Meet the lawyers helping women fund their escape from domestic abuse
Jack O'Donnell and Andy O'Connor came up with the idea of a first-of-its-kind divorce and separation loan, based not on someone's income or credit score, but on their likely property settlement.
Three years on, the JustFund founders and co-CEOs have to date helped more than 2300 people – mainly women fleeing abusive relationships – and secured more than $1.3 billion in settlements.
'We'd come to realise after spending years working in it [law] that it is a really unfair system,' Mr O'Donnell told news.com.au.
'Unfortunately, we kept turning away really good people who deserved really good advice, simply because they couldn't afford our fees and that never seemed right to us,' he said.
The duo believe their offering separates them from traditional banks, with those in need able to pay them back after the settlement is finalised with the divided assets.
Mr O'Connor said traditional lenders will look at income and credit score when a loan is applied for, which can become difficult for those who don't work.
'For most people, that means it's a computer says no outcome for that request,' he said.
'It's in putting yourself in the shoes of the borrower, of a client going through separation, and understanding, a) how the product needs to work for their circumstances and b) looking at eligibility in an entirely different way.
'You can't take a copy paste approach to normal lending and apply it in this space.
'When someone's in the shoes of separating from their partner and they're staring at a lawyer charging six, seven, eight hundred dollars an hour, if they're fortunate, if they and their partner can reach a settlement very, quickly, very cheaply, that's great.
'But not everyone's as lucky as that, particularly when you throw into the mix the existence of increasing awareness of the prevalence of domestic violence and financial control.
'In particular, what we see in so many of the experience of our clients, is how the system can be weaponised and how financial imbalances can play out in the negotiation of a settlement for a client.'
JustFund takes a 'family law approach' to value the assets that will be divided between the parties and forms a view as to what share the borrower is likely to receive.
A borrower is able to access the approved funds within days, with the team of 18 lawyers able to move more quickly if someone's circumstances were urgent.
Mr O'Connell said the most important thing to do was to empower those going through a difficult relationship, domestic abuse or financial control to 'take control of their own futures'.
'The reality is barriers to access to funding are really significant in how those situations play out, and we hear time and time again from clients that our approval of their funding application is the difference between them being able to move out of their homes and situations,' he said.
In Australia, data shows that about one in six women have experienced financial abuse – a common form of family violence – from a former or current partner.
'This can include things like stopping someone from earning money, controlling finances or denying access to money,' a spokesperson for Safe and Equal told news.com.au.
'It also includes incurring debts in someone's name, stealing someone's possessions, or excluding someone from financial decisions that impact them.
'Economic abuse is particularly insidious because it keeps a victim survivor financially dependent on their perpetrator, trapped and unable to safely escape without facing immense financial stress or, in many cases, poverty and homelessness,' they said, adding that because the abuse can escalate after separation, many victim survivors feel like they must remain in the relationship for their own safety.
'If they do manage to safely escape, the impacts can be lifelong, causing significant stress and damage long after the relationship has ended.
'We see this a lot in cases where the perpetrator has accrued large debts in the victim survivor's name,' the spokesperson said.
Safe and Equal said many victim survivors are unable or unwilling to go through costly separation or divorce proceedings, particularly when their abuser has the financial means to weaponise court systems and keep them embroiled in expensive litigation processes as a form of 'punishment' – such as prolonging family court proceedings, hiding assets, stalling joint property or debt settlements, or not paying child support.
'Victim survivors will often settle for much less than what they are entitled to, just to avoid the ongoing control and abuse,' the spokesperson said.
