Federal judge says voiceover artists AI lawsuit can move forward
The judge's decision comes after a flood of cases from artists against artificial intelligence companies alleging misuse of their work to train AI models.The artists' attorney, Steve Cohen, has called the decision a "spectacular" victory for his clients, saying he was confident a future jury will "hold big tech accountable". Lawyers for Lovo had called the artists' allegations a "kitchen sink approach" saying the artists' claims failed to make an actionable claim against the company.The artists, a couple living in New York City, filed a proposed class action lawsuit in 2024 after learning alleged clones of their voices were for sale via Lovo's text-to-speech platform Genny.The couple claim they were separately approached by anonymous Lovo employees for voiceover work through the online freelance marketplace Fiverr.Lehrman was paid $1200 (around £890). Sage received $800 (almost £600).In messages shared with the BBC, the anonymous client can be seen saying Lehrman and Sage's voices would be used for "academic research purposes only" and "test scripts for radio ads" respectively.The anonymous messenger said the voiceovers would "not be disclosed externally and will only be consumed internally". Months later, while driving near their home in New York City, the couple listened to a podcast about the ongoing strikes in Hollywood and how artificial intelligence (AI) could affect the industry.This episode had a unique hook – an interview with an AI-powered chatbot, equipped with text-to-speech software. It was asked how it thought the use of AI would affect jobs in Hollywood.But, when it spoke, it sounded just like Mr Lehrman."We needed to pull the car over," Mr Lehrman told the BBC in an interview last year. "The irony that AI is coming for the entertainment industry, and here is my voice talking about the potential destruction of the industry, was really quite shocking."Upon returning home, the couple found voices with the names Kyle Snow and Sally Coleman available for use by paid Lovo subscribers.They later found Sage's alleged clone voicing a fundraising video for the platform –while Lehrman's had been used in an advertisement on the company's YouTube page.The company eventually removed the voices, saying both voices were not popular on the platform.The case is now set to move ahead in the US District Court in Manhattan.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
37 minutes ago
- The Sun
Major gaming crackdown blocks millions of console owners from playing top titles for free using dangerous loophole
SEVEN websites used by millions to illegally obtain popular games for free has been shut down in a major crackdown by the FBI. For more than four years, players were able to obtain pirated copies of upcoming titles days or weeks before official release. 3 3 Between February and May this year, there were 3.2million downloads on the sites alone. It's estimated that the operation resulted a loss of $170million / £126million to the gaming industry. The seven sites specifically made Nintendo Switch ROMs available, which users download and play from a hacked console or PC emulator. A message saying that the website "has been seized" by the FBI now appears on all of them. "This domain has been seized by the Federal Bureau of Investigation in accordance with seizure warrant issued pursuant to 18 U.S.C §§ 2323 issued by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia," it reads. The seven sites that have been shut down are: Nintendo recently beef up its rules threatening to render consoles "unusable" if they're found to be loading illegal software on them. The firm's user agreement states that you must not "bypass, modify, decrypt, defeat, tamper with, or otherwise circumvent any of the functions or protections of the Nintendo Account Services" or it may "render the Console and/or Software permanently unusable". Nintendo has also sued illegal ROM-sharing websites too. Last year, Tropic Haze, a popular Yuzu Nintendo Switch emulator developer, agreed to pay the the company $2.4million. The Sun tries new Nintendo Switch 2 and Mario Kart before it's out 3
Daily Mail
39 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Inside the Jeffrey Epstein death report and the TEN troubling questions the DOJ refuses to explain
Jeffrey Epstein 's jailhouse death remains one of the most hotly debated and widespread conspiracy theories in recent American history since he was found dead in his cell while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges in 2019. But the Trump administration's recent memo on the investigation has now reignited the firestorm after it reaffirmed that the disgraced financier's death was a suicide and the FBI was concluding its review. The decision has only continued to fuel public speculation of a cover-up that suggests Epstein was murdered in order to protect other high-profile individuals that were potentially complicit in his crimes. It has also led to a re-examination of a damning 2023 report by the DOJ's own Office of Inspector General (OIG) which laid out the shocking failures and procedural breakdowns that allowed Epstein to take his own life at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan on August 10, 2019. has revisited the explosive 128-page report, which raises serious contradictions with the DOJ's recent claims and blames 'a combination of negligence, misconduct and outright job performance failures' by the Bureau of Prisons. At the heart of the controversy are these ten troubling questions that Attorney General Pam Bondi - who's already facing backlash Trump supporters for her handling of the case - must answer about Epstein's mysterious death. 