Wetin we know about new militant group Mahmuda for Kwara state
Recently, dem don dey attack plenty communities wey dey under Kaiama and Baruten local govment areas for di state.
Some reports even tok say di gunmen don dey hide for Lake National Park, from wia dem dey launch attack for both Kwara and Niger states.
Pipo for Kwara tok say di group don dey di region since 2020, and as time dey go, dem begin get ground well well and turn to strong force.
Dia attacks make many pipo begin dey run comot from dia homes go nearby villages wey dem believe say e safe pass.
For one interview wit one resident from Baruten local goment area, Seko Jibril tell BBC News Pidgin say dem suspect say some of di armed men na Boko Haram members wey escape from North East Nigeria sake of constant attack from Nigerian Army.
According to am "Dis new group, we believe say dem come from North East Nigeria, and some of dem na Boko Haram members wey run comot from dat region come our state."
Jibril still add say "Dem don dey for ground for Kwara since 2020, and na from dia dem begin attack and colonise some villages."
E also tok say di way Mahmuda militant group dey operate resemble Boko Haram style, sake say dem dey kill and slaughter pipo anytime dem attack.
"Dia operation just like Boko Haram own dem go attack, kill, and slaughter pipo."
Howeva, e mention say di communities wey suffer pass say na places like Karunji and Kermanji wey dey Baruten local goment, wia di attacks don turn nightmare for pipo.
"Dem don bring serious wahala for our pipo, plenty pipo from Karunji and Kermanji don run comot sake of fear. Dem don relocate go Chikanda, Ure, Kayama for safety."
Jibril add say "Di Mahmuda militants go enter community, kill pipo, shoot dem, carry dia money, food, and any oda valuable wey dem fit find."
E add say some weeks back, di militants retreat wen Nigerian military and local vigilante group face dem wit fire as dem try attack one community.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
3 days ago
- The Independent
US approves potential $346 million weapons sale to Nigeria to bolster security
The U.S. State Department approved a possible $346 million weapons sale to Nigeria to help improve security in the sub-Saharan country, the Pentagon said Wednesday. Congress was notified and would need to approve the sale, the Defense Security Cooperation Agency said in a statement. The agency is a division of the Department of Defense body that provides technical assistance and oversees transfers of defense equipment. The weapons requested by Nigeria include munitions, bombs and rockets. A resurgence of attacks by Boko Haram, Nigeria's homegrown jihadist group, has shaken Nigeria's northeast. The group took up arms in 2009 to fight Western education and impose its radical version of Islamic law. In recent months, Islamic extremists have repeatedly overrun military outposts, mined roads with bombs and raided civilian communities, raising fears of a possible return to the peak insecurity of the Boko Haram era despite the military's claims of success against them. The conflict, which has spread into Nigeria's northern neighbors, has claimed about 35,000 civilian lives and displaced more than 2 million people in the country's northeastern region, according to the U.N. Apart from the insurgency in the northeast, Africa's most populous country also faces serious security challenges in the north-central and northwest regions, where hundreds have been killed and injured in recent months. 'The proposed sale will improve Nigeria's capability to meet current and future threats through operations against terrorist organizations and to counter illicit trafficking in Nigeria and the Gulf of Guinea,' the Pentagon said Wednesday. 'There will be no adverse impact on U.S. defense readiness as a result of this proposed sale.' In the past 10 years, Nigeria has bought military equipment from the U.S. on several occasions. Most recently, the U.S. approved a $997-million weapons sale in 2022.
