BRICS+ Series: Unlocking Thailand's Potential in Trade
Thailand, one of the BRICS+ new partner countries, is a monumental development success story rooted in agriculture with predominant exports being rice, tapioca products and rubber- to mention a few. Today Thailand is the second top exporter of rice, following India and preceding Vietnam, all of which are associated within the BRICS+ bloc.
From Agriculture to Industrial Powerhouse
Since the mid 20th century, Thailand has made tremendous progress by transitioning from an agrarian Thai economy to one driven by export-orientated industrialisation, producing goods that are widely utilised across international markets. Furthermore, the state has been very successful in attracting substantial foreign direct investment (FDI), with the top sources being Singapore, China, Hong Kong, Taiwan and the USA. Some focal point industries that investments have been directed to include automotive and parts, electronics and chemicals the industries in which the investments are most dominant are automotive and parts, electronics, chemicals, digital, and food processing.
Strategic Advantages and FDI Attraction
Elements that have contributed to the nation's economic stature is their strategic location and infrastructure, centrally located in Southeast Asia which is a highly attractive point for companies expanding or trading internationally; as well as the fact the nation has a very well educated and skilled workforce which is favourable for a growing manufacturing base.
Warning Signs of Economic Decline
However, in recent years, the glorious makeup that makes Thailand successful is steadily declining. Since 2021, Thailand has witnessed 100 factories closed on a monthly basis. The nation that once had an annual growth rate of 7.5% between 1960-96, and between 1999-2005 had a 5% annual growth rate. Bangkok now faces a new reality where China's redirection of goods into Southeast Asian markets, as a result of trading tensions in the West, has catalysed a wave of already processed and assembled goods into the Thai market, a benefit for China regarding market penetration because of their cheap exports. For Thailand, however, this has dire consequences for the nation's economic environment with rising debt, a collapsing consumption, closing of factories and ultimately, an increase in unemployment.
The Pressure from Chinese Dominance
Furthermore, the strength of Chinese goods and FDI poses an additional issue most notably, their dominance in the electric vehicle (EV) market in Thailand. BYD, a Chinese company, is aggressively expanding its presence by establishing manufacturing plants in regions such as Thailand, where it aims to produce 15,000 units annually. This expansion is significantly impacting and overwhelming the local automotive market in a manner that they cannot compete with, another significant Chinese company having similar ripple effects worldwide is Shein. The closing of Thai factories is not a unique situation, there have been 80 000 jobs lost in Indonesia as a result of similar circumstances.
Factory Closures and Regional Tensions
Bangkok's economy is at a critical intersection where traditional manufacturing, consumption and industrial models are now at a new unknown level threatening to halt economic growth. Many of the closed factories are small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) mainly in garments, electronics, steel and furniture. A solution to protect local industries by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) governments is to implement protectionist policies to avoid becoming transit hubs for Chinese goods. However, doing so may hinder ASEAN's trade integration goals.
A seasoned former official from the Prime Minister's Office is calling on the government to re-evaluate the nation's industrial procedures. This appeal comes with a warning that failure to adequately address current conditions will only worsen the declining impact of manufacturing on the country's GDP.
BRICS+ membership as a Strategic Lifeline
Despite these challenges, Thailand's inclusion in the BRICS+ grouping offers a strategic opportunity to recalibrate its economic path. As a partner country of this expanding bloc, Thailand can leverage new South-South trade and investment partnerships that reduce dependence on traditional markets and utilise the influx for local benefit. The BRICS+ platform also provides an avenue for collective action on industrial policy, digital innovation, and trade diversification. Enhanced cooperation within the bloc could support Thailand in rebalancing its manufacturing base, increasing regional value chain integration, and negotiating fairer terms in global trade. If harnessed effectively, BRICS+ membership could help Thailand avoid economic stagnation and instead emerge as a resilient regional production and logistics hub.
Written By:
*Dr Iqbal Survé
Past chairman of the BRICS Business Council and co-chairman of the BRICS Media Forum and the BRNN
*Banthati Sekwala:
