Reconciliation bill targets SNAP, extends Trump tax cuts
No Democratic amendments made it into the so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill', which aims to cut $1.5 trillion from federal programs and services to pay for $4.5 trillion in proposed tax cuts.
'The poor decisions that are being made here in Congress, are going to have significant effects. People are looking for certainty right now and all they're getting is just stupid politics from Washington. We need to get the job done for the people back home,' said U.S. Congressman Eric Sorensen (D-Ill.)
Sorensen sits on the House Agriculture Committee, which is tasked with finding $230 billion in cuts. But the Republican-led committee cut even more than that.
Wednesday's bill contains $300 billion in cuts from Supplemental Nutrition Assistance (SNAP), commonly referred to as food stamps. The bill increases the age requirement for SNAP from 54 to 64 for able-bodied adults with children. It also shifts the direct cost of food benefits from the federal government to the states.
'We need to make sure that we're doing right by our American farmers, by those that are getting up early in the day, working late at night, working to feed their families. Instead, what are we doing? We're looking at taking away the ability for people to put food on the table, literally, that's what we just did in the Agriculture Committee,' said Sorensen, who voted against the bill.
Nearly two million Illinoisans, or one in seven people, depend on SNAP benefits to meet their nutritional needs, according to the Illinois Department of Health and Human Services.
Sorensen lashed at his Republican colleagues, accusing them of prioritizing billionaires over the middle class.
'The only reason that they're doing what they're doing today is to give Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos, and all of the rich fat cats, all of their tax breaks and put it onto the backs of working people. And so, let's call it out for what it is. It's a changing of how our government is working. It should be for the people by the people, but that's not what's going on today,' he said.
U.S. Congressman Darin LaHood (R-Ill.) sits on the House Ways and Means Committee. The committee's bill makes Trump's 2017 tax cuts permanent and increases the child tax credit.
Some of LaHood's provisions made it in as well. The 'Health Saving for Families Act' makes health savings accounts (HSA) more accessible.
'The House Ways and Means Committee voted to provide hardworking Americans, seniors, small businesses, and farmers with much-needed and immediate tax relief,' said LaHood. 'It is critical that Congress pass the One, Big, Beautiful Bill as soon as possible to give rocket fuel to the United States' economy.'
The committee bills now head to the House Budget Committee to combine into the legislative package.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
13 minutes ago
- NBC News
Trump's unusual approach to business and mediation ordered in Ohio State lawsuits: Morning Rundown
Trump takes an unprecedented approach to corporate affairs. Arab states stay quiet while other nations around the world decry the conditions in Gaza. And a woman's viral saga about falling in love with her psychiatrist spurs an existential question about AI chatbots. Here's what to know today. As the CEO in chief, Trump gets what he wants from companies Donald Trump has controlled his own businesses for decades. Now, as president, he's taking an increasingly active role in individual corporations' affairs — and several of them are meeting his demands. This represents a break with past administrations that may have been unwilling or unable, politically, to bring similar pressure to bear on businesses. Even some of Trump's opponents see the appeal of his efforts. In the past few months, Coca-Cola said it would produce soda with cane sugar in the U.S. Two major semiconductor makers agreed to give the government a cut of their sales to China. And Paramount paid millions to settle allegations Trump levied against CBS' '60 Minutes,' days before the administration approved the media conglomerate's merger with Skydance Media. This is Morning Rundown, a weekday newsletter to start your day. Sign up here to get it in your inbox. Trump also hasn't shied away from making explicit warnings. In the past week alone, he called for Lip-Bu Tan, the CEO of chipmaker Intel, to step down (though reversed course days later after a White House visit) and said Goldman Sachs should fire its chief economist because of the company's bearishness on his tariffs. 'It's so much different than the first time,' said a Republican lobbyist whose firm represents several Fortune 500 companies, of how Trump's actions differ from his first term. 'He's just acting like a businessman.' A progressive strategist who said he 'disagrees with the guy on almost every issue' concedes that Democrats could take a page out of Trump's strategy and 'adapt to the changing presidency' to take on corporations. The fear of reprisals has firms making strategic decisions to forgo any kind of legal challenge to his methods. Over the longer term, Ryan Bourne, a chair at the libertarian think tank the Cato Institute, predicts Trump's antics could give way to a less efficient economy. 