'In many cases, they never fully recover financially.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
23 minutes ago
- ABC News
What the PM did and didn't say to President Xi Jinping
President Xi Jinping and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese have officially sat down together in China. It's the crown in the jewel of this week's diplomatic exercise, with friends (and enemies) across the world eager to hear what's been said, and what the results might be. Has the PM successfully walked the diplomatic tightrope? And on Australian soil former Treasury head Ken Henry has addressed the National Press Club, in the same week as FOI revelations from a Treasury report to the government on housing and tax threw up questions over whether lofty goals are reachable without major changes. Patricia Karvelas and David Speers break it all down on Politics Now. Got a burning question? Got a burning political query? Send a short voice recording to PK and Fran for Question Time at thepartyroom@

ABC News
39 minutes ago
- ABC News
Award-winning cotton grower John Norman jailed over $8.7 million water fraud
Former Australian cotton grower of the year John Norman has been sentenced to a maximum of nine and a half years in prison over his role in one of Australia's most significant water frauds. After a complex police investigation, seven years of backroom legal wrangling, and an eventual guilty plea, Brisbane District Court Judge Bernard Porter described the case as a "wide-ranging fraud" that had "exploited" small family businesses. Between 2010 and 2016, John Norman and his former chief financial officer pressured contractors to alter invoices — or changed invoices themselves — to fraudulently claim millions of dollars from a government scheme. As part of the Murray-Darling Basin Plan, the Queensland government's Healthy Headwaters program was designed to encourage farmers to invest in water efficiency measures. Funded by the Commonwealth, it allowed irrigators to apply for money to improve irrigation infrastructure on their properties in exchange for a portion of the water savings being transferred to the government for environmental use. The court heard Norman received almost $20 million through the scheme, including $8.7 million in fraudulent claims. Judge Porter said the fraud had brought the Healthy Headwaters scheme into disrepute and undermined faith in regulators. The case is understood to be among the most significant water frauds prosecuted in Australia.

News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Fugitive daughter Ashlyn Nassif seeks to have $150m fraud case thrown out of court
The glamorous daughter of a controversial property developer is hoping to get fraud charges relating to an alleged $150 million loan to help her father build one of Sydney's biggest apartment towers thrown out of court. Ashlyn Nassif, 30, is alleged to have falsified documents to meet a $10.5m pre-sale condition for three towers of the Skyview apartments complex in Castle Hill in Sydney's northwest. Her father Jean Nassif is believed to be on the run in Lebanon and while police have not charged him, officers have issued a warrant for his arrest. Ms Nassif did not appear in Burwood Local Court on Wednesday where her matter was briefly mentioned. The prosecution told Magistrate Robyn Denes they were seeking further time to consider a proposal by the defence, which was not opposed. NewsWire understands a 'no bill' application has been put forward by Ms Nassif's solicitor Warwick Korn, which the DPP is considering. A no bill application, or a no further proceedings application, is a request before the NSW Local Court to discontinue a criminal case, usually due to claims of insufficient evidence. In an earlier two-day hearing in April, Ms Nassif attended Burwood Local Court and cried as her solicitors told the court her fugitive father had 'left his daughter to fend for herself'. In the hearing before Burwood Local Court, a sacked Westpac employee who worked with Mr Nassif gave evidence. Graham Smith, a former relationship manager at Westpac who had worked with and maintained a professional relationship with Mr Nassif since 2009, was questioned at length about three 'private commercial dealings' with the fugitive. The court was told Mr Smith was allegedly paid a total of $150,000 for 'consultancy work' as well as an overseas holiday to the US along with his family. These dealings were not disclosed to his former employer Westpac, which Mr Smith conceded he 'knew was a conflict of interest'. Mr Smith told the court he had been 'generally' honest with his former employer during an internal investigation before he was sacked. Lawyers for Ms Nassif told NewsWire outside court after the hearing that the case had 'changed significantly', prompting the no bill application. Ms Nassif was first charged in February 2023 with dishonestly obtaining a financial advantage by deception and publishing false or misleading material and remains on conditional bail. She is yet to enter any pleas. Police allege Ms Nassif submitted fake contracts to Westpac over three months in 2021 to obtain a $150m loan to fund about 900 apartments. The $900m apartment tower complex was built by Mr Nassif's development company Toplace, which spectacularly collapsed late in 2023. The matter will return to court in September.