1. Why was Epstein allowed to have two blankets and two extra mattresses the day before he was found dead? The most damning detail in the OIG report is that Epstein was given two additional blankets and two more mattresses just one day before his death. Epstein's death being ruled a suicide had been hotly debated since the news broke but the Justice Department and FBI's recent memo confirming that their findings are in line with the manner of death has reignited cover-up allegations That day, August 9, 2019, another inmate, identified as 'Inmate 3' told the investigators that correction officers brought the mattresses in and put them on the floor. Epstein put them on the right side of the cell. Inmate 3 also noticed the extra blankets which he thought was 'unusual because none of the (other) inmates had extra blankets' The report states: 'Inmate 3 said he asked Epstein to please not kill himself or hang himself while Inmate 3 was his cellmate because Inmate 3 had a chance to go home soon. 'Epstein told Inmate 3 not to worry and that he was not going to cause Inmate 3 any trouble'. The following day, after Inmate 3 had been moved out of the cell, Epstein was found hanged with a bedsheet around his neck inside his cell. The captain in charge of the SHU later reviewed photos from inside Epstein's cell and found there were 'too many linens, t-shirts and blankets' there. Having too many such materials in the room was a security issue as inmates could use them to try and escape or to make 'improvised nooses', the captain said. 2. Why were staff intimidated by Epstein? Inmate 3 told the OIG that correctional officers were on 'eggshells' around Epstein who had told them that if they refused his requests he would write down their names and give them to his lawyer. As a result Epstein was allowed to sleep on the floor which was not normal practice and could have explained why he was allowed to have the extra blanket and sheets. Another irregularity was that the day he left Epstein's cell, there was an orange cloth twisted around the ladder on the bunk which was a clothesline made up of a ripped sheet. The report states: 'According to Inmate 3, one night he woke up, saw Epstein fidgeting with the clothesline, and asked Epstein what he was doing. 'Epstein said he was trying to fix the clothesline, but Inmate 3 told him no and flushed the clothesline down the toilet'. 3. What happened to the missing minute of surveillance footage? As part of its memo released this week, the DOJ and FBI released 11 hours of footage from one of the security cameras showing the common area of the SHU that Epstein was housed in. However, observers noted that one minute of footage was missing, sparking a slew of conspiracy theories and memes, including one which showed Hillary Clinton going into one of the cells. The footage showed the SHU from 1:59 pm on August 9, 2019 to 12am the next day. Epstein died some time that night. Attorney General Pam Bondi tried to explain the missing minute during a cabinet meeting when Trump was present. She said that the Bureau of Prisons told her that the 60 seconds between 11:59pm and 12am is missing from all recordings in the prison because the footage is 'reset' each night. Bondi said the video system was from 1999 and so it resets every night and every night one minute was missing. She said: 'So we're looking for that video to release that as well, showing that a minute is missing every night' In its memo, the DOJ and FBI leaned heavily on the video footage to support their statement that Epstein did commit suicide. They wrote: 'Anyone entering or attempting to enter the tier where Epstein's cell was located from the SHU common area would have been captured by this footage. 'The FBI's independent review of this footage confirmed that from the time Epstein was locked in his cell at around 10:40 pm on August 9, 2019, until around 6:30am the next morning, nobody entered any of the tiers in the SHU' 4. Why were the cameras covering the door to Epstein's cell streaming but not recording? A stunning graphic in the OIG report reveals that the camera in the hallway where Epstein's cell was located was not even recording. The camera was streaming to the guards but was not recording so could not be reviewed afterwards. The footage released by the DOJ and FBI came from the camera in the common area of the SHU, so Epstein's cell was barely visible. The OIG report details a catalog of technical issues with the surveillance camera system. On August 8th, two days before Epstein was found dead, the Bureau of Prisons discovered that one of the two DVR recording systems was not working. In fact it had been out of action since July 29, nearly two weeks earlier, but hadn't been picked up until then. The technician who inspected the system found that of the 150 cameras in the prison, half were showing a live feed but were not recording. The report stated: 'The Electronics Technician told the OIG that, before Epstein's death, no one was specifically tasked with ensuring that video from the cameras was being recorded. 