
Former Calgary councillor rewarded costs in court battle with development family
Council amended its indemnification policy at its Feb. 8, 2021 meeting. Terrigno, in his lawsuit, argued that Farrell violated Section 172(1) of the MGA by voting for the amendment to be discussed in closed session at that meeting, claiming she had a pecuniary interest in the matter due to her use of the indemnity fund.
Article content
Angotti did concede in her memorandum of decision that 'it is undisputed' that Farrell had a pecuniary interest, but noted she had declared the conflict properly and abstained from voting on the amendment itself.
Article content
'Ms. Farrell denies that she did or failed to do anything that violated the MGA, as she properly declared her pecuniary interest,' Angotti wrote. 'She believes that Mr. Terrigno is bringing this application for vindictive reasons or simply to obtain costs.'
Article content
After Farrell resigned from her council seat ahead of the 2021 election, the Terrignos sought a declaration that their application be deemed moot, because it would entitle them to apply to recover costs against Farrell.
Article content
In 2023, Justice Michel Bourque ruled the fact Farrell was no longer on council did not make the Terrignos' application to force her resignation moot.
Article content
But while Farrell will be awarded costs for the indemnification suit, the defamation action from the Terrignos against her remains active.
Article content
Mike Terrigno, in a statement Friday, said the family is pleased the judge's decision confirmed that Farrell 'breached her duties as a councillor in preferring her own financial interest over her duties to the public.'
Article content
He added he expects the defamation action against her to go to trial in 2026.
Article content
'Our family is looking forward to having this matter behind us as it has caused serious harm to our family which is the basis of the lawsuit,' he wrote.
Article content
'We are particularly concerned that taxpayer funds are being used to defend Ms. Farrell for her malicious and defamatory statements about our family although the whistle-blowers who have come forward to give evidence against her clearly remember the defamatory statements she made to them.'
Article content
Article content
Striking the opposite tone, a statement from Farrell's legal counsel said Angotti's decision reflects that the former councillor's violation of the MGA was merely technical and committed in good faith.
Article content
'The court dismissed all of Mr. Terrigno's many other allegations against her,' the statement read, noting that because Farrell was found to be the winning party, the court awarded costs against Terrigno for bringing this action in the first place.
Article content
'Ms. Farrell will continue to defend herself against any and all claims that she acted inappropriately or allegations that she caused anyone damages.'
Article content
In early 2024, the Terrigno family resurrected their plans to develop on the site of their former restaurant in Kensington.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
2 days ago
- CTV News
Israeli flag installed outside town hall in Hampstead, Que. stirs local debate
Outside the Hampstead Town Hall, the addition of the flag of Israel is raising concerns among some residents. The Israeli flag has flown outside Hampstead's town hall since October 2023 — and it's getting mixed reactions from residents of the Montreal suburb. Among them is 25-year-old Adam Ben David, who says the flag doesn't belong on the municipal property. 'I think it's inflammatory to have a foreign flag that is not representative of every single person in this community, which is very diverse,' he said in an interview. The flag replaced Hampstead's municipal banner, taking its place alongside the Canadian and Quebec flags. Mayor Jeremy Levi told CTV News the move was suggested by the town's then–director general and supported by council. 'Every other government across the world had done so,' Levi said. 'We never told the DG how to do it or to remove the Hampstead flag. If Hampstead residents feel so patriotic towards the Hampstead flag, we can always install a fourth flagpole — I just don't think it's a great use of resources.' Residents split on the issue For some residents, the flag is a symbol of solidarity, but for others it's an inappropriate political statement for municipal grounds. CTV News approached several people outside town hall and in a nearby park, but the vast majority declined to speak publicly. Among those who did, opinions were divided. One woman, who asked not to be identified, said she supports keeping the flag. She described it as a sign of support, acknowledging how many communities in the Middle East are going through tragic times. 'I see nothing wrong in putting it up because it's reflecting that there's something terrible going on in Israel and we're all in mourning for that situation, collectively,' she said. Sisters Keren and Bénédicte Paka, who have lived in Hampstead for two years, saw it differently. 'It's problematic because there are many international students here, international workers, Quebecers and other people — I don't think it has its place here,' said Keren. Bénédicte added: 'I think to make everyone feel comfortable, the flag should be taken down — so that each person feels free and not oppressed by one community or another.' While there's division, Levi has been clear that he will not remove the flag. 