'Where it can lead is businesses, rather than focusing on creating value, now seek to play footsie with politicians more and more,' Bourne said. Read the full story here. More politics news: Trump announced this year's host of the Kennedy Center Honors ceremony: himself. But, he insisted, 'I didn't want to do it. OK?' As Trump's directive to crack down on Washington, D.C., crime moves forward, a new law enforcement checkpoint goes up in a bustling neighborhood. Trump does not intend to discuss any possible divisions of land during his meeting tomorrow with Russian President Vladimir Putin, he told European leaders on a call yesterday. A new ICE detention facility set to open in Texas offers a preview of the problems that may arise as the Trump administration ramps up mass deportations. E.J. Antoni, Trump's pick to lead the Bureau of Labor Statistics, was a 'bystander' at the U.S. Capitol during the Jan. 6 riot, social media footage shows. The dozens of Democratic legislators who fled Texas amid a redistricting fight are charting a plan for what comes next as the state's first special legislative session winds down. Why Arab rulers aren't more vocal about Gaza With deaths from starvation and Israeli bombardment mounting in Gaza, countries around the world have become more vocal in criticizing Israel for its conduct and pledging to recognize a Palestinian state. But Arab states have notably been much less vocal, leaving Palestinians, their supporters and some analysts angry. 'The Arabs are napping,' said Fawaz Gerges, a professor of international relations at the London School of Economics, adding that leaders 'have buried their heads in the sand.' There have been small signs of support. For example, Arab states have participated in airdrops of aid and food convoys into Gaza, but Palestinians say it's nowhere near enough to ward off a looming famine; and Egypt and Qatar have mediated talks between Israel, Hamas and the U.S., but they have not led to an end to the conflict. Experts say Gulf Arab states' ties with Israel have more to do with politics than public attitudes. Several states host U.S. military bases that analysts say help shield them from regional rival Iran. And access to Israel's tech sector has been a draw for some states. Meanwhile, the U.S. and Israel have floated plans for Arab countries to accept Gaza refugees. But fearing renewed Palestinian militancy and accusations of aiding ethnic cleansing, these Arab nations have rejected the idea. Read the full story here. Mediation ordered for Ohio State over sex abuse lawsuits Ohio State University has been ordered to resolve via mediation the remaining lawsuits filed by former students who claim that Dr. Richard Strauss molested them, mostly under the guise of giving physicals, while he was a school employee from the mid-1970s to the late 1990s. The university still faces five active lawsuits from 236 men alleging the school failed to protect them. U.S. District Judge Michael H. Watson issued the mediation order on Monday and referred the cases to Layn Phillips, who mediated the lawsuits filed against Michigan State by some 200 women athletes who were sexually abused by sports doctor Larry Nassar. An independent investigation in 2019 concluded that Strauss sexually abused at least 177 male athletes and students, and that coaches and administrators knew about it for two decades but failed to stop him. The university said it has paid out $60 million in settlement money already. Read the full story here. Read All About It Taylor Swift teared up during a podcast interview with her boyfriend (and his brother), chatting about her upcoming album, the start of their relationship, getting the master recordings for her music and more. A company that proposed a $30 billion data center on land owned by the widow of NASCAR champion Dale Earnhardt in rural North Carolina will not move forward with the project after intense backlash. ICE allegedly sent three children, including a boy with Stage 4 cancer, to Honduras with their deported mothers despite the moms' claims they wanted to stay in the U.S., according to a lawsuit. A man accused of faking his own death and fleeing the U.S. to avoid sexual assault and fraud allegations has been convicted of rape in Utah. A woman searched an Arkansas state park for a diamond for her engagement ring. On her very last day, she hit the jackpot. As AI chatbots become a regular tool in people's lives, recent incidents have put a renewed spotlight on how the people-pleasing nature of these bots can influence users' sense of reality. For Kendra Hilty, a TikTok user whose saga about falling in love with her psychiatrist has gone viral, her chatbots are like confidants. But 'I do my best to keep them in check,' she told me in an email this week. Still, stories such as Hilty's are sparking widespread discourse about the use of AI chatbots for validation, which is why I explored mental health experts' rising concerns about AI-fueled delusions, as well as how tech companies have struggled to combat the issue. — Angela Yang, culture & trends reporter NBC Select: Online Shopping, Simplified Arch pain, shin splints and other common issues while running can be alleviated with insole or shoe insert. Here's what podiatrists recommend. And don't let zits bum you out. The NBC Select team spoke to dermatologists about the best way to get rid of butt acne. here.


