat and Denial of Iran's Victory Claims
Donald Trump publicly challenged Khamenei's claim that Iran had emerged victorious over Israel and the US, calling it a 'lie' and bluntly stating, 'You got beat to hell.' He accused Khamenei of spreading falsehoods about the war's outcome, insisting that Iran's military and nuclear capabilities were severely damaged by U.S. strikes.
Trump repeatedly asserted that US forces had 'obliterated' three key Iranian nuclear facilities (Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz) during the conflict. He insisted these strikes dealt a devastating blow to Iran's nuclear ambitions, despite some intelligence reports suggesting only a temporary setback.
In a striking admission, Donald Trump revealed that he knew exactly where Khamenei was sheltering during the conflict and deliberately prevented Israeli and US forces from killing him, stating, 'I saved him from a very ugly and ignominious death.' Trump lamented that Khamenei did not 'thank' him for sparing his life.
Donald Trump warned that the US would 'definitely' strike Iran again if Tehran resumed uranium enrichment or nuclear activities that posed a threat. He did not rule out future military action against Iran's nuclear sites if necessary.
Trump disclosed that he was working on removing sanctions against Iran to aid its recovery but immediately dropped all efforts after Khamenei's 'statement of anger, hatred, and disgust.' He criticised Khamenei's tone and called it 'blatant and foolish,' blaming it for the collapse of potential diplomatic progress.
Trump warned Iran that unless it 'gets back into the world order flow,' conditions would worsen for the country, describing it as 'a burned out, blown up country, with no future, a decimated military, a horrible economy and death all around them.' He urged the Iranian leadership to adopt a more conciliatory approach, saying, 'you often get more with honey than you do with vinegar.'
Trump revealed that he ordered Israeli planes to turn back from a planned 'biggest attack of the war,' which he said would have caused significant Iranian casualties. He claimed to have restrained Israel from delivering a 'final knockout' blow to Iran.
A Fatwa is an interpretation of Islamic law issued by a Marja. It is binding for all Muslims, meaning that even if Islamic governments are not able to act on it, individual Muslims should ensure its enforcement.
A well-known example of states failing to act on a Fatwa, prompting individual Muslims to take matters into their own hands, is the case of Salman Rushdie.
On February 14, 1989, Imam Khameini, the founder of the Islamic Republic, issued a historic Fatwa calling for the execution of Salman Rushdie, the British-Indian author of The Satanic Verses, a novel filled with blasphemy against Prophet Mohammad (PBUH).
The fatwa stated: "I inform the proud Muslim people of the world that the author of The Satanic Verses book, which is against Islam, the Prophet, and the Quran, and all those involved in its publication who were aware of its content, are sentenced to death. I call on all zealous Muslims to execute them quickly, wherever they find them."
Rushdie was forced into hiding immediately after the fatwa was issued. He was placed under 24/7 British police protection and lived in safe houses for nearly a decade. In 1989, a bomb exploded at a London hotel where Rushdie was scheduled to speak.
Over three decades after the Fatwa was issued, when Rushdie emerged from hiding and began living more openly, the threat had not faded, contrary to his and the police's expectations. In 2022, Rushdie was stabbed on stage in New York by an attacker allegedly acting on the Fatwa. He has since retreated back into seclusion.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump threatens California schools with funding cuts over transgender policies, escalating culture war in America
President Donald Trump has sharpened his offensive against California, warning that school districts refusing to comply with his administration's transgender directives will be denied federal funding. The declaration, made through his social media platform, contained no further details, but its implications have already sent ripples through the education and political landscape. While federal dollars make up a fraction of overall school budgets compared to state and local contributions, they are critical for enrichment programmes, low-income student aid, and compliance with federal mandates. The prospect of withdrawing such funds transforms the policy clash into a direct threat to vulnerable school communities. From sports arenas to courtrooms The latest funding ultimatum builds on months of confrontation between Washington and Sacramento. In July, the Trump administration filed suit against the California Department of Education and the California Interscholastic Federation (CIF), challenging the state's policy that permits transgender girls to compete on girls' athletic teams. The Justice Department has argued that California's rules undermine Title IX protections, claiming they 'displace' cisgender girls from awards, podiums, and scholarship pathways. California, in turn, has defended its long-standing policy of allowing students to compete based on gender identity, describing the federal lawsuit as a 'cynical distraction' from pressing educational inequities. A culture war in motion This confrontation is not merely a localised dispute but part of a wider national culture war. More than 25 US states have passed laws banning transgender girls from female sports, according to US media reports, many of which are now tied up