'It doesn't matter to me if there's two signatures or 2,000 signatures,' he wrote in a statement to CTV News. 'My position will not change.' He also said he has never received a formal complaint from residents about it and, on the contrary, has received 'many compliments.' Petition for flag removal Ben David began knocking on doors this summer to build support for removing the flag. He has gathered roughly 40 signatures so far and said he plans to continue canvassing as the weather cools. 'The Israeli flag represents a whole host of things: politically, religiously, ethnically,' Ben David said. 'In my opinion, it's unfair for the mayor to hoist it on behalf of 7,000 people — because a flag can incite all sorts of things: happiness and joy, but also fear and despair.' Ben David told CTV News that some residents who agreed with him refused to sign publicly. 'They're afraid of either being chastised by the mayor or other people in our community,' he said, emphasizing that 'it's an incredibly difficult time to be Jewish.' He also questioned why the flag needed to remain permanently. 'I don't understand why it has to be permanent considering that we are a diverse plurality here,' he said. For his part, Levi rejected the allegation that residents feared harassment. 'I have never harassed or shamed a private resident and would never do so,' Levi wrote, adding that he believed the petition was politically motivated ahead of municipal elections in less than three months. He said residents who want the flag removed should take it up with council, which holds the vote. He insisted he will 'never back down from supporting Israel and the Jewish community,' adding: 'If residents are unhappy with that position, November 2, 2025, is their chance to make a change.' It's a position Levi also made clear in a post on X in late July, in which he wrote: 'I will never take down the Israeli flag, if that's a problem for you, vote me out next election.' Despite him standing firm on the decision, others, like Ben David, say they intend to push forward with their demand for the flag to come down. Ben David said he intends to bring the matter to town council next week. With the latest census data showing about 40 per cent of Hampstead residents are not Jewish, the flag remains a lightning rod in the small, predominantly Jewish suburb.


Calgary Herald
2 days ago
- Calgary Herald
Former Calgary councillor rewarded costs in court battle with development family
Article content Council amended its indemnification policy at its Feb. 8, 2021 meeting. Terrigno, in his lawsuit, argued that Farrell violated Section 172(1) of the MGA by voting for the amendment to be discussed in closed session at that meeting, claiming she had a pecuniary interest in the matter due to her use of the indemnity fund. Article content Angotti did concede in her memorandum of decision that 'it is undisputed' that Farrell had a pecuniary interest, but noted she had declared the conflict properly and abstained from voting on the amendment itself. Article content 'Ms. Farrell denies that she did or failed to do anything that violated the MGA, as she properly declared her pecuniary interest,' Angotti wrote. 'She believes that Mr. Terrigno is bringing this application for vindictive reasons or simply to obtain costs.' Article content After Farrell resigned from her council seat ahead of the 2021 election, the Terrignos sought a declaration that their application be deemed moot, because it would entitle them to apply to recover costs against Farrell. Article content In 2023, Justice Michel Bourque ruled the fact Farrell was no longer on council did not make the Terrignos' application to force her resignation moot. Article content But while Farrell will be awarded costs for the indemnification suit, the defamation action from the Terrignos against her remains active. Article content Mike Terrigno, in a statement Friday, said the family is pleased the judge's decision confirmed that Farrell 'breached her duties as a councillor in preferring her own financial interest over her duties to the public.' Article content He added he expects the defamation action against her to go to trial in 2026. Article content 'Our family is looking forward to having this matter behind us as it has caused serious harm to our family which is the basis of the lawsuit,' he wrote. Article content 'We are particularly concerned that taxpayer funds are being used to defend Ms. Farrell for her malicious and defamatory statements about our family although the whistle-blowers who have come forward to give evidence against her clearly remember the defamatory statements she made to them.' Article content Article content Striking the opposite tone, a statement from Farrell's legal counsel said Angotti's decision reflects that the former councillor's violation of the MGA was merely technical and committed in good faith. Article content 'The court dismissed all of Mr. Terrigno's many other allegations against her,' the statement read, noting that because Farrell was found to be the winning party, the court awarded costs against Terrigno for bringing this action in the first place. Article content 'Ms. Farrell will continue to defend herself against any and all claims that she acted inappropriately or allegations that she caused anyone damages.' Article content In early 2024, the Terrigno family resurrected their plans to develop on the site of their former restaurant in Kensington.