Spectator
4 days ago
- Spectator
What the Quran has to say about slavery
Slavery is one of the oldest and most persistent institutions of humankind. It was already well established four millennia ago when it was mentioned in the Epic of Gilgamesh. Today it has been formally abolished almost everywhere, but there are still reckoned to be some 30 million people living in some form of forced labour. For most of human history slavery was regarded as an economic necessity, one of many relationships of dependence which were accepted as facts of life. The current obsession with British and American involvement has concentrated attention on the Atlantic slave trade. This has masked the involvement of other significant actors. Foremost among them are the Islamic kingdoms of the Middle East. Islamic slavery is poorly documented. Anecdotal evidence is plentiful but may be untypical. Reliable statistics are scarce. But there is little doubt that the slave markets of North Africa and Constantinople were for centuries by far the largest in the world. Justin Marozzi's Captives and Companions is a successful attempt to fill this gap. The Quran has a lot to say about slavery. It deprecates the ill-treatment of slaves and attaches a high moral value to their emancipation. But it acknowledges the legitimacy of slavery and of the sexual exploitation of enslaved women. When challenged by European powers in the 19th century, Islamic rulers often cited the authority of their faith. In our own day, the so-called Islamic State in Syria and Iraq, and Boko Haram in northern Nigeria, have both justified their revival of slavery and forced concubinage on the founding texts of Islam. The Arabs, like later generations of Europeans, looked down on black Africans as inferiors for whom slavery was thought to be a natural fate. But, unlike Atlantic slavery, which was exclusively sourced from sub-Saharan Africa, Islamic slavery was racially indiscriminate. North African corsairs enslaved Europeans captured at sea and in coastal raids on Europe. The Crimean Tartars trafficked slaves captured in eastern Europe to the shores of the Bosphorus and the Black Sea. There were many thousands of these white slaves, to be commemorated in 19th-century Europe in escape narratives and sub-erotic orientalist paintings. North Africa and the Levant were not plantation economies. Most slaves sold into the markets of the Islamic world probably ended up in cities, employed in small businesses, public works, domestic households or concubinage. There is some evidence that a majority were women and girls. Theirs was usually a wretched existence. Islamic slavery, however, had some unique features which enabled a few slaves to achieve high status. One route was the harems of the great. Roxelana, the powerful and manipulative wife of the 16th-century sultan Suleiman the Magnificent, was a Ruthenian slave (from modern Poland). But the main route to social ascent was the army. Turkic slaves fought in the armies of the Abbasid caliphate (7th to 13th centuries), some of whom overthrew their Arab masters and founded local dynasties of their own. The Mamluks, a corps of Turkic slave soldiers, took over Egypt in the 13th century and ruled it until the beginning of the 19th. Between the 15th and the 17th centuries, the Ottomans regularly enslaved Greek children in their Balkan provinces, to be converted to Islam and assigned to the corps of Janissaries or the civil service. Some of these ethnic Greeks rose to the highest positions in the state. It is easy to understand when one reads Marozzi's book why the conservative societies of the Middle East proved to be so resistant to the abolition of slavery. Lord Ponsonby, for many years Queen Victoria's ambassador in Constantinople, reported that when he conveyed his government's objections to slavery to the sultan, he was 'heard with extreme astonishment, accompanied by a smile at the proposition for destroying an institution closely interwoven with the frame of society'. Slavery in the Americas was different and harsher. The slaves were not 'closely interwoven with the frame of society'. The plentiful supply of land and comparatively small number of European settlers made the Americas dependent on the forced labour of the indigenous populations and, increasingly, on imported slaves to cultivate labour-intensive crops such as cotton, tobacco and sugar. Although American slavery involved some incidental domestic service and concubinage, the destination of the great majority was the brutal, self-contained world of the plantations. David Eltis's Atlantic Cataclysm deals with the trade which supplied this world with slaves. The subject is a minefield for scholars, for much that has been written about it is vitiated by the tendentious selection of material to serve a modern political agenda. Eltis's book avoids this vice. It is a careful study of the economics of the Atlantic slave trade and its impact on all three continents involved. The words 'economic analysis' will