in litigation. Attorney General Pam Bondi, doubling down on Trump's stance, has warned other states that California's fate could soon be theirs. Civil rights advocates have reacted with alarm. Equality California, among other LGBTQ+ groups, has accused the administration of weaponising federal aid to target transgender youth. By contrast, conservative organisations frame the lawsuits as necessary to safeguard 'fairness' in women's athletics, a message that resonates with segments of the public uneasy about the changing definitions of gender and competition. Political calculations and nuanced voices Governor Gavin Newsom has positioned California as a bulwark against federal overreach, though even he has acknowledged, in a recent podcast, that questions of fairness remain unresolved. His candid reflections, criticised by both sides, illustrate the growing complexity of a debate that resists simplistic binaries. The political stakes are high: Republicans see in this issue a potent rallying cry for cultural conservatism, while Democrats risk fractures within their own coalition as they navigate between inclusivity and competitive equity. Students caught in the crossfire For students on the ground, particularly those vying for athletic scholarships, the dispute carries immediate consequences. Rules governing eligibility, participation, and recognition in competitive sports are now subject to unpredictable shifts driven by courtroom rulings and federal edicts. At stake is not merely the funding of schools or the structure of athletic competitions, but the broader question of how America defines fairness, inclusion, and civil rights in its classrooms and playing fields. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
The Print
34 minutes ago
- The Print
Trump bluffed? US embassy denies President's claim of $21 million USAID for voter turnout in India
The MEA informed the Parliament about this in a written response to a question asked by Rajya Sabha MP John Brittas. The Centre revealed that the US had conducted a global review of its foreign aid programmes in February this year. In a formal communication to the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), the embassy clarified that the US Agency for International Development (USAID) 'did not receive or provide funding of $21 million for voter turnout in India from Financial Year 2014 to 2024 nor implement any voter turnout-related activities'. New Delhi: The US embassy in New Delhi has denied claims that America provided $21 million in funding for voter turnout-related activities in India, directly contradicting statements made earlier this year by US President Donald Trump. 'On 2 July 2025, the US Embassy shared data that it said covered USAID funding in India from 2014 to 2024, including details of implementing partners, objectives, and key accomplishments of each activity undertaken. The embassy also maintains that 'USAID/India did not receive or provide funding of $21 million for voter turnout in India from fiscal years 2014 to 2024, nor has it implemented any voter turnout-related activities in India',' the MEA response said. The embassy's denial comes amid a broader shutdown of USAID operations worldwide. On 11 August, the US embassy informed India's Department of Economic Affairs that all seven partnership agreements between USAID and Government of India would be formally closed effective 15 August. It also shared a detailed, beneficiary-wise breakdown of USAID allocations for the years 2022, 2023, and 2024. The statement was issued in response to Trump's public assertion that USAID funds, originally issued for humanitarian purposes, were 'misused' by the Indian government to boost voter turnout. The claim followed a February 2025 announcement by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), then headed by Elon Musk, which listed the $21 million as part of a broader $723 million in cancelled foreign aid, allegedly allocated for voter turnout efforts in India. On 16 February, DOGE posted on X that it had cancelled $486 million in worldwide USAID funding for the Consortium for Elections and Political Process Strengthening (CEPPS), including a supposed $21 million set aside for India. USAID ceased most of its operations globally on 1 July, terminating approximately 83 percent of its programmes and laying off 94 percent of its staff. The US State Department has assumed control of the remaining 17 percent of foreign aid initiatives. The full closure of USAID is scheduled to be completed by 2 September. (Edited by Shashank Kishan) Also Read: George Soros funds and USAID move in tandem around the world
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
36 minutes ago
- Business Standard
EU, US set new steps to cut tariffs and boost transatlantic trade