Associate at BRICS+ Consulting Group Egyptian and South African Specialist
**The Views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Independent Media or IOL.
** MORE ARTICLES ON OUR WEBSITE https://bricscg.com/
** Follow https://x.com/brics_daily on X/Twitter for daily BRICS+ updates
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
BRICS+ Series: China's Belt & Road Initiative is Advancing Ethiopia's Infrastructure
Ethiopia's strategic partnership with China under the Belt and Road Initiative exemplifies a new development model for the Global South, as it aligns with BRICS' vision of infrastructure-led growth and cooperative partnerships. A new narrative is unfolding in the Horn of Africa and it is one that defies the legacies of colonialism and reclaims Africa's right to development on its own terms. With its dynamic economy and rich history, Ethiopia has become a key player in China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). As BRICS+ expands its footprint with the joining of Ethiopia in 2024, the alignment that is between BRICS development goals and Chinese infrastructure investments is both inspiring and critical. Reimagining Development Through BRICS The BRICS bloc has always championed alternative models of development. These models challenge the conditions and ideological strings of the institutions in the Global North and emphasise sovereignty, mutual respect and practical cooperation. The BRICS framework calls for infrastructure-led development, financial independence from traditionally dominant Western lenders such as the World Bank and the IMF and equitable partnerships. Ethiopia's collaboration with China, particularly within the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), exemplifies the BRICS vision of fostering physical and digital infrastructure, strengthening South-South cooperation, and promoting industrial growth across the Global South. The BRI, therefore, extends beyond a singular Chinese endeavor, embodying the core principles of the BRICS economic partnership. The Addis Ababa-Djibouti Railway: Steel Tracks to Sovereignty One of the most symbolic projects under the BRI of China is the Addis Ababa– Djibouti railway. Completed in 2016 with Chinese engineering and financing, the 750-kilometre electrified railway that connects landlocked Ethiopia to Djibouti's Port– the lifeline for over 95% of Ethiopia's exports and imports. This railway has significantly reduced the transport time from three days to less than 12 hours, improving trade efficiency, cutting costs and reshaping the architecture of logistics within the region. Despite "debt trap" criticisms of Chinese infrastructure investments, Ethiopia's experience with the Belt and Road Initiative offers a counter-narrative. The operational Addis Ababa–Djibouti Railway serves as a crucial element in Ethiopia's economic development. Instead of defaulting, Ethiopia successfully negotiated debt restructuring with China in 2023, demonstrating a cooperative and flexible partnership unlike the strict austerity measures often imposed by Western creditors. BRICS and Ethiopia: A Symbiotic Vision Ethiopia's 2024 entry into BRICS+ offers new opportunities for funding, technology exchange, and strategic partnerships. The New Development Bank (NDB), a BRICS initiative designed as an alternative to the World Bank, is now positioned to finance increased infrastructure development in East Africa. The NDB's lending approach is specifically designed for developing nations, prioritizing sustainability and local involvement—principles often overlooked by conventional financial institutions. For Ethiopia, this is a development model that is not only tailored to its unique challenges, but is also embedded in a bigger Global South coalition. The 10 year development plan of Ethiopia– centered on energy generation, industrial parks and digital transformation– emphasises BRICS' prioritisation of inclusive and high impact development. China financing Ethiopia's Industrial Parks in Adama and Hawassa, for example, has created thousands of jobs, especially for women, and it has also linked Ethiopia into global supply chains without the risk of compromising local control. Ethiopia as a BRICS Beacon in Africa Ethiopia's increasing symbolic and strategic importance within the expanding BRICS framework is evident. As one of Africa's most populous countries, a significant diplomatic center hosting the African Union, and a rising industrial force, Ethiopia's engagement with both the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and BRICS is a conscious decision. This reflects Ethiopia's strategic preference for infrastructure-driven development, South-South partnerships, and a multipolar world order, moving away from reliance on aid and traditional neoliberal approaches. Amidst global inequality, climate instability, and geopolitical changes, the Global South, exemplified by countries like Ethiopia, is moving beyond passively receiving development aid. It is actively shaping its own path, redefining progress, and building resilience. Platforms like BRICS and the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) are facilitating this shift, marking a new era of agency for Africa.A Future Built on CollaborationThe Ethiopia-China-BRICS alliance offers a compelling alternative to traditional development models in 2025. It demonstrates that development is a locally driven, negotiated process rooted in the needs of the people, rather than a uniform approach dictated by Western powers. Ethiopia's experience with the Belt and Road Initiative, especially as more Global South nations join BRICS and align with it, demonstrates that infrastructure development can be a source of liberation and that South-led development, fostered through empowering partnerships, ultimately benefits the global community. Ethiopia's experience exemplifies a BRICS-supported development model for the Global South, suggesting a broader renaissance across these nations. Written By: *Dr Iqbal Survé Past chairman of the BRICS Business Council and co-chairman of the BRICS Media Forum and the BRNN *Sesona Mdlokovana Associate at BRICS+ Consulting Group UAE & African Specialist **The Views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Independent Media or IOL. ** MORE ARTICLES ON OUR WEBSITE ** Follow @brics_daily on X/Twitter for daily BRICS+ updates
TimesLIVE
2 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Nissan's struggles open door for Chinese carmakers in SA