probably cause most general readers to run a mile, but that would be a mistake. For this is a readable and important book. It makes systematic use for the first time of the enormous databases of information about slave voyages, slavers and slaves compiled over the past 40 years. Eltis is certainly not an apologist for slavery or the slave trade. But he debunks many of the influential myths which have grown up around the trade since the publication in 1944 of Eric Williams's polemical but influential Capitalism and Slavery. Williams argued that the profits of slavery supplied the capital for Britain's industrial revolution and made possible its subsequent prosperity, and that slavery was only abolished because it later became unprofitable. He despised Wilberforce and his allies, and denied that abolition was a moral movement. Even given the material available to him, these arguments were hard to sustain. Eltis's analysis of the plentiful data on English slave businesses convincingly demonstrates that slavery was in fact profitable right up to the end, but that the profits were a tiny proportion of Britain's trading wealth, far too small to account for her industrialisation. Abolition does seem to have been a moral, not an economic, movement, driven by the evangelical revival of the late 18th century. There is a corresponding theory about the African end of the trade, which is in a sense the obverse of the Williams argument. It holds that just as the slave trade boosted the economic development of Britain, it exploited the African kingdoms which supplied the slaves, leading to the 'underdevelopment' of Africa. The consequences are said to have held back the continent to this day. This is a more difficult proposition to prove or disprove, because so little can be reliably known about pre-colonial Africa. But it is implausible. The traffic was never large enough to significantly depopulate the African kingdoms. The evidence marshalled by Eltis suggests that the African middlemen who alone could supply the slaves knew their market power and dealt on equal terms with their European counterparts. There are many possible explanations for the under-development of Africa but a trade which ended a century and a half ago is unlikely to be one of them. Eltis has done an unusual thing. He has reset the agenda in his field. It will no doubt make him enemies in all the right places.
Reuters
4 days ago
- Reuters
Nearly 600 killed in Nigeria airstrikes in eight months, air force says
LAGOS, Aug 13 (Reuters) - Nigeria's military has killed 592 armed militia members in the northeastern sate of Borno in the past eight months, after stepping up air strikes in a region hit by years of violence, the air force said. The results surpassed the operational gains recorded in 2024, Chief of Air Staff Hasan Abubakar said during a visit to Borno Governor Babagana Zulum on Tuesday. Abubakar said the air force also destroyed more than 200 technical vehicles and 166 logistics hubs in a sweeping offensive against insurgents in the northeast. Militants from Boko Haram and its splinter group, Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP), have attacked security forces and civilians in Nigeria's northeast, causing widespread displacement and thousands of deaths. Militia gangs in Borno State have killed at least 2,000 people since 2023, according to Nigeria Watch, a database that monitors lethal conflicts and security in the country. "This year, our air war is faster, sharper and more surgical," Abubakar said. "We are taking out high-value targets, crippling logistics networks and dismantling cells that threaten peace in the northeast." Confidence MacHarry, Senior Analyst at research consultancy SBM Intelligence in Lagos, said it was hard to independently verify how effective the air campaign had been. "However, the reality on the ground shows that the military's claim of success pales in comparison to gains and successful attacks carried out by the leading Boko Haram factions in Borno since the renewed ISWAP offensive was launched late 2024," he told Reuters. Abubakar said the operation involved coordinated day-and-night air strikes across key locations in the state, including Gonori, Rann, Dikwa, Damboa, Azir and Mallam Fatori. He said it was bolstered by A-29 Super Tucano aircraft capable of precision and night missions, Mi-171 helicopters for medical evacuation and logistics, and enhanced surveillance platforms for round-the-clock target tracking. A newly acquired Mi-35 gunship is expected to further strengthen close-air support for ground forces, Abubakar said. He said Nigerian Air Force aircraft flew 798 combat sorties and logged over 1,500 operational flight hours under Operation Hadin Kai, Nigeria's military's counterinsurgency operation in the northeast. This week, the military said it killed scores of armed gang members in a joint air and ground operation in Zamfara, northwest Nigeria, after more than 400 of them were seen preparing to attack a village in the state.