Cision Canada
2 days ago
- Cision Canada
Investing in water infrastructure improvements on Vancouver Island Français
SAYWARD, BC, /CNW/ - Two communities on Vancouver Island are receiving upgrades to their water infrastructure after a combined investment of more than $5.25 million from the federal and provincial governments and municipal partners. In the Municipality of North Cowichan, the Crofton Sewage Treatment Plant will be upgraded with two new clarifiers and a sludge thickening system to improve wastewater treatment and ensure the treated water remains clean and compliant with environmental standards. These upgrades will expand the plant's capacity to treat more wastewater, maintain the treatment plant's high level of compliance, and protect the health and safety of the community. The Village of Sayward will benefit from drainage and stormwater upgrades aimed at reducing flooding and minimizing flood risks for homes. The project involves upgrading stormwater pipes, adding biofilters to reduce pollution runoff, and other related improvements to support sustainable stormwater management. Together, these efforts will strengthen the community's resilience to extreme weather events, enhance water quality, and help create a safer and healthier environment for residents and local wildlife. Quotes "Our government is proud to support these important wastewater and stormwater management upgrades on Vancouver Island. This work will enhance climate resilience, support healthy communities and protect ecosystems for generations to come." The Honourable Stephanie McLean, Secretary of State (Seniors) "Cleaner water in local streams and waterways, reduced flooding and increased resilience to extreme weather events will make these Vancouver Island communities safer and stronger. Upgrades like these are helping protect the environment people live in and rely on and supporting a more secure future for British Columbians." Christine Boyle, Minister of Housing and Municipal Affairs "Our Council has made upgrading our infrastructure a top priority, and this investment in the Crofton sewage treatment plant reflects that commitment. This project will ensure the plant continues to produce clean effluent that meets stringent regulations and expand capacity to serve our growing community. By working together with our federal and provincial partners, we are safeguarding both public health and our local environment for generations to come." Rob Douglas, Mayor, Municipality of North Cowichan "This investment is a game-changer for the Village of Sayward. At nearly two and a half times our total annual tax revenue, this funding will allow us to move forward with essential drainage and stormwater upgrades that will protect homes, improve water quality, and strengthen our community's resilience to flooding and extreme weather. These improvements will not only benefit residents today but will also support the long-term environmental health and sustainability of our Village for generations to come." , Mayor, Village of Sayward Quick Facts The federal government is investing $1,402,864 in the Municipality of North Cowichan project and $697,230.40 in the Village of Sayward project through the Green Infrastructure Stream of the Investing in Canada Infrastructure Program. The Government of British Columbia is investing $1,168,936 in the Municipality of North Cowichan's project and $580,967 in the Village of Sayward project. The Municipality of North Cowichan is contributing $935,359 and the Village of Sayward is contributing $464,879. The Green Infrastructure Stream helps build greener communities by contributing to climate change preparedness, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and supporting renewable technologies. Including today's announcement, over 160 infrastructure projects under the Green Infrastructure Stream have been announced in British Columbia, with a total federal contribution of more than $765 million and a total provincial contribution of more than $429 million. Federal funding is conditional on fulfilling all requirements related to consultation with Indigenous groups and environmental assessment obligations. Green Infrastructure Stream Housing and Infrastructure Project Map Strengthened Climate Plan SOURCE Department of Housing, Infrastructure and Communities Contacts: For more information (media only), please contact: Renée LeBlanc Proctor, Senior Communications Advisor and Press Secretary, Office of the Minister of Housing, Infrastructure and Communities, [email protected]; Media Relations, Housing, Infrastructure and Communities Canada, 613-960-9251, Toll free: 1-877-250-7154, Email: [email protected]; British Columbia, Ministry of Housing and Municipal Affairs, 236-475-4435, [email protected]; Barb Floden, Manager, Communications and Public Engagement, Municipality of North Cowichan , 250-746-3100, [email protected]; Mark Baker, Mayor, Village of Sayward, [email protected]