Chery SA CEO Tony Liu said the Chinese automaker is exploring all available avenues to establish its first production facility in the country. Liu was responding to a question from TimesLIVE Motoring about whether an established plant, such as the Nissan Rosslyn operation whose future is under doubt, might be of interest. News agency Reuters reported in May that Japanese manufacturer Nissan was considering global plant closures, potentially including shutting the doors of its Tshwane facility. 'SA boasts a proud legacy of local vehicle manufacturing, and Chery is committed to strengthening the industry for generations to come. This would also allow us to enhance our contribution to local communities,' he said. According to Liu, the brand's outlook features two potential pathways: partnering with an existing manufacturer to 'help address current production gaps' or set up its own, dedicated manufacturing plant, realising the 'full production capabilities' of Chery. The CEO said the manufacturer's customer base, which grew to 55,000 over the three years since market re-entry, represents critical mass that has justified a feasibility study to assess how local manufacturing could support its long-term volume aspirations. 'Beyond market size, SA being the largest new car market in Sub-Saharan Africa, Chery recognises SA's role as a gateway into Africa through initiatives such as the African Continental Free Trade Agreement.' Liu said local manufacturing would also enable contribution to the domestic supply chain, with commitment to broad-based black Economic empowerment requirements. Meanwhile, Nissan SA representatives have countered the notion that the Rosslyn plant is on borrowed time. 'Nissan wants to clarify the news is not based on any official information of the company,' said head of communications Ramy Mohareb. 'At this stage we are not able to inform you which plants will be affected. Our focus remains on our operations and the dedicated workforce that drives our success,' he told TimesLIVE Motoring. The Rosslyn plant employs 1,080 people and has been operational since 1966. Mohareb was unable to comment on the facility's output, or elaborate on plans to sustain its business and protect local jobs and retailers. In 2024 the brand's top-selling NP200 half-tonne bakkie, produced at Rosslyn, was discontinued. The plant only produces the one-tonne Navara. A well-placed industry insider, speaking on condition of anonymity, expressed the view that Nissan SA, in its present guise, would struggle to find longevity. 'The key to being a successful manufacturer in SA is sufficient export volume, which Nissan never had. The best-selling SA cars and light commercial vehicles only manage about 25,000 units per year, insufficient for competitive manufacturing. This needs to be complemented with a proper export programme to reach a viable volume,' the source said. 'Toyota, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Volkswagen and Ford have the programmes but Nissan, with a few thousand Navara exports into Africa, aren't close. Getting there is a parent company decision. The SA factory needs to be part of the global supply chain, not a local market factory with a handful of exports to small regional markets.' According to the insider, the peak of Nissan SA's sales dates as far back as the period of 1976 to 1978 when it was the leading manufacturer in SA. 'Its most successful models included the original Datsun 1200s and the B120/140 bakkie, the original Datsun 1600s and the Skylines. The first Maxima and Primera were great cars but not quite the sellers they should have been. On the bakkie side, the Hardbody took the fight to the Hilux, but this faded as the last Hardbody's life was extended, ultimately a life of more than 20 years.' 'In my view, Nissan's product offering didn't keep up with the changing demands of the SA buyer. As the market evolved, moving from sedans to SUVs and crossovers, Nissan's range reduced significantly and the individual products were less competitive within their respective segments.' Mikel Mabasa, CEO of Naamsa, the national automotive business council, said the organisation was waiting for Nissan SA to provide an outline of its local plans. He said Naamsa was concerned by media reports casting doubt over the brand's future in SA. 'Any [possible] closure is not something we take lightly. We have a lot of people employed through such plants, not only those on the production line, but the value chain, including those who support the plant with components. If Nissan decides to discontinue operations, we will activate discussions with them directly, understanding their position and identifying how we can support the future of the facility,' Mabasa said. 'Naamsa will be at the forefront in working with partners to see what can be done to safeguard the plant for future operations,' he said, referencing the 2017 disinvestment of General Motors, where similar conversations were had. 'Isuzu was able to raise their hand and the Gqeberha plant was saved.' Separately, Mabasa confirmed Naamsa had been in discussions with brands who are importers, eyeing SA as a destination for manufacturing operations. He said Naamsa welcomed intentions for new operations by brands, whether it involves repurposing existing plants or establishing a greenfield investment from the ground up. Spokesperson for the department of trade, industry and competition, Bongani Lukhele, said Nissan had not provided formal communications on the issue, and the department was therefore not in a position to respond to queries.
TimesLIVE
3 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Work on $1bn Trump Tower in Vietnam could start next year: source
Investment in a planned Trump Tower in Vietnam is estimated at $1bn (R17.84bn) and construction of the at least 60-storey skyscraper could start next year, a person familiar with the discussions told Reuters. The building, for which plans are still preliminary, would be the second major project the Trump Organisation, US President Donald Trump's family business, is reviewing in Vietnam. The Southeast Asian country is in trade talks with Washington to avoid crippling 46% tariffs. Eric Trump, senior vice-president of the Trump Organisation, visited Vietnam last week to survey the site for the tower in the country's southern business hub of Ho Chi Minh City and to attend the groundbreaking for a golf resort in northern Vietnam. The approval for the golf club, according to Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh, had been expedited by the authorities. The Trump Organisation would operate the golf club, while its Vietnamese partner, real estate firm Kinhbac City, would focus on developing it with an estimated investment of $1.5bn (R26.77bn), the source said. The division of work had not been previously reported.
