
Trump and philippine leader plan to talk tariffs and china at the white house
Marcos' three-day visit shows the importance of the alliance between the treaty partners at a time when China is increasingly assertive in the South China Sea, where Manila and Beijing have clashed over the hotly contested Scarborough Shoal. Washington sees Beijing, the world's No. 2 economy, as its biggest competitor, and consecutive presidential administrations have sought to shift US military and economic focus to the Asia-Pacific in a bid to counter China. Trump, like others before him, has been distracted by efforts to broker peace in a range of conflicts from Ukraine to Gaza.
Tariffs also are expected to be on the agenda. Trump has threatened to impose 20 percent tariffs on Filipino goods on Aug. 1 unless the two sides can strike a deal. 'I intend to convey to President Trump and his Cabinet officials that the Philippines is ready to negotiate a bilateral trade deal that will ensure strong, mutually beneficial, and future-oriented collaborations that only the United States and the Philippines will be able to take advantage of,' Marcos said Sunday when he was departing for Washington, according to his office. Manila is open to offering zero tariffs on some US goods to strike a deal with Trump, finance chief Ralph Recto told local journalists.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt hinted that a trade agreement with the Philippines was in the works. 'Perhaps this will be a topic of discussion,' she told reporters Monday when asked about tariff negotiations. The White House said Trump will discuss with Marcos the shared commitment to upholding a free, open, prosperous, and secure Indo-Pacific. Before a meeting with Marcos at the Pentagon, Hegseth reiterated America's commitment to achieving peace through strength in the region. 'Our storied alliance has never been stronger or more essential than it is today, and together we remain committed to the mutual defense treaty,' Hegseth said Monday. 'And this pact extends to armed attacks on our armed forces, aircraft, or public vessels, including our Coast Guard, anywhere in the Pacific, including the South China Sea.'
Marcos, whose country is one of the oldest US treaty allies in the Pacific region, told Hegseth that the assurance to come to each other's mutual defense continues to be the cornerstone of that relationship, especially when it comes to defense and security cooperation. He said the cooperation has deepened since Hegseth's March visit to Manila, including joint exercises and US support in modernizing the Philippines' armed forces. Marcos thanked the US for support 'that we need in the face of the threats that our country is facing.' China, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei, and Taiwan have been involved in long-unresolved territorial conflicts in the South China Sea, a busy shipping passage for global trade. The Chinese coast guard has repeatedly used water cannon to hit Filipino boats in the South China Sea. China accused those vessels of entering the waters illegally or encroaching on its territory.
Hegseth told a security forum in Singapore in May that China poses a threat and the US is reorienting toward deterring aggression by Communist China. During Marcos' meeting Monday with Rubio, the two reaffirmed the alliance to maintain peace and stability in the region and discussed closer economic ties, including boosting supply chains, State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said. The US has endeavored to keep communication open with Beijing. Rubio and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi met this month on the sidelines of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations regional forum in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. They agreed to explore areas of potential cooperation and stressed the importance of managing differences.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Trump says Japan will invest $550 billion in US at his direction. It may not be a sure thing
President Donald Trump is bragging that Japan has given him, as part of a new trade framework, $550 billion to invest in the United States. It's an astonishing figure but still subject to negotiation and perhaps not the sure thing he's portraying. 'Japan is putting up $550 billion in order to lower their tariffs a little bit,' Trump said Thursday. 'They put up, as you could call it, seed money. Let's call it seed money.' He said 90 percent of any profits from the money invested would go to the US, even if Japan had put up the funds. 'It's not a loan or anything, it's a signing bonus,' the Republican president said on the trade framework that lowered his threatened tariff from 25 percent to 15 percent, including on autos. A White House official said the terms are being negotiated and nothing has been formalized in writing. The official, who insisted on anonymity to detail the terms of the talks, suggested the goal was for the $550 billion fund to make investments at Trump's direction. The sum is significant: It would represent more than 10 percent of Japan's entire gross domestic product. The Japan External Trade Organization estimates that direct investment into the US economy topped $780 billion in 2023. It is unclear the degree to which the $550 billion could represent new investment or flow into existing investment plans. What the trade framework announced Tuesday has achieved is a major talking point for the Trump administration. The president has claimed to have brought trillions of dollars in new investment into the US, though the impact of those commitments have yet to appear in the economic data for jobs, construction spending, or manufacturing output. The framework also enabled Trump to say other countries are agreeing to have their goods taxed, even if some of the cost of those taxes are ultimately passed along to US consumers. On the $550 billion, Japan's Cabinet Office said it involves the credit facility of state-affiliated financial institutions such as Japan Bank for International Cooperation. Further details would be decided based on the progress of the investment deals. Japanese trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa, upon returning to Japan, did not discuss the terms of the $550 billion investment. Akazawa said he believes a written joint statement is necessary, at least on working levels, to avoid differences. He is not thinking about a legally binding trade pact. The US apparently released its version of the deal while Japanese officials were on their return flight home. 'If we find differences of understanding, we may have to point them out and say that's not what we discussed,' Akazawa said. The US administration said the fund would be invested in critical minerals, pharmaceuticals, computer chips, and shipbuilding, among other industries. It has said Japan will also buy 100 airplanes from Boeing and rice from US farmers as part of the framework, which Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said would be evaluated every three months. 'And if the president is unhappy, then they will boomerang back to the 25 percent tariff rates, both on cars and the rest of their products. And I can tell you that I think at 25, especially in cars, the Japanese economy doesn't work,' Bessent told Fox News' 'The Ingraham Angle.' Akazawa denied that Bessent's quarterly review was part of the negotiations. 'In my past eight trips to the United States, during which I held talks with the president and the ministers,' Akazawa said, 'I have no recollection of discussing how we ensure the implementation of the latest agreement between Japan and the United States.' He said it would cause major disruptions to the economy and administrative processes if the rates first rise to 25 percent, as scheduled on August 1, and then drop to 15 percent. 'We definitely want to avoid that, and I believe that is the understanding shared by the US side,' he said. On buying US rice, Japanese officials have said they have no plans to raise the current 770,000-ton minimum access cap to import more from America. Agricultural Minister Shinjiro Koizumi said Japan will decide whether to increase US rice imports and that Japan is not committed to a fixed quota. Trump's commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, has suggested that the Japanese agreement is putting pressure on other countries, such as South Korea, to strike deals with the US. Trump, who is traveling in Scotland, plans to meet on Sunday with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen to discuss trade. 'Whatever Donald Trump wants to build, the Japanese will finance it for him,' Lutnick said Thursday on CNBC. 'Pretty amazing.'


Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
Modi's UK visit shows Europe is warming to India
It was not many years ago that Narendra Modi's reputation in Europe, and much of the rest of the world, was dogged by controversy surrounding his political past. However, the Indian prime minister is now widely feted internationally. This factor was highlighted, most recently, during Modi's state visit to the UK. Modi was accorded all the pomp that the UK state could muster, including a meeting with King Charles. The political icing on the cake was the signing with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer of the newly agreed India-UK trade deal that will boost bilateral trade on goods and services which was estimated at around £41 billion ($55 billion) in the 12 months through to September 2024, according to the UK government. The huge lure of India for the EU and much of the rest of the West is not just economic, tantalizing as the prospect is of a market projected, according to Morgan Stanley, as being on a pathway to surpass Japan and Germany to become the world's third-largest economy in coming years. This includes a middle-class consumer market expected to reach about 95 million by 2035, a number larger than the current population of every EU nation, including Germany. In addition, India is widely perceived in the West as a relatively friendly, long-term geopolitical ally. During the Cold War, India was aligned with the Soviet Union, and had a protectionist economy moving away from the colonial era. Yet, European and wider Western leaders regularly highlight that today there is a shared commitment to a rules-based global order, effective multilateralism, and sustainable development. There are also converging interests around shared defense mechanisms, including for maritime security in the Indian Ocean, where around 40 percent of bilateral trade passes. In the US, President Donald Trump would welcome a tariff and wider trade deal with Modi. However, it may be Europe that has been pushing hardest of any region for agreements with New Delhi. In March 2024, a trade agreement was signed by the four-member European Free Trade Association — Norway, Switzerland, Iceland, and Liechtenstein. This will trigger EFTA investment in India of about €95 billion ($111 billion) in a range of industries, including pharmaceuticals, machinery, and manufacturing. The deal arrived after almost 16 years of negotiations and will see India lifting key import tariffs on industrial goods from the four countries. The political icing on the cake was the signing with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer of the newly agreed India-UK trade deal. Andrew Hammond Next in line is the UK, which under several recent prime ministers, including Rishi Sunak and Starmer, has pushed hard for the deal that has now materialized. Of course, London and New Delhi have long had a unique relationship dating back to the British Empire and today's Commonwealth. What the new deal seeks to deliver is entrenching this in the context of a modern trade deal which can boost key UK sectors, including defense manufacturing, international investment — via the City of London — and technology, including telecoms. With the EFTA nations and the UK getting a deal done, the EU is also doubling down to secure an agreement with India. The seriousness with which Brussels takes India's economic opportunity was shown by the visit earlier this year of European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and the rest of the College of 27 Commissioners to India for the talks. This remarkably rare display of European political commitment to 'advance trade, economic security, and resilient supply chains, along with a common tech agenda and reinforced security and defense cooperation' helped kick-start resumption of India-EU negotiations on a proposed trade agreement. The massive EU market is India's largest single trading partner, with trade in goods valued at €124 billion in 2023, an increase of almost 90 percent in the past 10 years. About 6,000 European companies are located in India, providing 1.7 million jobs. One of the goals of the proposed new India-EU trade deal goal is enhancing collaboration on economic opportunities including digital transition and green technologies, including digital public infrastructure, and resilience of key value chains. What is remarkable in the current big European push toward trade deal-making with India is how much previous EU and UK concerns about human rights have been de-emphasized. Economics has come to dominate bilateral relations in a way that has been condemned by some nongovernmental organizations. To be sure, the Indian prime minister is now widely acclaimed not just in Europe, but in much of the wider world, too. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, for instance, even likened him to rock musician Bruce Springsteen at a Sydney event in 2023. This is much removed from the time when Modi's reputation was dogged by controversies surrounding his political past, especially in the period before he became prime minister. This includes treatment of religious minority groups by his Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party. More recently, Modi has also been walking a diplomatic tightrope between India's historical ally Russia and the West over the Ukraine war. He has, so far, declined to condemn the 2022 invasion by Moscow, while India snaps up discounted Russian oil that was previously consumed by European nations. Moreover, Russia continues to be one of India's largest arms suppliers. However, such controversies are likely to continue to be de-emphasized while the EU remains focused on its trade agreement with India. Following EFTA and the UK, Brussels now perceives a political window of opportunity for a deal to deliver deeper economic and geopolitical collaboration.

Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Trump says he is seeking a ceasefire between Thailand, Cambodia
US President Donald Trump said on Saturday he was calling the leaders of Cambodia and Thailand to press for a ceasefire as fighting along the border continued into a third day. 'The call with Cambodia has ended, but expect to call back regarding War stoppage and Ceasefire based on what Thailand has to say. I am trying to simplify a complex situation!' Trump wrote on his social media platform, adding that the call to Thailand's leader 'is being made momentarily.'