Atlantic
13 minutes ago
- Atlantic
Trump Is Having Trouble Prosecuting His Enemies
In November 2017, less than a year into his first term as president, Donald Trump publicly confronted a depressing reality. The traditions of Justice Department independence, he lamented in a radio interview, limited his ability to order an investigation of Hillary Clinton. It was 'the saddest thing,' he said. 'I'm not supposed to be doing the kind of things I would love to be doing, and I am very frustrated by it.' This time around, Trump is not similarly encumbered. During the interregnum between his terms, MAGA's would-be philosophers built out the intellectual architecture for a presidential takeover of the Justice Department. Once Trump was back in office, the new administration set about filling DOJ leadership with loyalists and firing anyone who might object to abuses of power. The president, insistent that he was the victim of persecution by federal law enforcement, now seeks to turn the same apparatus against his enemies. In a representative Truth Social post last month, he shared an AI-generated video of Barack Obama being handcuffed by FBI agents and dragged out of the Oval Office. But Trump's plan to leverage the DOJ for his campaign of revenge is not generating the results he might have hoped for, and not just because Obama remains a free man. The Justice Department has been slow to move forward with the investigations Trump demanded, hemmed in by the constraints of the legal system. Federal prosecutors targeting protesters and Democratic politicians have been dealt embarrassing defeats. American criminal law appears to be a less flexible tool in the hands of an authoritarian than Trump hoped—at least for now. Attorney General Pam Bondi identified herself right away as an enthusiastic participant in the president's personal-retribution project, launching a 'Weaponization Working Group' in February that would examine past investigations of Trump. In recent weeks, the department appears to have moved toward a potential criminal investigation of officials involved in the 2016 probe of Russian election interference. Outside the Justice Department, the Office of Special Counsel has opened an investigation into Jack Smith, the former special counsel who, from 2022 to 2024, oversaw the two federal criminal prosecutions of Trump for potential violations of the Hatch Act, which restricts political activities by government employees. (Despite its name, the Office of Special Counsel is an independent agency with no relationship to Smith's old shop.) Jonathan Chait: Trump's desperate move to quiet the Epstein scandal This is one model of law enforcement as a weapon: specific targeting of preexisting villains. Around the country, meanwhile, federal prosecutors handpicked by Trump are experimenting with another: cracking down on dissent. Anti-ICE protesters, and even Democratic elected officials pushing for oversight of immigration enforcement, have faced criminal charges. Attorney General Robert Jackson famously warned in 1940 that the federal prosecutor 'has more control over life, liberty, and reputation than any other person in America.' Still, prosecutorial authority has limits. A prosecutor has to find a crime to charge in the first place. If the offense is serious enough, the prosecutor must also be able to persuade a grand jury to issue an indictment. And if the defendant refuses to plead guilty, the prosecutor must persuade a petit jury to convict. These are far from insurmountable barriers; on the contrary, as criminal-justice reformers have long argued, the deck is stacked in favor of the prosecution. But the Trump administration keeps tripping up on them anyway. After June protests against ICE raids in Los Angeles, the office of Acting U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli filed more than 35 felony prosecutions, mostly for alleged assault of federal officers. But the Los Angeles Times and Bloomberg report that prosecutors were unable to persuade a grand jury to indict in several cases, as is required for felony charges. Court records show that in the weeks following the protests, the office moved to dismiss at least eight cases and downgraded another five to misdemeanors. (In one instance, the office charged a case as a felony, dropped it to a misdemeanor, and then recharged it as a felony a month and a half later, this time with an indictment in hand. Prosecutors have secured indictments in at least 12 cases, though two of those were later dismissed and a third indictment originally identified the defendant by the wrong name.) For context, in 2016, the last year for which data are available, the Bureau of Justice Statistics recorded only six refusals by grand juries out of roughly 180,000 cases pursued by federal prosecutors around the country. In more ordinary times, the old saying that a grand jury would indict a ham sandwich is not far off. On the opposite coast, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of New Jersey has dealt with an embarrassment of its own. The office's interim leader, Alina Habba (until recently one of Trump's personal lawyers), filed trespassing charges against Newark Mayor Ras Baraka after he attempted to visit an ICE detention facility in his city. 'NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW,' Habba trumpeted on X. Two weeks later, however, prosecutors moved to dismiss the charges. The magistrate judge handling the case chastened the office over its failure to 'thoughtfully consider the implications of your actions before wielding your immense power.' (Baraka, sitting in the courtroom during the hearing, was overheard commenting afterward, 'Jesus, he tore these people a new asshole.') Bondi, meanwhile, is struggling to respond to the president's demands to prosecute people involved in perpetrating what Trump calls the 'Russia hoax.' The biggest challenge there is that there was no hoax; as both Special Counsel Robert Mueller and a bipartisan Senate intelligence report concluded, Russia really did try to help Trump win the 2016 election. For that matter, even if the Justice Department could somehow identify a crime, any number of legal issues could trip up a prosecution—including the fact that the conduct in question took place almost 10 years ago, well past the typical five-year window for charging an offense. According to The New York Times, the attorney general was caught unawares by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's release of documents from 2016, and displeased about the political pressure from the right to launch an investigation in response. Despite an exciting headline from Fox News—'DOJ Launching Grand Jury Investigation Into Russiagate Conspiracy Allegations'—all Bondi appears to have done is ask prosecutors to possibly present grand jurors with evidence. When a grand jury will actually convene, and indeed whether it ever will, is not clear. Bondi's hedging on Russia hints at a broader awareness within the Justice Department that securing indictments, much less guilty verdicts, may be a problem. In May, Ed Martin, the crusading Trump supporter who is now leading the Justice Department's Weaponization Working Group, suggested that if the department were unable to charge 'bad actors' with crimes, it would settle for naming and shaming them publicly. (This would be a departure from long-running department policy, which holds that 'no legitimate governmental interest' is served by publicly voicing allegations against individuals without an accompanying criminal case.) Similarly, the investigation of Jack Smith might be a tacit admission of how little the administration has to go on here: The harshest penalty that the Office of Special Counsel could demand would be Smith's dismissal from government service, but he has already resigned. Shane Harris: The 'Russia hoax,' revisited These challenges are similar to ones that Trump ran into during his first term. In fact, the FBI's 2016 election-interference investigation was already the subject of an investigation by Special Counsel John Durham, which began in 2019. Despite MAGA hype, Durham's probe was a flop: He brought three criminal cases concerning alleged wrongdoing around the Russia investigation, two of which ended in acquittals by juries. (A third led to a former FBI lawyer being sentenced to probation after pleading guilty to having altered an email.) And a shaky criminal probe into former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, whom Trump had seized on as a symbol of the nefarious 'deep state,' quietly ground to a halt without charges being filed. It's difficult to say exactly what happened in the McCabe case because of strict rules around grand-jury secrecy, but one possibility is that jurors declined to issue an indictment. Still, the jury system will not always act as a defense against abuses. The same day that Baraka's case was dismissed, Habba announced her intent to indict Democratic Representative LaMonica McIver for 'forcibly impeding and interfering with federal officers' when attempting to shield Baraka from arrest. A grand jury returned the indictment. McIver has pleaded not guilty, but others might make different calculations: The overwhelming majority of criminal cases end with plea deals, because defendants decide against taking their chances in court. Meanwhile, the Justice Department recently sent out grand-jury subpoenas targeting New York Attorney General Letitia James over investigations by her office into Trump and the National Rifle Association. Fox News reports that another investigation may be under way into Trump's claims of supposed mortgage fraud by James and Democratic Senator Adam Schiff. Even if the harassment of James and Schiff goes nowhere, criminal investigations like these can be a grueling experience for the defendant, especially given the enormous cost of paying for a defense lawyer. A jury is in essence a democratic institution, requiring citizens to exercise their judgment in a model of shared deliberation that is at odds with Trump's autocratic tendencies. In the colonial era, grand juries sometimes refused to indict protesters against the Crown; in the decades before the Civil War, both grand and petit juries nullified prosecutions under the Fugitive Slave Act. Yet although the American jury system can be a powerful tool in the fight for self-government, it has not always been a reliable one. Juries also helped build the foundations of the Jim Crow South by shielding white Southerners from legal accountability for racial terror. So far, the system has held up against Trump's encroachment. But the rapid erosion of democratic life in the United States over the past six months is a reminder of how quickly things can change.


Fox News
13 minutes ago
- Fox News
DJ Daniel's father, Theodis, announces his campaign for TX-18
DJ Daniel, the 13-year-old with brain cancer who joined President Trump's joint address to Congress, has been honored by law enforcement agencies across the country. Now, his father, Theodis, is launching a congressional campaign.