'The Electronics Technician said he therefore did not perform any daily checks to ensure that video was being recorded'. The technician arrived at the MCC at 6am on August 10th to repair the DVR system but shortly afterwards, the alarm went off to say that staff had found Epstein's body. 5. Was the footage of Epstein's death doctored? A report in Wired last week claimed that the 11 hours of footage was 'modified', likely using editing software Adobe Premiere Pro. The report said that the footage, which Wired forensically examined, had been put together 'from at least two source clips, saved multiple times, exported, and then uploaded to the DOJ's website'. There it was presented as 'raw' footage but that was not the case, the metadata of the video shows. One lawyer quoted by Wired said: 'If a lawyer brought me this file and asked if it was suitable for court, I'd say no. Go back to the source. Do it right. Do a direct export from the original system - no monkey business'. 6. Why was Epstein not properly monitored despite trying to kill himself two weeks before his death? Two weeks before his death, on July 23rd 2019, Epstein was found in his cell with an orange cloth around his neck and his cellmate told prison staff he had tried to kill himself. BOP policy requires that inmates identified as suicide risks be 'placed on suicide watch until no longer at imminent risk', the OIG report states. But instead the BOP used a 'less restrictive' way of monitoring him. That meant Epstein was removed from suicide watch the next day and remained under psychological observation until July 30th. The prison psychologist who examined Epstein determined he needed to be housed with another inmate and emailed more than 70 MCC employees telling them about this requirement. Epstein was indeed given a cellmate, Inmate 3, and he remained in Epstein's cell until August 9, the day before he was found dead. This was in spite of more than 2,000 pages of damning documents being unsealed that very day which painted the fullest picture yet of Epstein's abuse of underage girls stretching back decades. The documents would have made clear to Epstein the scale of the case against him and how likely he was to be found guilty if the case had gone to trial. 7. Why was the charges against the negligent prison guards dropped? Epstein's previous suicide attempt meant he was supposed to be under strict supervision in his cell. But the night he died, the two correctional officers assigned to monitor him,failed to carry out 75 mandatory checks on him. He was locked in his cell at 8pm on August 9 and found dead at 6:30am the following day when the guards went to serve him breakfast. Records show the last time one of the two guards checked on Epstein was 10pm when they plugged in a medical device for him. The two guards, Michael Thomas and Tova Noel, were later charged with fabricating records but prosecutors decided to drop the case in December 2021. They admitted to 'willfully and knowingly' falsifying records to make it seem like they were doing proper checks on Epstein and agreed to perform 100 hours of community service. As the OIG report states, the pair were sitting at their station 15 feet away from Epstein's cell surfing the Internet instead of watching him. The report states: 'Noel used the computer periodically throughout the night, including to search the Internet for furniture sales and benefit websites and to read a news article about Epstein. 'Thomas used the computer briefly around 1 am and 6 am to search for motorcycle sales and sports news'. The report adds that between 1 am and 3 am both the guards appeared to be asleep. One of the reasons they were so tired is that one of them had been forced to work a 16-hour double shift and the other volunteered to work the night shift, having already done many hours of overtime that week. From Epstein's cell window, he could have been able to see if the guards were asleep. 8. Why was Epstein allowed to call his girlfriend the night before he died? In a breach of BOP policy, Epstein was allowed to use an unmonitored jail phone which was not recorded. Epstein claimed to have been calling his mother but it later transpired he was calling Karyna Shuliak, his much younger Belarussian girlfriend, who was with him when he was arrested after flying to New York from Paris. Shuliak had been with Epstein for years and, bizarrely, was a trained dentist: his victims have said that he would do work on their teeth if they were not to his taste. 9. Why was Epstein allowed to transfer money into other inmates' commissary accounts? A report into Epstein's death by the New York Times claimed it could have been used to 'buy protection'. Epstein had been putting money into at least three other inmates' accounts, which are normally used to buy discretionary items while inside prison. 10. Why was Epstein's psychological evaluation after his first suicide attempt just five minutes? The same New York Times report said that Epstein met with a therapist for just five minutes during one of his post suicide attempt check ups. Epstein's lawyer David Schoen even joked with Epstein and the therapist about how short the meeting had been.