The US and European Union took the next steps to formalize their trade pact, detailing plans that could reduce tariffs on European automobiles within weeks while opening the door to new potential discounts for steel and aluminum. The joint statement issued Thursday advances the preliminary deal announced a month ago, by including specific benchmarks for the EU to secure its promised sectoral tariff discounts on cars, pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, as well as new commitments to cooperate on economic security matters, food standards and digital trade. President Donald Trump has repeatedly praised the sweeping US-EU trade framework, extolling it as 'a big deal' in a Monday White House meeting with foreign leaders including European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. The deal provides predictability and 'delivers for our citizens & companies, and strengthens transatlantic relations,' von der Leyen said in a post on the social-media platform X. The development underscores the nature of trade talks under Trump, with some initial, broad pronouncements of deals giving way to weeks or more of work to hammer out detailed agreements. Many of them are also tied to sweeping policy changes that could take time to materialize. For example, Trump already imposed a flat 15 per cent rate on most European goods — half the 30 per cent he'd previously threatened. But the US promise to extend that lower levy to autos and auto parts now hinges on the EU formally introducing a legislative proposal to eliminate a host of its own tariffs on US industrial goods and provide 'preferential market access' for some US seafood and agricultural products. Car Relief The statement outlines choreographed action on both sides of the Atlantic, with the US codifying reduced auto tariffs once the EU 'formally introduces the necessary legislative proposal to enact' its own promised tariff reductions. The discounted 15 per cent tariffs on European auto imports — down from the current 27.5 per cent — would be effective from the start of the same month that legislation is advanced. They could be in place within weeks, said a senior Trump administration official who briefed reporters on the initiative. The shift has been anxiously anticipated by some EU member states, particularly Germany, which exported $34.9 billion of new cars and auto parts to the US in 2024. The legislative trigger is designed to help ensure the EU delivers on its promised tariff reductions — and ensure the 27-nation bloc has sufficient pressure to obtain the political mandate needed to make the changes, the administration official said. The US is committing to apply lower most-favored-nation, or MFN, tariffs to a slew of other European products — including aircraft and aircraft parts, generic pharmaceuticals and their ingredients and some natural resources such as cork. More carve-outs could be added in future, the statement says, but for now the EU has not succeeded in receiving the same treatment for wines, spirits and medical devices. The US is also renewing its commitment to cap future sectoral tariffs on European pharmaceutical products, semiconductors and lumber at 15 per cent. Metals Quotas It's also opening the prospect for discounted rates on some steel, aluminum and derivative products under a quota system. That's a shift from the White House's stated plans in July, when the Trump administration insisted those metal tariffs would remain at 50 per cent, helping to lower trade deficits with the EU and bring revenue to US coffers. On steel and aluminum, the EU and US now assert they 'intend to consider the possibility to cooperate on ring-fencing their respective domestic markets from overcapacity, while ensuring secure supply chains between each other,' according to the joint statement. Under the terms agreed by the two sides, the EU faces a 15 per cent tariff on most of its exports. The US clarified in an executive order last month that the EU's rate would function as a ceiling, while other exporters' universal duty is currently in addition to existing MFN duties. Goods covered by the order that faced MFN levies above 15 per cent will continue to do so, but separate sectoral tariffs do not stack on top of each other or on top of the universal rates, said some of the people. QuickTake: EU-US Trade Deal - What Has and Hasn't Been Agreed? The document leaves unanswered major questions about how the EU might fulfill its promise to invest $600 billion in the US or purchase some $750 billion in US energy resources — including liquefied natural gas, oil and nuclear power products — through 2028. Private sector investments by European companies would be expected across strategic sectors in the US, including pharmaceuticals, semiconductors and advanced manufacturing, the senior administration official said. Meanwhile, the EU plans to substantially increase procurement of military and defense equipment from the US, according to the statement, and intends to buy at least $40 billion worth of US artificial intelligence chips. According to the joint statement, the EU intends to provide preferential market access for a range of seafood and non-sensitive agricultural goods imported from the US, including tree nuts, certain dairy products, fresh and processed fruits and vegetables, processed foods, planting seeds, soybean oil, pork and bison meat. Digital Trade In recent weeks, deliberations over the EU's digital services regulations and potential relief for some goods — including wine and spirits - were seen prolonging talks. The EU didn't secure lower rates for alcohol in the joint statement. The US and EU are pledging to address some of what the joint statement calls 'unjustified digital trade barriers,' with the bloc confirming that it will 'not adopt or maintain network usage fees.' A question-and-answer paper released Thursday by Brussels said it made no commitment on digital services regulation. 'The Joint Statement does not include any commitment on EU digital regulations,' it said. The EU has committed to work toward providing more 'flexibilities' in its levy on carbon-intensive imports set to kick in next year, the statement said, and it will seek to ensure its corporate sustainability due diligence and reporting requirements don't pose 'undue restrictions on transatlantic trade.' Potential changes could include eased compliance requirements for small- and medium-sized businesses, according to the statement.