Daily Mail
44 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Sabrina Carpenter mocked by Lolita actress as she questions singer's copycat denial after backlash
Lolita actress Dominique Swain has seemingly accused Sabrina Carpenter of copying an iconic scene from the film – despite the singer having previously denied taking any inspiration. Dominique, 44, portrayed Lolita in the 1997 adaptation of Vladimir Nabokov's 1955 novel of the same name, starring alongside Jeremy Irons as Professor Humbert Humbert. Directed by Adrian Lyne and written by Stephen Schiff, the movie follows Humbert Humbert, who is sexually obsessed with 12-year-old Lolita. Taking to Instagram on Sunday, actress Dominique hinted that Sabrina took inspiration from the film in a previous photoshoot by Zoë Ghertner for W magazine. In a post uploaded to her profile, she shared a side-by-side comparison of two photos: one of Sabrina lying in grass under a sprinkler, and a movie still of Dominique doing the same thing. Captioning the post, she asked: 'Hmmmm, does this look familiar? @sabrinacarpenter.' Social media users rallied around Dominique and also pointed out how glaringly similar Sabrina's shoot was to the film scene, with one going as far as saying it was 'fully intentional.' Taking to the comments, one said: 'She won't admit it!! She said it wasn't her choice but the photographers?? Like girl it's an iconic scene, I know you know!' 'It's cowardly to take clear inspiration from such an iconic film and performance and then turn around and say "it was never on my mood board and never will be" like what?? 'Especially when the aesthetic and energy are being capitalized on,' another said. 'Give Dominique her flowers.' A third said: 'Oh it's fully intentional.' 'Same dress color and everything same pose same lighting same set up like the only thing missing is the braids,' another observed. A fifth penned: 'People are allowed to take inspiration from any movie or book they wish. Where she went wrong was denying this was inspired by Lolita. Just own it!' Sabrina recently defended the photo from her September 2024 W magazine spread after similar comparisons were made on social media. TikTok user @arcafan999 re-shared a side-by-side comparison of two photos. The post was captioned, 'gross,' and the social media user asked in a video, 'What the eff is this?' Sabrina denied the Lolita inspiration, writing in the comments: 'I've never seen this movie. It's never been on my mood board and never would be.' However, the critic didn't back down and instead doubled down on the judgement. In a comment that has garnered nearly 9,000 likes, the person quoted a line from Sabrina's song Nonsense, which she tweaked for a Mexican audience while on tour, writing: '"Fully grown but I look like a niña," yeah sure.' Per an account from Billboard, the complete lyric Sabrina used in the show was: 'I'm full grown but I look like a niña/Come put something big in my casita/Mexico, I think you are bonita!' Singer-songwriter Sabrina has largely used her sex appeal to market her music and keep fans tantalized. It's never been more evident than throughout her Short n' Sweet Tour, which kicked off last September and runs through this November. Audiences have come to expect simulated sex acts and cheekily engineered lyrics from the petite performer during the stage show. Footage from the set contain concertgoers reveling during these moments, but Sabrina has also received criticism for the NSFW display. Addressing the hate in her RS cover story, Carpenter noted that the sex-centric songs are the ones most beloved by fans. 'It's always so funny to me when people complain,' she said. 'They're like, "All she does is sing about this." But those are the songs that you've made popular. Clearly you love sex. You're obsessed with it.' Referencing one song in particular, she added: 'It's in my show. There's so many more moments than the "Juno" positions, but those are the ones you post every night and comment on. I can't control that. 'If you come to the show, you'll [also] hear the ballads, you'll hear the more introspective numbers.' The music artist reflected: 'I find irony and humor in all of that, because it seems to be a recurring theme. I'm not upset about it, other than I feel mad pressure to be funny sometimes.'
